Straight Dope Message Board

[jmoney_84]

NSFW link:

SPOILER:

http://www.google.com/imgres?q=porns...4&tx=126&ty=83

I know the woman on the right is Kelly Madison. But who's on the left side?

[Joey P]

Google Image Search says Eva Notty.

[panache45]

There are only 2 in that pic? I'm seeing 4.

[Joey P]

Originally Posted by panache45

There are only 2 in that pic? I'm seeing 4.

Move your face away from the monitor and clean the drool off of it.

[beowulff]

Originally Posted by Joey P

Move your face away from the monitor and clean the drool off of it.

Boy, have you got the wrong guy for that comment...

[Colibri]

Questions about cinema go in Cafe Society.

Colibri
General Questions Moderator

[Chefguy]

Don't know either one, but they're both grotesque.

[beowulff]

Originally Posted by Chefguy

Don't know either one, but they're both grotesque.

This is obviously some strange usage of the word "grotesque" that I hadn't previously been aware of.

[standingwave]

Originally Posted by Joey P

Google Image Search says Eva Notty.

Much as smart phones did for bar debates, Google Image Search (and TinEye) are ruining Internet debates.

[Joey P]

Originally Posted by standingwave

Much as smart phones did for bar debates, Google Image Search (and TinEye) are ruining Internet debates.

As much as I hate it when (for example) someone poses a question such as "Can anyone help me come up with a list of [obscure something or other]?" and we all have fun for a few posts trying to work it out until someone posts a link with exactly what the OP was asking for...this wasn't really a debate.

But I get what you're saying. I wish I could think of a concrete example or come up with a thread where someone plastered a link in the 10th post when the thread was just starting to get interesting.

[GuanoLad]

Skank McSkankersen?

[Kobal2]

Originally Posted by standingwave

Much as smart phones did for bar debates, Google Image Search (and TinEye) are ruining Internet debates.

Smart phones ruin nothing - they simply shift the debate from <whatever factoid is adamantly defended by either party> to <can Wikipedia/FactCheckers/TheStraightDope be trusted ?> to <What is trust ? What is truth, maaan ?> to even more fundamental ontological horizons. Or, depending on the state of the beer pitcher, lead to a violent row with Siri.

Either way, still entertaining.

(Anecdote: I once actually had a drunken row with a GPS navigator. The blasted thing kept saying to keep going forward when I knew full well we shoulda turned left right there, it was my fuckin' neighbourhood fer chrissakes.
I don't recall who won the argument in the end, however. I woke up in my bed, so it musta been me, on account of the piece of shit was trying to get us lost !)

[panache45]

Originally Posted by Joey P

Move your face away from the monitor and clean the drool off of it.

Never assume . . . .

[Joey P]

Originally Posted by panache45

Never assume . . . .

If it wasn't meant to be a joke...then I'm not seeing 4 pornstars in the linked picture, just 2.

[Disheavel]

[Deleted as it wasn't funny]

[PlainJain]

Originally Posted by GuanoLad

Skank McSkankersen?

I think it's Skank McTramperson.

[Snerky Snerk]

Originally Posted by panache45

There are only 2 in that pic? I'm seeing 4.

Maybe you're having a stroke.

[Robot Arm]

Originally Posted by beowulff

This is obviously some strange usage of the word "grotesque" that I hadn't previously been aware of.

If some is good, more is not always better.

[Kamino Neko]

Originally Posted by Joey P

If it wasn't meant to be a joke...then I'm not seeing 4 pornstars in the linked picture, just 2.

It's a tit joke, dude.

[beowulff]

Originally Posted by Robot Arm

If some is good, more is not always better.

Sure, some people don't like big boobs.
I get it.
But even so, that doesn't make them "grotesque."

[kayaker]

Originally Posted by Colibri

Questions about cinema go in Cafe Society.

Todaloo, I'm off for the cinema Lovey.

[CarnalK]

Originally Posted by beowulff

Sure, some people don't like big boobs.
I get it.
But even so, that doesn't make them "grotesque."

One definition of grotesque is "strangely or fantastically distorted". Even if you like big boobs, these particular 4 boobs have indeed been implanted to grotesque levels.

[Vinyl Turnip]

Originally Posted by Joey P

Move your face away from the monitor and clean the drool off of it.

That's not his face. And that's not drool.

[DarkFire]

Originally Posted by CarnalK

One definition of grotesque is "strangely or fantastically distorted". Even if you like big boobs, these particular 4 boobs have indeed been implanted to grotesque levels.

I err..had a friend. Yes, we'll go with friend.. do some research and he says the boobs of Eva Notty are NOT implants. And as far as he knows, ditto for the other woman. It's the bra that's deforming them.

[standingwave]

Originally Posted by DarkFire

I err..had a friend. Yes, we'll go with friend.. do some research and he says the boobs of Eva Notty are NOT implants. And as far as he knows, ditto for the other woman. It's the bra that's deforming them.

According to Boobpedia (never thought I'd be writing those words here), a wiki for big boobs, neither lady has implants. Staff, true? The site is moderately NSFW, seemingly containing just one softcore picture per page, but primarily it's just textual biographical information. (Now I know how I'll be spending the rest of the day.)

Kelly Madison

SPOILER:

Kelly Madison
Born: August 26, 1967 (age 45) Newport Beach, California
Years active: 2001-present
Measurements: 34FF-26-34 in
Bra/cup size: 34G (75G) (same as FF cup)
Boobs: Natural

Eva Notty

SPOILER:

Eva Notty
Born: July 7, 1982 (age 30) Tucson, Arizona
Years active: 2004-present
Measurements: 40-28-34
Bra/cup size: 34J (75J)
Boobs: Natural

[Joey P]

Originally Posted by standingwave

According to Boobpedia

Well there goes the rest of the workday.

[Labrador Deceiver]

It's nothing but naked women. How the hell is that "moderately" not safe for work?

[Nzinga, Seated]

Originally Posted by DarkFire

I err..had a friend. Yes, we'll go with friend.. do some research and he says the boobs of Eva Notty are NOT implants. And as far as he knows, ditto for the other woman. It's the bra that's deforming them.

Yeah, those boobs look real. They sit real in the bras, and the arm size of the ladies are not the stick thin arms of some women who buy huge implants.

I wouldn't say the bras are deforming the boobs though. They look great to me.

[kayaker]

Originally Posted by Labrador Deceiver

It's nothing but naked women. How the hell is that "moderately" not safe for work?

Depends where ya work, I guess.

[standingwave]

Originally Posted by kayaker

Depends where ya work, I guess.

This.

[Irishman]

Subscribing to review later.

Originally Posted by Kobal2

(Anecdote: I once actually had a drunken row with a GPS navigator. The blasted thing kept saying to keep going forward when I knew full well we shoulda turned left right there, it was my fuckin' neighbourhood fer chrissakes.
I don't recall who won the argument in the end, however. I woke up in my bed, so it musta been me, on account of the piece of shit was trying to get us lost !)

One time used someone's GPS to find my brother's house. I knew if I went on up the road a ways, I could turn right on a thoroughfare, then make a left into a neighborhood. And I knew the street names. Had even looked on a map. But thought I'd use the GPS. Damn thing took me on an early right into a different neighborhood, then an odd right on a side street, wandered around, a detour left, a curve through another street, a couple more wandering turns, and finally came out of that neighborhood at the light on the thoroughfare I had mentioned. Across from the turn. It had apparently wandered me around on a separate instance of the street with the same name that was not connected to the bit I wanted. It might or might not have been closer as the crow flies, but it sure wasn't closer or faster by the actual route.

[JoseB]

Originally Posted by Irishman

One time used someone's GPS to find my brother's house. I knew if I went on up the road a ways, I could turn right on a thoroughfare, then make a left into a neighborhood. And I knew the street names. Had even looked on a map. But thought I'd use the GPS. Damn thing took me on an early right into a different neighborhood, then an odd right on a side street, wandered around, a detour left, a curve through another street, a couple more wandering turns, and finally came out of that neighborhood at the light on the thoroughfare I had mentioned. Across from the turn. It had apparently wandered me around on a separate instance of the street with the same name that was not connected to the bit I wanted. It might or might not have been closer as the crow flies, but it sure wasn't closer or faster by the actual route.

Sometimes the problem lies in how the map data have been codified in the GPS software. I have found that my GPS wants to take me the wrong way through streets that are only one-way, or through bicycle lanes. I guess that there *will* be mistakes there.

And I am amazed at how a discussion about bounteous breastitude has been transformed into a talk on the accuracy of GPS receivers ...

[BigT]

Originally Posted by Kamino Neko

It's a tit joke, dude.

Which still seems to depend on panache being straight for it to make sense.

[Smapti]

Only on the Dope could a thread about boobies get hijacked into anecdotes about GPS problems.

[Irishman]

Well, I was posting from work.

[standingwave]

Originally Posted by Nzinga, Seated

Yeah, those boobs look real. They sit real in the bras, and the arm size of the ladies are not the stick thin arms of some women who buy huge implants.

I wouldn't say the bras are deforming the boobs though. They look great to me.

I don't mind seeing seeing women who don't appear to be on the verge of starvation.

[Voyager]

Originally Posted by Snerky Snerk

Maybe you're having a stroke.

I'm sure he is.

[Voyager]

Originally Posted by Joey P

Well there goes the rest of the workday.

It has a category Writers. Sure they're pushing that definition, including Sarah Palin, but it is nice to be surprised by the web after all these years.

[Nars Glinley]

Originally Posted by Joey P

Google Image Search says Eva Notty.

With a name like that, the poor girl never had a chance.

[Kamino Neko]

Originally Posted by BigT

Which still seems to depend on panache being straight for it to make sense.

No, I'm pretty sure gay guys know what tits are, and how many of them are to the average set.

[ministryman]

I was going to say it's Tits McGee, but I see the mystery had been solved.

[Vinyl Turnip]

Originally Posted by standingwave

I don't mind seeing seeing women who don't appear to be on the verge of starvation.

Welcome to paradise!

[panache45]

Originally Posted by BigT

Which still seems to depend on panache being straight for it to make sense.

I'm not. But I know how to count to 4.

[Kimballkid]

And it can be done with his free hand!!

(Would work better if panache45 were straight.)

[Irishman]

The joke appears to be that each of the tits is a star in its own right, purposely confusing tits vs people in the picture. Doesn't require anyone to be straight.

[Kimballkid]

If that was directed at me, I meant the counting to 4 part.

[twickster]

Originally Posted by standingwave

The site is moderately NSFW, seemingly containing just one softcore picture per page, but primarily it's just textual biographical information.

For the record, pictures of women with ginormous boobs who are not wearing clothing from the waist up should be considered NSFW, whether or not their nipples are visible.

I added spoiler boxes to two links to make them comply with our two-click rule, and broke the third.