Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-19-2020, 05:19 PM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,061

NC Senator dumped stocks before the market crash


https://www.propublica.org/article/s...s-preparedness

He's not running for re-election in 2022
  #2  
Old 03-19-2020, 05:39 PM
muldoonthief's Avatar
muldoonthief is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 11,481
You buried the lede a bit - it was Richard Burr, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who was getting daily classified briefings on the status and progress of Covid 19 weeks before the big shutdowns started to happen.
  #3  
Old 03-19-2020, 05:59 PM
elucidator is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Further
Posts: 60,681
Foolishness. And an alarming lack of faith in The Donald, who is on the case. And did he really imagine that the all-important hospitality industry would be orphaned without aid? Or was he so dumb that he failed to invest in hotels with immediate proximity to golf courses?

Run for re-election? He should run for cover.
  #4  
Old 03-19-2020, 06:05 PM
ThelmaLou's Avatar
ThelmaLou is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Neither here nor there
Posts: 18,302
There's a Pit thread on this in case you want to say something rude.
  #5  
Old 03-19-2020, 06:11 PM
Sherrerd's Avatar
Sherrerd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,884
Burr's voice was recorded. And wouldn't you know it,

Quote:
... in his public comments about the threat of COVID-19, Burr never offered the kind of precise warning that he delivered to the small group of his constituents. ...despite his longtime interest in biohazard threats, his expertise on the subject, and his role as chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Burr did not warn the public of the government actions he thought might become necessary, as he did at the luncheon on Feb. 27.
https://www.npr.org/2020/03/19/81819...ts-on-covid-19
  #6  
Old 03-19-2020, 06:42 PM
dalej42 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,465
Before people salivate, it’s not a Dem pickup, NC has to appoint a same party replacement. Most likely it’ll be a placeholder that has no intent to run in 2022. I’d suggest Elizabeth Dole, but she’s too old.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #7  
Old 03-19-2020, 07:02 PM
elucidator is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Further
Posts: 60,681
"Salivate"? Why does that ring a bell?
  #8  
Old 03-19-2020, 07:56 PM
jasg is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Upper left hand corner
Posts: 6,329
I wonder if the money he saved by selling early will be enough to offset his legal costs?
  #9  
Old 03-19-2020, 09:01 PM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,061
I wonder how much the Trump family dumped?
  #10  
Old 03-20-2020, 12:31 AM
SlackerInc's Avatar
SlackerInc is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Minnesota
Posts: 13,479
A real sleazebag, but it shows that more broadly, government officials should not be able to buy and sell stocks outside of some kind of defined monthly contribution to an index fund. Even if you're not as scummy as Burr, the temptation to act would be high if you knew you might be facing financial ruin.
__________________
SlackerInc on Twitter: http://twitter.com/slackerinc
  #11  
Old 03-20-2020, 12:44 AM
RioRico is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: beyond cell service
Posts: 3,193
Insider trading is a capital offense in some places. Maybe not directly, but tragic suicides occur, alas. Are US Senators routinely frisked or run through metal detectors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bijou Drains View Post
I wonder how much the Trump family dumped?
Not enough to pay back their Russian owners, apparently.

Last edited by RioRico; 03-20-2020 at 12:46 AM.
  #12  
Old 03-20-2020, 12:54 AM
RioRico is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: beyond cell service
Posts: 3,193
timeout dupe

Last edited by RioRico; 03-20-2020 at 12:54 AM.
  #13  
Old 03-20-2020, 06:31 AM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,061
Sen. Kelly Loeffler from Georgia also dumped a lot of stock
  #14  
Old 03-20-2020, 06:53 AM
Jonathan Chance is offline
Domo Arigato Mister Moderato
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: On the run with Kilroy
Posts: 23,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalej42 View Post
Before people salivate, itís not a Dem pickup, NC has to appoint a same party replacement. Most likely itíll be a placeholder that has no intent to run in 2022. Iíd suggest Elizabeth Dole, but sheís too old.
You're assuming facts not in evidence. Do you think he'll resign and be prosecuted?
  #15  
Old 03-20-2020, 08:02 AM
Icarus's Avatar
Icarus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In front of my PC, y tu?
Posts: 5,707
And to show that it's not only GOP senators who do this, Dianne Feinstein is also listed as selling off stock.

The whole lot of them should resign.
__________________
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.
- C. Darwin
  #16  
Old 03-20-2020, 08:08 AM
Ravenman is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 28,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icarus View Post
And to show that it's not only GOP senators who do this, Dianne Feinstein is also listed as selling off stock.
New articles report that three senators sold stocks before the crash: Feinstein, Loeffler, and Burr. Feinstein and Leoffler say that their assets are held in blind trusts, so an investment manager makes decisions without consulting them. I think without further evidence that they somehow violated the blind trust, it probably isnít fair to criticized them personally for selling assets, when they likely had no idea what was going on.

Notably, Burr does not seem to be claiming that his assets were in a blind trust.

In the immortal words of Rick Perry, ďOops.Ē
  #17  
Old 03-20-2020, 08:17 AM
Fiveyearlurker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenman View Post
New articles report that three senators sold stocks before the crash: Feinstein, Loeffler, and Burr. Feinstein and Leoffler say that their assets are held in blind trusts, so an investment manager makes decisions without consulting them. I think without further evidence that they somehow violated the blind trust, it probably isnít fair to criticized them personally for selling assets, when they likely had no idea what was going on.
Loeffler is gonna need a better explanation for buying stock in Citrix while simultaneously dumping her other stock. Until she provides that, the most likely explanation is that she was involved in those decisions.
  #18  
Old 03-20-2020, 08:27 AM
Monocracy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 623
Anyone could have sold stock before the market crash. It wasn't like COVID19 was some big secret that only Senators knew about. Unless they were dealing with some inside information, or purposefully legislated to make the plague outcome worse, I don't see where the problem is.
  #19  
Old 03-20-2020, 08:29 AM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 64,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icarus View Post
And to show that it's not only GOP senators who do this, Dianne Feinstein is also listed as selling off stock.

The whole lot of them should resign.
About that stock that Feinstein's husband sold off: Barrons reports that it was her husband that sold off biotech stock.
Quote:
Sen. Dianne Feinstein disclosed that her husband, Richard C. Blum, sold a biotech stock in January, when it was trading near its 2020 intraday lows.
Blum, the founder and head of investment firm Blum Capital Partners, sold $500,001 to $1 million in Allogene Therapeutics stock (ticker: ALLO) on Jan. 31, according to a form the senator filed with the Secretary of the Senate. Specific values arenít required for disclosure, only ranges.
. Biotech stock is something one would want to invest in if one thought a pandemic was possible, but
Quote:
The day that Blum sold Allogene stock, shares of the cancer researcher traded for as low as $21.28, just above the current 2020 intraday low of $21.25, which was set the next trading day, Feb. 1. Since then, however, Allogene stock has been rising, closing Friday at $27.00 for a year-to-date gain of 3.9%, while the S&P 500 index, a proxy for the broader market, has fallen 8.6%. Last year, Allogene stock slipped 3.5% while the S&P 500 rose 28.9%.
If this was "insider trading", it was the worst in history.
  #20  
Old 03-20-2020, 08:30 AM
Fiveyearlurker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monocracy View Post
Anyone could have sold stock before the market crash. It wasn't like COVID19 was some big secret that only Senators knew about. Unless they were dealing with some inside information, or purposefully legislated to make the plague outcome worse, I don't see where the problem is.
"As the head of the intelligence committee, Burr, a North Carolina Republican, has access to the government’s most highly classified information about threats to America’s security. His committee was receiving daily coronavirus briefings around this time, according to a Reuters story."

"Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) reported the first sale of stock jointly owned by her and her husband on Jan. 24, the very day that her committee, the Senate Health Committee, hosted a private, all-senators briefing from administration officials, including the CDC director and Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, on the coronavirus. "

Last edited by Fiveyearlurker; 03-20-2020 at 08:31 AM.
  #21  
Old 03-20-2020, 09:23 AM
Horatius is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 1,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monocracy View Post
Anyone could have sold stock before the market crash. It wasn't like COVID19 was some big secret that only Senators knew about. Unless they were dealing with some inside information, or purposefully legislated to make the plague outcome worse, I don't see where the problem is.


It's not just that he sold stocks. He also used his public position to publicly down-play the seriousness of the crisis, at a time we know, now, for a fact, that he knew it was much more serious. That's clearly an attempt to manipulate the market - deny the public good information long enough for him to get his money out, and screw everyone else. He abused his public trust to enrich himself.

Flogging's too good for this rat bastard.
__________________
Where am I going, and why am I in this handbasket?
  #22  
Old 03-20-2020, 10:06 AM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,061
Burr claims he only used public information to sell. I think there is no way to prove or disprove that .
  #23  
Old 03-20-2020, 10:50 AM
Do Not Taunt is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalej42 View Post
Before people salivate, itís not a Dem pickup, NC has to appoint a same party replacement. Most likely itíll be a placeholder that has no intent to run in 2022. Iíd suggest Elizabeth Dole, but sheís too old.
Would there be a special election in November, assuming a resignation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bijou Drains View Post
Burr claims he only used public information to sell. I think there is no way to prove or disprove that .
Oh, man - that's smart! I don't know why no one else in the history of insider trading has ever thought of that defense!
  #24  
Old 03-20-2020, 10:53 AM
Mundane Super Hero is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 385
[DiplomacyFilterAtMax]This seems to qualify as an Ethics violation... [/DiplomacyFilterAtMax]
  #25  
Old 03-20-2020, 10:53 AM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,061
Yes there would be a special election on Nov. if Burr quits now. Which means both NC Senate seats would be on the ballot. The other one is incumbent Tillis (R) vs. Cal Cunnigham who won the Dem primary super Tues
  #26  
Old 03-20-2020, 10:58 AM
Do Not Taunt is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bijou Drains View Post
Yes there would be a special election on Nov. if Burr quits now. Which means both NC Senate seats would be on the ballot. The other one is incumbent Tillis (R) vs. Cal Cunnigham who won the Dem primary super Tues
Do you know what the cutoff is? When would Burr have to resign / his successor take office by in order to trigger a special election in the fall? I don't know how the D bench is looking in NC these days, but I think they'd have to have a shot there.
  #27  
Old 03-20-2020, 11:31 AM
Left Hand of Dorkness's Avatar
Left Hand of Dorkness is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: at the right hand of cool
Posts: 42,801
Tom Tillis, our other (endangered) Republican senator, has called for Burr to give a full accounting. He is not planning to join his colleague under the bus.

Whether or not he's committed insider trading, though, it looks like he purposefully deceived the public about whether the US was fully prepared for this crisis. That is, in my mind, a far greater evil.
  #28  
Old 03-20-2020, 11:36 AM
Falchion is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenman View Post
New articles report that three senators sold stocks before the crash: Feinstein, Loeffler, and Burr. Feinstein and Leoffler say that their assets are held in blind trusts, so an investment manager makes decisions without consulting them. I think without further evidence that they somehow violated the blind trust, it probably isnít fair to criticized them personally for selling assets, when they likely had no idea what was going on.
As I understand it, Loeffler claims that her (and her husband's) investments are in a blind trust and the decision is made without their knowledge (specifically neither of their knowledge).

Feinstein is saying that her assets are in a blind trust, but that the investment decisions at issue were made by her husband without her input. So, I think, a significant portion of Feinstein's sales were intentionally made by her husband (whatever the implications of that).

Inhofe (who was also implicated, although at a much smaller scale than the others, I think -- $400k vs. Feinstein's $6 million) claims that the sales were part of an ongoing effort (since late 2018) to move all of his assets from stocks into mutual funds and he has no knowledge of any of the details of the transactions.

I don't think it would be unreasonable to make Loeffler and Inhofe "prove" their lack of control (although I don't know how you would do that).

Burr does not appear to have any real explanation (or excuse).

Last edited by Falchion; 03-20-2020 at 11:38 AM.
  #29  
Old 03-20-2020, 11:44 AM
Little Nemo is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Western New York
Posts: 86,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Left Hand of Dorkness View Post
Tom Tillis, our other (endangered) Republican senator, has called for Burr to give a full accounting. He is not planning to join his colleague under the bus.
He's probably pissed that he didn't get tipped off.
  #30  
Old 03-20-2020, 11:56 AM
Left Hand of Dorkness's Avatar
Left Hand of Dorkness is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: at the right hand of cool
Posts: 42,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falchion View Post
I don't think it would be unreasonable to make Loeffler and Inhofe "prove" their lack of control (although I don't know how you would do that).
Agreed, and I think the same would apply to Feinstein. As for how you'd prove it, I'd like the senators and their financial advisors/brokers to face law enforcement interviews about the details of any sales and any conversations they had with one another prior to those sales. If there are disparities, widen the investigation.
  #31  
Old 03-20-2020, 12:01 PM
Fiveyearlurker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bijou Drains View Post
Burr claims he only used public information to sell. I think there is no way to prove or disprove that .
I had inside information but it did not impact my decision and I just happened to do act in a manner consistent with the inside information and not the information that I was publicly espousing is not a tenable position to hold.
  #32  
Old 03-20-2020, 02:10 PM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,474
Someone needs to explain to Burr how insider trading works.

Let's say at 10 AM you read an article that has financial tips and decide to sell a stock based on that, but you don’t have time to call your broker because you have a 10:30 meeting you need to get to. You sit in the meeting and you learn about an impending pandemic that isn’t available to the public, and you need to start planning for the possibility of massive disruption. At noon you call your broker and sell your stock. It doesn’t matter that you had made the financial decision prior to learning insider info, and that the info didn’t influence the action you later took. It looks like it did, it’s even plausible that it did. As a result, you look guilty as hell and unless someone can read your mind you have no way to prove you weren’t. The prudent thing would have been to not act at all.

It’s the same reason judges recuse themselves from certain cases. Not because they can’t be fair in their judgement but they have no way to prove that whatever potential bias they have didn’t factor into the decision. All conflict of interest rules are based on that fact; it’s not whether or not you are guilty, but the appearance of guilt and inability to prove innocence will lead you to be treated as if you’re guilty.

I work in the public sector and that kind of thing is drilled into us. You’d think someone at his level would have this down.
  #33  
Old 03-20-2020, 04:03 PM
Mangosteen is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Namche Bazaar
Posts: 2,773
I thought all "Insider Trading" is legal for all Congressional Representatives, the President and Federal Judges.
__________________
Its only funny until someone gets hurt, then its fuckin' hilarious!
  #34  
Old 03-20-2020, 04:06 PM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,061
the real golden rule , he who has the gold makes the rules
  #35  
Old 03-20-2020, 04:18 PM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mangosteen View Post
I thought all "Insider Trading" is legal for all Congressional Representatives, the President and Federal Judges.
STOCK Act (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge)
It hasnít been legal since 2012. By the way, the law passed the Senate 96-3 and Burr was one of the three who voted against it.

Last edited by Atamasama; 03-20-2020 at 04:20 PM.
  #36  
Old 03-20-2020, 04:58 PM
OttoDaFe's Avatar
OttoDaFe is offline
Sluice Gate Tender, FCD #3
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Soviet of Washington
Posts: 2,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atamasama View Post
STOCK Act (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge)
It hasnít been legal since 2012. By the way, the law passed the Senate 96-3 and Burr was one of the three who voted against it.
Well, there you go: he voted against it, therefore it doesn't apply to him. QED.

Anyway, what about Benghazi?
  #37  
Old 03-20-2020, 04:58 PM
SlackerInc's Avatar
SlackerInc is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Minnesota
Posts: 13,479
Mike Pesca, whom I tend to trust, is saying he didn't have any confidential administration. But he has studied these issues closely, so he would be able to judge the danger more readily than your average bear.
__________________
SlackerInc on Twitter: http://twitter.com/slackerinc
  #38  
Old 03-20-2020, 05:30 PM
Fiveyearlurker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by OttoDaFe View Post
Well, there you go: he voted against it, therefore it doesn't apply to him. QED.

Anyway, what about Benghazi?
How are we not calling this "Burrisma"?
  #39  
Old 03-20-2020, 05:31 PM
Aspenglow's Avatar
Aspenglow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,915
I think Richard Burr is as corrupt a Republican as any of the rest of them, but when Tucker Carlson starts eagerly calling for a fellow dirt bag's head on a platter, I can't help but drift into Ulterior Motive territory.

Then I remembered that behind the scenes Burr, as the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has resisted opening another investigation into Hunter Biden, telling his fellow Republicans that to do so is to play right into Putin's hands.

Burr should be investigated, youbet. But perhaps calling for his resignation at this point may be premature. If you're a realpolitik Democrat, that is.
  #40  
Old 03-20-2020, 06:14 PM
Sherrerd's Avatar
Sherrerd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiveyearlurker View Post
How are we not calling this "Burrisma"?
#Burrisma has been getting a lot of play on Twitter, today.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Left Hand of Dorkness View Post
...Whether or not he's committed insider trading, though, it looks like he purposefully deceived the public about whether the US was fully prepared for this crisis. That is, in my mind, a far greater evil.
There you go. Silently cashing in would have been deplorable. But deliberately misleading the public to facilitate gain: Censure would fall short of what's called for, here. Expulsion then indictment sounds more reasonable.
  #41  
Old 03-20-2020, 10:46 PM
Ann Hedonia's Avatar
Ann Hedonia is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspenglow View Post
I think Richard Burr is as corrupt a Republican as any of the rest of them, but when Tucker Carlson starts eagerly calling for a fellow dirt bag's head on a platter, I can't help but drift into Ulterior Motive territory.

Then I remembered that behind the scenes Burr, as the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has resisted opening another investigation into Hunter Biden, telling his fellow Republicans that to do so is to play right into Putin's hands.

Burr should be investigated, youbet. But perhaps calling for his resignation at this point may be premature. If you're a realpolitik Democrat, that is.
Maybe. But Carlson is an outlier on economic policy within the Fox universe - he’s a populist, he believes in economic regulation and he’s praised Elizabeth Warren’s economic policies.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/05/polit...ism/index.html

He’s still a nasty racist asshole, but he does manage to be right about of a couple of things.

Last edited by Ann Hedonia; 03-20-2020 at 10:46 PM.
  #42  
Old 03-21-2020, 12:12 AM
RioRico is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: beyond cell service
Posts: 3,193
We have a simple, traditional way to adjudge Sen Burr's probity. Bind him and toss him in a pond. If innocent, he sinks. If guilty, he floats and can be pitchforked. Easy-peasy.
  #43  
Old 03-21-2020, 06:51 AM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,061
I bet NC GOP is probably already thinking of who they might pick if he decides to quit.
  #44  
Old 03-21-2020, 06:22 PM
Damuri Ajashi is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 21,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlackerInc View Post
A real sleazebag, but it shows that more broadly, government officials should not be able to buy and sell stocks outside of some kind of defined monthly contribution to an index fund. Even if you're not as scummy as Burr, the temptation to act would be high if you knew you might be facing financial ruin.
You would have to compensate government official a lot better to impose that sort of restriction on them. I know some people who have to file financial disclosures on a quarterly basis and they steadfastly avoid buying individual stocks particularly in industries that has dealing with their agency but how do you prevent them from selling their S&P 500 mutual fund and investing in bond funds when they see reports of how virulent COVID19 is?
  #45  
Old 03-21-2020, 06:42 PM
CarnalK's Avatar
CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 20,110
You require blind trusts for elected officials?
  #46  
Old 03-21-2020, 06:52 PM
iiandyiiii's Avatar
iiandyiiii is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 37,846
I don't think blind trusts are necessary, but there should be extremely robust laws banning this kind of insider-knowledge trading, with examples made of any public officials who violate it.
  #47  
Old 03-21-2020, 07:18 PM
Whack-a-Mole's Avatar
Whack-a-Mole is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 21,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by iiandyiiii View Post
I don't think blind trusts are necessary, but there should be extremely robust laws banning this kind of insider-knowledge trading, with examples made of any public officials who violate it.
You mean like the STOCK Act?

Quote:
The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act (Pub.L. 112Ė105, S. 2038, 126 Stat. 291, enacted April 4, 2012) is an Act of Congress designed to combat insider trading. It was signed into law by President Barack Obama on April 4, 2012. The bill prohibits the use of non-public information for private profit, including insider trading by members of Congress and other government employees. It confirms changes to the Commodity Exchange Act, specifies reporting intervals for financial transactions.

SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STOCK_Act
The problem is not that we do not have laws that cover this. The problem is the people who need to prosecute such people won't do it. I do not know if such a case would originate at the SEC or with William Barr's office but neither is likely to even start looking at this. Hell, Barr is more likely to pat him on the back and give him an "attaboy."
__________________
"I did not mean that Conservatives are generally stupid; I meant, that stupid persons are generally Conservative. I believe that to be so obvious and undeniable a fact that I hardly think any hon. Gentleman will question it." ~John Stuart Mill
  #48  
Old 03-21-2020, 08:13 PM
OttoDaFe's Avatar
OttoDaFe is offline
Sluice Gate Tender, FCD #3
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Soviet of Washington
Posts: 2,976
If Barr were to pursue any prosecution it would probably be because he wasn't cut in for a piece of the action.
  #49  
Old 03-22-2020, 07:56 AM
MikeF is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by elucidator View Post
"Salivate"? Why does that ring a bell?
Excellent!
  #50  
Old 03-22-2020, 05:58 PM
Sherrerd's Avatar
Sherrerd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by OttoDaFe View Post
If Barr were to pursue any prosecution it would probably be because he wasn't cut in for a piece of the action.
Maybe, or it could be because he's too busy:

Quote:
The Department of Justice is using the coronavirus outbreak to ask Congress for sweeping emergency powers including suspending habeas corpus during an emergency, a power grab that was denounced by civil liberties advocates.

... "You could be arrested and never brought before a judge until they decide that the emergency or the civil disobedience is over. I find it absolutely terrifying," National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers executive director Norman L. Reimer told Swan. "Especially in a time of emergency, we should be very careful about granting new powers to the government."
https://www.commondreams.org/news/20...ergency-powers
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017