Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2019, 11:54 AM
Sunny Daze's Avatar
Sunny Daze is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay Area Urban Sprawl
Posts: 12,866

Trump named in whistleblower complaint


A whistleblower has filed a complaint against Trump based on information they heard while Trump was interacting with a foreign leader.

Quote:
Trump’s interaction with the foreign leader included a “promise” that was regarded as so troubling that it prompted an official in the U.S. intelligence community to file a formal whistleblower complaint with the inspector general for the intelligence community, said the former officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.
There's not much information out there right now. From what I can tell, some members of Congress will be briefed, but there's a very tight lid on the information at the moment.

For discussion:
1) Who leaked? I'm guessing Bolton...
2) What did Trump (allegedly) do? It's got to be pretty bad, right?
3) Is this the thread that unravels the sweater? Please, oh please, oh please.
  #2  
Old 09-19-2019, 12:11 PM
Aspenglow's Avatar
Aspenglow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny Daze View Post
A whistleblower has filed a complaint against Trump based on information they heard while Trump was interacting with a foreign leader.



There's not much information out there right now. From what I can tell, some members of Congress will be briefed, but there's a very tight lid on the information at the moment.

For discussion:
1) Who leaked? I'm guessing Bolton...
2) What did Trump (allegedly) do? It's got to be pretty bad, right?
3) Is this the thread that unravels the sweater? Please, oh please, oh please.
1) I don't think there has been any leak. The Inspector General, whose job it was to pass the whistleblower complaint to the House Intelligence Committee, advised Adam Schiff he was unable to do so because the Acting DNI forbade him based on some non-existent reasoning given him by the DOJ. There was no reason for the DOJ to become involved. The language in the rule compelling the IG to pass the complaint to the House Intelligence Committee is utterly unambiguous. There's no interpretation of the law to be made by the DOJ. Adam Schiff simply made the issue public.

ETA: As I think about it, WaPo first broke the story, I believe. If that's actually the first we heard of it, then your guess is a good one.

2) No one yet knows what Trump supposedly did, but it seems he made a promise to a foreign leader that was inappropriate and of "urgent concern." In this matter, the term, "urgent concern" is a legal standard that the IG felt has been met. So yeah, pretty bad. The most common speculation I keep hearing is that Trump promised to lift Russian sanctions in exchange for Putin's help to win election in 2020.

3) Since Trump supporters have been propagandized to believe that Russian support is preferable to Democrats winning an election, I doubt it will move the needle for them. Senate Republicans should be thinking long and hard about how this willful and blatant disregard for the rule of law could feel when the shoe is on the other foot, but I doubt they will. They've staked all their hopes on blindly following their lawless leader.

So that's where we are.

Last edited by Aspenglow; 09-19-2019 at 12:13 PM.
  #3  
Old 09-19-2019, 12:27 PM
Sunny Daze's Avatar
Sunny Daze is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay Area Urban Sprawl
Posts: 12,866
I wonder if there are tapes...
  #4  
Old 09-19-2019, 12:30 PM
Aspenglow's Avatar
Aspenglow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,152
Lordy, I hope there are tapes.

(I'll go now, but it had to be said.)
  #5  
Old 09-19-2019, 01:06 PM
Nars Glinley is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sweeping down the plain.
Posts: 5,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspenglow View Post
1) I don't think there has been any leak. The Inspector General, whose job it was to pass the whistleblower complaint to the House Intelligence Committee, advised Adam Schiff he was unable to do so because the Acting DNI forbade him based on some non-existent reasoning given him by the DOJ. There was no reason for the DOJ to become involved. The language in the rule compelling the IG to pass the complaint to the House Intelligence Committee is utterly unambiguous. There's no interpretation of the law to be made by the DOJ. Adam Schiff simply made the issue public.
I thought that it was the DNI's responsibility to turn the complaint over to Congress.
__________________
I've decided to spend more time criticizing things I don't understand. - Dogbert
  #6  
Old 09-19-2019, 01:10 PM
bobot's Avatar
bobot is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago-ish
Posts: 9,175
It was also required that Trump's taxes be turned over to congress, and that was defied. Let's hope today's meeting was in some way tantamount to a handing-over of information. I doubt it was, though. Commence Republican wagon circling.
  #7  
Old 09-19-2019, 01:16 PM
Crotalus's Avatar
Crotalus is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio
Posts: 6,086
The inspector general didn't exactly spill his guts. I read on Twitter that the DOJ "reasoning" on this is that the subject of the complaint is outside of the intelligence community, so the IC whistle-blower law doesn't apply. But the director of central intelligence wasn't supposed to go to DOJ for guidance. The law says he "shall" give it to congress with seven days.
__________________
Ad hominem is a logical fallacy when it's used to argue against a concept. But it's perfectly appropriate when your point is that someone is an asshole. TonySinclair
  #8  
Old 09-19-2019, 01:18 PM
Euphonious Polemic is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,228
At this point, you've got to have to face that Republicans in congress, and many voters are just fine with anything Trump does. ANYthing.

They would be fine if Trump promised Putin that the US would abandon the Ukraine and put a stop to all sanctions, as long as Putin threw the entire support of his intelligence service behind getting Trump re-elected.

They would be fine if Trump promised Putin that the US would sell Alaska back to Russia in exchange for Trump Tower Moscow and $100 million in cash to Trump personally.

And they'd be fine with Trump ordering government officials to cover this up.

This is the simple state of affairs today. The USA has become a kleptocracy, run by a wanna-be dictator. So far, the Republican Party is indulging him in his dictatorial ways.

This may change. I doubt that it will though. I think that the entire party is in this shit-show all the way, and they know that they can't extricate themselves now.
  #9  
Old 09-19-2019, 01:19 PM
Euphonious Polemic is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crotalus View Post
The inspector general didn't exactly spill his guts. I read on Twitter that the DOJ "reasoning" on this is that the subject of the complaint is outside of the intelligence community, so the IC whistle-blower law doesn't apply. But the director of central intelligence wasn't supposed to go to DOJ for guidance. The law says he "shall" give it to congress with seven days.
Unless the dictator tells him not to.

This is how things are being run now. The rule of law is on the way out. You had a nice country while it lasted.
  #10  
Old 09-19-2019, 01:32 PM
Fiveyearlurker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,754
Is the mystery contained in this article from yesterday?

"The house committees’ chairs say they will scrutinise a telephone call between the US president and Mr Zelensky on 25 July, during which Mr Trump allegedly told the Ukrainian president to reopen the Biden investigation if he wanted to improve relations with the US."
  #11  
Old 09-19-2019, 02:19 PM
Buck Godot's Avatar
Buck Godot is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MD outside DC
Posts: 6,017
That would certainly fit the bill.
  #12  
Old 09-19-2019, 02:30 PM
bobot's Avatar
bobot is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago-ish
Posts: 9,175
And that is certainly waaaay fucked up. If true, that would be a shining example of Trump's so-called patriotism. And if true, what the hell does it say about those shielding him? Damn.
  #13  
Old 09-19-2019, 02:32 PM
Fiveyearlurker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,754
I mean, to be honest this is really just the equivalent of “Russia, if you’re listening...” but since it was done clandestine instead of completely in the open, it makes it seem worse.
  #14  
Old 09-19-2019, 02:42 PM
bobot's Avatar
bobot is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago-ish
Posts: 9,175
It's worse, I'd say, because it would prove that Trump has learned exactly jack shit about the whole thing. And this time he's got the authority to promise aid, taxpayers' money, etc.
  #15  
Old 09-19-2019, 02:45 PM
Euphonious Polemic is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,228
IOKITDI

It's OK If Trump Does It.
  #16  
Old 09-19-2019, 02:58 PM
Aspenglow's Avatar
Aspenglow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,152
Now being reported that the whistleblower complaint is based on multiple acts by Trump over the course of a lengthier period of time, culminating in his offer of a quid pro quo.

It just isn't that hard to figure out what's going on here.
  #17  
Old 09-19-2019, 03:09 PM
Fiveyearlurker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,754
Even the Republicans can't sweep this away, right?

Right?
  #18  
Old 09-19-2019, 03:11 PM
ElvisL1ves is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The land of the mouse
Posts: 50,549
Hold their beer.
  #19  
Old 09-19-2019, 03:30 PM
enalzi is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiveyearlurker View Post
Even the Republicans can't sweep this away, right?

Right?
"It's all Hilary's fault somehow."
  #20  
Old 09-19-2019, 03:35 PM
Akaj's Avatar
Akaj is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: In the vanishing middle
Posts: 777
(Copied from another thread.)

Will this swing 20 R senators to vote for removal in an impeachment trial? Of course not.

Will it be a nice juicy nugget for the ongoing House impeachment hearings to expose and publicize with snowballing evidence throughout the course of the 2020 election? Let's fucking hope so.
__________________
I'm not expecting any surprises.
  #21  
Old 09-19-2019, 03:38 PM
TimeWinder is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Albany/Corvallis, OR
Posts: 4,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiveyearlurker View Post
Even the Republicans can't sweep this away, right?

Right?
Sweep what away? We have already established that the President is above the law.
  #22  
Old 09-19-2019, 03:52 PM
ShadowFacts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,245
This NPR article includes letters from the IGIC to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (that Rep. Adam Schiff chairs) and from Schiff to the Director of National Intelligence. Good reading - both in the lines themselves and between them.
  #23  
Old 09-19-2019, 03:56 PM
Euphonious Polemic is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiveyearlurker View Post
Even the Republicans can't sweep this away, right?

Right?
Of course not.

They will use a sharpie.
  #24  
Old 09-19-2019, 04:14 PM
Fiddle Peghead's Avatar
Fiddle Peghead is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Harlem, New York, NY
Posts: 4,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspenglow View Post
The most common speculation I keep hearing is that Trump promised to lift Russian sanctions in exchange for Putin's help to win election in 2020.
Hearing from whom?
  #25  
Old 09-19-2019, 04:22 PM
iiandyiiii's Avatar
iiandyiiii is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 35,593
TPM has been up to date on this issue: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckra...-whistleblower

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog...line-of-events

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/prime/working-notes-2
  #26  
Old 09-19-2019, 04:43 PM
Aspenglow's Avatar
Aspenglow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddle Peghead View Post
Hearing from whom?
The various talking heads on the tee vee speculating based on what is already known; e.g., the dates of Trump's calls to foreign leaders, what was stated by the "administration" to be the topics of those conversations (Siberian wildfires? Really?), the timing of the departure of former DNI Dan Coats, Trump's stated willingness to accept foreign subversion of the 2020 election, etc.

All presented with stout disclaimers, of course. But it seems to be the most common theme of where the "what is known" evidence leads.
  #27  
Old 09-19-2019, 04:59 PM
Leaper is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: In my own little world...
Posts: 12,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by enalzi View Post
"It's all Hilary's fault somehow."
“Everyone who tells you anything odd is going on is lying.”
  #28  
Old 09-19-2019, 09:04 PM
JohnT's Avatar
JohnT is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 23,629
Lol, RudyG just admitted on CNN that he asked the President of Ukraine to do this:

https://twitter.com/axios/status/117...048375296?s=09
  #29  
Old 09-19-2019, 09:44 PM
Paul in Qatar is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 12,964
As a practical matter there must be tapes. I would assume the President's important calls are taped. If the President dodges that one, surely the Ukrainians record calls from the American president. Then on top of that is the possibility some third party is tapping the lines.

Is my reasoning reasonable?
__________________
800-237-5055
Shrine Hospitals for Children (North America)
Never any fee
Do you know a child in need?
  #30  
Old 09-20-2019, 01:27 AM
jasg is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Upper left hand corner
Posts: 6,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul in Qatar View Post
As a practical matter there must be tapes. I would assume the President's important calls are taped. If the President dodges that one, surely the Ukrainians record calls from the American president. Then on top of that is the possibility some third party is tapping the lines.

Is my reasoning reasonable?
Yep, it is a solid bet that the intelligence services/administration for the foreign leader will have tapes of the conversation.

Ergo, they have influence over Trump if he said anything questionable.

Blackmail is so easy to win...
  #31  
Old 09-20-2019, 07:35 AM
MikeF is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,621
Trump asks if anyone is dumb enough to believe that he would do something like is being alleged. The real question is does anyone believe that HE is dumb enough to have done it. Its a subtle difference but the first option implies that "you" are dumb if you believe it. I think we all know what the answer to the second question is.

"I would only do what is right anyway, and only do good for the USA!" seems like a tacit admission to me and, other than "Another fake news story", he doesn't deny it. Hmmm.
  #32  
Old 09-20-2019, 07:48 AM
Fiveyearlurker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,754
Do you think the information that Trump attempted to collude with the Ukrainians to interfere in the 2020 election will give any pause to the folks claiming that Trump attempting to collude with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election was ridiculous?

Last edited by Fiveyearlurker; 09-20-2019 at 07:48 AM.
  #33  
Old 09-20-2019, 07:52 AM
JKellyMap's Avatar
JKellyMap is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 9,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiveyearlurker View Post
Do you think the information that Trump attempted to collude with the Ukrainians to interfere in the 2020 election will give any pause to the folks claiming that Trump attempting to collude with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election was ridiculous?
If only. Their mentality has always been “He didn’t do it. But if he did, that doesn’t matter. Because reasons.”
  #34  
Old 09-20-2019, 07:55 AM
Snowboarder Bo's Avatar
Snowboarder Bo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 27,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnT View Post
Lol, RudyG just admitted on CNN that he asked the President of Ukraine to do this:

https://twitter.com/axios/status/117...048375296?s=09
Here's the whole 10 minute clip from CNN. Giuliani lies several times on camera, admits it several times, and just generally has a meltdown.
  #35  
Old 09-20-2019, 07:56 AM
JohnT's Avatar
JohnT is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 23,629
I've had cleaner breakups with women than what RudyG & Cuomo had there.

Last edited by JohnT; 09-20-2019 at 07:56 AM.
  #36  
Old 09-20-2019, 05:39 PM
TimeWinder is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Albany/Corvallis, OR
Posts: 4,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiveyearlurker View Post
Do you think the information that Trump attempted to collude with the Ukrainians to interfere in the 2020 election will give any pause to the folks claiming that Trump attempting to collude with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election was ridiculous?
A multiple hundred page report listing the specific collusions in great detail wasn't enough. Why would this new "fake news" be enough?
  #37  
Old 09-21-2019, 02:31 PM
Chronos's Avatar
Chronos is offline
Charter Member
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 85,165
Donald Trump, Jr. publicly publishing the very e-mails in which the collusion took place wasn't enough.
  #38  
Old 09-21-2019, 02:59 PM
Ravenman is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 26,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiveyearlurker View Post
Do you think the information that Trump attempted to collude with the Ukrainians to interfere in the 2020 election will give any pause to the folks claiming that Trump attempting to collude with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election was ridiculous?
Trump said in an interview that he would take the help of foreign nations in getting dirt on opponents. And yet, some people believe - without pause - that he is incapable of such a thing.
  #39  
Old 09-21-2019, 03:01 PM
SlackerInc's Avatar
SlackerInc is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Minnesota
Posts: 12,719
I have been against impeachment for political reasons, but I don’t see how it can be avoided now. He has to be impeached, and then if the Senate does not remove him they can await the judgment of history. I don’t think at this point it would really torpedo Democrats’ chances in the election, because anyone who was inclined to vote against Trump cannot possibly want to punish Democrats for impeaching under these circumstances.
  #40  
Old 09-21-2019, 03:50 PM
ThelmaLou's Avatar
ThelmaLou is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Neither here nor there
Posts: 16,566
nm
__________________
* "Former President Trump" -- saying it until it becomes true.

Last edited by ThelmaLou; 09-21-2019 at 03:51 PM.
  #41  
Old 09-21-2019, 03:52 PM
JohnT's Avatar
JohnT is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 23,629
He means this, Thelma:

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/s...455953413?s=19

(The tweet where DJTjr attached his collusion emails.)

Last edited by JohnT; 09-21-2019 at 03:53 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017