View Single Post
Old 09-09-2019, 03:35 PM
ElvisL1ves is offline
Charter Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The land of the mouse
Posts: 50,549
Originally Posted by XT View Post
assurances about WHO would have the right (and, more specifically not the right) to keep and bear arms, and under what conditions.
Thank you.

Also, there is the thing that's been pointed out to you multiple times, which is that the use of the terms in the amendment have changed over time
They still don't necessarily mean what you want them to, no matter how frantically you handwave. That's been pointed out to you multiple times. You're telling us that you don't want the clause to mean anything, so it doesn't. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way.

If you want there to be a Constitutional right to own your own personal machine guns arsenal, get that amendment going to allow it. Otherwise, go find a recruiter and raise your right hand, okay?

we don't need context, we don't need history
If you're declaring the rights of slaveholders to suppress insurrections, you're welcome to. Are you really?

Originally Posted by HurricaneDitka View Post
Fortunately, we've still made good progress since 2015
Who are you including in "we"?

Last edited by ElvisL1ves; 09-09-2019 at 03:37 PM.