Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #551  
Old 07-05-2016, 01:40 PM
adaher is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 28,896
Rule#1. Never cite campaign talking points. They are almost always inaccurate.
  #552  
Old 07-05-2016, 03:16 PM
XT's Avatar
XT is offline
Agnatheist
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The Great South West
Posts: 35,516
Probably already cited, but I haven't bothered to slog through the seemingly endless pages of wrangling on this, so I figured I'd like to this CNN article and cut and paste some of the salient points:

Quote:
CNN)FBI Director James Comey said Tuesday that he would not recommend charges against Hillary Clinton over her use of private email servers while secretary of state, removing a huge shadow hovering over her presidential campaign.
But Comey administered an extraordinary tongue-lashing to Clinton and her aides, rebuking them for being "extremely careless" in the handling of classified information and saying the presumptive Democratic nominee should have known an unclassified email system was no place to conduct sensitive government business.
Quote:
Comey's decision not to recommend charges likely removes the threat of prosecution in the middle of Clinton's campaign for the presidency, but the political fallout will continue. His explicit criticism of Clinton's conduct offered her enemies a trove of fresh ammunition for their assault on her character, honesty and trustworthiness — one of her biggest vulnerabilities.
In a stunning moment of Washington theater, Comey stepped up to the microphone to deliver the FBI's findings just over two hours before Clinton climbed aboard Air Force One to travel to her first campaign event with President Barack Obama. Adding to the tension, he made clear the White House and the Justice Department "do not know what I am about to say."
Quote:
"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information," he said, "there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."
In the first reaction from the Clinton camp to Comey's statement, spokesman Brian Fallon said that the campaign was "pleased that the career officials handling this case have determined that no further action by the Department is appropriate.

"As the Secretary has long said, it was a mistake to use her personal email and she would not do it again. We are glad that this matter is now resolved."
Quote:
Clinton has admitted her use of a private email server — discovered during investigation by the House Select Committee — on Benghazi was a mistake. But she has maintained that she never received or passed on information that was marked classified at the time -- a legalistic position that has exposed her to significant political fire.

Comey said that the FBI "painstakingly" combed through every bit of Clinton's multiple servers and mobile devices that they could from her four-year tenure as secretary of state. He described a series of obstacles, including a server that had its software wiped.
Quote:
The Justice Department is considered highly likely to accept Comey's recommendations. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said as much amid a furor last week over her encounter with former President Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac in Phoenix, which sparked claims by Republicans that a fix was being concocted to ensure Hillary Clinton was not charged.

Comey said of the 30,000 emails that Clinton's team turned over to the State Department, 110 emails in 52 email chains were determined to have contained classified information "at the time they were sent or received," Comey said. Eight of those chains contained information considered "top secret," the highest level of classification.

That's in addition to 2,000 emails that were "upclassified," or determined to have classified information only in hindsight.

Last edited by XT; 07-05-2016 at 03:17 PM.
  #553  
Old 07-05-2016, 07:48 PM
jayjay is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 37,167
J. Edgar Comey...wonder who HE'S keeping files on?
  #554  
Old 07-05-2016, 07:53 PM
running coach's Avatar
running coach is online now
Arms of Steel, Leg of Jello
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riding my handcycle
Posts: 37,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayjay View Post
J. Edgar Comey...wonder who HE'S keeping files on?
Everyone.

*looks around surreptitiously*
  #555  
Old 09-18-2019, 05:53 PM
JohnT's Avatar
JohnT is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 23,562
Trump today, September 18th, 2019:

"One thing we haven't mentioned is technology, they're wired so we will know if somebody's trying to break through and you may want to discuss that a little bit, General."

General: "Sir, there could be some merit in not discussing that."

https://twitter.com/ScottMStedman/st...925982208?s=19

Some times, when Dotard gets really open about the treason stuff*, I come back to this thread and laugh, and laugh, and laugh. Then I cry, then I laugh some more, and then I remember:

But Her Emails

... and I somber up, because, yes, her emails.

I note that this thread ended about 10, 20 or so days before Trump publicly implored Russia to release the emails. I also note that those emails... if they ever existed... has yet to be released.

Lol, "perhaps there's some merit in not discussing that", lol.

*my last time here was just a few weeks ago, when he <confirming...> tweeted the Top Secret document that he <checks notes> took pictures with using his <flips page> cell phone.

But that server! Those emails! They proved, er, fit a narrative, didn't they?

Last edited by JohnT; 09-18-2019 at 05:55 PM.
  #556  
Old 09-19-2019, 06:23 AM
JKellyMap's Avatar
JKellyMap is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 9,712
Thanks for reviving this. Yes, Trump’s hypocrisy is noteworthy. Richard Parker’s 2016 concerns about Hillary were reasonable and well articulated, but he (and others in the thread) rightly noted it was nothing like the incompetence and childish behavior that a President Trump would display.

(Funny comment in that Twitter link: “His kids have the hardest jobs! They have to try and sell what he gives away.”)

Last edited by JKellyMap; 09-19-2019 at 06:26 AM.
  #557  
Old 09-19-2019, 07:31 AM
John_Stamos'_Left_Ear is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKellyMap View Post
Thanks for reviving this. Yes, Trumpís hypocrisy is noteworthy. Richard Parkerís 2016 concerns about Hillary were reasonable and well articulated, but he (and others in the thread) rightly noted it was nothing like the incompetence and childish behavior that a President Trump would display.
Except that this was part of a bigger trend, articulated by a complicit mainstream media, that every negative about Trump had to be met with an equal negative about Hillary. Oh, you can add a hundred disclaimers, but like the errata on page 67 of the newspaper doesn't change much about the errors in the headline story in the preceding day's newspaper, it all added up to bullshit false equivalence which is the only reason we have president Trump.

I haven't changed my mind about the Clinton email (non) scandal (and neither should you).
  #558  
Old 09-19-2019, 08:19 AM
guizot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: An East Hollywood dingbat
Posts: 8,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKellyMap View Post
. . . he (and others in the thread) rightly noted it was nothing like the incompetence and childish behavior that a President Trump would display...
The more stridently Trump accuses others of something, the more it turns out he does it himself, to a greater degree. (Such as accusing Obama of playing golf, etc.) This is, indeed, exactly how children behave. We have a six-year-old president.
  #559  
Old 09-19-2019, 08:33 AM
bobot's Avatar
bobot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago-ish
Posts: 9,132
The orange national security hole in the oval office, and the fact that Americans are *yawn* about it certainly shine a light of perspective on everything else.
  #560  
Old 09-19-2019, 09:18 AM
JohnT's Avatar
JohnT is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 23,562
Yup. Treason is OK if a white man does it and doesn't make him unelectable.

Having a private email server is an utter abomination unto God, however, if done by a woman and makes her completely unfit for the office.
  #561  
Old 09-19-2019, 09:22 AM
JohnT's Avatar
JohnT is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 23,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Parker View Post
It is remarkable how many posters can only view this issue through a narrow lense of partisan point-scoring, responding to this thread as if Sean Hannity wrote it. I knew that would describe some responses, but I am mildly shocked at how widespread that sentiment is. It is bad news for our political health.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnT View Post
As a Hillary supporter, even more importantly as an Obama and ACA supporter, I have absolutely no idea why this email issue should be worth more to me than the continued survival and expansion of the ACA, than the importance of keeping Trump (or any R) out of the White House, than the importance of having a solidly-progressive Supreme Court.

This thread, despite the tens of thousands of words expended, has not made that case. "Old Lady with power is bad at computer security" is far, far, far less important to me than keeping "you can still get quality health insurance even if you have a pre-existing condition" a rock-solid cornerstone of health insurance provisions.

So it is not "bad news", it is merely a weighing of priorities and long-term objectives for many of us, with those conclusions not matching your own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
Perfect response. Lol. Forget it, Richard Parker. It's Dopertown.
This exchange is particularly mirthful. LOL, "Dopertown", because I recognized a non-issue when I saw it, especially compared to the things listed.

But, no, I was in "Dopertown" because, let's see, I felt that HRC was far less a security risk... and offered a far better slate of policy positions... than Donald Trump, and viewed this bullshit issue through such a lens.

Last edited by JohnT; 09-19-2019 at 09:26 AM.
  #562  
Old 09-19-2019, 11:06 AM
Richard Parker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 12,153
JohnT, what you failed to understand then and fail to understand now is that this thread was not an argument for how you should vote. So framing it all in terms of why this didn't amount to an argument for voting against Clinton was missing the point entirely. Obviously she was a vastly superior candidate on every metric.

This thread was an attempt to identify and defend a norm worth defending against the onslaught of subordinating every goddamn thing to partisan point-scoring. That has, if anything, become an even more important point in the intervening 3 years which you remain on the wrong side of, apparently.
  #563  
Old 09-19-2019, 11:07 AM
CarnalK's Avatar
CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 18,435
Well, I'm sure Richard Parker now regrets voting for Trump over this issue.
  #564  
Old 09-19-2019, 11:17 AM
Gyrate is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greater Croydonia
Posts: 23,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnT View Post
Yup. Treason is OK if a white man does it and doesn't make him unelectable.

Having a private email server is an utter abomination unto God, however, if done by a woman and makes her completely unfit for the office.
Nope. It also has to be done by a Democrat to be a bad thing.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017