View Single Post
Old 12-11-2019, 01:39 PM
drad dog is offline
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 6,502
I'd say make urban votes worth more than rural. We have had the just opposite for centuries, so there can't be a moral objection to it. I think the experiment ended and failed miserably, when dt got elected. Fin de seicle.

You can make the value of a vote based on the connections and proximity to fellow citizens, an algorithm basically about how central and proximate you are to society. The more populated your abode the more central you are. And I would add: the more your vote is worth to society. It's clear that power in the hands of isolated angry people is not well placed.

Are there objections? They could start to pay attention to the rest of the world, and maybe change their voting status by making good business decisions. Whose fault is it that they are miserable?