FAQ |
Calendar |
![]() |
|
![]() |
#101
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Did the man bake the muffins himself?
Was the man severely malnourished? Did the man feel free to go outside? Was other food available, which the man would have accepted? Was the man's mental disorder something like paranoia or OCD? (I'm thinking, of course, of the famous mathematician Kurt Gödel's strange and bizarre death -- which, however, didn't involve any shooting.) |
#103
|
||||
|
||||
Did the man have OCD? Was he obsessed with counting or numbers?
|
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
#105
|
|||
|
|||
This puzzle isn't good enough to go on this long. I'm going to reveal because it really is not that great in my opinion.
SPOILER:
I know, not great. But there it is. I'm sure I can find a (better) one, but does anyone else have a good one? |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
OK, I'll have a try at posing one:
If only the angry man had said something else, it would save $800 million a year. What did he say?
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Would it save a company the $800 million? Is the angry man a real man? |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
No.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Does $800 million in your question mean 800,000,000 U.S. dollars?
|
|
||||
#110
|
||||
|
||||
Would it save the government $800 million?
Would is save the general public $800 million? Was the money lost because someone else heard what the angry man said and took action as a result? |
#111
|
||||
|
||||
Was what the man said an expression of his anger?
Was what he said a declarative statement? Was what he said an imperative? Was what he said a question? Was what he said a matter of fact? Was what he said a matter of opinion? Was the angry man in a position of authority? Was the angry man in a position of sufficient authority that he would ordinarily have control of hundreds of millions of dollars? Was the angry man involved in politics? Was the angry man involved in business? |
#112
|
||||
|
||||
Was he angry over a financial issue?
Was he angry over a health issue? Was he angry because something needed repairing? Was he angry over a relationship or family issue? Was he angry because something was misplaced? Was he angry because his coworkers and managers are incompetent idiots and don't listen to him? |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry it's taken me so long to reply to these! Busy day!
Does $800 million in your question mean 800,000,000 U.S. dollars? Yes. Would it save the government $800 million? No, though it would likely save the government some part of that amount. Would is save the general public $800 million? Yes. Was the money lost because someone else heard what the angry man said and took action as a result? Yes. Was what the man said an expression of his anger? Yes. Was what he said a declarative statement? Yes. Was what he said an imperative? No. Was what he said a question? No. Was what he said a matter of fact? No. Was what he said a matter of opinion? Yes, pretty much. Was the angry man in a position of authority? Yes. Was the angry man in a position of sufficient authority that he would ordinarily have control of hundreds of millions of dollars? No. Was the angry man involved in politics? Yes. Was the angry man involved in business? No. Was he angry over a financial issue? Hmm, tricky. This is not how I would primarily characterize it, although finances were involved. Was he angry over a health issue? No. Was he angry because something needed repairing? No. Was he angry over a relationship or family issue? Yes. Was he angry because something was misplaced? No. Was he angry because his coworkers and managers are incompetent idiots... No. ... and don't listen to him? Yes-ish.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#114
|
||||
|
||||
Was the statement by the angry man one that:
denied people access to something? denied the use of something tangible? denied intangible rights to something, like a copyright or patent? claimed responsibility for something or someone? disclaimed responsibility for something or someone? gave access or rights to something? Is the $800 million an ongoing expense every year, in perpetuity? Does it vary? Does it vary with inflation? Does it vary with population? If it varies, does it consistently increase, or decrease, or is not consistent in that way? |
|
|||
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Was the statement by the angry man one that:
denied people access to something? denied the use of something tangible? denied intangible rights to something, like a copyright or patent? claimed responsibility for something or someone? disclaimed responsibility for something or someone? gave access or rights to something? No to all of these. Is the $800 million an ongoing expense every year, in perpetuity? Yes (but with variance in the exact amount, see below). Does it vary? Yes. Does it vary with inflation? Probably. Does it vary with population? Most likely yes. If it varies, does it consistently increase, or decrease, or is not consistent in that way? It is not consistent.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick Last edited by Fretful Porpentine; 10-31-2019 at 05:08 PM. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Did this involve PBS funding?
Did it involve Fred Rogers? I'm shooting for the time Fred Rogers saved PBS with his plea to congress. Last edited by Mahaloth; 10-31-2019 at 06:50 PM. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Did this involve PBS funding? No.
Did it involve Fred Rogers? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#118
|
||||
|
||||
Is it something to do with worn-out bills being recycled?
|
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Is it something to do with worn-out bills being recycled? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
|
||||
#120
|
||||
|
||||
Did Mr. Angry get divorced recently?
Is Mr. Angry wealthy? Did Mr. Angry misunderstand something? Did somebody misunderstand something about Mr. Angry? |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Was the angry man one member of a group of persons?
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Did Mr. Angry get divorced recently? No.
Is Mr. Angry wealthy? Yes. Did Mr. Angry misunderstand something? No Did somebody misunderstand something about Mr. Angry? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Was the angry man one member of a group of persons? Could you clarify? I mean, everyone is one member of a group of persons a lot of the time, but I assume you mean something more specific?
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#124
|
||||
|
||||
Is/was the angry man president of the USA?
I the angry man Trump? |
|
|||
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Is/was the angry man president of the USA? No.
I the angry man Trump? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Is the $800 mil part of the cost of the US military?
Part of the cost of Social Security? Part of the cost of some other govnment program? To do with health care? |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Is the $800 mil part of the cost of the US military?
Part of the cost of Social Security? Part of the cost of some other govnment program? To do with health care? No to all.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#128
|
||||
|
||||
Was the money saved by one or more Americans?
Is the angry man a non-American? Did he say something threatening to an American? Was he speaking to a high-profile American? Did he take off his shoe and pound it on a table? |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Was the money saved by one or more Americans? The money was lost by one or more Americans, and would have been saved by them had the man said something else.
Is the angry man a non-American? Yes. Did he say something threatening ... Yes. ... to an American? No. Was he speaking to a high-profile American? No. Did he take off his shoe and pound it on a table? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
|
||||
#130
|
||||
|
||||
Was the man the head or representative of his country?
Did he say it to a high-profile American official? Would it help if we knew what country he was from? Would it help if we knew when or where he said it? |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
Was the man the head or representative of his country? No.
Did he say it to a high-profile American official? No. Would it help if we knew what country he was from? Yes. Would it help if we knew when or where he said it? Yes.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#132
|
||||
|
||||
Was the angry man from a European country?
Was the angry man from a Soviet Block country? Was the angry man from an Asian Country? |
#133
|
||||
|
||||
Did he say it before 1950?
Did he say it to an American industrialist? Last edited by panache45; 11-01-2019 at 09:26 AM. |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Was the angry man from a European country? Yes.
Was the angry man from a Soviet Block country? No. Was the angry man from an Asian Country? No. Did he say it before 1950? Yes. Did he say it to an American industrialist? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
|
||||
#135
|
||||
|
||||
Is this to do with paying off instalments or interest on a debt?
Is this an expense incurred as the result of war? |
#136
|
||||
|
||||
Was the angry man Hitler?
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Note: I'm going to assume the "this" in the next couple of questions refers specifically to the $800 million, and answer accordingly. Without giving too much away, I can anticipate some additional situations where ambiguities are likely to arise. I'm going to make my answers as literally accurate as possible, according to how questions are actually phrased, but be aware that questions that are worded slightly differently may produce seemingly contradictory answers.
Is this to do with paying off instalments or interest on a debt? No. Is this an expense incurred as the result of war? No. Was the angry man Hitler? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#138
|
||||
|
||||
Was the angry man from either Germany or The Soviet Union (or Russia)?
Did he say it before 1930? Did the angry man survive more than a year after he said it? |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Was the angry man from either Germany or The Soviet Union (or Russia)? No.
Did he say it before 1930? Yes. Did the angry man survive more than a year after he said it? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
|
|||
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Did this take place in the following decades:
1770's-1930's: (Please tell me which decade you would say "yes" to) |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
Recap time?
The angry man was (more or less) a real man. He was in a position of authority, though not one where he would normally have control of hundreds of millions of dollars. He was involved in politics. He was not involved in business. He was not American, Asian, president of the USA, or Donald Trump. He was not the representative of his country. He was European, but not from Russia, Germany, or a Soviet bloc country. He was not Hitler. He did not take off his shoe and pound it on a table. He did not survive for more than a year after his statement. He was not angry over a health issue, because something needed repairing, because something was misplaced, or because his co-workers and managers were incompetent idiots. He was angry over a matter that involved family or relationships and (to some extent) finance. He was angry at not being listened to. The thing that he said was a declarative statement that expressed his anger, and primarily a matter of opinion rather than fact. It was not a question or an imperative. It was not a statement that denied people access to something, denied the use of something tangible, denied intangible rights to something, claimed or disclaimed responsibility for something, or gave access or rights to something. It was a threat, but not against an American. He was not speaking to a high-profile American, or to an American industrialist. He said it before 1930. The loss of money is because somebody heard what the angry man said and took action as a result. $800 million means 800 million US dollars. The loss of $800 million is borne by the general public, not a specific company or, primarily, the government (although the government may be paying part of it). It is an ongoing expense that fluctuates from year to year, in ways that are not consistent. Inflation and population have some effect on the fluctuation. The money is lost by Americans. It is not part of the cost of the US military, social security, government programs, or related to health care. The expense is not due to war or paying off installments or interest on a debt. The situation does not involve PBS funding, Fred Rogers, or worn-out bills being recycled.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Did this take place in the following decades:
1770's-1930's: (Please tell me which decade you would say "yes" to) This is very difficult to answer. Some of the relevant events took place in the 1890s. Others did not take place during these years at all.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Did he only lose $800 million when adjusted for inflation?
Did it involve the purchase of land? |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
Did he only lose $800 million when adjusted for inflation? No, the loss is ongoing, in the present day.
Did it involve the purchase of land? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
|
||||
#145
|
||||
|
||||
Did the angry man actually SAY the thing, verbally, with his mouth?
Did the angry man WRITE what he said? Was what he said of a philosophical nature? Did it have economic implications? Was what he said a result of his anger? If he hadn't been angry, would he still have said it? |
#146
|
||||
|
||||
(BTW, I think I might have one after this one is finished)
|
#147
|
|||
|
|||
Did the angry man actually SAY the thing, verbally, with his mouth? It was a verbal utterance.
Did the angry man WRITE what he said? No. Was what he said of a philosophical nature? No. Did it have economic implications? No. Was what he said a result of his anger? Yes. If he hadn't been angry, would he still have said it? No.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
#148
|
||||
|
||||
Does this "more or less" real person have a real mouth that can make sounds in the real world?
Is the person a character in some sort of artistic work? (Fiction or nonfiction) An automaton of some kind? A role or title more than an individual holding the title? Is the money that is lost spent on some kind of consumer good? On some other kind of property? On a service? |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
Heh, FINALLY someone followed up on the "more or less" answer!
Does this "more or less" real person have a real mouth that can make sounds in the real world? Yes. Is the person a character in some sort of artistic work? (Fiction or nonfiction) Yes. An automaton of some kind? No. A role or title more than an individual holding the title? No. Is the money that is lost spent on some kind of consumer good? On some other kind of property? On a service? None of these is the primary cause of the loss, although some part of the loss may involve expenditures on some or all of these things.
__________________
Live merrily, and trust to good verses. -- Robert Herrick |
|
|||
#150
|
|||
|
|||
Is this a character in fiction?
Is this a character in nonfiction Did angry man really exist in the real world? Does this involve royalties? Does this involve copyright? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|