#1  
Old 02-10-2020, 08:09 PM
GMANCANADA is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 426

Typewriting calories measured how?


https://www.straightdope.com/columns...ain-20-pounds/

Interesting column, but I'm curious as to how the US or Italian doctors mentioned could possibly measure caloric burn to 2 decimal places per minute in the 1950's or even today?

That seems shockingly accurate to me.
  #2  
Old 02-10-2020, 09:24 PM
Chronos's Avatar
Chronos is offline
Charter Member
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 86,612
I think they do it by measuring the amount of oxygen consumed. If you've ever seen a picture of a person on a treadmill with a hose in their mouth, that's the sort of apparatus they use.
  #3  
Old 02-11-2020, 09:34 AM
Jasmine's Avatar
Jasmine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 2,572
The postulate stated in the article strikes me as totally ridiculous based on my knowledge of diet and my experience with exercise.
__________________
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance -- it is the illusion of knowledge."
--Daniel J Boorstin
  #4  
Old 02-11-2020, 08:19 PM
GMANCANADA is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 426
They did that back in the 1950's in Italy? Wow, I'm impressed.

But that's really not measuring caloric burn, it's measuring oxygen consumption as it correlates to caloric burn, correct? (Similar to a fitness watch that correlates heart rate to caloric burn?) Given that they're measuring a correlational factor and not the factor itself how can they possibly state their conclusions so firmly and with such accuracy? It still seems ridiculous to me.

Lastly, I minored in stats in university and from what little knowledge remains in my head, I think that to get such firmly stated conclusions based on so little variance (two decimal places) it seems to me that they'd have a sample of 75 or more. That also strikes me as ridiculous.

I think the skepticism implicit in Cecil's column is well-deserved but also very understated. That study is BS.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017