View Single Post
  #60  
Old 06-11-2019, 05:35 PM
DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 41,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkbites View Post
I’ll ask again: are you willing to compromise any of your civil liberties?

Sure.

1st Ad: I think making and selling Kiddie porn with live underage kids should be illegal, and seriously penalized. I am Ok with laws against Libel, slander, plagiarism and copyright abuse. I dont think that your religion should make me do anything.


4th: Privacy- you only have a right to privacy when you have a legitimate expectation of privacy.

And so forth. Just like the 2nd Ad, as set out in Heller: 2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited.
It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any
manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment
or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast
doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by
felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or
laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of
arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those
“in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition
of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.


No Right is absolute.

But again, we are getting away from which Dem candidates have which gun policies/programs/platforms/

Last edited by DrDeth; 06-11-2019 at 05:36 PM.