Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2019, 02:43 AM
Jim B.'s Avatar
Jim B. is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,060

Holocaust Denial?


I put it in Great Debates, because I assume it will spark one.

But why do white supremacists almost always deny the Holocaust? I don't need a cite. And I say "almost always". But in reality, I never saw one who didn't.

Why do they do it? It seems to be pretty universal for them, as I said. What is their point? And purpose, for that matter?

__________________
"Love takes no less than everything." (from "Love Is", a duet by Vanessa Williams and Brian McKnight)
  #2  
Old 11-21-2019, 02:52 AM
Velocity is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 15,801
Well, there is considerable overlap between anti-Semitism and white supremacism (why, I don't know - most Jews are white), so, something such as the Holocaust that boosts the cause of the Jews (in the PR sense) is obviously something white supremacists will object to.
  #3  
Old 11-21-2019, 03:15 AM
Sage Rat's Avatar
Sage Rat is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Howdy
Posts: 22,177
It wasn't just Germany who hated and feared Jewish people, prior to WWII. A fairly large number of American Jews originally came from Russia - not Germany - fleeing pogroms there. Even here in the US, you see Hollywood forming largely as a predominately Jewish place as a way to escape persecution on the Eastern seaboard. And, of course, there was Henry Ford.

All of that hatred went back nearly two thousand years, in a fairly non-stop stream.

It is probably fair to say that the Holocaust is what broke Western culture out of all of that. Today, being friendly with Jewish people and pro-Israel is, realistically, an amazing turnaround from where society was before the war. And that's largely in part to the sheer mass of the evil that was perpetuated.

If you can prove that the Holocaust wasn't real, and that the Jewish community faked it, that goes way beyond dirty tricks. It would be downright evil - which is, of course, what a white supremacist would expect from "the Jews".
  #4  
Old 11-21-2019, 03:52 AM
Broomstick's Avatar
Broomstick is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 29,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velocity View Post
Well, there is considerable overlap between anti-Semitism and white supremacism (why, I don't know - most Jews are white), so, something such as the Holocaust that boosts the cause of the Jews (in the PR sense) is obviously something white supremacists will object to.
I just want to point out that a non-trivial number of white supremacists/neo-Nazis/Holocaust deniers do not, in fact, consider Jews to be "white people" even if a large number of them have pale skin. I'm not sure how they arrive at that notion.
  #5  
Old 11-21-2019, 06:30 AM
Tim@T-Bonham.net is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 15,119
It's not limited to white supremacists. Here in Minneapolis, my Congressperson is a non-white, non-Christian woman, and she is a holocaust denier. Of the Armenian holocaust, at least, based on her recent vote on that.
  #6  
Old 11-21-2019, 07:19 AM
MrDibble's Avatar
MrDibble is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa &
Posts: 26,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim B. View Post
Why do they do it? It seems to be pretty universal for them, as I said. What is their point? And purpose, for that matter?
Because it really hurts the people who were affected. They're bullies, and they want to make their victims feel bad. There's no more intellectual justification than that needed, Bubbe's tears are the point for most of it.
  #7  
Old 11-21-2019, 08:46 AM
Jackmannii's Avatar
Jackmannii is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: the extreme center
Posts: 32,462
Holocaust denial = anti-Semitism.

White supremacists also characteristically deny that conditions were bad under slavery.

It's the nature of the beast.
  #8  
Old 11-21-2019, 09:23 AM
bump is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 18,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackmannii View Post
Holocaust denial = anti-Semitism.

White supremacists also characteristically deny that conditions were bad under slavery.

It's the nature of the beast.
Exactly. If you're a white supremacist, then it's hard to swallow that one of the most monumental episode of mass-murder and genocide in history was perpetrated by someone who in effect, was THE supreme white supremacist.

So you deny that it actually happened, and say it's all a conspiracy, because you know, you can't have your idol actually being a mass-murderer and genocidal lunatic, and you're personally not quite evil enough to think that the Holocaust was actually a good thing either.
  #9  
Old 11-21-2019, 09:37 AM
eschrodinger's Avatar
eschrodinger is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 284
A typical white supremacist belief is that Jews secretly run everything and have enormous power. The Holocaust certainly undermines that narrative, whereas Jews falsely concocting the Holocaust to manipulate people reinforces that narrative. Gross, but not too mysterious why they would believe it.

Last edited by eschrodinger; 11-21-2019 at 09:38 AM.
  #10  
Old 11-21-2019, 10:49 AM
ASL v2.0's Avatar
ASL v2.0 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Various
Posts: 658
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschrodinger View Post
A typical white supremacist belief is that Jews secretly run everything and have enormous power. The Holocaust certainly undermines that narrative, whereas Jews falsely concocting the Holocaust to manipulate people reinforces that narrative. Gross, but not too mysterious why they would believe it.
Thatís almost exactly what I was going to say. Itís not that they necessarily see the Holocaust as so heinous and beyond the pale and committed by "one of their *own" that they want to deny it, but that anything that paints white racists as being on top and Jews being the victims of systemic persecution by powerful governments completely undermines their hypothesis that the Jews run everything.

So, to have their fantasy of the Jews running everything, they have to put off (at least outwardly) belief in their other fantasy re: Jews, which is mass murder and persecution.

And yes, yes. I am aware there are white supremacists who insist they donít want to murder anyone, they just want to preserve the races as separate for... important historical and cultural reasons that are "totally not racist." But if murder should happen to be the unfortunate consequence of this sorting process, given our current mixed state, well... they just want to make sure whites aren't murdered. Just looking after their own, you know? "Totally not racist."

* And of course, some may disavow Hitler because he was an obvious loser who failed utterly to achieve his goals, and they canít deify someone like that, even if thatís basically the textbook white supremacist: a loser who will either mercifully (for the rest of us) fail or succeed just long enough to bring ruin to his or her country.
  #11  
Old 11-21-2019, 10:53 AM
kayaker's Avatar
kayaker is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rural Western PA
Posts: 33,286
White supremacists are, by and large, not good people, despite what the president may have said.
  #12  
Old 11-21-2019, 11:28 AM
Annie-Xmas is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 57,757
Yes, the thought that a straight, white, rich, Christian man might bring evil to the world is unthinkable for the white supremacists. And Trump did not call them "good," his very words were "very fine people."

Last edited by Annie-Xmas; 11-21-2019 at 11:29 AM.
  #13  
Old 11-21-2019, 11:43 AM
Ponderoid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Off the Deep End
Posts: 712
I'm sure one thing that goes into their moral calculus is that by having this big black mark against them in the historical record, they're less able to sway more people to their cause.
__________________
That's my post. Hope you liked it!
  #14  
Old 11-21-2019, 12:50 PM
Horatius is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 1,261
It's marketing. Absent the Holocaust, WWII is just another European War. The Nazis lost, but, hey, the Kaiser lost WWI, and no one today holds him up as the epitome of evil, right?

They're trying to reform the image of the Nazis, so they need to get rid of the one thing that everyone agrees put the Nazis beyond the pale.

So they can do it again.
__________________
Where am I going, and why am I in this handbasket?
  #15  
Old 11-21-2019, 01:00 PM
DPRK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 4,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by bump View Post
Exactly. If you're a white supremacist, then it's hard to swallow that one of the most monumental episode of mass-murder and genocide in history was perpetrated by someone who in effect, was THE supreme white supremacist.

So you deny that it actually happened, and say it's all a conspiracy, because you know, you can't have your idol actually being a mass-murderer and genocidal lunatic, and you're personally not quite evil enough to think that the Holocaust was actually a good thing either.
One would think that real Nazis are all about genocide and ethnic cleansing. They do not view it as a bad thing. There was once an interview on TV with a nice young man from the American Nazi Party who, when asked, were they in power, what his party's policy would be towards American Jews, politely explained that they would be "encouraged to leave, one way or another." He did not for a second hesitate or seem uncomfortable with the idea.
  #16  
Old 11-21-2019, 02:58 PM
nelliebly is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,050
It's a mistake to think of White Supremacy as only against people of color, though people of color have certainly suffered the worst of its violent contempt. White Supremacist groups like the KKK have always been against anybody who isn't white, Protestant, and native-born--though their hatred toward Catholics seems to have largely dissipated.
  #17  
Old 11-21-2019, 03:16 PM
Jragon's Avatar
Jragon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miskatonic University
Posts: 10,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broomstick View Post
I just want to point out that a non-trivial number of white supremacists/neo-Nazis/Holocaust deniers do not, in fact, consider Jews to be "white people" even if a large number of them have pale skin. I'm not sure how they arrive at that notion.
It's because whiteness is a constructed identity that essentially defines the "in-group" and "absence of race" and is only broadly correlates with skin color. Irish and Italian people were not considered "white" in America for a time, for instance, despite a lot of Irish people being pale as snow. Jews have sort of waxed and waned in "whiteness" over the years depending on the political climate. I'd say in the current climate Jews have become "less white" in that they're being separated out as more of a distinct ethnic group due to said White Supremacists having more of a platform, but maybe... 10 years ago were probably more on the "white" spectrum where most American Jewish people were treated more as a distinct white cultural group like the Dutch or French.

Last edited by Jragon; 11-21-2019 at 03:18 PM.
  #18  
Old 11-21-2019, 03:23 PM
Jragon's Avatar
Jragon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miskatonic University
Posts: 10,708
Also note that White Supremacy and White Fascism is essentially a death cult that progressively more narrowly defines "white" based on the predominant prevailing identities of the people in charge as they get more power. So they may even allow some "useful" POC when they're low on power to be in their sphere, but once they get power those get purged (either from the party/positions of power or literally in the sense of genocide or exile), and then Italians get purged, and then Irish People, and then... say... the Spanish, then the French etc etc until suddenly only Baltic people or German people or English people or someone who can prove they've never had any non-what-is-now-defined-as-white ancestry going back 5 centuries or whatever are "white". There's always an increasing standard of "purity" among white supremacist communities. This usually ends up extending to other marginalized people too, such as the disabled, or gay people or trans people.

Last edited by Jragon; 11-21-2019 at 03:25 PM.
  #19  
Old 11-21-2019, 03:38 PM
Nightfall1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 165
I think white supremacists admire Hitler and want other people to admire him too but when Hitler is the cause of killing six million Jews just because they were Jews that's a tough sell. That's insane. If they can convince people that the Holocaust never happened then Hitler is just another leader that ended up on the wrong side of a war.
  #20  
Old 11-21-2019, 03:45 PM
Jragon's Avatar
Jragon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miskatonic University
Posts: 10,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfall1 View Post
I think white supremacists admire Hitler and want other people to admire him too but when Hitler is the cause of killing six million Jews just because they were Jews that's a tough sell. That's insane. If they can convince people that the Holocaust never happened then Hitler is just another leader that ended up on the wrong side of a war.
I mean somewhat this, but it's more of a recruitment tool for white supremacy in general. The idea is to sell some knowledge or thing that makes people "more educated", but also makes white supremacy "less bad" or other things as "just a joke", as part of making them go to a deeper layer in the radicalization onion. After all, if the holocaust never happened then "gas the jews" is (or can be passed off as) just a joke about something people think happened but didn't. It helps people go deeper. When people are "nazi enough" whether the holocaust happened or not is really immaterial, and they honestly generally think it did. Even among most holocaust deniers you see in comments there's usually a very obvious thread of "the Holocaust didn't happen (but I wish it did)".

Not all Holocaust deniers outright deny it, though, either. A more common form of holocaust denial is what you may call "Holocaust minimization". That is "okay, sure, it happened, and that's awful and everything but the claims are grossly exaggerated it was maybe like a few hundred tops."
  #21  
Old 11-21-2019, 03:59 PM
MortSahlFan is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: US
Posts: 536
I wonder why the US Congress finally acknowledged the Armenian genocide. It took over 100 years!!!
  #22  
Old 11-21-2019, 04:25 PM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by DPRK View Post
One would think that real Nazis are all about genocide and ethnic cleansing. They do not view it as a bad thing. There was once an interview on TV with a nice young man from the American Nazi Party who, when asked, were they in power, what his party's policy would be towards American Jews, politely explained that they would be "encouraged to leave, one way or another." He did not for a second hesitate or seem uncomfortable with the idea.
I expect he would have hesitated for considerably more than a second to say, at any rate on public TV, "We're going to murder right off all the children and old people except for a few to do medical experiments on, keep some of the prettier young women alive so we can rape them, and work/starve the ablebodied adults to death."

Whether that particular individual wanted to do so I don't know -- though I bet he could have been gotten there if his party got enough of a chance -- but saying so in public tends to put off the people he needs to at least keep pacified in order to give his party a chance.

And pointing out that there's plenty of historical evidence that that's where letting Nazis get power winds up also tends to put people off Nazis. So yes, they're going to deny that historical evidence.


-- Sage Rat's also right about the change the Holocaust caused in general Western culture in attitudes toward Jews.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jragon View Post
Also note that White Supremacy and White Fascism is essentially a death cult that progressively more narrowly defines "white" based on the predominant prevailing identities of the people in charge as they get more power. So they may even allow some "useful" POC when they're low on power to be in their sphere, but once they get power those get purged (either from the party/positions of power or literally in the sense of genocide or exile), and then Italians get purged, and then Irish People, and then... say... the Spanish, then the French etc etc until suddenly only Baltic people or German people or English people or someone who can prove they've never had any non-what-is-now-defined-as-white ancestry going back 5 centuries or whatever are "white". There's always an increasing standard of "purity" among white supremacist communities. This usually ends up extending to other marginalized people too, such as the disabled, or gay people or trans people.
Yup. The problem -- well, one of the problems, and one often not brought out enough -- with groups who take and/or keep power by working up hatred against an out-group is that, in order to continue keeping power, they always have to have an out-group to demonize. Whenever whichever outgroup they started with isn't getting them enough traction, they have to move on to defining and attacking another one.

"Everybody's wrong but me and thee and thee's a little queer --"

(yes, I know that's not quite the quote.)
  #23  
Old 11-21-2019, 04:28 PM
ASL v2.0's Avatar
ASL v2.0 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Various
Posts: 658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jragon View Post
Not all Holocaust deniers outright deny it, though, either. A more common form of holocaust denial is what you may call "Holocaust minimization". That is "okay, sure, it happened, and that's awful and everything but the claims are grossly exaggerated it was maybe like a few hundred tops."
Sure, like, "Yes, a great many political dissidents, including Jews, were rounded up by Germany during WWII, in the same sense that Americans rounded up and interred the Japanese. As it happens, things didnít go we for Germany, and so conditions in the Germany internment campus were that much worse than in America, and through starvation and disease many people died. Yes, a few people were deliberately executed, but only in as much as they endorsed treason against the state. So itís not that Iím saying millions of people didnít die during WWIIóindeed, many diedóonly that the situation in Germany wasnít all that different than in the US, it was just a matter of much worse conditions. Itís a real shame the Soviet Union was so awful, though. I mean, what with their gulags and their purges, they killed even more than Germany, right? Those damn communists..."

Of course itís a crock, but a committed white supremacist doesnít really care about whatís true.
  #24  
Old 11-21-2019, 04:31 PM
MortSahlFan is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: US
Posts: 536
My older relative had a teacher who got fired for saying, "Communists, homosexuals, gypsies were rounded up and killed. Most happened to be Jewish.".. I asked for more about the guy, but he couldn't remember.

The next time I do another newspaper.com free trial, I'd like to look at these questions raised, but comparing the years. What were they saying in 1948, 1958, etc.
  #25  
Old 11-21-2019, 04:39 PM
RioRico is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: beyond cell service
Posts: 732
As mentioned, Anglo-American elites did not consider Irish and Italians as white. The press depicted Irish literally as apes - see ubiquitous 19th-century cartoons. White supremacists of Irish or Italian background are nuts.

I have no use for deniers of the Nazi holocaust. I only learned of my uncle's US Army unit's role in liberating death camps after he died, when we looked through his notes. He witnessed. Deniers are scum.

I'm puzzled by 2000 years of antisemitism based of biblical tales. Jewish Jesus was executed as a "bandit", a rebel leader, by Romans, not Jews. If Christians need to blame anyone, start with Italians.

Racial purity. That means inbreeding, right? Alsatian dogs suffer from hip displasia because of that. For the greatest purity, incest is indicated. Darwin, Poe, Einstein, Giuliani all married their cousins and are white, so there you have it.

Don't accommodate deniers or the next holocaust will be here.
  #26  
Old 11-21-2019, 04:45 PM
Tamerlane is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 13,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by MortSahlFan View Post
I wonder why the US Congress finally acknowledged the Armenian genocide. It took over 100 years!!!
Politics. Turkey was in NATO. The Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic was very much NOT. Real rapprochement did not begin until after 1991 when Armenia became independent and even then it was a far less important geopolitical entity to the U.S. than Turkey. Basically it took a good long while for relations with Turkey to sour to the point where political expediency was no longer the dominant issue.

Even at that it might not have happened if relations with Turkey had nose-dived so severely in the wake of the Syrian mess. Cynically, one might suggest the recognition was ultimately more political theater/punishment than a heartfelt belief finally acted on.

Last edited by Tamerlane; 11-21-2019 at 04:47 PM.
  #27  
Old 11-21-2019, 05:33 PM
Tim@T-Bonham.net is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 15,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by MortSahlFan View Post
I wonder why the US Congress finally acknowledged the Armenian genocide. It took over 100 years!!!
Congress did not. Only the House of Representatives did; the Senate has yet to act on the bill (And Moscow Mitch has indicated that he does not plan to bring it up for a vote.

Even the House took a long time; it was introduced 12 years ago, in 2007.
  #28  
Old 11-21-2019, 07:24 PM
str8cashhomie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by DPRK View Post
One would think that real Nazis are all about genocide and ethnic cleansing. They do not view it as a bad thing. There was once an interview on TV with a nice young man from the American Nazi Party who, when asked, were they in power, what his party's policy would be towards American Jews, politely explained that they would be "encouraged to leave, one way or another." He did not for a second hesitate or seem uncomfortable with the idea.
That is what neonazis privately think, but holocaust denial/minimization is a tool they use when speaking publicly. When the general public hears someone ostensibly just talking about the evidence and not being overtly hateful, it plants the seed in people's minds that the actual hateful ideas behind it are reasonable to consider and debate. A small proportion of those people will actually buy into some of the arguments and become useful idiots to further spread the message.
  #29  
Old 11-21-2019, 07:41 PM
Guinastasia's Avatar
Guinastasia is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 52,993
And there are still people who deny it out there, or at least, claim it wasn't an actual "genocide".

(I think it's illegal to refer to it in Turkey, isn't it?)
  #30  
Old 11-21-2019, 11:59 PM
DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 42,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim@T-Bonham.net View Post
It's not limited to white supremacists. Here in Minneapolis, my Congressperson is a non-white, non-Christian woman, and she is a holocaust denier. Of the Armenian holocaust, at least, based on her recent vote on that.
Well, that one is much more debatable. I mean, there was a war and the Armenians did side with the enemy, and what happened is less well known, not to mention it is hard to tell if the Government actually organized a planned systemic genocide. The Ottoman Empire was falling apart and massively corrupt and incompetent, so perhaps the "planned" part is questionable, as it's reasonable to doubt they could plan a birthday party, let alone a genocide.

Most experts consider it so, but it's somewhat debatable whereas the Nazi genocide is not.
  #31  
Old 11-22-2019, 12:07 AM
DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 42,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by MortSahlFan View Post
My older relative had a teacher who got fired for saying, "Communists, homosexuals, gypsies were rounded up and killed. Most happened to be Jewish.".. I asked for more about the guy, but he couldn't remember.
...
Well, that raises a point. If you say it wasnt six million Jews, it was more like three or four or five million- you could be called a denier.

I got called a denier by pointing out that yes, Communists, homosexuals, and gypsies were also killed off. So were "politicals", my Euro relatives were sent to Dachau where perhaps, they had it a tiny bit better than the Jews. But not much as when the Allies captured the camps, many Politicals were sent to Soviet Gulags.

So "denier" is waved around a bit too much.
  #32  
Old 11-22-2019, 12:18 AM
Velocity is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 15,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by MortSahlFan View Post
My older relative had a teacher who got fired for saying, "Communists, homosexuals, gypsies were rounded up and killed. Most happened to be Jewish.".. I asked for more about the guy, but he couldn't remember.
WTF. That's simply the truth. 6 million Holocaust victims were Jews, 6 million were other groups.
  #33  
Old 11-22-2019, 12:19 AM
Horatio Hellpop is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Jeju-si, S. Korea
Posts: 9,853
Prior to the public learning details about the Holocaust, anti-semitism was a lot more...I don't want to say it was "respectable," but it was a lot more mainstream, and could be again of the notion of a massive human atrocity could somehow be minimalized or denied.
  #34  
Old 11-22-2019, 12:23 AM
str8cashhomie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velocity View Post
WTF. That's simply the truth. 6 million Holocaust victims were Jews, 6 million were other groups.
I think the implication of "happened to be Jews" was that the Nazis weren't intentionally trying to mass murder Jews.
  #35  
Old 11-22-2019, 12:24 AM
DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 42,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velocity View Post
WTF. That's simply the truth. 6 million Holocaust victims were Jews, 6 million were other groups.
Yeah, sure. But what I was told, and called a "denier' is that "to mention anyone else but the Jews, who were the REAL targets of Nazi hatred, is to dilute the Holocaust" and thereby I was a "denier".
  #36  
Old 11-22-2019, 12:29 AM
str8cashhomie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
Well, that one is much more debatable. I mean, there was a war and the Armenians did side with the enemy, and what happened is less well known, not to mention it is hard to tell if the Government actually organized a planned systemic genocide. The Ottoman Empire was falling apart and massively corrupt and incompetent, so perhaps the "planned" part is questionable, as it's reasonable to doubt they could plan a birthday party, let alone a genocide.

Most experts consider it so, but it's somewhat debatable whereas the Nazi genocide is not.
It is very clearly supported by the historical record that the Ottomans orchestrated the Armenian genocide from the highest levels of government.

The Pashas (the 3 joint leaders of the Ottoman Empire at the time) admitted (or arguably bragged) as much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talat Pasha
Turkey is taking advantage of the war in order to thoroughly liquidate its internal foes, i.e., the indigenous Christians, without being thereby disturbed by foreign intervention. What on earth do you want? The question is settled. There are no more Armenians.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enver Pasha
The Ottoman Empire should be cleaned up of the Armenians and the Lebanese. We have destroyed the former by the sword, we shall destroy the latter through starvation.
Source: https://www.genocide1915.info/quotes/
  #37  
Old 11-22-2019, 12:52 AM
madsircool is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,869
And Hitler mentions the genocide of Armenians

https://www.armenian-genocide.org/hitler.html


Quote:
Our strength consists in our speed and in our brutality. Genghis Khan led millions of women and children to slaughter -- with premeditation and a happy heart. History sees in him solely the founder of a state. It's a matter of indifference to me what a weak western European civilization will say about me.

I have issued the command -- and I'll have anybody who utters but one word of criticism executed by a firing squad -- that our war aim does not consist in reaching certain lines, but in the physical destruction of the enemy. Accordingly, I have placed my death-head formations in readiness -- for the present only in the East -- with orders to them to send to death mercilessly and without compassion, men, women, and children of Polish derivation and language. Only thus shall we gain the living space (Lebensraum) which we need. Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?
  #38  
Old 11-22-2019, 02:22 AM
nelliebly is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,050
There are Holocaust deniers, and there are Holocaust minimizers

David Irving, the British writer of history books... is not so much an outright Holocaust denier as a Holocaust minimizer. He is convinced that no one was gassed at Auschwitz. He does not deny that many Jews died there, but claims this was mostly from disease. He also concedes that others were shot, in Poland and elsewhere, by overenthusiastic S.S. men, but he has argued that Hitler had nothing to do with this. So no gas, no plan by Hitler, thus no Holocaust. People who remember differently are, inI rving's peculiar phrase, "the Auschwitz Survivors, Survivors of the Holocaust, and Other LiarsóA.S.S.H.O.L.E.S."

Then there's Fred Leuchter, who claimed cyanide wasn't used in the camps to gas people but to delouse them. To "prove" this, he went to Auschwitz and other camps and surreptitiously chipped samples off walls, ceilings, and floors. Then he took them to a lab in Boston He didn't tell the lab the source of the chunk or his intentions. The lab found only traces of cyanide in the sample, which Leuchter then trumpeted as proof nobody was gassed at the camps. But cyanide only penetrates the depth of a human hair, and when the lab pulverized the samples, they diluted them. Too late: Leutner had already spread word of his "proof."

It's easy to convince people of the lies they want to believe but difficult to argue them out of those beliefs, no matter how strong the evidence.
  #39  
Old 11-22-2019, 02:25 AM
MrDibble's Avatar
MrDibble is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa &
Posts: 26,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
Well, that one is much more debatable.
No, it isn't.
Quote:
I mean, there was a war
You may have heard of a little thing called WWII?
Quote:
and the Armenians did side with the enemy
Like all those Polish and French and other enemy Jews, you mean?
Quote:
it is hard to tell if the Government actually organized a planned systemic genocide.
Other than by literally bragging about just that, you mean...

When your whole argument hinges around "weren't quite as efficient at planning their murder as the Nazis would later be", you may want to rethink your stance.

Anyway, a shittily-planned genocide is still a genocide, so still not debatable at all.
  #40  
Old 11-22-2019, 05:33 AM
Paul in Qatar is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 13,033
Holocaust deniers come in three flavors.

1) Nazis (Odd because you would think anyone who is a real Nazi would be cool with mass murder.)

2) Troublemakers (I recall a story of a denier who brought a Black lady as his date to a Holocaust denier dinner. Holocaust denier dinners seem to be a thing.)

3) Kids who simply are saying strange stuff because they are not too educated.
__________________
800-237-5055
Shrine Hospitals for Children (North America)
Never any fee
Do you know a child in need?
  #41  
Old 11-22-2019, 06:49 AM
MrDibble's Avatar
MrDibble is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa &
Posts: 26,919
There is also the anti-Israeli political flavour, like from various Middle East governments and movements like Hammas.

I imagine that flavour tastes like pistachio and crippling insecurity.
  #42  
Old 11-22-2019, 09:06 AM
Derleth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Missoula, Montana, USA
Posts: 21,350
It's a recruitment tool in another way:

If They are lying to you about this important piece of history, what else are They lying to you about? Why are They lying to you at all? Who is this They I'm talking about?

Secret knowledge is a big bait. It makes people feel important, knowing something most people don't. That's why Life Hacks spread so well, even the ones which are patently absurd if you ever actually tried them: They're little things I know that you don't, which puts me one up on you, innit? Well, imagine that, except for a big chunk of human history.

All of a sudden the whole damn world has been debunked. Up is down, black is white, and you have part of the biggest secret in the whole world. Some people will kill for stuff like that. Some people will die for it. People have died for it, if you consider cults to be one aspect of this: "I know the path to eternal happiness, and it happens to go through drinking poisoned soft drinks, possibly after mutilating my sexual organs."

Once you have someone hooked like that, you can feed them increasingly absurd shit which happens to line up with them continuing to follow you.
__________________
"Ridicule is the only weapon that can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them."
If you don't stop to analyze the snot spray, you are missing that which is best in life. - Miller
I'm not sure why this is, but I actually find this idea grosser than cannibalism. - Excalibre, after reading one of my surefire million-seller business plans.
  #43  
Old 11-22-2019, 10:24 AM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is offline
Champion Chili Chef
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 63,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
Yeah, sure. But what I was told, and called a "denier' is that "to mention anyone else but the Jews, who were the REAL targets of Nazi hatred, is to dilute the Holocaust" and thereby I was a "denier".
You were told that here?
By whom?
  #44  
Old 11-22-2019, 02:41 PM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by MortSahlFan View Post
My older relative had a teacher who got fired for saying, "Communists, homosexuals, gypsies were rounded up and killed. Most happened to be Jewish.".. I asked for more about the guy, but he couldn't remember.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velocity View Post
WTF. That's simply the truth. 6 million Holocaust victims were Jews, 6 million were other groups.
It isn't "simply the truth" that most communists, homosexuals, and Romani were Jewish.

MortSahlFan reads to me as describing an incident from quite a few years ago; and the teacher may well have thought of "communists, homosexuals, gypsies" as all being groups who most people at the time would deplore. The quote reads to me as the teacher meaning to denigrate Jews by saying that most of the members of denigrated groups were Jewish.

Even if that wasn't part of it, the statement as given clearly means to say that Jews weren't targeted solely for being Jews; which is nonsense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
Most experts consider it so, but it's somewhat debatable
No, it really isn't debatable. -- well, I suppose everything's debatable in some sense; but the Armenian genocide really shouldn't be. It doesn't have to be the same in every exact detail as what the Nazis did in WWII to count.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
I got called a denier by pointing out that yes, Communists, homosexuals, and gypsies were also killed off. So were "politicals", my Euro relatives were sent to Dachau where perhaps, they had it a tiny bit better than the Jews. But not much as when the Allies captured the camps, many Politicals were sent to Soviet Gulags.

So "denier" is waved around a bit too much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
Yeah, sure. But what I was told, and called a "denier' is that "to mention anyone else but the Jews, who were the REAL targets of Nazi hatred, is to dilute the Holocaust" and thereby I was a "denier".
I'd like some more context for that; because I've never run into anybody saying that. Of course Communists, homosexuals, Romani, political opponents, the differently abled, a lot of Polish Catholics, and members of some other groups were also targeted and murdered in the camps; that is indeed simple fact. Who called you a denier simply for saying so? (I don't mean name, necessarily, but general context: someone on these boards? a workmate? a family member? somebody at a party?) Was it an isolated incident, or have you had this happen often; and if you've had it happen repeatedly, was it always the same person, or the same context?

And I'd also like the context of your pointing it out; because, while I'm not saying you were doing so, there are some people who try to use that information to minimize or denigrate the impact on Jews. If the phrasing of your statement, or the context in which you brought it up, gave the impression that that was what you were trying to do, that could justifiably get you some pushback.
  #45  
Old 11-22-2019, 03:55 PM
Urbanredneck is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 7,954
How about all the people in Poland, Germany, and all over Europe that are living in homes and have property stolen from Jews. I read stories about Jews who did survive the camps, coming home and being killed when they tried to go back into their old homes.
  #46  
Old 11-22-2019, 06:10 PM
DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 42,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by thorny locust View Post
..
I'd like some more context for that; because I've never run into anybody saying that. Of course Communists, homosexuals, Romani, political opponents, the differently abled, a lot of Polish Catholics, and members of some other groups were also targeted and murdered in the camps; that is indeed simple fact.....
A friend who altho was a atheist was very proud of his Jewish Heritage. When I mentioned this on another MB some time ago, one poster said he agree I was a "denier" while several others said no.

But that term does get tossed around a lot.
  #47  
Old 11-22-2019, 06:34 PM
Lance Turbo is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 4,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim@T-Bonham.net View Post
It's not limited to white supremacists. Here in Minneapolis, my Congressperson is a non-white, non-Christian woman, and she is a holocaust denier. Of the Armenian holocaust, at least, based on her recent vote on that.
This is a bullshit smear of Congresswoman Omar. She put out a statement explaining her 'present' vote on the Armenian genocide resolution. It's extraordinarily misleading to suggest that the reason for her vote was denial that those events occurred.

Last edited by Lance Turbo; 11-22-2019 at 06:34 PM.
  #48  
Old 11-22-2019, 07:23 PM
thorny locust's Avatar
thorny locust is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,477
DrDeth, I wouldn't say that twice in a lifetime, the second time when you brought up the first incident, counts as "tossed around a lot"; at least, unless you're not just counting the cases you describe but also those in which it's being "tossed" accurately.

And I also asked for the context [ETA: and phrasing] in which you brought it up the first time. You don't have to answer, of course; but I can't really form an opinion without it.

Last edited by thorny locust; 11-22-2019 at 07:24 PM.
  #49  
Old 11-22-2019, 07:28 PM
Jragon's Avatar
Jragon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Miskatonic University
Posts: 10,708
Yeah there's a lot of contexts you can bring that information up, and a lot of contexts where it's a bad look. For instance going into a conversation about Jewish holocaust survivers and saying "you know, the Jews weren't the only group..." and pointing out in a different context that say, Romani people have a long history of discrimination in Europe including being killed by the Nazis. There's also, as mentioned, the Holocaust minimization tactic of insinuating that the Jews that were executed were executed because they were gay/communists/whatever.

I absolutely believe there's some high strung Jewish people somewhere who really believe you should never mention other affected groups, or someone who just had a bad day dealing with a denier flying off the handle when it wasn't warranted, but it's not, IME, common.

Last edited by Jragon; 11-22-2019 at 07:29 PM.
  #50  
Old 11-22-2019, 08:00 PM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is offline
Champion Chili Chef
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 63,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
A friend who altho was a atheist was very proud of his Jewish Heritage. When I mentioned this on another MB some time ago, one poster said he agree I was a "denier" while several others said no.

But that term does get tossed around a lot.
so...one anonymous poster on some unnamed message board some time ago.
With that much solid evidence I apologize for ever doubting you.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017