Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2020, 11:09 PM
Hirka T'Bawa is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SE Metro Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 1,368

What did the US Senate fight over with coronavirus bill?


I want to keep this GQ. I want as many facts as possible, let's try to link consequences to their respective forums, link to a new thread.

The US Senate just pasted a corona virus bill, after negotiations lasted days; what is different between this bill and the one voted down earlier this week? What changes were made?
  #2  
Old 03-25-2020, 11:36 PM
OldGuy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Very east of Foggybog, WI
Posts: 5,576
I'm not sure what came out of it finally, but two of the things the Democrats were fighting for were (1) to make nonprofits that receive Medicaid payments eligible for relief (Basically, it seems the Republicans were targeting Planned Parenthood and other organizations in blue states which had accepted expanded Medicaid back under Obama. (2) put some controls and transparency on the $500 billion dollar fund that Mnuchin could basically do what he saw fit with.
  #3  
Old 03-26-2020, 12:01 AM
Colibri's Avatar
Colibri is offline
SD Curator of Critters
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Panama
Posts: 44,454
Since a political discussion probably can't be avoided, let's move this to Politics & Elections.

Colibri
General Questions Moderator
  #4  
Old 03-26-2020, 09:17 AM
That Don Guy's Avatar
That Don Guy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,933
I think another change is, the original bill had a restriction on the $1200 payments where no one could get more than the amount they paid in taxes for 2018, which meant that the poorest people, and probably the ones that needed the money the most, would get little, if any.
  #5  
Old 03-26-2020, 11:59 AM
Jas09 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 5,771
Democrats also got language added that bans any of the relief funds from going directly to business owned by the President, Vice President, cabinet officials, and members of Congress. I believe it also excludes businesses owned by their children.

They also got an extension to unemployment benefits that was more generous to out-of-work folks than what the original bill had.
  #6  
Old 03-26-2020, 06:19 PM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,986
I think there's also language that says that companies that accept bailout money have to use it to pay their workers; they can't just use it to buy back their stock or give bonuses to top level management.

Disclaimer: I haven't read the thing; I've just read articles about it.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017