Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old 08-15-2019, 01:08 PM
Acsenray is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 36,228
Right, but is that the use of "The" as an indicator of source for the T-shirts? Does this use and significant uses like it make it impossible for "The" to function as an indicator of source for T-shirts?

Quote:
If I saw a shirt with just the word "THE" on it, I'd probably think of the band, first. Does that count as brand confusion? Admittedly, I'm unlikely to attempt to get an undergrad degree from a The The concert, or expect a live music show if I'm sitting in a econ 101 class room in Idaho.
You'll never get a definitive answer to that question just talking about it on the internet. Ultimately, trademark rights are about positioning yourself for a fight. And there are several stages at which a fight can happen.

O.S.U. has an application before the P.T.O. Well, someone can challenge that application in an opposition proceeding. But that someone has to have standing, that is, it has to be someone who either already claims rights in a confusingly similar trademark or stands to face a legal threat from O.S.U. over "The."

Well, say O.S.U. wins the opposition proceeding and the P.T.O. issues a registration. Well, that's not the end of it. Someone can bring a cancellation proceeding and argue that the P.T.O. made a mistake and should cancel it. Say O.S.U. wins a cancellation proceeding. That's not the end of it.

Someone can go to a federal court and say, "Hey, the P.T.O. got it wrong!" and ask the court to direct the P.T.O. to cancel the registration.

Or, the registration itself need not be directly challenged. If O.S.U. threatens someone over "The," E can go to a court and say, "O.S.U.'s trademark claim is bogus." Or, E can wait for O.S.U. to sue, and then argue as a defense "O.S.U.'s trademark claim is bogus."

It's only after a court rules on the merits that we really know what O.S.U.'s real trademark rights are. But if no one in competition with O.S.U. is willing to spend the time and money fighting over it, that day won't come.

And the longer O.S.U. goes without a legal challenge, the likelier it is that any eventual challenge will be unsuccessful. For one thing, if O.S.U. gets a registration, after five years, O.S.U. becomes immune to certain (but not all) arguments.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Icarus View Post
Hmmmp, I this doesn't cause any issues with how we describe our expressways in Southern California.

THE 101
THE 405
THE 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acsenray View Post
Are you asking for a serious answer or are you just joshing?
Okay, just in case you aren't joshing and really are wondering --

Trademark law regulates the use in commerce of trademarks. When you walk around in your own life saying "the 210," you're not using a trademark in commerce in a way that creates a likelihood of confusion with someone else's trademark.

This is a critical concept and one that causes a lot of people to get unnecessarily outraged over trademarks.

Trademark law is not a regulation of speech in general. For example, the Lego company would love it if you said "Lego-brand toy blocks" all the time and only in reference to their legitimately branded blocks and avoided calling them "Legos," and especially avoided calling someone else's blocks "legos" in a generic sense.

But you can do it all day every day for the rest of your life. You can even write a book that does it. A newspaper can go around printing "Legos" and "legos" all it wants, and the Lego company will never get any relief for it.

That's because there's no use in commerce here. Nobody is selling goods or services using "Legos" or "legos" as a source indicator (i.e., brand name). They can send out letters and publish websites complaining about "trademark misuse," but you know what? Trademark misuse isn't a thing in the law. So tough shit. Ultimately, if the public decides that "legos" is more useful as a generic term rather than as a brand name, then the Lego company is screwed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Don Guy View Post
Of course, all of these pale in comparison to what the International Olympic Committee does to protect the trademark "Olympics," right down to demanding that Greek restaurants that use the work "Olympic" change their names. The one event not controlled by the IOC that gets away with it: the Special Olympics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller View Post
They threatened to sue the makers of the card game Legend of the Five Rings, because they had a picture of five rings on the back of the cards.
The Olympic Committee's trademark are very special. You might think of them as "super trademarks." The reason is that they have their very own statute, the Ted Stevens Amateur Sports Act of 1998, 36 U.S.C. Sec. 220506, which gives them rights that ordinary trademark owners don't have.

And there are only a few exceptions--for example, businesses that have been using Olympics trademarks continuously since before 1950, businesses whose obviously are named after the Olympic mountain range, and businesses located west of the Cascade Mountains in Washington state.
__________________
*I'm experimenting with E, em, and es and emself as pronouns that do not indicate any specific gender nor exclude any specific gender.
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017