Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2020, 11:16 PM
Velocity is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 17,457

What's Bernie's remaining realistic path to the nomination?


Bernie was dealt a harsh blow on Tuesday, no doubt. Do the remaining states (yet to vote) in this race favor him or Joe?

The superdelegates sure won't be on Bernie's side should it come to a second ballot, so he can only get the nomination via direct first-ballot victory. Looks like he can only win if Warren drops out pronto, and Joe suddenly has some gaffes of a worse-than-usual nature, and Bernie somehow successfully jolts the youth into actually showing up to vote.
  #2  
Old 03-04-2020, 11:20 PM
Gatopescado is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: on your last raw nerve
Posts: 23,720
None.
  #3  
Old 03-05-2020, 12:22 AM
DSeid's Avatar
DSeid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 23,964
Somehow kicking butt next week, especially in Michigan.

Michigan is one of the must win states in the general and a surprising big Sanders win there, especially one that comes with a large young Black voter turnout for him, would change the narrative. With that narrative maybe then pulling out Florida and Ohio. Then he has an argument to make if it is no one with a majority and him close to Biden.

A narrow win in Michigan wouldn't do it.

Not impossible. Maybe not probable ...

Last edited by DSeid; 03-05-2020 at 12:22 AM.
  #4  
Old 03-05-2020, 12:22 AM
Chisquirrel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2,999
Get his supporters off of Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter and into the voting booths.

He has significant leads in every demographic under 45, which combine to over 55% of the electorate. Unfortunately for Sanders, those same demographics are showing up at less than half the rate of Biden's supporters. If they actually SHOW UP, he has an uphill, but viable, path. If they continue to sit at home and rage at the unfairness of other people voicing their opinion, then he losing yet again to a "milquetoast Republican-lite".
  #5  
Old 03-05-2020, 01:18 AM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSeid View Post
Somehow kicking butt next week, especially in Michigan.

Michigan is one of the must win states in the general and a surprising big Sanders win there, especially one that comes with a large young Black voter turnout for him, would change the narrative. With that narrative maybe then pulling out Florida and Ohio. Then he has an argument to make if it is no one with a majority and him close to Biden.

A narrow win in Michigan wouldn't do it.

Not impossible. Maybe not probable ...
Bernie is dead in Florida with doubling down on Castro.

Amy and Pete people are heading to Michigan to help Biden.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #6  
Old 03-05-2020, 02:37 AM
Little Nemo is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Western New York
Posts: 86,116
There would have to be a major shift for him to regain his momentum.

I agree that his best chance is to get out there and show that he can get young people to show up and vote. If he shows he can deliver a sizable youth vote at the polls, he has a shot at getting back into this.
  #7  
Old 03-05-2020, 04:21 AM
iiandyiiii's Avatar
iiandyiiii is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 37,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chisquirrel View Post
Get his supporters off of Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter and into the voting booths.

He has significant leads in every demographic under 45, which combine to over 55% of the electorate. Unfortunately for Sanders, those same demographics are showing up at less than half the rate of Biden's supporters. If they actually SHOW UP, he has an uphill, but viable, path. If they continue to sit at home and rage at the unfairness of other people voicing their opinion, then he losing yet again to a "milquetoast Republican-lite".
Basically this. A very tall task, but possible.
  #8  
Old 03-05-2020, 06:58 AM
BobLibDem is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home 07 NCAA HockeyChamps
Posts: 22,337
I don't see a path for him. With proportional delegate allocation, it's really hard to cut into someone's lead. Personally, I think his win in Michigan in 2016 was a fluke and Biden will actually carry this state (he's got one vote from me here). Even if he wins say 50-30 with the rest scattered, that doesn't translate into a delegate sweep. Biden can make that back in spades with a huge win in Georgia which he will definitely get. Add to that LA, MS, PA, DE, NJ, and likely NY. We've seen a remarkable turnaround in the past week, and barring another one this week I think the race is over.
  #9  
Old 03-05-2020, 07:22 AM
QuickSilver's Avatar
QuickSilver is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,244
While I do not see a path for Sanders, I am ever so slightly rueful about the fact that it won't be Sanders on the debate stage against Trump. I don't think Biden will be able to express the level of scathing contempt that Bernie can pull off. Biden is simply not in the same league as a debater. But, I hold fast to the dream in which Joe punches Trump right in the mouth, FTW.
__________________
St. QuickSilver: Patron Saint of Thermometers.
  #10  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:00 AM
Northern Piper is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: At home, hunkered.
Posts: 31,041
Every politician has their own strengths.
__________________
My great-grandparents came through emigrating to a new country.
My grandparents came through the Great War and the Great Depression.
My parents came through the Great Depression and World War II.
We will come through this pandemic. Hang on tight to the ones you love.
  #11  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:00 AM
CarnalK's Avatar
CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 20,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobLibDem View Post
I don't see a path for him. With proportional delegate allocation, it's really hard to cut into someone's lead.
Should be cautious though. We really don't know what Biden's lead is at the moment. California still can change.
  #12  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:08 AM
BrotherCadfael is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 10,513
Chicago '68-style riots at the convention. It would kill any chance at winning the election, but it might get him the nom.
  #13  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:11 AM
Steve MB is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 13,646
The two paths are:

1. The arrival of the Millennium on the hooves of Space Unicorns, or

2. Young people actually showing up to vote at rates at least equal to their elders.

Experience suggests that Door #1 is the more realistic possibility.
__________________
The Internet: Nobody knows if you're a dog. Everybody knows if you're a jackass.
  #14  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:14 AM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,833

What's Bernie's remaining realistic path to the nomination?


I think he should show up at the convention, act insane and say "I'm not going to be ignored' like Glenn Close did in fatal attraction.

Sanders is currently trailing Biden by 67 delegates, 582 vs 515. There are still a lot of outstanding delegates in states Sanders won like CO, CA, UT. TX is mostly a wash, TN & NC have a few Biden delgates outstanding too.

But again, I know there have been predictions but the delegate lead will likely narrow as more ballots are counted. There are 189 outstanding delegates in states Sanders won like CA, UT & CO; 26 outstanding in states Biden won, 33 in Texas (which was pretty much a tie), and 13 in overseas democrats.

It really depends on how Sanders does in industrial midwest and northeast states. The big delegates are in IL, OH, NY, MI. Not sure how he will do in those.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion
  #15  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:22 AM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,833
Missed the edit window:

Also supposedly Warren is in talks with Sanders to try to unite their campaigns. Not sure if she will succeed or if her voters will go to Sanders, but if they do that'll help Sanders narrow the gap even more.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion
  #16  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:23 AM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,013
probably he has to have Biden get very sick or have a major screw up
  #17  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:47 AM
Happy Lendervedder's Avatar
Happy Lendervedder is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Clark View Post
I think he should show up at the convention, act insane and say "I'm not going to be ignored' like Glenn Close did in fatal attraction.

Sanders is currently trailing Biden by 67 delegates, 582 vs 515. There are still a lot of outstanding delegates in states Sanders won like CO, CA, UT. TX is mostly a wash, TN & NC have a few Biden delgates outstanding too.

But again, I know there have been predictions but the delegate lead will likely narrow as more ballots are counted. There are 189 outstanding delegates in states Sanders won like CA, UT & CO; 26 outstanding in states Biden won, 33 in Texas (which was pretty much a tie), and 13 in overseas democrats.

It really depends on how Sanders does in industrial midwest and northeast states. The big delegates are in IL, OH, NY, MI. Not sure how he will do in those.
You keep saying Texas was pretty much a tie, but Biden won Texas by 5 points. That's a solid win, especially when a majority of polls in the past month showed Bernie winning there.
  #18  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:58 AM
ShadowFacts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,285
Well, let's look at the upcoming primary calendar with number of delegates at stake in parentheses, not including superdelegates):

March 10
Idaho (20)
Michigan (125)
Mississippi (36)
Missouri (68)
North Dakota (14)
Washington (89)

Looking at that list and based on the general pattern that Sanders is stronger in the West and Biden in the South, then that's not a terrible crop of states for Sanders IF he pulls off a good victory in Michigan. IF that happens, you could see him win MI, ID, ND and WA. 4/6 and the big prize could give him some momentum and change the narrative. If MI is essentially a draw, that generally probably helps slightly further the current Biden narrative. Biden wins MI decisively, things begin to look very dicey for Sanders.


March 14
Northern Mariana

I think we can agree this will have no big effect.

March 17
Arizona (67)
Florida (219)
Illinois (155)
Ohio (136)

Based on current polling, this is likely a much worse crop of states for Sanders and they are big ones. Unless he can win MI and get some momentum as I mentioned earlier, these states seem like very favorable for Biden and could be where he lands the knockout punch. But maybe a Warren endorsement solidifies a Sanders lead in Illinois and puts Ohio into play? That could even the delegate count out.

The race has changed quickly several times, so I don't think any scenario is out of bounds at this point. I would not count Sanders out yet.
  #19  
Old 03-05-2020, 08:59 AM
BobLibDem is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home 07 NCAA HockeyChamps
Posts: 22,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
Should be cautious though. We really don't know what Biden's lead is at the moment. California still can change.
Indeed. I've been following the NPR Delegate Tracker pretty closely. At the moment they have Biden up 595-528 with 144 California delegates unallocated. Biden's lead could certainly shrink to nearly nothing, but the map becomes a lot unfriendlier to Bernie in the weeks ahead. MI and WA may be his best chances among sizeable states, but I don't see a blowout for him anywhere with huge delegate hauls. On the other hand, I can totally see Biden running up the score in PA, GA, FL, MD, NJ, and a few others.
  #20  
Old 03-05-2020, 09:03 AM
DCnDC's Avatar
DCnDC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Dueling Grounds
Posts: 13,749
Biden suddenly dying.
  #21  
Old 03-05-2020, 09:04 AM
Fotheringay-Phipps is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 12,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chisquirrel View Post
Get his supporters off of Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter and into the voting booths.

He has significant leads in every demographic under 45, which combine to over 55% of the electorate. Unfortunately for Sanders, those same demographics are showing up at less than half the rate of Biden's supporters. If they actually SHOW UP, he has an uphill, but viable, path. If they continue to sit at home and rage at the unfairness of other people voicing their opinion, then he losing yet again to a "milquetoast Republican-lite".
I would quibble with the notion that increased youth turnout necessarily helps Sanders.

This is because I also quibble with the (widely-expressed) notion that Sanders supporters attend his rallies and post support for him on social media and then don't bother to vote. (I'm sure there are such people but not enough to be a major factor.) I think the people who attend the rallies and post on social media do vote, but these people are a small -though very visible - minority of the population even in that age group, and the vast majority don't do these things. What's driving low youth-voter turnout is that the non-rally-attending young people vote at much lower levels than non-rally attending people in older age groups.

IOW, the cohort of young people is more dichotomous than older people in this regard. There are more passionate fervent political junkies and also more apolitical people.

But here's the thing, as applied to Sanders. Politically passionate young people tend to be drawn to revolutionary ideas, causes, and people. This has been the case throughout history AFAICT. And this is the basis of Sanders' strong support among this cohort. He's the guy who is going to remake the system and lead us to a Brave New World utopia. But it doesn't follow that Sanders has nearly the same level of support among the more politically apathetic young people.

In sum, people are making the assumption that if younger eligible voters voted at the same levels as older voters, that Sanders would receive the same level of support as he does from others in that cohort. But I don't that assumption is necessarily correct, and it's likely that among those marginal additional voters his advantage would be significantly smaller if it would exist at all.
  #22  
Old 03-05-2020, 09:39 AM
Ann Hedonia's Avatar
Ann Hedonia is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chisquirrel View Post
Get his supporters off of Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter and into the voting booths.

He has significant leads in every demographic under 45, which combine to over 55% of the electorate. Unfortunately for Sanders, those same demographics are showing up at less than half the rate of Biden's supporters. If they actually SHOW UP, he has an uphill, but viable, path. If they continue to sit at home and rage at the unfairness of other people voicing their opinion, then he losing yet again to a "milquetoast Republican-lite".
In fairness, I think most of his vocal supporters probably voted. But most voters arenít vocal. Most voters donít even follow politics online. Most voters have FaceBook feeds filled with family photos, cat videos and special interest material. Most voters donít watch debates or research candidates. Most voters donít even feel strongly about their candidates.

Among the older set, there are lots of people that vote because they were conditioned from a young age to do so. Because voting is symbolic of the wonderfulness of democracy. Itís your civic duty and if you donít do it you have no right to complain about your governance. Itís a right that our forefathers fought for and we need to respect their work.

So the older folks dutifully march to the polls every couple of years and click the box next to the least objectionable candidate. They donít have to love them or even like them. They donít have to feel that they are going to do something that will personally benefit them. They do it because thatís what we do. They donít need the promise of a revolution, because they vote to fufill the promises made in that revolution 250 or so years ago.

Maybe that makes them mindless drones, but it gets out the vote. And young people just donít vote like that. So they lose the numbers game.

Last edited by Ann Hedonia; 03-05-2020 at 09:41 AM.
  #23  
Old 03-05-2020, 09:43 AM
Ludovic is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: America's Wing
Posts: 31,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowFacts View Post
March 14
Northern Mariana

I think we can agree this will have no big effect.
It did 60 years ago but only for a very limited amount of time

Last edited by Ludovic; 03-05-2020 at 09:44 AM.
  #24  
Old 03-05-2020, 09:50 AM
DSeid's Avatar
DSeid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 23,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Clark View Post
Missed the edit window:

Also supposedly Warren is in talks with Sanders to try to unite their campaigns. Not sure if she will succeed or if her voters will go to Sanders, but if they do that'll help Sanders narrow the gap even more.
I wouldn't assume her voting support goes disproportionately to Sanders. In polling support she is pretty equally split under and over 45. But as we've seen, in voting behavior the young ones who likely disproportionately prefer Sanders as their second choice are disproportionately less likely to actually vote. The older ones (skewed to college educated white women) OTOH may go to Biden much more and they are coming out to vote.
  #25  
Old 03-05-2020, 09:53 AM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,013
Warren just quit the race
  #26  
Old 03-05-2020, 10:03 AM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Lendervedder View Post
You keep saying Texas was pretty much a tie, but Biden won Texas by 5 points. That's a solid win, especially when a majority of polls in the past month showed Bernie winning there.
Texas just finished assigning all their delegates.

111 - Biden
102 - Sanders

The other 15 went to Bloomberg and Warren.

That is pretty much a tie.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion

Last edited by Wesley Clark; 03-05-2020 at 10:06 AM.
  #27  
Old 03-05-2020, 10:13 AM
FlikTheBlue is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,156
My prediction is that the vast majority of Bloomberg voters will go to Biden. Sanders, at best, might get about half of the Warren voters. I think it’s more likely that Warren’s supporters will split evenly between Sanders and Biden.

In terms of the map, I think it also favors Biden. There are still several southern states where he is heavily favored, including the big ones of Florida and Georgia. Bernie may very well win out west, but those are small states like Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Washington and Oregon are somewhat larger but won’t outweigh Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, etc. So that leaves the Midwest. Sanders would have to win states like Michigan this coming Tuesday as well as Ohio and Illinois, by something like 60/40 or greater in order to have a chance. It’s not impossible, but I think it’s highly unlikely.

My guess is that the odds right now are something like 96/3/1 for Biden, Sanders, and a contested convention respectively.
  #28  
Old 03-05-2020, 10:14 AM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,833
228 delegates left to be assigned from super Tuesday.

Sanders trails Biden by 65 (596 vs 531).

Of the 228, 189 are in states sanders is winning, CA, Co and UT.

23 are in Biden states. AL, MN, NC, TN

3 in MA which was pretty much tied.

13 for democrats abroad, no idea what will happen there.

But yeah, looks like Biden won. There are still southern states that will go Biden and I assume Biden will win the industrial Midwest.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion

Last edited by Wesley Clark; 03-05-2020 at 10:16 AM.
  #29  
Old 03-05-2020, 10:19 AM
BobLibDem is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home 07 NCAA HockeyChamps
Posts: 22,337
Apparently the path does not run through Florida.

Quote:
More than 61% of likely Florida voters favor Biden, according to the most recent survey by St. Pete Polls commissioned by Florida Politics (the full PDF of the poll is embedded below). That gives the former Vice President a commanding lead over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, at 12%, and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, with 5%.
  #30  
Old 03-05-2020, 10:46 AM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,013
I guess the 12% who favor Sanders are not Cuban.
  #31  
Old 03-05-2020, 11:00 AM
SuntanLotion is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: mentor ohio
Posts: 505
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrotherCadfael View Post
Chicago '68-style riots at the convention. It would kill any chance at winning the election, but it might get him the nom.
It sounds rude, but I would find that awesome
__________________
Divide and conquer. Power to the people
  #32  
Old 03-05-2020, 11:08 AM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,833
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobLibDem View Post
Yup. All the delegate rich states are either southern states or rust belt states, states that Biden has a lock on.

Looks like Biden will win an outright majority of delegates. I'm guessing final tally will be about 2000 vs 1500 or so.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion
  #33  
Old 03-05-2020, 11:19 AM
DSeid's Avatar
DSeid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 23,964
While I still maintain he aint dead yet, he is indeed circling the drain. Lose Michigan, especially solidly, and there is no path forward.

Next question is how long does he stay in bringing on bigger more desperate attacks against Biden? How nasty do his attacks get?

Unfortunately I am afraid he won't move to circling the wagons until it is literally the case that Biden has enough pledged delegates of his own to win without winning a single additional one, and maybe not even until they have voted at the convention. And that he will get quite divisive between now and then.
  #34  
Old 03-05-2020, 11:35 AM
Buck Godot's Avatar
Buck Godot is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MD outside DC
Posts: 6,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Clark View Post
228 delegates left to be assigned from super Tuesday.

Sanders trails Biden by 65 (596 vs 531).

Of the 228, 189 are in states sanders is winning, CA, Co and UT.
I've heard that in California it was the mail in ballots that were tallied first, many of which were sent before Biden's resurgence after South Carolina. So the remaining delegates may not tilt as heavily to Sanders as the ones that have been counted so far.
  #35  
Old 03-05-2020, 11:46 AM
That Don Guy's Avatar
That Don Guy is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Clark View Post
13 for democrats abroad, no idea what will happen there.
Nitpick: Democrats Abroad voting runs from 3/3 through 3/10, so it's not really a Super Tuesday primary.
  #36  
Old 03-05-2020, 12:10 PM
RioRico is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: beyond cell service
Posts: 3,193
I'll go with the "Bernie gets the nom if Biden dies" trope. The big question is, who will Biden's veep pick be?
  #37  
Old 03-05-2020, 01:19 PM
kenobi 65's Avatar
kenobi 65 is online now
Corellian Nerfherder
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brookfield, IL
Posts: 17,725
There are two demographic facts about Michigan which would seem to make it a tougher challenge for Sanders:

1) I heard repeatedly on Super Tuesday that Biden tends to do better among African-Americans, and Sanders tends to do better among Hispanics.

As of the 2010 Census, 14.2% of Michigan residents are African-American (the national number for 2010 was 13%). Meanwhile, only 4.4% of Michigan residents in that census identified as Hispanic (versus 16% nationally).

2) Michigan is, relatively speaking, an older state. Its median age is 39.8, making it the 14th-oldest state.
  #38  
Old 03-05-2020, 01:50 PM
Aspenglow's Avatar
Aspenglow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSeid View Post
While I still maintain he aint dead yet, he is indeed circling the drain. Lose Michigan, especially solidly, and there is no path forward.

Next question is how long does he stay in bringing on bigger more desperate attacks against Biden? How nasty do his attacks get?

Unfortunately I am afraid he won't move to circling the wagons until it is literally the case that Biden has enough pledged delegates of his own to win without winning a single additional one, and maybe not even until they have voted at the convention. And that he will get quite divisive between now and then.
This is what I think, too.

There was someone in another thread, Dallas Jones, I think. S/he said something to the effect of, it's not two separate wings of the Democratic party. It's two parties trying to share the Democratic party's umbrella. Very different things. I think that is nail-on-the-head stuff, there.

A pundit recently summarized where Bernie is at: It's hard to lead a party when you're treating many of its members like they are the enemy.

Bernie's greatest failing is that he has no real allies in the party. No surrogates to speak of to go out and share his vision for the future. Well, I guess Bill DeBlasio and Michael Moore... but even Elizabeth Warren, the person whom most perceive as being the closest to Sanders ideologically, isn't endorsing him. I'll be very surprised if she does.

What Bernie has tried to do over these past 5 years is co-opt the Democratic party for his own vision of the future -- much as Trump did to Republicans. That's fine. He can try. But I've said for years that if the Republican party had employed super delegates, there would have been no Trump presidency. This is what super delegates are for: To prevent a hostile takeover of your party by an outlier who doesn't really share your vision of what you've worked to build. Someone doesn't get to just join your party and say, "Hey! Look at me, I'm a Democrat! Now everyone think in lockstep with meeeee!!" We can see what happened to Republicans with this approach.

Bernie is free to go start his own third party. I hope he does. It's what he really wants.

Maddow gave him a hard knock last night. She didn't let him spout his talking points unchallenged. She showed him with actual math how his assertions about how he has "excited the American people" with his ideas are simply wrong. In the end, it was kind of sad. Bernie kept returning to his practiced message, but it really no longer resonates.

He said again and again that he would inspire turnout among "hard-working Americans" by showing them that his way is a better way. All I kept thinking was, how long are we supposed to give you to complete this inspirational work while the country burns to the ground?

Agree particularly that if there is a decisive win by or split with Biden in Michigan, Sanders needs to get out. I doubt he will. As the rest of the party coalesces around Biden, I can only hope they give Biden the magic 1,991 delegates before the convention. The "Democratic establishment" learned from 2016. They know they need a decisive win by a candidate in advance of Milwaukee. We'll soon find out if Bernie really is all about beating Trump -- or something else.
  #39  
Old 03-05-2020, 01:51 PM
Do Not Taunt is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowFacts View Post
Well, let's look at the upcoming primary calendar with number of delegates at stake in parentheses, not including superdelegates):

March 10
Idaho (20)
Michigan (125)
Mississippi (36)
Missouri (68)
North Dakota (14)
Washington (89)
Sanders won Washington overwhelmingly in 2016 (73/27), though an interesting thing has changed: 2016 was a caucus, whereas 2020 will be a primary (w/ vote by mail, as all Washington elections are.) It'll be interesting to see how he does this time around.

(Washington actually held a primary in 2016, too, which didn't allocate delegates. Don't ask, it's too dumb to think about. Clinton actually won that narrowly, though I'm not sure it has any predictive value.)
  #40  
Old 03-05-2020, 02:19 PM
Atamasama's Avatar
Atamasama is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,474
AP is showing 603-538 Joe-Bernie. A gap of 65. So that divide seems to be holding pretty firm even as more votes are tallied.
  #41  
Old 03-05-2020, 02:52 PM
SuntanLotion is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: mentor ohio
Posts: 505
Quote:
Originally Posted by RioRico View Post
I'll go with the "Bernie gets the nom if Biden dies" trope. The big question is, who will Biden's veep pick be?
Bernie! That'd show em
__________________
Divide and conquer. Power to the people
  #42  
Old 03-05-2020, 03:24 PM
DSeid's Avatar
DSeid is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 23,964
I think Warren at this point sees her role to be the final nail on Bernie if he loses Michigan big and stays divisive. She won’t jump on the losing train and she will hold off on endorsing Biden until it places her as unity builder.
  #43  
Old 03-05-2020, 03:33 PM
Aspenglow's Avatar
Aspenglow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSeid View Post
I think Warren at this point sees her role to be the final nail on Bernie if he loses Michigan big and stays divisive. She wonít jump on the losing train and she will hold off on endorsing Biden until it places her as unity builder.
Again, agreed. Warren wants to remain relevant and has never fought with the mainstream Democratic party in the way Sanders has.
  #44  
Old 03-05-2020, 03:45 PM
Mike Mabes is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspenglow View Post
Agree particularly that if there is a decisive win by or split with Biden in Michigan, Sanders needs to get out. I doubt he will. As the rest of the party coalesces around Biden, I can only hope they give Biden the magic 1,991 delegates before the convention. The "Democratic establishment" learned from 2016. They know they need a decisive win by a candidate in advance of Milwaukee. We'll soon find out if Bernie really is all about beating Trump -- or something else.
Yes. He'll probably be like Hillary in 2008 trying to hang on hoping for a miracle. But I don't think that cost Obama many or any votes. This is different, Bernie is going hard after Biden. If Bernie loses badly in Michigan and stays in, I will lose all the respect I currently have for him.
  #45  
Old 03-05-2020, 04:29 PM
Aspenglow's Avatar
Aspenglow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Mabes View Post
Yes. He'll probably be like Hillary in 2008 trying to hang on hoping for a miracle. But I don't think that cost Obama many or any votes. This is different, Bernie is going hard after Biden. If Bernie loses badly in Michigan and stays in, I will lose all the respect I currently have for him.
Hang on. It's not fair to compare 2008 to 2020.

from Wiki:

Quote:
The clear front-runner, she (Clinton) was widely expected to clinch the nomination early, but as of June 3, 2008, she had 1,923 delegates, 231 behind Barack Obama and 195 short of the 2,118 required to win the Democratic nomination. She withdrew from the race and endorsed Barack Obama, as the presumptive nominee, on June 7.

Clinton was nominated and subsequently assumed the office of Secretary of State in the Obama administration.
(emphasis mine)

Look how close their delegate totals were all the way to June 7th. (Wiki)

So pretty much at the moment it became apparent she could not win, she suspended. And I can tell you, going on to be the SoS in an Obama administration had to be about the most bitter pill in the world to swallow, given the state of our foreign policy after GWB. Nevertheless, as a team player, she stepped up and took a horrible job after a demoralizing defeat by upstart Obama.

Contrast this with what Bernie pulled on her in 2016. Also from Wiki:

Quote:
Clinton finally declared victory on the evening of June 7, as the results ensured that she had won a majority of the pledged delegates and the popular vote. Sanders stated he would continue to run for the Democratic Party's nomination in the final primary in the District of Columbia on June 14, which Clinton won. Both campaigns met at a downtown Washington D.C. hotel after the primary. The Sanders campaign said that they would release a video statement on June 16 to clarify the future of Sanders' campaign; the video announced that Sanders looked forward to help Clinton defeat Trump. On July 12, 2016, Sanders endorsed Clinton in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.
(emphasis mine)

He still didn't officially drop out of the race until the convention on July 26, 2016.

Biden is already up 65-odd votes against Bernie this time around. It is easy to see with upcoming races, Sanders is likely to lag behind by far more than 231 votes, and much sooner.

I suspect you're going to lose all respect for him shortly, as I did in 2016.
  #46  
Old 03-05-2020, 05:37 PM
Mike Mabes is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 803
It's been a long time. I remember reading on this board a thread about how Hillary should concede but the details are fuzzy, but let's not get sidetracked. Forget the Hillary reference, Bernie has to get out soon
  #47  
Old 03-05-2020, 06:12 PM
Aspenglow's Avatar
Aspenglow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Mabes View Post
It's been a long time. I remember reading on this board a thread about how Hillary should concede but the details are fuzzy, but let's not get sidetracked. Forget the Hillary reference, Bernie has to get out soon
Agreed on all counts. Thanks for being gracious.
  #48  
Old 03-05-2020, 11:17 PM
Little Nemo is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Western New York
Posts: 86,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspenglow View Post
What Bernie has tried to do over these past 5 years is co-opt the Democratic party for his own vision of the future -- much as Trump did to Republicans. That's fine. He can try. But I've said for years that if the Republican party had employed super delegates, there would have been no Trump presidency. This is what super delegates are for: To prevent a hostile takeover of your party by an outlier who doesn't really share your vision of what you've worked to build. Someone doesn't get to just join your party and say, "Hey! Look at me, I'm a Democrat! Now everyone think in lockstep with meeeee!!" We can see what happened to Republicans with this approach.
I have to disagree with this. Sanders on his worst day is not Trump. Sanders is the leader of a movement. The only cause Trump cares about is what's best for Donald Trump. As far as Trump's concerned, the Republican Party can go out of business they day he leaves office.

That said, I agree that Sanders and his movement are trying to hijack the party. They want to be the only ones steering the ship but they want everybody else to stay on board and paddle.
  #49  
Old 03-06-2020, 02:20 AM
foolsguinea is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 15,896
I think at this point it's just a matter of Bernie volunteers working phones & hammering home that "credit card Joe' isn't really a strong candidate. Which he isn't.

Joe Biden is a right-wing kind of corrupt candidate:
war on drugs, war on crime, war on Iraq
He'd move your job overseas & not let you write off your debt.
Called children of single mothers "superpredators."
Indifferent to or unaware of the urgency climate change.

There's already a party for that kind of thing; he's not in it; and they have the White House now.
Bernie is the candidate of the Democratic voter. Biden is the candidate of people who don't care who wins this fall.

That's it. It may not work, but that's the pitch.
  #50  
Old 03-06-2020, 03:07 AM
Manwich is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Japan
Posts: 547
Agreed.

With Bernie and Biden neck and neck now and Biden having a very vulnerable history and present, Bernie has a great opportunity.

Rich voters with some morals hopefully hate Bidens homophobia, millions of drug imprisonments, pro war record etc.

Poorer voters should hate his anti social security policies, free trade free reign attitude and refusal to support Medicare for all.

Low information voters have his apparent senility.

Bernie has grass roots support and small money donors. Those small money donors have to count for solid word of mouth support. Something corporate support can't do.

Bloomberg's massive waste of money has demonstrated the limits of oligarchy.

It's one type of purity politics versus another now. Pure establishment, corporate backed interests, or the interests of regular Americans.

Bernie has a good chance.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017