View Single Post
  #22  
Old 02-29-2004, 06:47 PM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 29,901
This is getting into the realm of metaphysics rather than physics, but my understanding is that Mathochist is physically incorrect.

There is no way - even in principle - to precisely predict the outcome of a chaotic situation, i.e. one in which small changes in the original parameters lead to large changes in the results.

And the lottery example is a chaotic situation to an even greater extent than his pendulum example. No measurement can be made to sufficient precision to run a deterministic model of the events. And I don't see how QM can possibly be ignored. The precision needed to forecast the outcome would necessarily be such that QM uncertainty would confound the numbers.

I can't see how what Mathochist is saying is different from: if you take out everything that makes it indeterminable, it becomes determinable.

Can you try your explanation again?