Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2016, 07:56 AM
GuanoLad's Avatar
GuanoLad is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 24,904

How's Trudeau doing, Canada?


I was quite impressed by Justin Trudeau's diverse new Cabinet and his dynamic attitude, but it was way too early to tell if his youthful enthusiasm was going to follow through on actual results.

But there must be some indicators on how he's managing things. When Nathan Fillion tweeted his support today, there were some cynical responses, but that's Politics, not everybody is going to be happy, so now I'm wondering what the facts are, or at least the word on the street.

We'd all like our next Government to move away from the Old Boys Club and be something new and bring real change, but is Canada going to be the example we want it to be?

Last edited by GuanoLad; 02-13-2016 at 07:57 AM.
  #2  
Old 02-13-2016, 09:54 AM
wolfpup's Avatar
wolfpup is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,965
A couple of things, in case you haven't seen them ...

I started a thread some time ago in a kind of euphoric celebration of Trudeau's first few days and, specifically, his new Cabinet. It seemed to me that the bright and accomplished progressive young people he had appointed were a stark contrast to the old-school reactionaries that were typical of Harper.

Some 100 days later, I think approval and optimism are still running high. There's a CBC article here. Trudeau and his Cabinet recently convened at a three-day retreat on the east coast in which one of the key participants was Michael Barber, a highly regarded former civil servant in Britain who has laid out a blueprint for what he calls the agenda for 21st century governance, the three pillars of which are environment, diversity, and democratic renewal. There's no doubt that Trudeau's agenda is an ambitious one.
  #3  
Old 02-13-2016, 06:15 PM
GuanoLad's Avatar
GuanoLad is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 24,904
Cool. Okay, I guess it's still too early to tell, and they're all waiting to see what happens next. But no big complaints is an achievement in itself.
  #4  
Old 02-16-2016, 10:45 AM
Elendil's Heir is offline
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: my Herkimer Battle Jitney
Posts: 85,220
Glad to see the honeymoon is continuing, more or less. As a progressive neighbor to the south and occasional visitor to Canada, I wish the new PM and his team very well.
  #5  
Old 02-16-2016, 01:53 PM
Hari Seldon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Trantor
Posts: 12,980
He hasn't done much that impinges on my life. So far, I have to say he seems like a decent sort, but hasn't done much. Maybe that's all I want in a politician.

The one promise he has nearly fulfilled (it has taken longer than predicted) is open up the borders to middle eastern refugees. I wonder how they felt, any who arrived here the other night when the wind chill hit -41 (that's -42F).
  #6  
Old 02-16-2016, 03:09 PM
wolfpup's Avatar
wolfpup is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hari Seldon View Post
The one promise he has nearly fulfilled (it has taken longer than predicted) is open up the borders to middle eastern refugees. I wonder how they felt, any who arrived here the other night when the wind chill hit -41 (that's -42F).
CBC actually detailed about a half dozen election promises carried out so far. But on the subject of weather, please don't give our American friends who may never have been up here the impression that we breathe liquid nitrogen! The temperature in the Toronto area almost precisely coinciding with the NBA all-star weekend was somewhere around 25 degrees below normal, which was bad enough in giving our American visitors the wrong impression! It is now back up again to just above freezing where I live. Parts of southern Ontario are farther south than parts of California, and some of it is getting to be really good and expanding wine-growing country. It had to be said!
  #7  
Old 03-10-2016, 10:36 AM
Elendil's Heir is offline
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: my Herkimer Battle Jitney
Posts: 85,220
Looks like the PM is receiving a red-carpet welcome at the like-minded Obama White House: http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/09/politi...sit/index.html
  #8  
Old 03-10-2016, 08:00 PM
wolfpup's Avatar
wolfpup is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,965
Major state dinner going on right now. Sounds like good eats, wish I was there.

But yes, a number of news organizations including CBC and CNN have remarked on the close ideological alignment and close relationship between Obama and Trudeau. The previous Harper government was so hostile to the Obama administration that apparently the US ambassador was shunned by the Harper minions and practically locked out of government access.

This is all going to end next January with the new US administration. If it's Hillary, it might not be too bad a challenge. If it's any of the Republicans the major problem is going to be managing the American refugees.

Last edited by wolfpup; 03-10-2016 at 08:03 PM.
  #9  
Old 03-11-2016, 07:48 AM
Elendil's Heir is offline
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: my Herkimer Battle Jitney
Posts: 85,220
Nice photo album of the Trudeau visit to Washington here: http://www.aol.com/article/2016/03/1...pLid%3D4240869
  #10  
Old 10-01-2016, 11:21 PM
GuanoLad's Avatar
GuanoLad is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 24,904
Thought I'd bump this up and check in. How is Canada going now? You may be getting an influx of new immigrants very soon.
  #11  
Old 10-01-2016, 11:35 PM
Qin Shi Huangdi is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Posts: 9,092
A virtue-signalling standpatter who actually is what the Right claimed Obama was.
  #12  
Old 10-02-2016, 12:37 AM
GuanoLad's Avatar
GuanoLad is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 24,904
Um. Okay. I don't what that means.
  #13  
Old 10-02-2016, 03:22 AM
MrDibble's Avatar
MrDibble is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa &
Posts: 26,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qin Shi Huangdi View Post
A virtue-signalling standpatter who actually is what the Right claimed Obama was.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuanoLad View Post
Um. Okay. I don't what that means.
He's saying Trudeau is a fake-Lefty hardass. I think.
"Virtue signalling" means that he's saying all the right things to seem Left/liberal/'woke' (but implies it's all front, no conviction), and standpatter means "resistant to change" - in a stubborn rather than Conservative sense.

Last edited by MrDibble; 10-02-2016 at 03:23 AM.
  #14  
Old 10-02-2016, 09:34 AM
Dr. Drake is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 6,303
He's getting some flak for caving on environmental issues (e.g. supporting pipelines), which is deserved, and for his relations for First Nations. I think the expectations of what he could do re: First Nations is unreasonable, and he's largely moving things forward as fast as is possible. A couple of minor scandals, but nothing big.

Overall, he's still doing well.

And as a reminder, we didn't even start our campaign until your presidential primary campaigns were well underway, and this month he's been in office about a year already.

Last edited by Dr. Drake; 10-02-2016 at 09:35 AM.
  #15  
Old 10-02-2016, 10:07 AM
LSLGuy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 21,035
IOW, he's apparently accomplishing some of the easier stuff he said he'd do and waffling or backtracking on the harder stuff.

So once again reality demonstrates that chief executives of modern representative democracies can't govern like the Leftist/Rightist dictators their supporters seem to crave and their opponents seem to fear. I'm shocked. Shocked I say!
  #16  
Old 10-02-2016, 10:22 AM
Miller's Avatar
Miller is offline
Sith Mod
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bear Flag Republic
Posts: 44,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qin Shi Huangdi View Post
A virtue-signalling standpatter who actually is what the Right claimed Obama was.
...he's Kenyan?
  #17  
Old 10-02-2016, 11:09 AM
LSLGuy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 21,035
Muslim?
Perhaps not born in the USA?
All black, not just part?

The mind boggles at the nearly endless possibilities.

With apologies to Prof Farnsworth: That's the wonder of being a fantasist! Everything's possible once you dream it (up).

Last edited by LSLGuy; 10-02-2016 at 11:10 AM.
  #18  
Old 10-02-2016, 11:36 AM
CarnalK's Avatar
CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 18,183
Here's what Trudeaumeter says:
Tracking 219 campaign promises:
103 not started yet
62 in progress
34 achieved
20 broken
  #19  
Old 10-02-2016, 11:57 AM
BrotherCadfael is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 10,280
Well, Doonesbury is starting to look a little long in the tooth...

What?
  #20  
Old 10-02-2016, 01:18 PM
Cat Whisperer's Avatar
Cat Whisperer is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lethbridge, AB.
Posts: 49,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Drake View Post
He's getting some flak for caving on environmental issues (e.g. supporting pipelines)<snip>
If he's going to start supporting pipelines, then this Albertan might start feeling a little more cordial towards Trudeau II. Alberta's in a terrible recession, and a Trudeau is Prime Minister - this didn't go well for us last time.
__________________
"Your guilty consciences may make you vote Democratic, but secretly you all yearn for a Republican president to lower taxes, brutalize criminals, and rule you like a king!"
- S. Bob
  #21  
Old 10-02-2016, 01:22 PM
CarnalK's Avatar
CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cat Whisperer View Post
If he's going to start supporting pipelines, then this Albertan might start feeling a little more cordial towards Trudeau II. Alberta's in a terrible recession, and a Trudeau is Prime Minister - this didn't go well for us last time.
Well you'll be comforted to know that one of the promises listed as "broken" on the Trudeaumeter is to phase out fossil fuel industry subsidies.
  #22  
Old 10-03-2016, 03:17 AM
BigT's Avatar
BigT is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: "Hicksville", Ark.
Posts: 36,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
Here's what Trudeaumeter says:
Tracking 219 campaign promises:
103 not started yet
62 in progress
34 achieved
20 broken
I see a distinct lack of "attemped but failed" in that list. That makes me suspicious of the "broken" tally. There is a difference between breaking a promise and not being able to fulfill it.
  #23  
Old 10-03-2016, 04:48 AM
DWMarch is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Nanaimo, BC
Posts: 2,122
I like him. Can you imagine any previous Prime Minister at the Tragically Hip's final concert, looking as if they even remotely belonged there? Trudeau brings a freshness to Canadian politics that is much needed after staid, stoic, stale Harper. I don't think the running tally of promises kept or broken is as important as the fact that he is going to do his best to leave this country in better shape than he found it.
  #24  
Old 10-03-2016, 08:29 AM
Gorsnak is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskaboom
Posts: 9,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
I see a distinct lack of "attemped but failed" in that list. That makes me suspicious of the "broken" tally. There is a difference between breaking a promise and not being able to fulfill it.
One promise listed as broken is the 'admit 30k Syrian refugees by January' promise. While they did miss the arbitrary deadline, I have a hard time seeing an impartial commentator viewing that as a broken promise.
  #25  
Old 10-03-2016, 08:39 AM
RickJay is offline
Charter Jays Fan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 41,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
I see a distinct lack of "attemped but failed" in that list. That makes me suspicious of the "broken" tally. There is a difference between breaking a promise and not being able to fulfill it.
You do have to wonder about the sincerity of a promise that within less than a year allegedly can't be fulfilled.

The promise "Guarantee that First Nation communities have a veto over natural resource development in their territories" is something any intelligent observer would have known is completely impossible, for the simple reason that there is no clear agreement as to what constitutes the totality of "territories" belonging to First Nations - some things clearly are, but there are varying degrees of claim and contest over any number of other territories, and offering a complete veto to anyone is kind of stupid.

The plan to accept 25,000 government-sponsored Syrian refugees by the end of 2015 was obviously a logistical impossibility and only a complete sucker would have thought otherwise.

If a promise can't be done but was insincere to start with, how does one rate that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWMarch
I don't think the running tally of promises kept or broken is as important as the fact that he is going to do his best to leave this country in better shape than he found it.
The same thing can be said of the other 22 Prime Ministers who've served. All have tried to make Canada a better place. Not one of them embarked upon a progarm where they were honestly trying to make Canada a worse place. Some were successful, some were not, some a mix of the two, and some weren't in office long enough to do anything. "Doing their best to leave this country in better shape" is not a point of admiration, it's to be expected.
  #26  
Old 10-09-2016, 02:45 AM
Dr_Paprika is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South of Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,945
Trudeau is doing okay. Still pretty popular. I knew him in college and he is genuinely principled for a politician. The Liberals have this far avoided major gaffes and talked a good game.
  #27  
Old 10-09-2016, 09:48 AM
Leaffan's Avatar
Leaffan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,549
Carbon tax.
  #28  
Old 10-10-2016, 08:04 AM
Hari Seldon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Trantor
Posts: 12,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan View Post
Carbon tax.
To expand on that cryptic comment, he has announced that every province will have to institute either a cap-and-trade system or a carbon tax and that if any province refuses, he will institute a carbon in their province. IMHO, this is extremely positive. Needless to say, the provinces that do not already have such a scheme in place or in the works (only Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia do) are up in arms over this "job-killing initiative". Not that there is any evidence it kills jobs (since it also creates some), but it makes a good line. The other thing he has done is go back to government fact-collecting and also a sane science policy. The previous minister in charge of science policy was a creationist chiropracter who was opposed to what he called "curiosity-driven" research, that is the kind that makes fundamental breakthroughs.

So far, the motion is slow but at least in the right direction and I am moderately happy with him. Of course, being better than his predecessor is a low bar to clear, but he has with ease.
  #29  
Old 10-10-2016, 08:15 AM
Raygun99 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Haligonia
Posts: 3,418
Alberta has a carbon tax plan in the gestational stages, FWIW.
  #30  
Old 10-10-2016, 03:35 PM
Leaffan's Avatar
Leaffan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,549
It amazes me how we all view things through a different lens.
  #31  
Old 10-10-2016, 09:49 PM
RickJay is offline
Charter Jays Fan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 41,480
Well, the words "carbon tax" aren't much of an argument. What's wrong with it? Why is in inferior to other revenue options? What specific market distortion a does it create? Are they offset by positive effects on market failures?
  #32  
Old 10-10-2016, 10:11 PM
Leaffan's Avatar
Leaffan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,549
My electricity bill last year was $7,000. That's what's wrong with a fucking carbon fucking tax.

ETA: Thank you Hydro One!

Last edited by Leaffan; 10-10-2016 at 10:12 PM.
  #33  
Old 10-11-2016, 08:10 AM
RickJay is offline
Charter Jays Fan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 41,480
So you are aware, I trust, that your electricity bill wasn't $7,000 because of a carbon tax, right?
  #34  
Old 10-11-2016, 08:12 AM
Raygun99 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Haligonia
Posts: 3,418
Mine was about $800. What the hell were you doing? Not to mention that a carbon tax is fairly unlikely to have much of an effect on *hydroelectrically* generated power.

Last edited by Raygun99; 10-11-2016 at 08:14 AM.
  #35  
Old 10-11-2016, 08:59 AM
RickJay is offline
Charter Jays Fan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 41,480
Some people are getting completely screwed with delivery charges. The system is insane.

Inicdentally, Ontario's electricty is mostly not produced by hydroelectric sources, contrary to popular belief. Most of it is generated by nuclear energy. I know it's called "Hydro One." and we used to call it "Ontario Hydro," and people call electricity "Hydro" for some reason, but your electricity is largely thanks to uranium, assuming you live in Ontario. The "Hydro" thing is an artifact of history.

Obviously, a carbon tax would still affect one's electricity bill, since SOME of it is generated with fossil fuel, albeit not much - less than ten percent - and electricity is basically fungible, it's not like you can decide you want more electrons from nuclear. Having said that, one's electricity bill isn't necessarily all that connected with how much electricity you use or any sort of logic that related to the customer, which is why we have examples of Hydro One customers who used no power at all getting bills in the hundreds of dollars, or people living across the street from each other using the same amount of power and being billed completely different amounts. Ontario's electricity system is a financial and organizational disaster of epic proportions, many years in the making.

What that has to do with a carbon tax is basically nothing. Carbon taxes can have disruptive effects of the economy, and I think it is reasonable to mistrust the Wynne government about basically anything at all, inasmuch as any sense of honesty or principle was abandoned quite a long time ago. Having said that, the pure economic argument for shifting tax burden to carbon, and away from other things, is extremely solid. You can mess up the implementation of it fifty thousand ways, but in principle it's actually very wise.

Last edited by RickJay; 10-11-2016 at 09:39 AM.
  #36  
Old 10-11-2016, 09:36 AM
Ludovic is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: America's Wing
Posts: 30,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hari Seldon View Post
he will institute a carbon in their province.
Isn't "instituting a carbon in their province" what Trump claims to do with impunity?
  #37  
Old 10-11-2016, 11:37 AM
Euphonious Polemic is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan View Post
My electricity bill last year was $7,000. That's what's wrong with a fucking carbon fucking tax.

ETA: Thank you Hydro One!
My God.

This really does sum up what is wrong with the electorate, when educated people can make comments like this.

It is to laugh.
  #38  
Old 10-11-2016, 11:47 AM
drm is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raygun99 View Post
Mine was about $800. What the hell were you doing? Not to mention that a carbon tax is fairly unlikely to have much of an effect on *hydroelectrically* generated power.
My parents house and Cottage combined was around 7000. The delivery charges to the cottage were pretty substantial. As for the house, they run a huge AC unit and heater in my dads office (he has elderly patients) that accounts for a large chunk. Long story short, maybe theirs is a similar scenario.

As for our little house in the city, we are well under 100 per month and we have bullfrog which apparently inflates it.
  #39  
Old 10-11-2016, 12:23 PM
leahcim is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,668
I, for one, am getting this sweater to wear to the office on (American) election day.
  #40  
Old 10-11-2016, 01:21 PM
Ike Witt's Avatar
Ike Witt is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lost in the mists of time
Posts: 14,783
No doubt that Trudeau is winning the social media battles with his shirtless photobombs. And at this point he has had more vacation time since he was elected than I have had in the last 5 years.
  #41  
Old 10-12-2016, 07:10 PM
Larry Mudd is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ass end of Alberta
Posts: 17,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan View Post
My electricity bill last year was $7,000. That's what's wrong with a fucking carbon fucking tax.

ETA: Thank you Hydro One!
Wait, what? I have a hard time understanding this. How do pay more than seven times per year than I do for a four-member family in a detached house? If it's hydro, how do you expect a carbon tax to impact you?

I moved to Alberta just in time to help elect an NDP government, so I am used to hearing a lot of irrational things about the concept of a carbon tax, but hell our household costs are less than a hundred bucks a year more and we qualify for a 100% rebate on that. Yet my Facebook feed is full of people furious with the tax - it's perplexing.
  #42  
Old 10-12-2016, 07:44 PM
Kimstu is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 22,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Witt View Post
And at this point he has had more vacation time since he was elected than I have had in the last 5 years.
Wow, you've had less than 30 days total vacation over a 5-year period? That sounds pretty brutal for you, but it doesn't suggest to me that the Canadian PM is slacking off.

I see from CarnalK's "Trudeaumeter" link that his objectives include increasing access to parental leaves and flexible working schedules. I hope some combination of that will succeed in helping you regain a healthier work/life balance!
  #43  
Old 10-13-2016, 02:04 AM
Leaffan's Avatar
Leaffan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Euphonious Polemic View Post
My God.

This really does sum up what is wrong with the electorate, when educated people can make comments like this.

It is to laugh.
You think a carbon tax will have no effect of the cost of electricity?

I beg to differ.
  #44  
Old 10-13-2016, 02:07 AM
Leaffan's Avatar
Leaffan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickJay View Post
So you are aware, I trust, that your electricity bill wasn't $7,000 because of a carbon tax, right?
Yeah. It's because of the green energy program, which is also a fucking disaster.
  #45  
Old 10-13-2016, 08:00 AM
RickJay is offline
Charter Jays Fan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 41,480
Okay, but when asked by you opposed a carbon tax, you cited your electricity bill. They're different issues. The impact of a carbon tax on your electricity bill would be very small.

I hate to point this out but a carbon tax makes sense, and what made even more sense was Stephane Dion's "Green Shift" - a full scale movement of taxation away from things like income tax and sales tax and towards carbon tax. The use of fossil fuel is a market failure because of the externality of pollution. Fossil fuel use is quite literally the most logical thing the government COULD tax. Taxing people for the costs they actually create for society is one of the most economically logical things a person can do.

In fact, this is precisely the opposite of your electricity bill problem. One of the problems with the power bills Ontarians are paying is that the connection between how much electricity you use and how much you pay is, shall we say, sketchy. I am sure you've read the news stories of people getting hefty bills when they had no electricity at all, while people who use electricity in other places get lower bills. Charging people an amount that is not immediately and logically connected to their usage of the system, and indirectly charging people for other people's electricity use, as in fact happens in Ontario, is an outstanding way to waste billions of dollars in money, incentivize waste, and fail to incentivize conservation.
  #46  
Old 10-13-2016, 09:28 AM
Leaffan's Avatar
Leaffan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,549
Fossil fuel tax may make sense if you live in an area with decent public transportation. My house is in an area with no public transportation. I work in an area with no public transportation. I have no options. Anyway, it's all just nickel and diming me to death, and I'm bitter for other reasons at this point in life.

(And it has nothing to do with the hockey game last night.)

Last edited by Leaffan; 10-13-2016 at 09:29 AM.
  #47  
Old 10-13-2016, 11:17 AM
RickJay is offline
Charter Jays Fan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 41,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan View Post
Fossil fuel tax may make sense if you live in an area with decent public transportation.
A fossil fuel tax makes sense, full stop. IMHO, it should be generally offset by tax breaks elsewhere.

Do you use more fossil fuel than someone in a big city? Yes, and you should pay for it. A central tenet of good economic policy is that one should pay for what one uses, and that a situation where other people pay for what you use - an externality - is inefficient. (Conversely, you would ideally also be paid, or subsidized, for creating a positive externality - an example being lower WSIB rates for companies with good safety records and programs.)

If you live in the sticks and have to drive more, you should pay for the extra fuel you use, just as a person in the city has to pay more for the land they live on.
  #48  
Old 11-02-2016, 11:25 AM
Elendil's Heir is offline
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: my Herkimer Battle Jitney
Posts: 85,220
A New Yorker humorist warns of the risk of increased American immigration due to a Trudeau photo: http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borow...refugee-crisis
  #49  
Old 11-02-2016, 11:30 AM
LSLGuy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southeast Florida USA
Posts: 21,035
I wonder how Trump and his followers would react if Canada built a wall?
  #50  
Old 11-02-2016, 11:40 AM
Chimera is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In the Dreaming
Posts: 24,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSLGuy View Post
I wonder how Trump and his followers would react if Canada built a wall?
And it was paid for by ex-pat Americans?
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright 2018 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017