Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 07-09-2019, 07:54 PM
Chessic Sense is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
What we mean is what was said. It isn't clearly true, because Trump himself did not offer that explanation. When someone is being called to task, their explanation is the one that is relevant. Explanations made up after the fact are just attempts to defend them. They have little relevance.
OMG, you're not actually suggesting that Trump might LIE about something and fail to admit fault, are you?! Egad!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
However, even if we do allow for your explanation, it still doesn't actually work. It doesn't explain how, once he was off the teleprompter, he said even dumber things. There is no word that replaced "airports" that would fit, and neither Trump himself nor his speechwriters have offered one.
I already told you the word that replaces "airports." It's "ramparts." "Manned the ramparts." Y'know, as in "o'er the ramparts we watched." You may have heard that alongside other phrases Trump said, like "the rockets’ red glare" and "their star spangled banner waved." Sound familiar?

Watch the video again. You can hear him say it wrong, stop himself, and try again.
"Our army manned the airpuh...it read the ramparts" After that, he's off track. Watch his hands. His body language says "I don't know what to say." Do you really think a professional speechwriter put "it did everything it had to do" in the final text? In the words of Joe Biden, c'mon man.


Quote:
Originally Posted by BigT View Post
Trump said these stupid things, which is evidence of declining intelligence compared to what he's said before, and thus evidence of dementia. You even admitted he didn't know what he was saying.
You guys are acting like the dude is speaking extemporaneously, generating ideas from his own head. He's not. He's reading. It's really not that hard to figure out.

I like how you say "admitted", like a confession or something.
  #102  
Old 07-09-2019, 10:25 PM
The Tooth is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 4,746
Yeah, but he told a bunch of boy scouts about his friend's sex yacht; it's hard to chalk that one up to a bad read. It's not my place to say if President Not-my-type is clinically mentally ill, but I feel safe in proclaiming him fucking bonkers. He's at the bottom end of every other bell curve that describes human behaviour, why not mental health's as well?
__________________
"It would never occur to me to wear pink, just as it would never occur to Michael Douglas to play a poor person." - Sarah Vowell
  #103  
Old 07-10-2019, 07:24 PM
BeepKillBeep is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,574
This parody doesn't sound to far off from reality. I've no idea if bush has dementia, but he is definitely an idiot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NI0_mEMaTyE
  #104  
Old 07-10-2019, 08:43 PM
Wesley Clark is offline
2018 Midterm Prediction Winner
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 22,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chessic Sense View Post
Guys, it's not that hard to figure out. "Ramparts" was on the teleprompter. He's behind bulletproof glass, rain is beading on the panes, so probably on the screen too, and he's got 70 year old eyes. It says "manned the ramparts." He said "manned the air [whoops, I mean] rammed [ah fuck, it says ramparts] the ramparts." Does it make sense? No. Does it make him look stupid? Yes. Is it hard to figure out what happened? No.
Do you remember when the right used to complain endlessly about how Obama would read his speeches off a teleprompter? Because I do

And now we're supposed to excuse Trump being a deranged, incompetent moron who thought there were airports in the 18th century because he read it on a teleprompter?

Nope.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion

Last edited by Wesley Clark; 07-10-2019 at 08:43 PM.
  #105  
Old 07-10-2019, 08:49 PM
Chessic Sense is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Clark View Post
Do you remember when the right used to complain endlessly about how Obama would read his speeches off a teleprompter? Because I do

And now we're supposed to excuse Trump
Supposed to? Who is doing supposing? Were you given a homework assignment or something?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Clark View Post
being a deranged, incompetent moron who thought there were airports in the 18th century because he read it on a teleprompter?

Nope.
So you agree he misread a teleprompter.

Last edited by Chessic Sense; 07-10-2019 at 08:51 PM.
  #106  
Old 07-10-2019, 09:01 PM
Wesley Clark is offline
2018 Midterm Prediction Winner
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 22,226
No, I don't agree his misread a teleprompter. I'm saying even if he did it doesn't excuse him being a fucking moron.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion
  #107  
Old 07-10-2019, 09:07 PM
Moriarty's Avatar
Moriarty is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 2,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tooth View Post
...I feel safe in proclaiming him fucking bonkers...
Now that’s a diagnosis I heartily endorse!
  #108  
Old 07-10-2019, 09:19 PM
Happy Lendervedder's Avatar
Happy Lendervedder is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tooth View Post
...I feel safe in proclaiming him fucking bonkers...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moriarty View Post
Now that’s a diagnosis I heartily endorse!
Oh, but poor Bonkers.
  #109  
Old 07-10-2019, 10:56 PM
Left Hand of Dorkness's Avatar
Left Hand of Dorkness is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: at the right hand of cool
Posts: 41,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chessic Sense View Post
So you agree he misread a teleprompter.
There's a delightful children's book, The Book With No Pictures, designed to be read aloud.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Book With No Pictures
Here is how books work: everything the words say, the person reading the book has to say.

No matter what.

That's the deal.
That's the rule.

So that means, even if the words say

BLORK
wait--what?

That doesn't even mean anything.
And so on, until by the end of the book the reader confesses to having a best friend named Boo Boo Butt and to being a monkey who taught themselves to read and who is reading with a monkey mouth in a monkey voice.

Kids freakin LOVE this book. Part of what's so funny to them is that it's obviously not true: just because the words are on the page, YOU DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE TO READ THEM.

Teleprompters work the same way.

Last edited by Left Hand of Dorkness; 07-10-2019 at 10:56 PM.
  #110  
Old 07-10-2019, 11:02 PM
Left Hand of Dorkness's Avatar
Left Hand of Dorkness is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: at the right hand of cool
Posts: 41,294
To be clear: I can easily imagine myself misreading a teleprompter and thinking the word "rampart" was "airport."

But I cannot imagine myself not realizing what I was saying. And if I'd said something about an 18th-century army taking over airports, I can't imagine just continuing on as if there was nothing wrong with that. Motherfucker just keeps on talking through that line, doesn't even stumble after he says "they took over the airports."

That's not right, y'all.
  #111  
Old 07-10-2019, 11:06 PM
Left Hand of Dorkness's Avatar
Left Hand of Dorkness is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: at the right hand of cool
Posts: 41,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chessic Sense View Post
After that, he's off track. Watch his hands. His body language says "I don't know what to say."

...

You guys are acting like the dude is speaking extemporaneously, generating ideas from his own head. He's not. He's reading.
I'm actually having trouble figuring out your argument, on rereading it. When he's blathering about taking over airports, do you believe he's reading, or do you believe he's off-track and doesn't know what to say and so is extemporizing?
  #112  
Old 07-11-2019, 12:27 AM
Bookkeeper's Avatar
Bookkeeper is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ottawa, Canuckistan
Posts: 2,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Left Hand of Dorkness View Post
To be clear: I can easily imagine myself misreading a teleprompter and thinking the word "rampart" was "airport."

But I cannot imagine myself not realizing what I was saying. And if I'd said something about an 18th-century army taking over airports, I can't imagine just continuing on as if there was nothing wrong with that. Motherfucker just keeps on talking through that line, doesn't even stumble after he says "they took over the airports."

That's not right, y'all.
I suspect that his disinclination for reading briefing papers (and apparently pretty much anything) may be due to some form of dyslexia and/or refusal to use glasses as age hampers his eyesight. He misreads a word and his mouth fills in something similar sounding. He doesn't notice that it doesn't make sense because the words are of no significance to him - they are merely the "blah, blah, blah" that lets him stand up there in the role of POTUS and have people applaud him and jet planes roar overhead.
  #113  
Old 07-11-2019, 07:34 AM
BeepKillBeep is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,574
Exactly. If you give Trump every possible benefit of the doubt, then he's still at a minimum incredibly dumb, incompetent and ignorant.
  #114  
Old 07-11-2019, 08:53 AM
ThelmaLou's Avatar
ThelmaLou is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Neither here nor there
Posts: 16,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bookkeeper View Post
I suspect that his disinclination for reading briefing papers (and apparently pretty much anything) may be due to some form of dyslexia and/or refusal to use glasses as age hampers his eyesight. He misreads a word and his mouth fills in something similar sounding. He doesn't notice that it doesn't make sense because the words are of no significance to him - they are merely the "blah, blah, blah" that lets him stand up there in the role of POTUS and have people applaud him and jet planes roar overhead.
Like this. All he hears are a few key words and his name.
__________________
"If we're not supposed to dance, why all this music?" Gregory Orr
  #115  
Old 07-14-2019, 01:38 PM
Crane is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,093
Neurological disorder? Sounds like something clinical that I'm not qualified to diagnose.

However, I can comment on what I observe.

Trump was raised in Dr. Norman Vincent Peales' "Power of Positive Thinking" church. The basic tenet of the church is to react to the world as you believe it should be - not as it is. Trump constantly exhibits this characteristic. In Trumps' world he is the all powerful head of the US Government. Those who support his world view are noble and skilled. Those who do not support his world view are stupid loosers. An individual may occupy both positions within minutes of each other. It's simply Trumps' world view at the time of the utterance. The past, fact and truth do not exist in the Peale positive philosophy. Positive belief can alter reality.

Ones religious belief is delusional, even an atheist. It's a matter of degree. So, is Trumps' delusion an illness? Is his philosophy in the office of President a First Amendment violation?
  #116  
Old 07-14-2019, 01:46 PM
QuickSilver is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Left Hand of Dorkness View Post
To be clear: I can easily imagine myself misreading a teleprompter and thinking the word "rampart" was "airport."

But I cannot imagine myself not realizing what I was saying. And if I'd said something about an 18th-century army taking over airports, I can't imagine just continuing on as if there was nothing wrong with that. Motherfucker just keeps on talking through that line, doesn't even stumble after he says "they took over the airports."

That's not right, y'all.
But they had already "rammed the ramparts" in the previous sentence. Clearly taking over the airports is the next strategic move. A very stable genius knows this.
__________________
St. QuickSilver: Patron Saint of Thermometers.
  #117  
Old 07-14-2019, 02:34 PM
carrps is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 805
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThelmaLou View Post
Like this. All he hears are a few key words and his name.
Ha. I knew it would be this cartoon. One of my favs.
  #118  
Old 07-24-2019, 03:54 AM
Eclipse Chaser is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 125
He's now referring to Boris Johnson as "Britain Trump". Not "British Trump". Britain Trump. Doesn't make sense.

And saying that we in the UK love him .... sorry, I don't know anyone who doesn't despise him.
  #119  
Old 07-24-2019, 06:12 AM
Wolf333 is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThelmaLou View Post
Like this. All he hears are a few key words and his name.

The dog is even almost the right color.
  #120  
Old 07-24-2019, 07:45 AM
Defensive Indifference is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 7,166
I'll admit that I don't watch Trump's every move, but lately he seems to be more coherent, if no less hateful and wrong. His recent attacks on AOC and others, and his "love it ir leave it" speeches have seemed dangerously calculated and consistent.
  #121  
Old 07-24-2019, 10:59 AM
krondys's Avatar
krondys is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gillette, Wyoming
Posts: 1,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThelmaLou View Post
Like this. All he hears are a few key words and his name.
Ha, I knew before clicking what it would be...

ETA: carrps and I had eerily similar responses...

Last edited by krondys; 07-24-2019 at 11:01 AM. Reason: ETA: <keanu> Whoa... </keanu>
  #122  
Old 07-25-2019, 01:57 PM
Defensive Indifference is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 7,166
I don't know if this was today, and I don't have the full context, but Trump looks and sounds pretty muddled here as he makes remarks at an honor guard review. He stumbles over "lawmakers", then seems to go off in a direction only he understands, rambling about 98 or 90...something

https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/...61541103575040

Yesterday I was saying he seemed more coherent. Now I'm back in the "something ain't right" camp.
  #123  
Old 07-25-2019, 02:20 PM
ThelmaLou's Avatar
ThelmaLou is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Neither here nor there
Posts: 16,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensive Indifference View Post
I don't know if this was today, and I don't have the full context, but Trump looks and sounds pretty muddled here as he makes remarks at an honor guard review. He stumbles over "lawmakers", then seems to go off in a direction only he understands, rambling about 98 or 90...something

https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/...61541103575040

Yesterday I was saying he seemed more coherent. Now I'm back in the "something ain't right" camp.
WHOA! I never listen to him. I don't watch any news on TV, and if he comes on NPR in the car I turn off the radio for 20 seconds or so. I can honestly say I have not heard him speak since the debates with Hillary.

This was way weird.

"Lawmerkers"?? He's speaking very slowly and hesitantly and his voice is a bit scratchy.

Looking at the Twitter comments. It certainly could be xanax.

Another Twitter comment: "And to think, people were questioning Mueller's mental capacity for not being able to remember specifics about his 400+ page report." No kidding.
__________________
"If we're not supposed to dance, why all this music?" Gregory Orr
  #124  
Old 07-25-2019, 02:25 PM
Ravenman is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 26,376
The 90, 98, or what? thing was about how many votes the new Secretary of Defense got for his confirmation.

I'm not totally sure I am onboard with assuming a neurological condition here. He's not smart, he's a bad public speaker even on his best day, he's slowing down because of his age, and he has serious personality disorders. Those are all major issues, but not the same as dementia or whatever is being implied.
  #125  
Old 07-25-2019, 03:12 PM
Defensive Indifference is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 7,166
He also said something that sounded like "combat infantroopen badge" .

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1154422075345526785

To be fair, he probably just stumbled over "Combat Infantryman Badge", getting his wires crossed with "infantryman", which is not that common a word outside the military, and thinking "troop" belonged in there somewhere.
  #126  
Old 07-25-2019, 03:15 PM
kayaker's Avatar
kayaker is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 32,555
Wow. How long before the POTUS shits his pants at the podium?
  #127  
Old 07-25-2019, 03:33 PM
dropzone's Avatar
dropzone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 29,929
Won't matter if he's wearing his Depends.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...6/4KAE9KKM.jpg
  #128  
Old 07-25-2019, 03:44 PM
kayaker's Avatar
kayaker is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 32,555
No, seriously. I wonder if his people near the podium have a protocol, maybe code named "brown dog" where they've discussed how to handle the misfortune of a presidential anal sphincter breach. It happens to people his age, especially when neurological capacity is declining.

In their shoes, I'm thinking, yell, "gun", then hold your nose and get POTUS to a secure men's.
  #129  
Old 07-25-2019, 03:55 PM
Euphonious Polemic is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,751
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayaker View Post
Wow. How long before the POTUS shits his pants at the podium?
He'll blame Obama.

Mitch McConnel, when asked for comment, will go off on a rant about "socialists"

Fox News personalities will do a piece on the lovely scent, color and texture of the Trump feces.
  #130  
Old 07-25-2019, 04:21 PM
dropzone's Avatar
dropzone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 29,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayaker View Post
No, seriously.
I was being serious.
  #131  
Old 07-25-2019, 05:28 PM
Defensive Indifference is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Euphonious Polemic View Post
He'll blame Obama.

Mitch McConnel, when asked for comment, will go off on a rant about "socialists"

Fox News personalities will do a piece on the lovely scent, color and texture of the Trump feces.
Obama did it first! Remember that tan suit? It wasn't tan in the morning! Why was it OK when Obama shit himself but not when Trump does EXACTLY THE SAME THING???
  #132  
Old 07-25-2019, 05:53 PM
Peter Morris's Avatar
Peter Morris is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The far canal
Posts: 12,650
and the latest news: Trump speaks in front of a fake seal that mocks him.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49116539

This appears to be a goof by one of his supporters, who pulled the image off the internet without noticing the fakery.
  #133  
Old 07-27-2019, 09:16 AM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,418
Trump's behavior is so bad it's hard for me to think of anyone I've met who acts that way. His behavior is so far out of norm for an adult it's just pathetic.
  #134  
Old 07-27-2019, 09:30 AM
dropzone's Avatar
dropzone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 29,929
Pathetic would be the right word because if you knew someone IRL who was that far gone you'd feel sorry for him and his family.
  #135  
Old 07-27-2019, 09:57 AM
enipla is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Colorado Rockies.
Posts: 14,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropzone View Post
Pathetic would be the right word because if you knew someone IRL who was that far gone you'd feel sorry for him and his family.
Nearly half of the country are cheering this behavior. And it seems the rest of us sit in stunned silence. Like really finding a turd in the punchbowl. It's another abomination every day. Can't keep up with it.

Well, no. Not exactly. I, myself, am stunned that there doesn't seem to be a dam thing we can do about it. Used to be that voting counted. Not so much anymore (doesn't keep me from voting of course).

I do hope the republicans finally get their final Bonnie and Clyde moment. Not with bullets, but with real votes. Bring the whole republican crime spree to a screeching smoking halt. The End.
__________________
I don't live in the middle of nowhere, but I can see it from here.
  #136  
Old 08-23-2019, 09:53 AM
Dung Beetle's Avatar
Dung Beetle is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 16,603
Mush-brain mouth is is at it again.
  #137  
Old 08-23-2019, 10:16 AM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is online now
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 62,071
If My Beloved caught me talking like that(and I was't drunk or high as a kite) she would immediately call 911. How brain-damaged does he have to appear to be before the Vice President steps up and does his moral/ethical duty and steps in? Has it gotten to the point that, if he got up there and drooled uncontrollably while attempting to talk, they would just let him continue?
  #138  
Old 08-23-2019, 12:04 PM
bobot's Avatar
bobot is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago-ish
Posts: 8,714
Trump has hereby ordered American companies to find sources other than China, because he's a sane and sound one. I don't know what it will take for Trump supporters to realize they were bamboozled.
  #139  
Old 08-23-2019, 12:06 PM
OttoDaFe's Avatar
OttoDaFe is offline
Sluice Gate Tender, FCD #3
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Soviet of Washington
Posts: 2,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Czarcasm View Post
If My Beloved caught me talking like that(and I was't drunk or high as a kite) she would immediately call 911. How brain-damaged does he have to appear to be before the Vice President steps up and does his moral/ethical duty and steps in? Has it gotten to the point that, if he got up there and drooled uncontrollably while attempting to talk, they would just let him continue?
From a transcript of Wednesday's Lawrence O'Donnell (about 2/3 of the way down):
Quote:
… I want to read a couple of tweets today of people who I was impressed by. One is Dr. Eugene Gu, thoughtful observer of our times. He said, we learn in med school that if someone comes to the emergency room calling themselves the King of Israel and the second coming of God, that patient is either high on drugs or is having a psychotic break and needs to be promptly evaluated with a Tox screen and psychiatric consult.

And he was replied to by Maureen Tracey who said, Dr. Gu, I worked as a nurse for more than 40 years, there is no way Donald Trump would not have been referred repeatedly to psych!, and if his docs had not been accommodating they would have found themselves in hot water. This guy is not mentally stable from all outside appearances, and there are no serious defenses by Trump supporters against those statements.
"No serious defenses" other than the (alternative) fact that he's The Chosen One.
  #140  
Old 08-23-2019, 12:11 PM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is online now
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 62,071
Chosen by Loki, perhaps?
  #141  
Old 08-23-2019, 12:16 PM
nelliebly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,630
As long as Trump can wind himself up and get out there, McConnell and the GOP will continue to do so. He spits out a few key phrases, his ardent supporters fill in the blanks and ignore the glitches, and all appears well. In fact, I think his supporters trust him more because he's NOT coherent: to them it reads as unscripted and sincere. (Can't trust politicians who are smooth, eloquent, and educated.)To admit he's neurologically compromised would derail the Trump Train and lead to GOP defeat in 2020, they can't have that, no matter what the cost to the country.
  #142  
Old 08-23-2019, 12:25 PM
QuickSilver is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Czarcasm View Post
Has it gotten to the point that, if he got up there and drooled uncontrollably while attempting to talk, they would just let him continue?
This has been my singular and most fondest hope for him. To see him struck down by a stroke in the most public and embarrassing way imaginable. I mean a full on drooling, babbling, incontinent meltdown. One which he absolutely must survive but never recover from and be forced to watch on replay on Fox News for the rest of his worthless life. Insh'allah.
__________________
St. QuickSilver: Patron Saint of Thermometers.
  #143  
Old 08-23-2019, 01:16 PM
bump is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 18,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dung Beetle View Post
Mush-brain mouth is is at it again.
The part that's most telling to me isn't the mispronunciations; I can attribute that to a mismatch in thinking/speaking speeds. It's the continual Porky-Pig style pauses and rephrasings- he'll start saying something, have it derail, and then just sort of go on with something else- sometimes a variation on what he was going to say, and others in a non-sequitur way.

It's like he's not quite able to hold a coherent thought and articulate it in speech- he just sort of has diarrhea of the mouth, which is not particularly uncommon in early dementia patients.

https://www.sciencealert.com/ramblin...cientists-find
  #144  
Old 08-23-2019, 01:34 PM
k9bfriender is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by quicksilver View Post
this has been my singular and most fondest hope for him. To see him struck down by a stroke in the most public and embarrassing way imaginable. I mean a full on drooling, babbling, incontinent meltdown. One which he absolutely must survive but never recover from and be forced to watch on replay on fox news for the rest of his worthless life. Insh'allah.
best speech evar!!!!
  #145  
Old 08-23-2019, 02:08 PM
carrps is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dung Beetle View Post
Mush-brain mouth is is at it again.
He's pretty sweaty in that clip.
  #146  
Old 09-01-2019, 12:10 PM
Charlotte Little is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 11

Bumping this back up


Given Trump's behavior and appearance at the G7, I began digging on Twitter, found Tom Joseph and started following him. I don't know that the man is correct about what is going on with Trump, and he certainly shouldn't be diagnosing Trump from afar. But something is amiss and more and more folks are realizing it. (Just in 72 hours, Tom's Twitter following has gone up from 43K to 46k, so I'm not the only curious cat.)

From Nicole Wallace to Rachel Maddow this past week, the questioning & speculation without mentioning dementia is happening. Pair that with Trump being whisked off to Camp David and then off to "golf" after canceling his trip to Poland, and then Pence seeming to step in for Trump to speak on Hurricane Dorian, Tom may be on to something.

https://twitter.com/TomJChicago/stat...32680438951936

I'm fascinated by it, because for the life of me, I cannot understand Pelosi's reluctance to go full throttle on impeachment. If she knows Trump is ill and deteriorating, that may be what's motivating her to keep hitting the brakes even though we are now at the place where over half of the House is calling for his removal.

Things are not as they seem. There is an explanation that we are not (and may never be) fully aware of. But if Tom is right, Trump will not be mentally or physically able to run for reelection.
  #147  
Old 09-01-2019, 01:36 PM
Locrian is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Valley Village, CA
Posts: 4,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlotte Little View Post
Given Trump's behavior and appearance at the G7, I began digging on Twitter, found Tom Joseph and started following him. I don't know that the man is correct about what is going on with Trump, and he certainly shouldn't be diagnosing Trump from afar. But something is amiss and more and more folks are realizing it. (Just in 72 hours, Tom's Twitter following has gone up from 43K to 46k, so I'm not the only curious cat.)

From Nicole Wallace to Rachel Maddow this past week, the questioning & speculation without mentioning dementia is happening. Pair that with Trump being whisked off to Camp David and then off to "golf" after canceling his trip to Poland, and then Pence seeming to step in for Trump to speak on Hurricane Dorian, Tom may be on to something.

https://twitter.com/TomJChicago/stat...32680438951936

I'm fascinated by it, because for the life of me, I cannot understand Pelosi's reluctance to go full throttle on impeachment. If she knows Trump is ill and deteriorating, that may be what's motivating her to keep hitting the brakes even though we are now at the place where over half of the House is calling for his removal.

Things are not as they seem. There is an explanation that we are not (and may never be) fully aware of. But if Tom is right, Trump will not be mentally or physically able to run for reelection.
Interesting read. I think even if he doesn't or can't run for re-election, he'll finagle a trip to Russia for whatever reason, announce he's having the best doctors, Russian doctors, check his health, then he never returns to avoid maybe prosecution. And I'm sure that GOP members have noticed this about his behavior too, so maybe they're thinking that the jig is up.
  #148  
Old 09-01-2019, 06:18 PM
Sherrerd's Avatar
Sherrerd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlotte Little View Post
... I cannot understand Pelosi's reluctance to go full throttle on impeachment. If she knows Trump is ill and deteriorating, that may be what's motivating her to keep hitting the brakes even though we are now at the place where over half of the House is calling for his removal. ...
IF "over half the House" were calling for impeachment (not "removal," as the House has no power to remove a president), then it would be remarkable indeed that Pelosi hasn't called for a vote.

But of course that is not the case. There are 435 voting members of the House, and to date 134 of them have called for "an impeachment inquiry" (not a vote). ('More than half' of 435 would be 218.)

An impeachment vote now would endanger the House Democratic majority:

Quote:
Of the 31 lawmakers from districts Trump won in 2016, only two — freshman Reps. Lauren Underwood of Illinois and Chris Pappas of New Hampshire — have backed impeachment during the six-week-long congressional recess, according to an analysis by The Washington Post.

“People in my district are wanting us to pass bills, and they fear that if we go down this path of impeachment, we’re not going to be working on the things that affect their lives, their pocketbooks, their kids,” said freshman Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), who represents a Trump district and has yet to back an impeachment inquiry.

... House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has also resisted calls for proceedings in part out of concern about political blowback on these very lawmakers who were crucial to delivering the House majority last year.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...f68_story.html



And of course a vote that leads to a Senate acquittal would give Trump a boasting-point that far outstrips a mere 'they haven't voted to impeach me'*. And practical people are looking at the results of such a vindication for Trump. How would Americans be better off with Republican-majority Senate AND House (again), with a re-elected Trump?

Quote:
And as Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) told impeachment-backing constituents at a recent town hall: The Senate is refusing to vote on a bipartisan gun control bill supported by the vast majority of Americans; if the Senate won’t do that, don’t expect senators to vote to convict Trump, she said.
ibid


*The idea is often advanced by Impeach Now advocates, that if the House doesn't impeach soon, Trump will brag that they can't impeach him. That theory comes off poorly against reality: he could be bragging about that every day-----yet he never mentions it. So that particular talking point appears to be worthless.

[My emphasis in the first quote.]
  #149  
Old 09-01-2019, 06:42 PM
Charlotte Little is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherrerd View Post
IF "over half the House" were calling for impeachment (not "removal," as the House has no power to remove a president), then it would be remarkable indeed that Pelosi hasn't called for a vote.

But of course that is not the case. There are 435 voting members of the House, and to date 134 of them have called for "an impeachment inquiry" (not a vote). ('More than half' of 435 would be 218.)

An impeachment vote now would endanger the House Democratic majority:

[My emphasis in the first quote.]
I meant impeachment and House democrats (republicans will never be on board). I guess I need to slow down and really look at what I've typed.

As for the rest of your comment, I don't agree. Impeachment is their job whether or not the senate will vote to remove him. You don't let the corrupt decide the outcome without even being willing to fight. It is the one remedy to (try to) remove a corrupt POTUS and is morally imperative. If not Trump, then no future POTUS will be impeached. We might as well just roll over and allow authoritarianism to settle in.

Not everything is political. Sometimes it's just about right and wrong and standing up for your country. No one, no one, can predict what will ultimately happen in 2020. And as I was saying in this thread about Trump's failing faculties - he may not even be the candidate after all.
  #150  
Old 09-01-2019, 07:16 PM
Sherrerd's Avatar
Sherrerd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlotte Little View Post
I meant impeachment and House democrats (republicans will never be on board). I guess I need to slow down and really look at what I've typed.

As for the rest of your comment, I don't agree. Impeachment is their job whether or not the senate will vote to remove him. You don't let the corrupt decide the outcome without even being willing to fight. It is the one remedy to (try to) remove a corrupt POTUS and is morally imperative. If not Trump, then no future POTUS will be impeached. We might as well just roll over and allow authoritarianism to settle in.

Not everything is political. Sometimes it's just about right and wrong and standing up for your country. No one, no one, can predict what will ultimately happen in 2020. And as I was saying in this thread about Trump's failing faculties - he may not even be the candidate after all.
I agree that we don't know what the coming months hold with respect to Trump's health---it's entirely possible that he'll suffer some health crisis (stroke; heart attack; something else) that will be so clearly debilitating that the Cabinet and Pence will actually put the 25th Amendment into action.

I still haven't seen an "impeach now" argument that works, though. How is it "fighting" to hand the House back to the Republicans and the WH back to Trump (assuming he remains minimally upright and coherent)? The 2020 election will not be determined solely by Woke Twitter. The majority of Americans, who oppose impeaching Trump, will determine that outcome. They will let Democrats who try to take things into their own hands, know their displeasure.

How is it "fighting" to simply surrender to corrupt fascism?

Isn't it better to root out corrupt fascism by empowering the people of the United States to declare their preference for the rule of law---by voting for it?
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2018 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017