View Single Post
Old 11-21-2014, 07:57 AM
QuickSilver is offline
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 20,326
Originally Posted by brickbacon View Post
Remember, the jury didn't hear everything we heard in the way we heard it.
That's really the bottom line, isn't it? SK has not uncovered any new evidence in her investigation. All she's done is shine a new light on evidence that's been sitting around for the past 15 years. Given what's been presented thus far, I'm inclined to think that there is sufficient reason to have this case be brought back in front of a judge on appeal. Not because I'm convinced the wrong guy is doing life in prison but because there was insufficient evidence to convict him in the first place.