#1  
Old 09-10-2019, 03:11 PM
kirkrapine is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 381

Is a recession coming?


I recently heard an economist on NPR say the yield curve has been "inverted" for the past three quarters in a row -- a circumstance that preceded each of the last seven recessions.
  #2  
Old 09-10-2019, 03:21 PM
beowulff's Avatar
beowulff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Scottsdale, more-or-less
Posts: 16,813
Of course.
The only question is: when?
  #3  
Old 09-10-2019, 04:01 PM
Icarus's Avatar
Icarus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In front of my PC, y tu?
Posts: 5,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by beowulff View Post
Of course.
The only question is: when?
And how long, and how deep?

If there were ever a time for a "That's what she said!"
  #4  
Old 09-10-2019, 04:06 PM
Bosda Di'Chi of Tricor's Avatar
Bosda Di'Chi of Tricor is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Dogpatch/Middle TN.
Posts: 31,099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icarus View Post
And how long, and how deep?

If there were ever a time for a "That's what she said!"

That what she said!

BA-DUM-DA!
\
That you folks, I'll be here all week, try the veal!
__________________
"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist."
~~~Dom Helder Camara
  #5  
Old 09-10-2019, 07:23 PM
kirkrapine is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosda Di'Chi of Tricor View Post
That what she said!

BA-DUM-DA!
\
That you folks, I'll be here all week, try the veal!
No, no, it goes, "Tip the veal, try your waitress!"
  #6  
Old 09-10-2019, 10:07 PM
Bone's Avatar
Bone is online now
Extrajudicial
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,847

Moderating


Quote:
Originally Posted by kirkrapine View Post
No, no, it goes, "Tip the veal, try your waitress!"
You're relatively new, so I'm quoting you, but there were a few other comments in this thread as well. Knock off the juvenile locker room innuendo.

[/moderating]
  #7  
Old 09-10-2019, 04:11 PM
Velocity is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 15,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by beowulff View Post
Of course.
The only question is: when?
The D's had better hope it doesn't wait until 2021.
  #8  
Old 09-10-2019, 03:23 PM
Telemark's Avatar
Telemark is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Just outside of Titletown
Posts: 22,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by kirkrapine View Post
I recently heard an economist on NPR say the yield curve has been "inverted" for the past three quarters in a row -- a circumstance that preceded each of the last seven recessions.
Economists have predicted 14 of the last 6 recessions.
  #9  
Old 09-10-2019, 04:18 PM
Snowboarder Bo's Avatar
Snowboarder Bo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 27,496
Re: the OP: yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telemark View Post
Economists have predicted 14 of the last 6 recessions.
Ddamn! That's a helluva record!
  #10  
Old 09-10-2019, 07:03 PM
KarlGauss's Avatar
KarlGauss is offline
Entangled
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Between pole and tropic
Posts: 8,433
The information needed to 'predict' a recession can't possibly exist, can it? Given the huge number of interacting (and I would say unknowable) systems that such predictions are based on, the best they can do is give likelihoods and their confidence intervals must be considerable (if they are even knowable).

Moreover, once a prediction was publicized, wouldn't the model necessarily have to be changed or at least be reiterated since the prediction itself would influence the economy (Hawthorne Effect, Psychohistory, . . . ) thereby rendering the earlier prediction obsolete?
  #11  
Old 09-11-2019, 12:24 AM
Flyer is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlGauss View Post
The information needed to 'predict' a recession can't possibly exist, can it? Given the huge number of interacting (and I would say unknowable) systems that such predictions are based on, the best they can do is give likelihoods and their confidence intervals must be considerable (if they are even knowable).
Of course the information exists. It's existed for well over 100 years. It's called "the business cycle."

Haven't you ever read an Econ101 textbook?
  #12  
Old 09-11-2019, 05:49 AM
KarlGauss's Avatar
KarlGauss is offline
Entangled
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Between pole and tropic
Posts: 8,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer View Post
Of course the information exists. It's existed for well over 100 years. It's called "the business cycle."

Haven't you ever read an Econ101 textbook?
Thank you for your reply.

Let me follow-up by asking a couple of questions: Was the "business cycle" extent in 2007? Do you believe that global/national economies are stochastic systems? Might the economy be affected by the weather? A terrorist attack?
  #13  
Old 09-15-2019, 11:26 AM
KarlGauss's Avatar
KarlGauss is offline
Entangled
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Between pole and tropic
Posts: 8,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer View Post
Haven't you ever read an Econ101 textbook?
Well, Robert Shiller, Sterling Professor of Economics at Yale surely did (presumably before he won the Nobel Prize).

Have you read what he wrote? It was published just today in the NYT so I'm gonna go out on a limb and bet the answer is no. It's probably behind a paywall anyway. So, I'll excerpt a bit for you:

Quote:
When will the next recession arrive?

Economists are evaluating such factors as . . . shifting tariff policy, the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve and other central banks, and such “leading indicators” as the yields in the bond market.

. . . They provide insights about the state of the markets and the economy, but they have severe limitations as forecasting tools. This approach will not produce a definitive advance reading of a major shift from growth to contraction: a recession.

Forecasting such a shift is extremely difficult . . .

The probability that a recession will come soon — or be severe when it does — depends in part on the state of ever-changing popular narratives about the economy. These are stories that provide a framework for piecing together the seemingly random bits of information that one picks up from friends, the news or social media.

For consumers these narratives affect decisions on whether to spend or save, whether to take a demanding or an easy job, whether to take a risk or stick with something safer. For businesspeople the prevailing narratives affect deliberations on whether to hire more help or lay off employees, whether to expand or retrench or even start a new enterprise.

. . . Hardly any of us have precise formulas to decide our plans. So we allow ourselves to be influenced by the emotions, theories and scripts suggested in the stories we hear from others.
BTW, do you agree or disagree that
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlGauss
the prediction itself would influence the economy

Last edited by KarlGauss; 09-15-2019 at 11:27 AM.
  #14  
Old 09-10-2019, 06:40 PM
begbert2 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 13,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telemark View Post
Economists have predicted 14 of the last 6 recessions.
According to the cite, the yield curve has actually predicted 7 of 7 recessions, with 100% accuracy, over the past 50 years.

It appears that the delay from inversion to recession ranges from half a year to a year and a half, based on the admittedly small data set presented.

Last edited by begbert2; 09-10-2019 at 06:41 PM.
  #15  
Old 09-15-2019, 12:33 PM
Buck Godot's Avatar
Buck Godot is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MD outside DC
Posts: 6,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by begbert2 View Post
According to the cite, the yield curve has actually predicted 7 of 7 recessions, with 100% accuracy, over the past 50 years.

It appears that the delay from inversion to recession ranges from half a year to a year and a half, based on the admittedly small data set presented.
I wouldn't put much faith in a study set that small. p. The actual accuracy could be 75% and would still have 13% likelihood of appearing 100% accurate over 7 trials. even more so if you account for cherry picking of economic indeators and the inclusion of a delay that gives them a large amount of wiggle room. Recall the obviously coincidental Redskin Rule which had 100% accuracy until it didn't

Last edited by Buck Godot; 09-15-2019 at 12:38 PM.
  #16  
Old 09-15-2019, 02:51 PM
Sam Stone is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 28,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck Godot View Post
I wouldn't put much faith in a study set that small. p. The actual accuracy could be 75% and would still have 13% likelihood of appearing 100% accurate over 7 trials. even more so if you account for cherry picking of economic indeators and the inclusion of a delay that gives them a large amount of wiggle room. Recall the obviously coincidental Redskin Rule which had 100% accuracy until it didn't
Totally agree. Fudging the time window is a big giveaway. Historically, the average business cycle has lasted five and a half years. If you consider a recession unlikely in the first half of the cycle, you can simply 'predict' that a recession will hit sometime in the last two years of the business cycle and be correct most of the time. And of course, with only seven samples it's easy enough to be correct through sheer luck so long as you are even remotely in the ballpark.

The same is true for almost all political data. In this election year, you'll hear a lot of crap like, 'If he wins, this will only be the first time in 50 years that a person with X has won an election in that state while not carrying the capital' or some such rot. Then you look at the stats and discover that in the time mentioned there were only three or four elections where that could possibly have mattered, so it's essentially just random.
  #17  
Old 09-10-2019, 09:41 PM
Sunny Daze's Avatar
Sunny Daze is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay Area Urban Sprawl
Posts: 12,813
Class-y.
  #18  
Old 09-15-2019, 02:46 PM
Sam Stone is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 28,195
Predicting a recession is a lot like trying to predict whether the next grain of sand dropped on a pile will cause it to collapse. It's impossible, because of complexity. But even if it's impossible to literally predict, you can certainly see conditions that suggest that things are starting to get unstable.

Start with a bare table. Start piling up sand. At first, you can easily predict that with each new sand grain, the pile will get a little higher. But as the pile grows, stresses inside it get bigger and bigger. At some point, you think, "Okay, this thing will collapse any time now". But you can't predict the grain of sand that will do it, or even maybe whether the next 100 or 1000 grains of sand will do it. Just that the pile is getting to the point where in the past it showed a tendency to collapse.

That's what predicting a recession is like. Towards the end of a business cycle you can certainly see the strains in the system. The Yield curve being one of them. But you simply can't predict whether a recession or financial crash or some other collapse of meta-stability will hit today, or next week, or next month, or next year. You just know that the pile is starting to look mighty shaky.

That's where we are at now. Record debt, trade tariffs, a slowdown of the economy in Europe and Asia, interest rates near the zero bound, moribund long-term investment. We can see that the pile is getting pretty big, and pebbles are starting to roll down the sides, but we have no idea when the collapse will come, other than it sure looks like we're creeping up on it.
  #19  
Old 09-16-2019, 08:58 AM
Corry El is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Stone View Post
Predicting a recession is a lot like trying to predict whether the next grain of sand dropped on a pile will cause it to collapse. It's impossible, because of complexity. But even if it's impossible to literally predict, you can certainly see conditions that suggest that things are starting to get unstable.
...
That's where we are at now. Record debt, trade tariffs, a slowdown of the economy in Europe and Asia, interest rates near the zero bound, moribund long-term investment. We can see that the pile is getting pretty big, and pebbles are starting to roll down the sides, but we have no idea when the collapse will come, other than it sure looks like we're creeping up on it.
You can't predict timing I agree. And it's not entirely clear we're that near the actual casual factors of previous recessions. Which have been first and foremost Fed tightening cycles* and increase private sector (not govt or total) debt loads. The Fed *was* tightening, though now loosening again, so if there is a recession in the next year or two it might be argued it follows past cases. But not very aggressive tightening and now going the other way. On debt, the relative cost of servicing debt for households and corps in the US is still significantly lower than 2007. Debt in general in the world is higher, but the kind of increase in debt servicing cost relative to income in the US that's preceded most US recessions, not so much right now.

OTOH the gradually greater internationalization of the economy, or even the recent backsliding of that (trade tensions) makes past correlations of US-centric measures to US recessions less reliable. Which could cut either way now. On the pro-recession side there's definitely slower growth in a lot of the world, apparently much higher chance for example Eurozone goes back into recession soon, and China not recession as in negative growth but negative compared to recent growth. On anti-recessions side the world financial system has become more USD-centric even in recent years, even since the 2008-9 crisis, even as US GDP as % of world GDP goes down, and even as import/export is a relatively low % of the US *real economy*. Meaning on one hand the shape of the US treasury yield curve is more influenced by overall global financial conditions than it used to be, but the US real economy while certainly affected by world economic conditions, isn't affected to the same degree. This is a notable caveat IMO for the 'yield curve shape predicts recession' argument which also as others have pointed out is based on actually pretty few examples statistically speaking.

And that's even assuming the statistical process is stationary, which it's not. Derivations of the supposed underlying statistical process in finance and economics often assume it's like inferring the odds of a dice or roulette table by sampling outcomes. But in case of finance/economics the 'dice' or 'table' is probably also changing shape between trials. This tends to defeat prediction by means of 'what's always happened' to a degree people tend to underestimate IMO, even people who should know better or are even those paid to make such predictions.

*inverted yield curve being in part a symptom of relatively tight Fed monetary policy, they directly control short term not long term rates.
  #20  
Old 09-15-2019, 11:55 PM
Bone's Avatar
Bone is online now
Extrajudicial
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,847

Moderating


On re-read, this is more IMHO so I'm moving there from GD.

[/moderating]
  #21  
Old 09-16-2019, 09:33 AM
TheKingOfBread is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 13
It's so hard to determine when the next recession is coming. One eventually always comes because malinvestment is occuring all the time. When too much malinvestment gets built up in a certain sector and fuels massive speculation then one's likely to happen again. Many people cite student loans as the next one, but as many posters are saying its almost impossible to know.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017