View Single Post
Old 06-12-2019, 12:25 PM
MichaelEmouse's Avatar
MichaelEmouse is online now
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,391
Originally Posted by SenorBeef View Post
Most guns made in the last, oh, 80 years or so barely make a difference in the effectiveness of shooting up random people in a crowded area. Non-gun people really don't understand how it works and have some severe misconceptions about how much certain guns are disproportionately powerful.
Yes, high-performance guns matter a lot when you're going up against other people with guns. Other than that, perhaps the size of the first magazine can make a difference but after that, everyone's running or hiding.

Originally Posted by SenorBeef View Post
Virginia Tech, which IIRC is the most deadly mass shooting we've had, used regular old handguns.
What factors made him so effective?

Originally Posted by SenorBeef View Post
And so when in reaction to a mass shooting, we spend 2 months of media time examining the shooter from every angle, and screaming about how we need to ban these dangerous assault weapons, it misses the point entirely.
Media/incentives matter more than guns/resources here. I'm wondering how that could be changed though. Even if you get most of the media to go along, how do you get the people working at Fox to be decent human beings?