Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2019, 03:03 PM
garygnu is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 11,436

"Tank for Tua" OR The 0-16 NFL Season Thread (2019 ed.)


Come one, come all, welcome to the thread where we celebrate the losingest losers in the NFL. Which team can match the epic ineptitude of the 1976 Buccaneers and 2008 Lions? Who will fire the coach and GM to, ultimately, no avail? Who will get their choice of QBs in an apparently loaded 2020 class? Will a team really dedicate themselves, snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, and go down down down in history with the infamous 0-16?

The Miami Dolphins really do seem like they're a solid candidate to go all the way, but we have lots of contenders. Here are the 15 team that lost Week 1, sorted by how much they lost by:
Miami Dolphins (-49)
Cleveland Browns (-30)
Pittsburgh Steelers (-30)
New York Giants (-18)
Atlanta Falcons (-16)
Jacksonville Jaguars (-14)
Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-14)
Denver Broncos (-8)
Chicago Bears (-7)
Indianapolis Colts (-6)
Washington Redskins (-5)
Carolina Panthers (-3)
Houston Texans (-2)
New York Jets (-1)
Cincinnati Bengals (-1)

The Detroit Lions and Arizona Cardinals tied, so conceivably could still go winless. Somehow "0-15-1" seems even worse.

Week 2 games that feature two winless teams:
Bucs at Panthers (Thurs Night)
Jaguars at Texans
Bears at Broncos
Browns at Jets (Mon Night)

This thread is for mocking bad teams, but discuss anything that relates, such as draft picks.
__________________
įoį
  #2  
Old 09-11-2019, 05:09 PM
Omniscient is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 17,548
The 2017 Browns get a pass here?
  #3  
Old 09-11-2019, 05:37 PM
garygnu is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 11,436
LoL, so forgettable. Oops, copy/paste mistake.
__________________
įoį

Last edited by garygnu; 09-11-2019 at 05:38 PM.
  #4  
Old 09-11-2019, 06:15 PM
Chingon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: the hypersphere
Posts: 598
Betting the franchise on an Alabama QB is risky business.
  #5  
Old 09-11-2019, 07:19 PM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omniscient View Post
The 2017 Browns get a pass here?
They were awesome, not just 0-16 but 1-32. Historically bad.
  #6  
Old 09-12-2019, 07:56 AM
ElvisL1ves is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The land of the mouse
Posts: 50,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingon View Post
Betting the franchise on an Alabama QB is risky business.
Bart Starr, Joe Namath ... on the other hand, Richard Todd, AJ McCarron ...
  #7  
Old 09-12-2019, 08:11 AM
Chingon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: the hypersphere
Posts: 598
Believe it or not, 50 years ago things were different.
  #8  
Old 09-12-2019, 08:17 AM
DCnDC's Avatar
DCnDC is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Dueling Grounds
Posts: 12,415
The Dolphins seem to be the only ones that are intentionally trying to lose.
  #9  
Old 09-12-2019, 10:51 AM
Procrustus is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pacific NW. •
Posts: 12,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCnDC View Post
The Dolphins seem to be the only ones that are intentionally trying to lose.
The Seahawks looked they tried, but failed.
  #10  
Old 09-12-2019, 10:54 AM
ElvisL1ves is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The land of the mouse
Posts: 50,382
If you try to fail, and somehow succeed anyway, is that really failure? You've failed to fail.
  #11  
Old 09-12-2019, 10:59 AM
enalzi is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,087
Jet's QB Sam Darnold is going to be out for at least a few weeks with Mono. It's going to be a race to the bottom in the AFCE.
  #12  
Old 09-12-2019, 11:01 AM
ElvisL1ves is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The land of the mouse
Posts: 50,382
Belichick was willing to trade Demaryius Thomas to the Jets only because he doesn't think he has anything left.
  #13  
Old 09-12-2019, 12:07 PM
FoieGrasIsEvil's Avatar
FoieGrasIsEvil is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Land of Cheese Coneys
Posts: 18,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Procrustus View Post
The Seahawks looked they tried, but failed.
They were dominated in every facet of the game but the scoreboard. Happens.
__________________
Posting From Above The Browns
  #14  
Old 09-12-2019, 01:09 PM
kenobi 65's Avatar
kenobi 65 is online now
Corellian Nerfherder
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brookfield, IL
Posts: 15,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingon View Post
Believe it or not, 50 years ago things were different.
Yup. Here's a list from Wikipedia of Alabama's starting quarterbacks, in chronological order. The most recent guy to have had a significant NFL career as a starting QB was, in fact, Richard Todd (starter at Alabama from 1974-1975).

There are three Pro Football Hall of Fame quarterbacks who played at Alabama (Starr, Namath, and Stabler), but as you note, they were at Alabama 50-60 years ago.

Last edited by kenobi 65; 09-12-2019 at 01:10 PM.
  #15  
Old 09-12-2019, 03:38 PM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Procrustus View Post
The Seahawks looked they tried, but failed.
Thereís some truth to that. Giving up yards was intentional. I donít know what crazy strategy that they have but it works. In the Pete Carroll era, Seattle has given up more than 400 yards passing on only 6 occasions, and they are 6-0 in those games. They donít mind the repeated short yardage, itís the explosive plays they try to prevent. (And failed a couple of times to prevent last Sunday, which Iím sure wasnít in the plan.)

As I said, though, itís weird but it works. Pete basically says he doesnít care if you ďdink and dunkĒ on him, as long as you donít score.

The sacks and hits and other pressure on Wilson werenít intentional either, of course, but that OL is better than it performed and Iím sure theyíll get that fixed.
  #16  
Old 09-12-2019, 04:02 PM
Procrustus is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pacific NW. •
Posts: 12,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atamasama View Post
Thereís some truth to that. Giving up yards was intentional. I donít know what crazy strategy that they have but it works. In the Pete Carroll era, Seattle has given up more than 400 yards passing on only 6 occasions, and they are 6-0 in those games. They donít mind the repeated short yardage, itís the explosive plays they try to prevent. (And failed a couple of times to prevent last Sunday, which Iím sure wasnít in the plan.)

As I said, though, itís weird but it works. Pete basically says he doesnít care if you ďdink and dunkĒ on him, as long as you donít score.

The sacks and hits and other pressure on Wilson werenít intentional either, of course, but that OL is better than it performed and Iím sure theyíll get that fixed.
I agree. We were at the game. It was ugly. But I still have hope for a good season.

(of course, I also thought the Mariners would get 81 wins this year)
  #17  
Old 09-12-2019, 04:15 PM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Procrustus View Post
(of course, I also thought the Mariners would get 81 wins this year)
They just got all the wins out of the way early so that they didnít need to worry later in the season.
  #18  
Old 09-12-2019, 11:29 PM
FoieGrasIsEvil's Avatar
FoieGrasIsEvil is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Land of Cheese Coneys
Posts: 18,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atamasama View Post

As I said, though, itís weird but it works. Pete basically says he doesnít care if you ďdink and dunkĒ on him, as long as you donít score.

The sacks and hits and other pressure on Wilson werenít intentional either, of course, but that OL is better than it performed and Iím sure theyíll get that fixed.
The bolded works until you play the Patriots. And those pressures and hits/sacks are a result of a rejuvenated Bengals defensive line that has a LOT of talent on it. Most around the league aren't noticing, but if the Bengals beat Jimmy Garrapolo in convincing fashion, it's going to be because of that line.

The entire team is playing better. Mediocre Marv was the head cheese for SIXTEEN years. Let that marinate.

I'm telling you, don't sleep on them. Seriously.
__________________
Posting From Above The Browns
  #19  
Old 09-13-2019, 12:36 AM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoieGrasIsEvil View Post
The bolded works until you play the Patriots. And those pressures and hits/sacks are a result of a rejuvenated Bengals defensive line that has a LOT of talent on it. Most around the league aren't noticing, but if the Bengals beat Jimmy Garrapolo in convincing fashion, it's going to be because of that line.

The entire team is playing better. Mediocre Marv was the head cheese for SIXTEEN years. Let that marinate.

I'm telling you, don't sleep on them. Seriously.
If nothing else that Bengals pass rush is terrifying. Theyíre crazy good. They kept demonstrating during replays how they were off at full speed at the moment the ball is snapped. That is hard to block. I think Cincinnati might be a contender this year. Yeah itís only week 1 but they are good.

And John Ross... Being from the Seattle area, I saw a lot of him as a Husky and I thought heíd be a star in the NFL. His rookie year was a dud but it seems like heís figuring out how to make his speed work in the pros like he did in college. If he can get his catching skills to improve he will be a huge asset, especially once A.J. Green is back.
  #20  
Old 09-13-2019, 12:44 AM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,056
Oh, I’ll add, the Panthers are winning!

The list, I mean. Only the OP’s list.
  #21  
Old 09-13-2019, 02:28 PM
Isosleepy's Avatar
Isosleepy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,734
The fact that not even half the NFL teams managed to get a win is a sad state of affairs. As to the op question: while I don’t think the Bengals will go 0-16, they will come close, and hasten their move to become London’s NFL team.
  #22  
Old 09-15-2019, 05:23 PM
DinoR is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,657
...and the Lions continue their undefeated ways through two games. This time they even removed the prospect of still being winless at season's end. They are even number two in their division regardless of what happens with the Bears.

I know the reality. Don't mess with the fantasy. This year we get into the playoffs and manage our second playoff win in the Super Bowl era. I can feel it. We're gonna party like it's 1991. Break out the Barry Sanders jerseys!

Again, don't mess with the fantasy. The Lions can take care of crushing their fan dreams without help.
  #23  
Old 09-15-2019, 05:50 PM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isosleepy View Post
The fact that not even half the NFL teams managed to get a win is a sad state of affairs. As to the op question: while I donít think the Bengals will go 0-16, they will come close, and hasten their move to become Londonís NFL team.
Looked at another way, most teams didnít lose! Way to go teams!
  #24  
Old 09-15-2019, 07:01 PM
What Exit?'s Avatar
What Exit? is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central NJ (near Bree)
Posts: 29,264
Giants in theory don't even need Tua, if they keep this up how much can they get for the #1 pick?
  #25  
Old 09-16-2019, 09:14 PM
garygnu is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 11,436
They'll win, but it looks like the Browns want to stay in this race.
__________________
įoį
  #26  
Old 09-17-2019, 08:04 AM
cmkeller's Avatar
cmkeller is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 13,432
ElvisL1ves:

Quote:
Belichick was willing to trade Demaryius Thomas to the Jets only because he doesn't think he has anything left.
Well, if he learned anything from his time with Belichick, he'll just resign as QB of the NYJ.
__________________
"Sherlock Holmes once said that once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the answer. I, however, do not like to eliminate the impossible. The impossible often has a kind of integrity to it that the merely improbable lacks."
-- Douglas Adams's Dirk Gently, Holistic Detective
  #27  
Old 09-17-2019, 11:30 AM
garygnu is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 11,436

Week Two Aftermath


Six of the 0-1 teams won their second game. The 0-0-1 Lions won as well.
Cleveland Browns
Atlanta Falcons
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Chicago Bears
Indianapolis Colts
Houston Texans
Detroit Lions

Here are our nine remaining awkward aspirants, sorted by average margin of loss, and their next opponent:
Miami Dolphins (-46.0) at Cowboys (2-0, +14.0)
Pittsburgh Steelers (-16.0) at 49ers (2-0, +19.0)
New York Giants (-16.0) at Buccaneers (1-1, -4.0)
Cincinnati Bengals (-12.5) at Bills (2-0, +7.5)
New York Jets (-10.5) at Patriots (2-0, +36.5)
Washington Redskins (-7.5) host Bears (1-1, -2.5) Mon Night
Jacksonville Jaguars (-7.5) host Titans (1-1, +14.0) Thurs Night
Denver Broncos (-5) at Packers (2-0, +6.0)
Carolina Panthers (-4.5) at Cardinals (0-1-1, -3.0)

Winless:
Arizona Cardinals (-3.0) host Panthers (0-2, -4.5)

None of the remaining teams looked anything other than pathetic, apart from the Broncos. They're not good, but got a little jobbed at the end of their last game. Looking ahead, it's not good. Most of these teams are on the road next week, five on the road against 2-0 teams. The Patriots and Cowboys are both favored by more than 20 points. I think they'll both cover. The only matchup of winless teams is Panthers at Cardinals. Giants at Bucs might be good, featuring the debut of QB Daniel Jones. Jags at Titans could be entertaining on short rest Thursday. Perhaps there will be more shouting matches or temper tantrums on the sidelines; perhaps some divisional fighting. Otherwise, I see most of these dolt teams next week, still here with the goose egg in the win column.
__________________
įoį
  #28  
Old 09-17-2019, 12:06 PM
kenobi 65's Avatar
kenobi 65 is online now
Corellian Nerfherder
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brookfield, IL
Posts: 15,418
It's interesting to note that, out of the still-winless, three of them will be starting a different quarterback this week than they started in Week 1: Pittsburgh, Jacksonville, and both New York teams. And, a fifth (Miami) has sent in their second-stringer in both games so far.

Last edited by kenobi 65; 09-17-2019 at 12:06 PM.
  #29  
Old 09-17-2019, 12:08 PM
enalzi is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,087
Jets and Dolphins are just sad. Has the #1 and #2 stop in the draft ever gone to teams from the same division?
  #30  
Old 09-17-2019, 12:23 PM
enalzi is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenobi 65 View Post
It's interesting to note that, out of the still-winless, three of them will be starting a different quarterback this week than they started in Week 1: Pittsburgh, Jacksonville, and both New York teams. And, a fifth (Miami) has sent in their second-stringer in both games so far.
Sounds like Cam's going to be out too.
  #31  
Old 09-17-2019, 12:25 PM
kenobi 65's Avatar
kenobi 65 is online now
Corellian Nerfherder
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brookfield, IL
Posts: 15,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by enalzi View Post
Sounds like Cam's going to be out too.
If so, then, that's five, only one of which (the Giants) made the switch willingly.
  #32  
Old 09-17-2019, 12:52 PM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by enalzi View Post
Jets and Dolphins are just sad. Has the #1 and #2 stop in the draft ever gone to teams from the same division?
Uh, that just happened in the most recent draft. Cardinals had the first pick, the 49ers had the second.
  #33  
Old 09-17-2019, 01:08 PM
What Exit?'s Avatar
What Exit? is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central NJ (near Bree)
Posts: 29,264
They just bench Eli Manning today.
The Daniel Jones experiment begins.
  #34  
Old 09-17-2019, 01:10 PM
Sailboat's Avatar
Sailboat is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by garygnu View Post
Which team can match the epic ineptitude of the 1976 Buccaneers.
Hugh Culverhouse, the inaugural owner of the Tampa Bay franchise, refused to pay my father for some freelance publishing work. My father, an old-school and sarcastic character, swore he actually paid an old Gypsy woman to put a curse on Culverhouse and the team (almost certainly in jest).

It was a source of great personal satisfaction to him as Tampa Bay built the Buccaneers' NFL-record streak of fourteen consecutive losing seasons.
  #35  
Old 09-17-2019, 01:36 PM
enalzi is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atamasama View Post
Uh, that just happened in the most recent draft. Cardinals had the first pick, the 49ers had the second.
Well, has it ever happened two years in a row?
  #36  
Old Yesterday, 07:47 AM
FlikTheBlue is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by enalzi View Post
Jets and Dolphins are just sad. Has the #1 and #2 stop in the draft ever gone to teams from the same division?
It wouldnít surprise me if both of them suck so bad that they fail to pull off 0-16 by beating each other. I see both teams finishing 1-15.
  #37  
Old Yesterday, 09:37 AM
Intergalactic Gladiator's Avatar
Intergalactic Gladiator is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,191
Could be 0-15-1, which would be amazing.

I would like to see Miami go 0 and 16 just for being a piece of history and the only team to go completely undefeated and completely winless.
  #38  
Old Yesterday, 09:42 AM
Intergalactic Gladiator's Avatar
Intergalactic Gladiator is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,191
Whoops, make that 0-14-2 because they play each other twice. Duh.
  #39  
Old Yesterday, 09:57 AM
Oakminster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Surefall Glade, Antonica
Posts: 19,118
Sadly, my Saints are contenders. We won the first game, but probably won't win another unless/until Brees comes back, at which point we'll already be all but eliminated from playoff contention anyway....
  #40  
Old Yesterday, 10:19 AM
Intergalactic Gladiator's Avatar
Intergalactic Gladiator is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,191
Yes but that just might mean we get more Taysom Hill action. For a number 3 quarterback, he's not a bad wide receiver/punt returner/punt rusher/punt coverage guy.
  #41  
Old Yesterday, 10:33 AM
enalzi is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oakminster View Post
Sadly, my Saints are contenders. We won the first game, but probably won't win another unless/until Brees comes back, at which point we'll already be all but eliminated from playoff contention anyway....
Eh, you play the Jags during the stretch. And I really don't see Brees sitting out the second half of the season if he's healthy, regardless of playoff odds.
  #42  
Old Yesterday, 11:19 AM
DCnDC's Avatar
DCnDC is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Dueling Grounds
Posts: 12,415
They probably deserve to, but Washington isn't going to go 0-16. Five of their remaining 14 games are against teams still on the Week 2 list (Giants, Miami, Jets, Panthers, Giants). They'll win at least a couple of those, and they'll probably win a couple of games against better teams that they shouldn't. They always manage to pull one or two of those out every year no matter how shitty they are.
  #43  
Old Yesterday, 12:34 PM
Oakminster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Surefall Glade, Antonica
Posts: 19,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by enalzi View Post
Eh, you play the Jags during the stretch. And I really don't see Brees sitting out the second half of the season if he's healthy, regardless of playoff odds.
I'm a pessimist by nature. I'm not convinced Drew is coming back from this. He's pretty old, and his hand may not heal as quickly or completely as expected....
  #44  
Old Yesterday, 12:39 PM
Harrington is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intergalactic Gladiator View Post
Whoops, make that 0-14-2 because they play each other twice. Duh.
The Jets and Dolphins are so bad, it is possible for both of them to lose when they play each other.
  #45  
Old Yesterday, 03:26 PM
Typo Negative's Avatar
Typo Negative is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 7th Level of Hell, Ca
Posts: 17,776
I have seen several articles in the new today that say the Dolphins and tanking on purpose. The Dolphins (management, not players) are intentionally fielding a bad team to improve their draft position next year.

Can season ticket holders sue? Or at the very least, get a refund?? They paid full price, but are intentionally getting sub-par product.
__________________
"Just love everybody. I'll sort 'em out later"

-God

Last edited by Typo Negative; Yesterday at 03:26 PM.
  #46  
Old Yesterday, 03:34 PM
kenobi 65's Avatar
kenobi 65 is online now
Corellian Nerfherder
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brookfield, IL
Posts: 15,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Typo Negative View Post
Can season ticket holders sue? Or at the very least, get a refund??
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.

Can they sue? Sure -- my understanding is that you can file a lawsuit over practically anything, and "I'm suing you" is shorthand for "I'm filing a lawsuit against you." Do they have a case? Now there's the question, and I suspect that the answer is "no." They bought tickets to professional football games, and there's no promise that the team that management puts on the field is going to be good.

The players have all signed NFL contracts, they are all getting paid -- they *are* professional football players. Whether or not they're competitive with the other teams they play may be frustating and annoying to the fans, but I doubt it's a breach of contract.

Last edited by kenobi 65; Yesterday at 03:36 PM.
  #47  
Old Yesterday, 03:46 PM
Typo Negative's Avatar
Typo Negative is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 7th Level of Hell, Ca
Posts: 17,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenobi 65 View Post
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.


The players have all signed NFL contracts, they are all getting paid -- they *are* professional football players. Whether or not they're competitive with the other teams they play may be frustating and annoying to the fans, but I doubt it's a breach of contract.
Clarification. It is not the players that are breaching the contract, it's the owner and management. They have purposefully put a sub par team together. They have traded away what little talent they had. They have decided NOT to compete this year. IMO, they have defrauded the paying customers. They should give those customers a refund.
__________________
"Just love everybody. I'll sort 'em out later"

-God
  #48  
Old Yesterday, 03:50 PM
kenobi 65's Avatar
kenobi 65 is online now
Corellian Nerfherder
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brookfield, IL
Posts: 15,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Typo Negative View Post
Clarification. It is not the players that are breaching the contract, it's the owner and management.
Oh, I know, and that's what I was referring to -- the contract that's part of buying a ticket for a game. I mentioned the players because the ticket-holders have bought tickets for a professional football game, and by any technical definition of the term, the players that the Dolphins are fielding *are* professional football players -- they have signed NFL contracts, and they are getting paid. They *are* professionals.

"Putting a subpar product on the field" may feel fraudulent, but I don't believe that there is anything in the contract between the ticket-holder and the team that promises a par product.

Last edited by kenobi 65; Yesterday at 03:52 PM.
  #49  
Old Yesterday, 04:47 PM
garygnu is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 11,436
The team can also deny that they are "intentionally putting out a sub-par product." They can simply argue they are trying to field the best team they can, but as with any business, working toward future success has to be accounted for.
__________________
įoį
  #50  
Old Yesterday, 05:09 PM
Harrington is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Typo Negative View Post
They have purposefully put a sub par team together... They have decided NOT to compete this year.
That's going to be really tough to demonstrate in a court of law.

Lawyer: Are you tanking?

Respondent: No.

Last edited by Harrington; Yesterday at 05:12 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2018 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017