Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-09-2019, 03:44 PM
KidCharlemagne is online now
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,340

Why isn't the filibuster "nuclear option" just standard procedure now?

I'm looking for information here, not making an argument, but I figured this thread best go here.

The filibuster was originally just a loophole that ultimately became standard procedure. It went from being used rarely to common practice. It's so standard that most people seem to believe that 60 votes are a technical rather than practical requirement for a vote to pass the Senate.

The "nuclear option" has now been used by both parties. Why isn't this becoming the new standard? Fear that it won't ultmately hold up in court?


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to:

Send comments about this website to:

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

Copyright © 2017