Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2019, 01:26 PM
Boycott is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 247

What exactly is a "liberal elite"?


I know conservatives love to talk about lifting yourself from your bootstraps but that's not monopolised by one politically aligned group of people.

Wealth and nepotism is not subject to one group of politically aligned group either.

Donald Trump is the product of inheriting wealth. His kids are even more notorious for living off a silver spoon. Just look at this picture:

https://media.guestofaguest.com/t_ca...ump-family.jpg

George W Bush campaigned in 2004 portraying John Kerry as a liberal elite despite Bush attending Yale like his father and benefitting off his name, and the fact Kerry enlisting to serve in Vietnam, getting the Purple Heart, ended up with conservatives doubting his record of service. Bush of course had doubts over his National Guard record.

Then you get conservatives like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh make a living by using that distinction. Neither completed college. There's no shame in dropping out of a course but the way they talk it's like the shame is in completing the course.

Meghan McCain appears on a hugely popular debate show as the conservative point of view, but her use of "my father" as a qualifier has become a running joke. Meanwhile someone else, who now may be living a cushy life, had to overcome several barriers to get to the same position.

You get conservatives who went to top class higher education institutes, like Ted Cruz at Harvard, frequently use the "liberal elite" tag to degrade opposition points of view as out of touch. What makes him - a conservative - in touch with the ordinary folks anymore than a liberal at Harvard?
  #2  
Old 10-28-2019, 01:29 PM
Velocity is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 15,617
Well, you're right - a conservative elite is an elite, just like a liberal elite. They're not necessarily any closer to earth.


That being said, for examples of liberal elites, I suppose the Kennedy family would count as one.
  #3  
Old 10-28-2019, 01:48 PM
nelliebly is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,847
I've always interpreted "liberal elite" to be code for "educated liberals." I think it's supposed to imply that college-educated liberals live in an ivory tower of idealism while the masses toil away in the "real" world. In reality, of course, most politicos using that term are also college graduates, but what matters to the masses isn't the educational level of those who use the term; it's that it reflects their own world view while reassuring them that good ol' common sense is more useful than a fancy degree.
  #4  
Old 10-28-2019, 03:05 PM
Buck Godot's Avatar
Buck Godot is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MD outside DC
Posts: 6,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelliebly View Post
I've always interpreted "liberal elite" to be code for "educated liberals." I think it's supposed to imply that college-educated liberals live in an ivory tower of idealism while the masses toil away in the "real" world. In reality, of course, most politicos using that term are also college graduates, but what matters to the masses isn't the educational level of those who use the term; it's that it reflects their own world view while reassuring them that good ol' common sense is more useful than a fancy degree.
That would be my interpretation as well. Although as other have said its really just a catch-all insult designed to deflect attention away from Republicans Plutocratic policies, it only works because there is a strong resonance among conservatives. It goes back to city slickers with degrees in agriculture from universities trying to tell farmers how to grow their crops. More recently it involves, kids leaving small towns for college and coming back and lecturing their parents on the moral importance of secularism, multiculturalism, and environmentalism. The other place its used is in attacking those in the entertainment industry who promote similar ideas.
  #5  
Old 10-28-2019, 02:09 PM
DCnDC's Avatar
DCnDC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Dueling Grounds
Posts: 12,880
It's a boogeyman invented by conservative "leaders" as a scapegoat for gullible, low information voters who they know will just take them at their word.
  #6  
Old 10-28-2019, 02:12 PM
iiandyiiii's Avatar
iiandyiiii is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 35,781
Appears to me to be no fixed definition, and is used by conservative blowhards to dismiss any group of people they don't like.
  #7  
Old 10-28-2019, 02:41 PM
Moriarty's Avatar
Moriarty is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boycott View Post
I know conservatives love to talk about lifting yourself from your bootstraps but that's not monopolised by one politically aligned group of people.
Interestingly enough, pull one's self up by one's bootstraps is impossible, and describes an absurd premise.

Meanwhile, I understand the term 'liberal elite' to describe a class of wealthy people who, at least in theory, "look down" on those who have less wealth as them, and judge them to be inferior in all respects, including taste and class. For these elites, this creates a sort of sympathy for these others, based on a conclusion that they must be dreadfully suffering with their pedestrian way of life. As such, and due to the sense of superiority it reinforces, these 'elites' feel perfectly qualified to not only judge these people but also interfere and try to change them.

It's a stereotype, and not necessarily an accurate one. But perhaps the best example I can think of would be white people who kidnapped native American kids to raise them in white society. Ostensibly, they are 'offering assistance' and trying to 'improve lives', but the reality is that they are destroying another culture due to a misguided belief that they know better.

When it comes to modern society, and the threat of the 'liberal elite', I think this is what is being discussed: it's an apprehension that people from elsewhere, thinking they know better, will swoop in and destroy the culture and its value under the guise of improvement.

"Those liberal elites are gonna come here and take away your traditions, your beliefs, your way of speech, your cherished sports, your style of dress, your taste in food...because they think they KNOW BETTER."

Last edited by Moriarty; 10-28-2019 at 02:44 PM.
  #8  
Old 10-28-2019, 02:43 PM
Kearsen1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moriarty View Post
Interestingly enough, pull one's self up by one's bootstraps is impossible, and describes an absurd premise.

Meanwhile, I understand the term 'liberal elite' to describe a class of wealthy people who, at least in theory, "look down" on those who have less wealth as them, and judge them to be inferior in all respects, including taste and class. For these elites, this creates a sort of sympathy for these others, based on a conclusion that they must be dreadfully suffering with their pedestrian way of life. As such, and due to the sense of superiority it reinforces, these 'elites' feel perfectly qualified to not only judge these people but also interfere and try to change them.

It's a stereotype, and not necessarily an accurate one. But perhaps the best example I can think of would be white people who kidnapped native American kids to raise them in white society. Ostensibly, they are 'offering assistance' and trying to 'improve lives', but the reality is that they are destroying another culture due to a misguided belief that they know better.

When it comes to modern society, and the threat of the 'liberal elite', I think this is what is being discussed: it's an apprehension that people from elsewhere, thinking they know better, will swoop in and destroy the culture and its value under the guise of improvement.

"Those liberal elites are gonna come here and take away your traditions, your beliefs, your way of speech, your cherished sports, your style of dress, your taste in food...because they think they KNOW BETTER.

My understanding of the term is that.
Liberal elites will just fix you right up because they know better than you do what you need.
  #9  
Old 10-28-2019, 02:45 PM
manson1972's Avatar
manson1972 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moriarty View Post
"Those liberal elites are gonna come here and take away your traditions, your beliefs, your way of speech, your cherished sports, your style of dress, your taste in food...because they think they KNOW BETTER."
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCnDC View Post
It's a boogeyman invented by conservative "leaders" as a scapegoat for gullible, low information voters who they know will just take them at their word.
That checks out.
  #10  
Old 10-28-2019, 04:37 PM
wolfpup's Avatar
wolfpup is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 11,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelliebly View Post
I've always interpreted "liberal elite" to be code for "educated liberals." I think it's supposed to imply that college-educated liberals live in an ivory tower of idealism while the masses toil away in the "real" world. In reality, of course, most politicos using that term are also college graduates, but what matters to the masses isn't the educational level of those who use the term; it's that it reflects their own world view while reassuring them that good ol' common sense is more useful than a fancy degree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCnDC View Post
It's a boogeyman invented by conservative "leaders" as a scapegoat for gullible, low information voters who they know will just take them at their word.
I believe both of those are accurate. The myth of the "liberal elite" is an ironic and intentionally divisive falsehood invented by a certain subset of conservatives (a subset currently well represented by mainstream Republicans) to disparage liberals in a way that resonates emotionally while being completely meaningless. It's ironic because it's actually conservatives who tend to be the elitists to the extent of possessing the more disproportionate wealth and therefore being isolated in their own communities and detached from the struggles of the middle and poorer classes -- at least, the conservative leadership that sets the conservative agenda, if not necessarily the low-information rubes who believe them and vote for them. It's further ironic because educated people in general tend to understand social and economic issues better than their less informed counterparts, which indeed is why certain kinds of conservatives brand them as "liberals" in the first place, and consider institutions of higher learning to be "hotbeds of liberalism".

Think about the Bush dynasty, where George W. and his gaffe-prone mother both famously could never figure out poor people, or Mitt Romney, or Donald J. Trump and his entire family, or the privileged life of Ronald Reagan, he of the "trickle-down theory" fame. Those are the true elitists -- people who have never had to worry about a crappy public education system, or about their kids having successful careers, or about community safety, or about social injustices, or mortgage payments or car troubles. Their governing style can be described as "by wealthy elitists, for wealthy elitists".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moriarty View Post
Interestingly enough, pull one's self up by one's bootstraps is impossible, and describes an absurd premise.
Yes, it's physically impossible, but if I may digress for a moment, it describes a figurative concept that is actually quite important if applied correctly, and to that extent conservatives touting it aren't necessarily wrong. The figurative concept is the idea of creating stepping stones that let you achieve goals incrementally that would not otherwise be achievable. It's a pervasive and important concept in computer science that has existed since long before PCs. For example, it's generally not feasible to load the entirety of an operating system in one single operation to get a computer started, but it's easy to load a very small number of instructions. That small program can then load a much larger loader, albeit inefficiently. The larger loader can then efficiently load key parts of the OS, which then loads the rest of itself. Computer science is replete with methods by which the information processing power of the computer itself is used to assist with -- or "bootstrap" -- programming tasks.

In the same way, someone starting a small business might use the modest wealth created by that business to incrementally grow it into a larger and more diversified business that they might not otherwise have been able to do. This part of conservative ideology is sound; the fallacy is in the implication that this is the only kind of value there is, or that starting a business is a sure path to success, or that government's primary role is to simply clear away all obstacles to that one and only noble goal.

Last edited by wolfpup; 10-28-2019 at 04:39 PM.
  #11  
Old 10-28-2019, 02:47 PM
Velocity is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 15,617
Here's a YouTube video, for instance: Senator Maggie Hirono (D-Hawaii) says that "We Democrats know so much, we have to kind of tell everybody how smart we are."

To be fair, I think Hirono meant her words in the sense that Democrats should not try to talk over voters with this mindset of "I know more than you do, so you should just obey me," but rather, that Democrats need to use more emotional persuasion rather than just cold logic or facts. But there is indeed this prevalent attitude among many liberals that they are the educated, they are the informed, and it is their job to tug along the uneducated dirty unshaven masses by the ears.
  #12  
Old 10-28-2019, 02:58 PM
ASL v2.0's Avatar
ASL v2.0 is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Various
Posts: 425
I think there’s also an implied accusation of hypocrisy. As in "If these liberal elites are so worried about the poor and think the wealthy should be taxed to fund their pet social programs, then why don’t they take all of their own substantial wealth and donate it to charity?"

Those are my own words, presented as a summary of what I’ve generally considered the term "liberal elite" to be shorthand for as an accusation. Not that I necessarily subscribe to such a view myself.
  #13  
Old 10-28-2019, 03:06 PM
XT's Avatar
XT is offline
Agnatheist
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The Great South West
Posts: 35,600
I've always interpreted the term to be about liberals (obviously) who are elitist. This doesn't necessarily mean rich, but who have elitist mindsets which I always summarized by, to paraphrase 'we know better than them what they need' or 'what's best for them'. There are certainly a group of liberals who DO look down on many of their fellow citizens and DO think they know what's best for the majority because they are smarter, better informed or whatever other props they use to decide they just know best.

There are, of course, conservative elites as well, but as this was more about liberal elites that's my take. I know several people who I would consider 'liberal elite'...there are quite a few on this board in fact. Hell, I'm probably one myself, though I don't consider myself either liberal or an elite, but I'm sure that on some specific issues I'd be considered one (certainly several in my family THINK this is the case) by those who use that term a lot.
__________________
-XT

That's what happens when you let rednecks play with anti-matter!

Last edited by XT; 10-28-2019 at 03:07 PM.
  #14  
Old 10-28-2019, 03:24 PM
Bone's Avatar
Bone is online now
Extrajudicial
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by XT View Post
I've always interpreted the term to be about liberals (obviously) who are elitist. This doesn't necessarily mean rich, but who have elitist mindsets which I always summarized by, to paraphrase 'we know better than them what they need' or 'what's best for them'. There are certainly a group of liberals who DO look down on many of their fellow citizens and DO think they know what's best for the majority because they are smarter, better informed or whatever other props they use to decide they just know best.
This is my understanding as well. A key underlying sentiment that usually permeates the theme of knowing better than the other person is arrogance.
  #15  
Old 10-28-2019, 04:45 PM
HMS Irruncible is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 8,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by XT View Post
There are certainly a group of liberals who DO look down on many of their fellow citizens and DO think they know what's best for the majority because they are smarter, better informed or whatever other props they use to decide they just know best.
If we're deciding who knows best, are there better criteria than being smart and informed?

I mean, in my experience, people do not go around saying "I am more smart and informed". They make arguments and present information. Then the losers of those arguments stomp off, disparaging the very concept of being informed.

To be quite honest, the only folks you hear trumpeting a superior "Facts and Logic" approach are conservatives like Ben Shapiro, Rush Limbaugh, and countless other stooges. Conservatives really love being smarty-pants on the few occasions that they can make it work for them.
  #16  
Old 10-28-2019, 04:55 PM
XT's Avatar
XT is offline
Agnatheist
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The Great South West
Posts: 35,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMS Irruncible View Post
If we're deciding who knows best, are there better criteria than being smart and informed?

I mean, in my experience, people do not go around saying "I am more smart and informed". They make arguments and present information. Then the losers of those arguments stomp off, disparaging the very concept of being informed.

To be quite honest, the only folks you hear trumpeting a superior "Facts and Logic" approach are conservatives like Ben Shapiro, Rush Limbaugh, and countless other stooges. Conservatives really love being smarty-pants on the few occasions that they can make it work for them.
Well, they THINK they know best, but often folks think that. And generally they are elitist of one stripe or another who do think that. I've rarely seen any historical evidence that elites of any stripe actually DO know what's best for others, especially when they disdain them and belittle them. YMMV of course.

Look at the posts in this thread. There is a ton of denial here. Very few are attempting to actually take a deep look at this to see WHY there are so many who think there are 'liberal elites'. Instead, it's about denial that it's a real thing, projection that it's conservatives or Republicans or right wing media that created it out of whole clothe, and, of course, belittling various versions of 'the common man' or 'gullible, low information voters'. Hell, we have one poster who seems to need some sort of extraordinary proof that people use the phrase 'fly over country' in a disparaging way...or maybe at all. I'm not sure, as they are pointing at inconsistencies in a post as proof of...well, something.

This is, IMHO, when the 'dope becomes more of an echo chamber than it normally is. This board DOES have a lot of liberals on it. And they are more than happy to point out the mote in the conservatives eyes. Hell, I am as well. But when confronted with something they don't want to hear, this thread is the general response. Using the tools of skepticism in some cases to pick apart a post to prove...something. And going into automatic denial, with a touch of CT to be honest...as if this is all a manufactured construct by Right Wing Media(tm) or some other loopy shit like that.

It's fine. It allows me to kick back and feel superior, which is really the reason I'm a moderate elite in the first place. Which is silly, of course since in another thread, it was proved that there ARE no moderates.
__________________
-XT

That's what happens when you let rednecks play with anti-matter!

Last edited by XT; 10-28-2019 at 04:57 PM.
  #17  
Old 10-28-2019, 05:00 PM
Bone's Avatar
Bone is online now
Extrajudicial
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMS Irruncible View Post
If we're deciding who knows best, are there better criteria than being smart and informed?
I think there is a demarcation between objective things and subjective things. Being smart and informed is pretty damn useful when it comes to objective things. The stereotype of liberal elites comes into play when that attitude is shifted into the arena of the subjective.

Rocket scientist talking about the engineering feats of launching satellites into orbit doesn't elicit liberal elitism criticism. Rocket scientist saying that their work is more important than XYZ is closer along those lines.
  #18  
Old 10-28-2019, 03:55 PM
chappachula is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,775
You know the phrase "flyover country"?
That describes the liberal elite....they are not only disconnected from the heartland, they are proud of being disconnected, and very happy to fly over it--- while telling those poor country folk how primitive they are.

Yes, this is a real thing.
And yes, the term "liberal elite" is way overused by Rush Limbaugh types.

But I have met more than a few New Yorkers who fit the stereotype.

People who were born,raised and lived their entire lives between 1st Avenue and 9th.
Never learned to drive a car, and are proud of that fact. Never had the slightest desire to take a road trip and see America.They have never had a conversation with someone who served in the military, and are proud of that. They will go to a concert where an anthropologist plays primitive music on a wooden pipe made by a tribe in the Amazon,but would never listen to a banjo or a country song on the radio.
If they read a New York Times story about the strict and modest dress code at Brigham Young U (the Mormon university in Utah), they fill the comments page with reactions of horror, that women must be free to wear shorts, etc. But these same people will gladly change their clothes to cover up their entire body if they visit a Muslim site.


Pompous asses exist everywhere. There are plenty of farmers who are proud that they are ignorant of big-city culture. But somehow that seems less irritating to me than big-city folk who do the same.
Maybe it's 'cause I like the smell of a barn more than the smell of smog.

Last edited by chappachula; 10-28-2019 at 03:59 PM.
  #19  
Old 10-28-2019, 04:06 PM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is online now
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 62,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by chappachula View Post
You know the phrase "flyover country"?
That describes the liberal elite....they are not only disconnected from the heartland, they are proud of being disconnected, and very happy to fly over it--- while telling those poor country folk how primitive they are.

Yes, this is a real thing..
Yeah. Your one bit of evidence is a letters page where students seek freedom of expression, but there is no evidence whatsoever that these same students "will gladly change their clothes to cover up their entire body if they visit a Muslim site." In fact, your "evidence" doesn't seem to tie in with your first paragraph at all(which seems to be nothing more than blather that can be found on any number of right-wing websites).
  #20  
Old 10-28-2019, 04:18 PM
HMS Irruncible is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 8,610
Liberals are all unemployed layabouts who steal money from hardworking Americans, unless they're employed, in which case they're stealing jobs from hardworking Americans. If they are wealthy then they are probably sports stars or entertainers who are stealing attention from hardworking Americans. If they aren't sports stars or entertainers then they are George Soros.

(giant sarcasm tag if it's not clear enough)
  #21  
Old 10-28-2019, 04:47 PM
QuickSilver is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 19,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by chappachula View Post
Pompous asses exist everywhere. There are plenty of farmers who are proud that they are ignorant of big-city culture. But somehow that seems less irritating to me than big-city folk who do the same.
Maybe it's 'cause I like the smell of a barn more than the smell of smog.
So you're admitting that the opposite of liberal elite is bullshit bias.
__________________
St. QuickSilver: Patron Saint of Thermometers.
  #22  
Old 10-28-2019, 03:05 PM
Ravenman is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 26,927
I heard a very funny segment on the radio this morning describing the two real elites in America: the boat elite and the intellectual elite.

The boat elite are a reference to Trump's comment that his supporters have bigger boats. To an intellectual elite, the very idea of owning a boat is already kind of stupid, as though one should establish one's social dominance by piling up large amounts of cash and setting it on fire, all Ozymandias-style. But that's my take on it.

The author interviewed describes the concept in his own words, which you can sample here. One funny part:
Quote:
The biggest difference between the two elites is that the Boat Elites are steeped in honor culture.... If they get cut off, they honk. Then they yell at the other driver to get out of their car and fight. The Intellectual Elite don't do this because we know that honking and yelling makes it hard to hear NPR stories.
Or, you can hear the interview here.
  #23  
Old 10-28-2019, 03:25 PM
Larry Borgia's Avatar
Larry Borgia is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 10,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenman View Post
I heard a very funny segment on the radio this morning describing the two real elites in America: the boat elite and the intellectual elite.

The boat elite are a reference to Trump's comment that his supporters have bigger boats. To an intellectual elite, the very idea of owning a boat is already kind of stupid, as though one should establish one's social dominance by piling up large amounts of cash and setting it on fire, all Ozymandias-style. But that's my take on it.

The author interviewed describes the concept in his own words, which you can sample here. One funny part:

Or, you can hear the interview here.
He's also on This Cracked Podcast. It's worth a listen, as he's pretty entertaining and he tries to be even handed. The only omission he makes is that there is a conservative intellectual elite with access to their own politicians and celebrities.

He's pushing a book, but I'm not sure he'll make any points beyond the interviews.
  #24  
Old 10-28-2019, 03:18 PM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is online now
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 62,892
It is an appeal to the common man, telling them that they are more worthy because they are common, and that those who strive to be better are striving just to spite them.
  #25  
Old 10-28-2019, 03:49 PM
XT's Avatar
XT is offline
Agnatheist
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The Great South West
Posts: 35,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCnDC
It's a boogeyman invented by conservative "leaders" as a scapegoat for gullible, low information voters who they know will just take them at their word.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Czarcasm View Post
It is an appeal to the common man, telling them that they are more worthy because they are common, and that those who strive to be better are striving just to spite them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Typo Negative
Liberal Elite means "people who think they are better than us real people". The irony is pre-loaded.
There is certainly quite a bit of, obviously unintentional, irony. No doubt about it.
__________________
-XT

That's what happens when you let rednecks play with anti-matter!
  #26  
Old 10-28-2019, 03:46 PM
Typo Negative's Avatar
Typo Negative is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 7th Level of Hell, Ca
Posts: 17,999
Liberal Elite means "people who think they are better than us real people". The irony is pre-loaded.
__________________
"Just love everybody. I'll sort 'em out later"

-God
  #27  
Old 10-28-2019, 07:43 PM
DrFidelius's Avatar
DrFidelius is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Miskatonic University
Posts: 12,548
I thought "liberal elite" meant Jews.
__________________
The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not represent any other persons, organizations, spirits, thinking machines, hive minds or other sentient beings on this world or any adjacent dimensions in the multiverse.
  #28  
Old 10-28-2019, 09:28 PM
F. U. Shakespeare is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore or less
Posts: 4,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFidelius View Post
I thought "liberal elite" meant Jews.
I'm pretty sure the code for Jews is "eastern liberals".

The Clintons are liberal elite, since they hail from the midwest/south.

In contrast, Patrick Buchanan (who was born in DC, went to private Catholic schools in DC, and private Catholic Georgetown in DC, and was nicknamed "Mr. Inside" when he worked for the Nixon White House [take a guess where?]) is a man of the people.

Last edited by F. U. Shakespeare; 10-28-2019 at 09:30 PM.
  #29  
Old 10-29-2019, 10:40 AM
Gatopescado is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: on your last raw nerve
Posts: 22,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFidelius View Post
I thought "liberal elite" meant Jews.
Glad I wasn't drinking! I would have done a 'spit-take'!
  #30  
Old 10-30-2019, 06:03 AM
GoodOmens is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFidelius View Post
I thought "liberal elite" meant Jews.
That's "cosmopolitan" or "globalist."

A stereotypical "liberal elite" is someone who brags that he doesn't own a TV. The salient aspect is not the TV, it's the bragging.
  #31  
Old 10-30-2019, 07:34 AM
septimus's Avatar
septimus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Land of Smiles
Posts: 19,963
This thread is hard to follow because the words 'elite' and '"elite"' each have several meanings, and some posters use the terms interchangeably. And what is a 'conservative elite'? Does it come with or without quotation marks?

One theme I glean from reading the thread is that some well-educated people are denounced for thinking they are well educated. Is it only uneducated people who have the right to feel well-educated?

In that context, over the last 20 years there has been a profound shift in voting demographics which may help explain a correlation between liberal and elite:

Quote:
“In 1994, those with at least some postgraduate experience were evenly split between the Democratic and Republican parties. Today, the Democratic Party enjoys a roughly two-to-one advantage in leaned partisan identification. While some of this shift took place a decade ago, postgraduate voters’ affiliation with and leaning to the Democratic Party have grown substantially just over the past few years, from 55% in 2015 to 63% in 2017.”
  #32  
Old 10-28-2019, 09:23 PM
Bryan Ekers's Avatar
Bryan Ekers is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 59,350
It's a label useful for making people hostile to people better educated than they are. It's a pity, because one should be trying to emulate smart people rather than sneering at them, but sneering is lazier so it's an easy sell.
  #33  
Old 10-29-2019, 12:09 AM
ASL v2.0's Avatar
ASL v2.0 is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Various
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers View Post
It's a label useful for making people hostile to people better educated than they are. It's a pity, because one should be trying to emulate smart people rather than sneering at them, but sneering is lazier so it's an easy sell.
I guess I’m the lone dissenting view in this. Or at least, I’m the lone dissenting view who sees it as an allegation of implicit hypocrisy rather than of merely being "out of touch."

To break it down, the natural counter to the term "liberal elite," if you believe the term is meant as a pejorative related primarily to extraordinary wealth and advanced education, is to point to the extraordinary fortunes and Ivy League educations of your Bushes and your Romneys. If the argument were strictly an argument against wealth and education, then that would be sufficient to at least negate it as an argument for your prototypical arch-conservative over your classic "liberal elite."

But if, as I believe, it is meant to suggest that the liberal elite are hypocrites, then you can’t simply negate it by reducing it to the absurd, you must directly refute the assumptions that underpin the argument (which probably have something to do with a belief in the efficacy of trickle down economics, the idea that unfettered capitalism is the best and only way to run a "free country," and that the government should function only to provide a safe haven for the same). That’s what I think "the other guy" really means when he throws around the term liberal elite as a pejorative.

Other guy says, "Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are just out of touch liberal elites and so have no business running this country full of good, honest, hard-working folks like me and my audience."

You reply, "Oh yeah? Well what about the Bushes, and for that matter what about you, mister syndicated talk show host with a six-figure income?"

Other guy snaps back with, "Hey, my problem isn’t with people working hard and making money, I’m all for capitalism. What me, Bush, and my viewers have in common is we all believe that if someone works hard, they deserve to succeed and to make money and ultimately achieve the American Dream (tm). The ability to pass that wealth on to the people we care about is yet more motivation to work even harder. What you and your liberal elites want his to have us all living in shitty public housing, with the government controlling every aspect of our lives and taxing us into mediocrity so that a bunch of welfare queens can get buy for nothing."

You say, "No, we just want a social safety net, so people who fall on hard times—"

Other guy interrupts with, "Oh? Well then why don’t you give to charity? I bet you could give me—and to worthy causes—if you weren’t already getting taxed so much. I mean, look at Bush the Elder: he donated to cancer kids. Uncle Joe, Bernie, and Elizabeth Warren just want to raise taxes so they can force you to pay for inefficient government programs that THEY choose, and in the meantime I don’t see them living in public housing or donating their money to charity. Nope, they’ve got posh New England homes on top of their DC town houses. They refuse to live the life they would foist on the rest of us."

/dialogue

The term "liberal elite" is, in a sense, an accusation of class-treason levied by a capitalist against a socialist, but of course they can’t actually call it "class-treason" or refer to the so-called liberal elite a "class-traitor" because those are socialist terms, not suitable for use by a committed capitalist.

Last edited by ASL v2.0; 10-29-2019 at 12:13 AM.
  #34  
Old 10-29-2019, 10:16 AM
Velocity is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 15,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers View Post
It's a label useful for making people hostile to people better educated than they are. It's a pity, because one should be trying to emulate smart people rather than sneering at them, but sneering is lazier so it's an easy sell.
Ironically, this sounds exactly like the question/type being referred to by the OP.
  #35  
Old 10-29-2019, 10:29 AM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is online now
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 62,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velocity View Post
Ironically, this sounds exactly like the question/type being referred to by the OP.
I think the word "ironic" is being used as an excuse to dismiss any response that doesn't buy into this "liberal elite" crap. Defending their position-that's just what I expect the Liberal Elite to do. How ironic!

If you are going to see any response that doesn't agree with the premise as "ironic", what's the point in conversing about the matter?

Last edited by Czarcasm; 10-29-2019 at 10:29 AM.
  #36  
Old 10-29-2019, 02:05 PM
Bryan Ekers's Avatar
Bryan Ekers is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 59,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velocity View Post
Ironically, this sounds exactly like the question/type being referred to by the OP.
I feel no shame in thinking of myself as elite. Well, elite-ish. Frankly, compared to the recent troglodyte tide, I'm practically divine.
  #37  
Old 10-30-2019, 05:27 AM
Annoyed is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers View Post
It's a label useful for making people hostile to people better educated than they are. It's a pity, because one should be trying to emulate smart people rather than sneering at them, but sneering is lazier so it's an easy sell.
This poster pretty much defines the question in the OP.
  #38  
Old 10-29-2019, 12:30 AM
Bryan Ekers's Avatar
Bryan Ekers is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 59,350
You're putting way more thought into it than people railing against the "liberal elite" expect their audiences to, I speculate.
__________________
Don't worry about the end of Inception. We have top men working on it right now. Top. Men.
  #39  
Old 10-29-2019, 12:42 AM
ASL v2.0's Avatar
ASL v2.0 is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Various
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan Ekers View Post
You're putting way more thought into it than people railing against the "liberal elite" expect their audiences to, I speculate.
Right. That’s why it works as a pejorative for their audience but not for me. QED.
  #40  
Old 10-29-2019, 08:36 AM
JRDelirious is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Displaced
Posts: 16,007
Can't help but wonder, if deciding we can and should decipher and libsplain what is behind the notion of "liberal elite" and why it's wrong... makes us an example of the liberal elite?
  #41  
Old 10-29-2019, 09:34 AM
octopus's Avatar
octopus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 9,136
Thomas Sowell’s book Vision of the Anointed gives a good idea of what a liberal elite is and why they are so dangerous.
  #42  
Old 10-29-2019, 10:39 AM
wguy123 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by octopus View Post
Thomas Sowell’s book Vision of the Anointed gives a good idea of what a liberal elite is and why they are so dangerous.
Can you give us a hint what they are and why they are dangerous?
  #43  
Old 10-29-2019, 10:47 AM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is online now
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 62,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by wguy123 View Post
Can you give us a hint what they are and why they are dangerous?
Every group that doesn't agree with the author's ideas are part of an "elite"-the Media Elite, the Liberal Elite, the Political Elite etc., and all those supposed crises that the "Elites" say they are trying to solve are artificial-created by the "Elites" to keep them in power. All attempts to defend, explain or deny are evidence that he is right, as is refusing to defend, explain or deny. This well isn't just poisoned-it is radioactive.
  #44  
Old 10-29-2019, 12:23 PM
octopus's Avatar
octopus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 9,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by wguy123 View Post
Can you give us a hint what they are and why they are dangerous?
Yes. Will it be an answer you find satisfactory? Not a chance. But, in essence, naive or disingenuous power hungry or social approval seeking folk that are largely insulated from feedback from first order effects of the counterproductive yet superficially compassionate or noble policies they advocate. Anyways, there is a book you can read it should only take about 4-5 hrs.
  #45  
Old 10-29-2019, 12:31 PM
ASL v2.0's Avatar
ASL v2.0 is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Various
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by octopus View Post
But, in essence, naive or disingenuous power hungry or social approval seeking folk that are largely insulated from feedback from first order effects of the counterproductive yet superficially compassionate or noble policies they advocate.
So... would you (and that book you read) say that the so-called "liberal elites" are hypocrites?
  #46  
Old 10-29-2019, 10:46 AM
Damuri Ajashi is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boycott View Post
I know conservatives love to talk about lifting yourself from your bootstraps but that's not monopolised by one politically aligned group of people.

Wealth and nepotism is not subject to one group of politically aligned group either.

Donald Trump is the product of inheriting wealth. His kids are even more notorious for living off a silver spoon. Just look at this picture:

https://media.guestofaguest.com/t_ca...ump-family.jpg

George W Bush campaigned in 2004 portraying John Kerry as a liberal elite despite Bush attending Yale like his father and benefitting off his name, and the fact Kerry enlisting to serve in Vietnam, getting the Purple Heart, ended up with conservatives doubting his record of service. Bush of course had doubts over his National Guard record.

Then you get conservatives like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh make a living by using that distinction. Neither completed college. There's no shame in dropping out of a course but the way they talk it's like the shame is in completing the course.

Meghan McCain appears on a hugely popular debate show as the conservative point of view, but her use of "my father" as a qualifier has become a running joke. Meanwhile someone else, who now may be living a cushy life, had to overcome several barriers to get to the same position.

You get conservatives who went to top class higher education institutes, like Ted Cruz at Harvard, frequently use the "liberal elite" tag to degrade opposition points of view as out of touch. What makes him - a conservative - in touch with the ordinary folks anymore than a liberal at Harvard?
I have always understood liberal elite to include wealthy liberals, liberals in academia, liberals in media/Hollywood.
  #47  
Old 10-29-2019, 10:49 AM
Velocity is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 15,617
Some of the answers thus far, especially yesterday, were basically: "Conservatives have elites too." Sure they do, but that isn't exactly an answer to the thread/OP.
  #48  
Old 10-29-2019, 11:21 AM
Kearsen1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velocity View Post
Some of the answers thus far, especially yesterday, were basically: "Conservatives have elites too." Sure they do, but that isn't exactly an answer to the thread/OP.
I think we can break it down to a more simple version.
The Elite are those who think they know better than the "others". How Republicans use the term is very simply the "liberal elite" that think they know better what to do with 'your money, your taxes, and your wealth'.

As Bone explained already, most of the recommendations by the Elite are all on subjective terms.

While you don't hear much run of the Elite being wrong about Global Warming, you might hear of them being wrong about how to best go about fixing it.
Pretty much all policies positions that have subjective terminology can be. It isn't that the underlying facts are wrong , it is only when trying to determine the best approach to fixing it that takes some of those liberal elite off rail, and go so far as to say "we know better than you" so just trust us.
  #49  
Old 10-29-2019, 01:39 PM
Voyager's Avatar
Voyager is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deep Space
Posts: 46,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kearsen1 View Post
I think we can break it down to a more simple version.
The Elite are those who think they know better than the "others". How Republicans use the term is very simply the "liberal elite" that think they know better what to do with 'your money, your taxes, and your wealth'.
So, conservatives who want to take my money to pay for the military are members of the Liberal Elite also? Or does it only apply to things you don't like, like providing food and health care to the poor?

Quote:
While you don't hear much run of the Elite being wrong about Global Warming, you might hear of them being wrong about how to best go about fixing it.
Pretty much all policies positions that have subjective terminology can be. It isn't that the underlying facts are wrong , it is only when trying to determine the best approach to fixing it that takes some of those liberal elite off rail, and go so far as to say "we know better than you" so just trust us.
Really? You haven't heard Fearless Leader refer to global warming as a hoax?
There is hardly a single liberal position on the best way to reduce the problem, only that there is one. A debate about how to fix it starting with a shared that climate change is happening and that we are responsible for much of it would help. That wouldn't involve withdrawing from treaties.
  #50  
Old 10-29-2019, 04:18 PM
Kearsen1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Austin
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyager View Post
So, conservatives who want to take my money to pay for the military are members of the Liberal Elite also? Or does it only apply to things you don't like, like providing food and health care to the poor?



Really? You haven't heard Fearless Leader refer to global warming as a hoax?
There is hardly a single liberal position on the best way to reduce the problem, only that there is one. A debate about how to fix it starting with a shared that climate change is happening and that we are responsible for much of it would help. That wouldn't involve withdrawing from treaties.
I mean, I t would supposedly apply to those the same, if they ran on policies of taking your money and giving it to the US Armed forces (except you know the term Liberal would no longer apply, it'd be Conservatives Elites!). But it currently resides where those who think they know better where and how to spend someone else's money, money that they want to tax others for to spend in the correct way because those others don't know how to spend it correctly.

We can bring up Trump all day long, he's an idiot and definitely could be deserving of the label if he ran around telling others that he wanted to tax them so he could pay for whatever.

Whether it's right or wrong, or in between. We can't even agree there is such a thing?!

Climate change The FIX: Get everyone to agree to immediately eliminate 90% of all fossil fuel usage. EVERYONE.

Done.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017