Thread: God and Life
View Single Post
Old 05-05-2018, 02:31 AM
Biffster's Avatar
Biffster Biffster is offline
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,715
Originally Posted by DavidwithanR View Post
Since the original discussion as you conceived it is not at all in the spirit of having a discussion*, I figured my idea would fit in just fine. And I think it's perfectly productive for you to consider the possibility that the equivalence you're proposing is incomplete or false.

* A discussion always includes an OP who's perfectly willing to be proved wrong.

Alright. I've considered it and I don't agree. Fair enough?

Re: discussion: again, it is not me you are "proving wrong," but rather the conjecture of Neale Donald Walsch that I offered up as a basis for discussion. Your preoccupation with "proving" things one way or another is your thing, not mine. I'm fine with agreeing to disagree.