Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-30-2019, 12:58 PM
davidm's Avatar
davidm is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Near Philadelphia PA, USA
Posts: 12,345

Deceased G.O.P. Strategist’s Hard Drives Reveal New Details on the Census Citizenship Question


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/u...-hofeller.html
Quote:
But after he died last summer, his estranged daughter discovered hard drives in her father’s home that revealed something else: Mr. Hofeller had played a crucial role in the Trump administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

Files on those drives showed that he wrote a study in 2015 concluding that adding a citizenship question to the census would allow Republicans to draft even more extreme gerrymandered maps to stymie Democrats.
...
he wrote the key portion of a draft Justice Department letter claiming the question was needed to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act — the rationale the administration later used to justify its decision.
The documents are cited in a court filing by opponents of the citizenship question.
__________________
Check out my t-shirt designs in Marketplace. https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb...php?p=21131885
  #2  
Old 05-30-2019, 01:02 PM
bobot's Avatar
bobot is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago-ish
Posts: 7,997
Isn't it quite a coincidence that the most blatantly obvious reason for adding the question is also the actual reason? Man, Republicans just keep tripping over coincidence.
  #3  
Old 05-30-2019, 01:27 PM
Buck Godot's Avatar
Buck Godot is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MD outside DC
Posts: 5,731
Alas it may be too little too late.

From the Washington post article on the same topic
Quote:
It is unclear whether there is a way for lawyers challenging the citizenship question to get the new information to the Supreme Court, which will decide the case by the term’s end next month.
I realize that this isn't what is meant by this sentence, but part of me is thinking "Can't they just leave a few copies of the New York times around the gym where RBG works out.?"
  #4  
Old 05-30-2019, 03:56 PM
Left Hand of Dorkness's Avatar
Left Hand of Dorkness is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: at the right hand of cool
Posts: 40,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck Godot View Post
Alas it may be too little too late.

From the Washington post article on the same topic


I realize that this isn't what is meant by this sentence, but part of me is thinking "Can't they just leave a few copies of the New York times around the gym where RBG works out.?"
RBG is already going to vote against the question. Roberts is likely torn between his belief that the executive branch may behave like a bull in a china shop, and his worry about being seen as partisan.
  #5  
Old 05-30-2019, 10:45 PM
Buck Godot's Avatar
Buck Godot is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MD outside DC
Posts: 5,731
I wasn't talking about RBG specifically but just amused at the implication that this new information would somehow have to be smuggled in in order for the justices to become aware of it.
  #6  
Old 05-31-2019, 02:02 AM
septimus's Avatar
septimus is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Land of Smiles
Posts: 19,346
What would happen if the Governor of California simply announced that that question wouldn't be asked in his state, that census workers who failed to black out the question on their forms would be charged with a misdemeanor?

Would one of the GOP traitors try to arrest Newsom? If a Gopster Governor defied an immoral order he'd become a hero.
  #7  
Old 05-31-2019, 10:30 AM
enipla is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Colorado Rockies.
Posts: 14,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by septimus View Post
What would happen if the Governor of California simply announced that that question wouldn't be asked in his state, that census workers who failed to black out the question on their forms would be charged with a misdemeanor?

Would one of the GOP traitors try to arrest Newsom? If a Gopster Governor defied an immoral order he'd become a hero.
Census takers don't sit down with you with a form and ask you questions. Censes forms are mailed, or in the case of places that don't get mail, are hand delivered to the residence.

And messing with, or using census data improperly imposes serious fines. I was on the hook for 100k when I was just updating address information.
__________________
I don't live in the middle of nowhere, but I can see it from here.
  #8  
Old 05-31-2019, 11:00 AM
septimus's Avatar
septimus is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Land of Smiles
Posts: 19,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by enipla View Post
Census takers don't sit down with you with a form and ask you questions. Censes forms are mailed, or in the case of places that don't get mail, are hand delivered to the residence.

And messing with, or using census data improperly imposes serious fines. I was on the hook for 100k when I was just updating address information.
In my scenario, the Governor might intercept mailings from the Census, and insert amended material. Would the DoJ arrest Newsom? Maybe ó he'd become a martyr to democracy.

These are serious times, folks. Our democracy is being taken over by criminals trying to make this a banana republic. Don't give me your "that would be illegal ..." spiels.
  #9  
Old 05-31-2019, 11:05 AM
Procrustus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pacific NW. •
Posts: 12,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by septimus View Post
In my scenario, the Governor might intercept mailings from the Census, and insert amended material. Would the DoJ arrest Newsom? Maybe ó he'd become a martyr to democracy.

These are serious times, folks. Our democracy is being taken over by criminals trying to make this a banana republic. Don't give me your "that would be illegal ..." spiels.
The state of California doesn't have any way to "intercept mailings." What do you envision, stopping and search USPS trucks as they come in from Nevada and Arizona? And, yes, doing so would be illegal. I agree these are serious times and the assholes are trying to take over our country. We'll have to find more creative and legal means to resist.
  #10  
Old 05-31-2019, 11:06 AM
Procrustus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pacific NW. •
Posts: 12,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobot View Post
Isn't it quite a coincidence that the most blatantly obvious reason for adding the question is also the actual reason? Man, Republicans just keep tripping over coincidence.
Did they ever really try to dispute this? I don't see anything new here. I didn't know this particular guy was involved, but there was never a question about what they were trying to accomplish.
  #11  
Old 05-31-2019, 11:06 AM
enipla is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Colorado Rockies.
Posts: 14,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by septimus View Post
In my scenario, the Governor might intercept mailings from the Census, and insert amended material. Would the DoJ arrest Newsom? Maybe ó he'd become a martyr to democracy.

These are serious times, folks. Our democracy is being taken over by criminals trying to make this a banana republic. Don't give me your "that would be illegal ..." spiels.
Wasn't a 'spiel' Was simply a fact. And I imagine in your amended scenario, the Postal Inspector would have Newsom arrested first. Then the DOJ would get their turn I'm sure.

That is of course, it intercepting all of the census mailings would be anyway feasible.

Make no mistake, I would like to see Trumps entire crime syndicate in prison.
__________________
I don't live in the middle of nowhere, but I can see it from here.
  #12  
Old 05-31-2019, 11:23 AM
Left Hand of Dorkness's Avatar
Left Hand of Dorkness is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: at the right hand of cool
Posts: 40,736
Civil disobedience could take a different form. Given that this is clearly a Republican plan, and that the Republicans in control are consistently doing nothing to stop this explicitly racist plan, folks who oppose it could choose a method to sabotage it based on where they live:

-If they live in districts that are strongly Democratic, they could give false, inflated numbers to the Census bureau.
-If they live in districts that are strongly Republican, they could decline to return the survey.

Of course, Republicans could respond in an equal-and-opposite fashion. But the problem is that Democrats realize the census will be invalid with the racist plan in place, and can act to amplify the invalidity of the census through civil disobedience. Republicans who respond in kind will also be amplifying the census's invalidity.

I am not, of course, advocating this plan. But I am curious about how it could play out.
  #13  
Old 05-31-2019, 11:27 AM
HurricaneDitka is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 13,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by septimus View Post
In my scenario, the Governor might intercept mailings from the Census, and insert amended material. Would the DoJ arrest Newsom? Maybe — he'd become a martyr to democracy.

These are serious times, folks. Our democracy is being taken over by criminals trying to make this a banana republic. Don't give me your "that would be illegal ..." spiels.
LOL!

1) fucking with the mail is a serious federal offense.

2) equating asking about citizenship on the census with "Our democracy is being taken over by criminals trying to make this a banana republic" sounds loony-tunes unhinged to normal people.

Last edited by HurricaneDitka; 05-31-2019 at 11:29 AM.
  #14  
Old 05-31-2019, 12:01 PM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,122
If you don't send the form in , they send someone to knock on your door to pick it up and you can fill it out while they are at your door.
  #15  
Old 05-31-2019, 12:12 PM
bobot's Avatar
bobot is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago-ish
Posts: 7,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Procrustus View Post
Did they ever really try to dispute this? ...
Oh hell yeah. I've heard it implied that the reason was for simple accuracy of results, which is the opposite of what it would accomplish.
Anyway, I'll predict that you'll see denials of the intent in this very thread. Give it, say, a week from now. If you don't, I'll donate $20 to the charity of your choice.
  #16  
Old 05-31-2019, 01:02 PM
elucidator is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Further
Posts: 59,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneDitka View Post
LOL!

1) fucking with the mail is a serious federal offense.

2) equating asking about citizenship on the census with "Our democracy is being taken over by criminals trying to make this a banana republic" sounds loony-tunes unhinged to normal people.
Your quote reflects the notion that many Americans support the question. But "...loony-tunes unhinged to normal people...", however, is your interpretation, tacked on for your own purposes. Which is to say, nice try.
  #17  
Old 05-31-2019, 01:08 PM
Buck Godot's Avatar
Buck Godot is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MD outside DC
Posts: 5,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Procrustus View Post
Did they ever really try to dispute this? I don't see anything new here. I didn't know this particular guy was involved, but there was never a question about what they were trying to accomplish.
Oh yes, they were claiming up and down that this question was posed for entirely non-partisan reasons. That doing so would help states make districts that comply with the voting rights act protecting minorities from having a district listed as majority Hispanic actually have only a minority of the eligible voters being Hispanic.

These documents reveals that the true goal was the exact opposite.

(which, yes, any non-partisan with half a brain already realized.)

Last edited by Buck Godot; 05-31-2019 at 01:08 PM.
  #18  
Old 05-31-2019, 02:00 PM
davidm's Avatar
davidm is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Near Philadelphia PA, USA
Posts: 12,345
In case there's any question as to whether Hofeller was involved in the census plan:
https://www.npr.org/2019/05/30/72823...nship-question
Quote:
Neuman provided an early draft of the Justice Department's letter requesting the question.

That draft letter includes a paragraph about using the Voting Rights Act to justify the question. It matches word for word a paragraph found in a document among Hofeller's files. The plaintiffs' attorneys say that shows Hofeller ghostwrote a portion of the draft letter.
Paragraph from the letter A. Mark Neumann provided to John Gore:
https://apps.npr.org/documents/docum...t/p120/a504025

Paragraph from Thomas Hofeller's files:
https://apps.npr.org/documents/docum...t/p123/a504023
__________________
Check out my t-shirt designs in Marketplace. https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb...php?p=21131885
  #19  
Old 05-31-2019, 02:18 PM
jasg is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Upper left hand corner
Posts: 5,972
The ACLU has notified the Supreme Court but this article says that it probably won't matter.

Quote:
The ACLUís letter states that a district court hearing in the matter is set for June 5, but it wanted to let the high court know it asked for an order to show cause whether sanctions or other appropriate relief are warranted in light of the new evidence.
...
Itís not exactly clear if the new evidence can or will have an impact on the Supreme Courtís decision, but Election law expert Rick Hasen, Professor of Law and Political Science at UC Irvine, has speculated it wonít change the conservative votes on the court.
  #20  
Old 06-01-2019, 09:22 AM
DummyGladHands is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,072
So in a small act of civil disobedience, what would happen if a citizen said no to that question?
  #21  
Old 06-01-2019, 09:59 AM
elucidator is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Further
Posts: 59,836
The Republican Party has already clearly stated that their only goal in this is to ensure the power of the Voting Rights Act. The fact that this would empower their political enemies is not lost on them, but nonetheless! they persist! A noble act of non-partisan sacrifice in the pursuit of justice and equality.

Let us take a moment to bask in the warm glow of this selfless courage.
  #22  
Old 06-01-2019, 11:54 AM
davidm's Avatar
davidm is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Near Philadelphia PA, USA
Posts: 12,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by elucidator View Post
The Republican Party has already clearly stated that their only goal in this is to ensure the power of the Voting Rights Act. The fact that this would empower their political enemies is not lost on them, but nonetheless! they persist! A noble act of non-partisan sacrifice in the pursuit of justice and equality.

Let us take a moment to bask in the warm glow of this selfless courage.
Yes! They are indeed pillars of integrity and sincerity..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Republicans
We must oppose wind turbines to protect birds!

We must shut down clinics that have a few bottles of expired hand sanitizer!

We must have voter ID to protect the sanctity of the vote!

We must protect the rights of the poor beleaguered Christians!

We must stop the evil welfare state from suppressing minorities by making them dependent on huge welfare checks and overly generous food stamps!

We must increase the number of guns to cut down on their use!

We must fight to protect workers' rights to receive union level wages without paying union dues!

We must fight for low wage jobs to protect high school students!
Can I get an amen!?
__________________
Check out my t-shirt designs in Marketplace. https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb...php?p=21131885

Last edited by davidm; 06-01-2019 at 11:56 AM.
  #23  
Old 06-01-2019, 03:32 PM
HurricaneDitka is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 13,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by DummyGladHands View Post
So in a small act of civil disobedience, what would happen if a citizen said no to that question?
There is a legal penalty for lying on the census forms, but as a practical matter, I doubt it's enforced very often, if ever.
  #24  
Old 06-02-2019, 04:28 AM
Fugazi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneDitka View Post
There is a legal penalty for lying on the census forms, but as a practical matter, I doubt it's enforced very often, if ever.
So what if you just don't answer that question?
__________________
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. - Douglas Adams
  #25  
Old 06-02-2019, 05:34 AM
HurricaneDitka is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 13,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fugazi View Post
So what if you just don't answer that question?
There's a penalty for that too, but again, I suspect seldom enforced.
  #26  
Old 06-02-2019, 10:46 AM
betonbill is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 38
Along with the "no," not answering the question, why not N/A? One is actually filling in the blank with a third answer.
  #27  
Old 06-02-2019, 03:16 PM
Anny Middon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,104
How about answering BOTH yes and no to the question?
  #28  
Old 06-02-2019, 03:29 PM
k9bfriender is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anny Middon View Post
How about answering BOTH yes and no to the question?
Aren't we all immigrants?
  #29  
Old 06-02-2019, 03:49 PM
The Other Waldo Pepper is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by k9bfriender View Post
Aren't we all immigrants?
Not that Iím aware of, no.
  #30  
Old 06-06-2019, 07:30 AM
Fleetwood's Avatar
Fleetwood is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: NH-US
Posts: 1,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by k9bfriender View Post
Aren't we all immigrants?
I'm not.

One can be an immigrant and a citizen, however.
  #31  
Old 06-06-2019, 09:22 AM
HurricaneDitka is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 13,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anny Middon View Post
How about answering BOTH yes and no to the question?
Answering that you are both a citizen and not a citizen? That would still probably count as lying on the census, if one is concerned about such things.
  #32  
Old 06-06-2019, 09:57 AM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 60,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneDitka View Post
LOL!

1) fucking with the mail is a serious federal offense.

2) equating asking about citizenship on the census with "Our democracy is being taken over by criminals trying to make this a banana republic" sounds loony-tunes unhinged to normal people.
Any opinions about what was revealed in the OP?
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2018 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017