Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-23-2020, 01:07 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460

January 23 2019: the remarkable rise of Pete Buttigieg


One year ago today I woke up in a Washington DC hotel room and saw mentions of a candidate announcement from Pete Buttigieg. I thought it was cute, I knew about Pete from the DNC chair race as well as his coming out story made the Chicago LGBT media. I sure didnít expect to amount to anything except perhaps the first openly LGBT candidate making one of the early debates.

That story was completely crowded out by the ongoing government shutdown.

Now, one year later, it is the most amazing American political story of the modern era. Pete came from absolutely nowhere to be a leading candidate for president. On January 23 2019, everyone knew who Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden were. Pete has set fundraising records and didnít start with a massive donor list like the other candidates. Even Cory Booker and Kamala Harris had Senate campaign donor lists as well as coverage during the recent Kavanaugh hearings.

Hereís Peteís announcement from a year ago:
https://twitter.com/petebuttigieg/st...718874112?s=21

Pete may not get the nomination but the past year has definitely been amazing. Donald Trump may not have had any political experience but he entered the race also with 100% name recognition.

Iowa is in less than two weeks and heís got as good of a chance as winning as the rest of the big 4.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #2  
Old 01-23-2020, 01:21 PM
iiandyiiii's Avatar
iiandyiiii is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 37,833
I like Pete okay, and I'll happily support him if he wins the nomination (though he's not my first pick), but "the most amazing American political story of the modern era" is just a wee-bit premature. He hasn't won anything yet. If he ends up winning the nomination and the Presidency, then yes, he'll be up there as one of "the most amazing American political stories of the modern era" (up there with Obama and, unfortunately, Trump). If he doesn't win Iowa and drops out after Super Tues (and doesn't get picked as Veep), then Pete will be a footnote in the story of 2020. We'll see.

But no matter how he does in this election, Pete's obviously a very talented young Democrat and has a very bright future in the party and in US politics. Assuming he doesn't win this time, I hope he runs for Senator or Governor of Indiana, and then he'd be in prime position to run for Prez again later.
  #3  
Old 01-23-2020, 01:27 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by iiandyiiii View Post
I like Pete okay, and I'll happily support him if he wins the nomination (though he's not my first pick), but "the most amazing American political story of the modern era" is just a wee-bit premature. He hasn't won anything yet. If he ends up winning the nomination and the Presidency, then yes, he'll be up there as one of "the most amazing American political stories of the modern era" (up there with Obama and, unfortunately, Trump). If he doesn't win Iowa and drops out after Super Tues (and doesn't get picked as Veep), then Pete will be a footnote in the story of 2020. We'll see.

But no matter how he does in this election, Pete's obviously a very talented young Democrat and has a very bright future in the party and in US politics. Assuming he doesn't win this time, I hope he runs for Senator or Governor of Indiana, and then he'd be in prime position to run for Prez again later.
Iíd expect that if he doesnít get the nomination or a cabinet position in a Democratic administration, he might actually move out of state. Chasten can probably get a teaching position in a blue state and I donít think Pete has a path ahead in bright red Indiana.

I think it is still an amazing story, 0% name recognition to where he is today.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #4  
Old 01-23-2020, 01:37 PM
Thing Fish is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago (NL)
Posts: 3,904
It was a pretty remarkable rise. Three months after his announcement, he was polling at 7% and had moved into third place in the 538 polling average. Sadly for dale's narrative, it's now ten months later and he's still at 7%. He's been in fourth place since mid-May and is only a few tenths of a percent from falling into fifth behind Bloomberg. His support among minorities is basically zero.
  #5  
Old 01-23-2020, 01:55 PM
Thing Fish is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago (NL)
Posts: 3,904
Also, Nate Silver's current estimates of each candidate's chances of winning Iowa:

Biden 36%, Sanders 23%, Buttigieg 19%, Warren 18%.

It's not impossible that he might win Iowa, and if he did it's plausible that that would give him momentum and lead to more wins. So his chances of becoming President, despite his anemic national polling numbers, aren't quite zero. But they certainly aren't close to being as good as Biden's, Sanders' or even Warren's.
  #6  
Old 01-23-2020, 02:19 PM
ISiddiqui is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Decatur, Georgia, USA
Posts: 7,105
OMG, he's doubling down on this. He basically topped out nationally at 10% in early December and has been falling from that. He's not even as impressive as Howard Dean at this point, right?

Last edited by ISiddiqui; 01-23-2020 at 02:21 PM.
  #7  
Old 01-23-2020, 02:24 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
The campaign has put all their eggs into IA and NH there’s no doubt about it. It’s a smart strategy because I think only one of Pete or Warren survives the first 3 with a realistic path. As of now, it looks like Biden has a lock on SC.

The last DMR poll comes out Saturday, that’ll tell a lot.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #8  
Old 01-23-2020, 02:32 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalej42 View Post
The campaign has put all their eggs into IA and NH thereís no doubt about it. Itís a smart strategy because I think only one of Pete or Warren survives the first 3 with a realistic path. As of now, it looks like Biden has a lock on SC.

The last DMR poll comes out Saturday, thatíll tell a lot.
Correction: the last poll comes out February 1.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #9  
Old 02-06-2020, 10:20 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
And we win Iowa! Yes, I agree Iowa was a clusterfuck and it’s basically a tie with Sanders.

But, the title of the this thread is The Remarkable Rise of Pete Buttigieg. I think it is a fair statement to say that those who caucused on Monday all knew about Biden/Bernie/Warren on February 3 2019. No one knew about Pete. I don’t know if he will win this nomination or not, but this is one hell of a success story in American politics.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His

Last edited by dalej42; 02-06-2020 at 10:20 PM.
  #10  
Old 02-06-2020, 11:02 PM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,834
Bernie Sanders rise from anonymity in 2015 to becoming a meaningful challenger to Hillary Clinton in the primary was more inspirational. That was a true dark horse candidate. Sanders has empowered the democratic base and given voice to the voiceless. Obama's rise was inspirational but I feel Sanders was moreso.

I would be happy to vote for Buttigieg for president, but he doesn't seem to have a lot of substance other than being non-threatening and good at debate. He changes his opinions based on what he needs to say to win. When he was unkonwn he seemed to take the progressive side, but then he tried to become a moderate as a younger, smarter alternative to Biden and his agenda changed. Granted, being smart enough to read a room and change tactics isn't a negative. But I don't know how hard he would fight as president for his agenda.

Either way, Pete is talented and win or not he has a good future in politics ahead of him. However I agree with OP, he has no future in Indiana. He will never become governor or senator in this red state. He will have to try for a different office (probably a cabinet position if he loses the primary).
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion

Last edited by Wesley Clark; 02-06-2020 at 11:04 PM.
  #11  
Old 02-06-2020, 11:06 PM
Thing Fish is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago (NL)
Posts: 3,904
I mean, obviously I agree that Bernie is more inspirational, but as far as sudden rises, really, Buttigieg is more impressive. Bernie didn’t have great name recognition nationwide, but when a US Senator runs for President, voters and the media are going to take him at least somewhat seriously. Mayor of South Bend? Not so much.

Last edited by Thing Fish; 02-06-2020 at 11:08 PM.
  #12  
Old 02-06-2020, 11:09 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Clark View Post
Bernie Sanders rise from anonymity in 2015 to becoming a meaningful challenger to Hillary Clinton in the primary was more inspirational. That was a true dark horse candidate. Sanders has empowered the democratic base and given voice to the voiceless. Obama's rise was inspirational but I feel Sanders was moreso.

I would be happy to vote for Buttigieg for president, but he doesn't seem to have a lot of substance other than being non-threatening and good at debate. He changes his opinions based on what he needs to say to win. When he was unkonwn he seemed to take the progressive tactic, but then he tried to become a younger, smarter alternative to Biden and his agenda changed.
I fully admit Iím anti-Sanders to the core but I donít really think he was unknown. Heís been in congress since 1990 and that election certainly made news as a socialist got elected. With the rise of social media, especially YouTube and Facebook, there were plenty of Bernie speeches on the senate floor out there.

Bernie was never a John McCain or a Bob Dole with 100% name recognition. But, I think among those who vote in Democratic primaries, he wasnít exactly unknown.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #13  
Old 02-06-2020, 11:09 PM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thing Fish View Post
I mean, really, Buttigieg is more impressive. Bernie didn’t have great name recognition nationwide, but when a US Senator runs for President, people are going to take him at least somewhat seriously. Mayor of South Bend? Not so much.
A lot of senators and a lot of mayors have run and gotten nowhere though.

Buttigieg, even if he wins, will not help build a grassroots political movement and give voice to people who have felt ignored by their own party for years.

Either way, Either one of them would make a good president.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion

Last edited by Wesley Clark; 02-06-2020 at 11:10 PM.
  #14  
Old 02-06-2020, 11:15 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thing Fish View Post
I mean, obviously I agree that Bernie is more inspirational, but as far as sudden rises, really, Buttigieg is more impressive. Bernie didnít have great name recognition nationwide, but when a US Senator runs for President, voters and the media are going to take him at least somewhat seriously. Mayor of South Bend? Not so much.
Wow, we actually agree on something!! And Iíd say the same thing if the mayor of Burlington, VT had just won (or tied) in the Iowa caucuses. If Pete was one of the senators from Indiana, him winning Iowa might be a surprise but not one of the greatest rises in modern American politics.

As great as Obama was, everyone knew that 2004 keynote speech and he was a senator from Illinois. Had he been the mayor of Champaign, Illinois, it would have been a different story.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #15  
Old 02-07-2020, 08:55 AM
Translucent Daydream is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Grand Valley
Posts: 1,958
It seems to me a lot of the same things that are getting sad about mayor Pete now were said about Obama in 2007. I’m not saying he’s an Obama or anything but he seems like the one that would be the best next door neighbor.
__________________
I promise itís not as bad or as good as you think it is.
  #16  
Old 02-07-2020, 09:21 AM
QuickSilver's Avatar
QuickSilver is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,245
Buttegieg did well in the town hall yesterday. Don't think he put a foot wrong. He rarely does. I would be very happy to see him win the nomination and I think he would be far more effective as a contrast to Trump than Bernie or Joe.

That said, Bernie did exceptionally well, too. It's hard not to like the guy.
__________________
St. QuickSilver: Patron Saint of Thermometers.
  #17  
Old 02-08-2020, 05:11 PM
RTFirefly is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Maryland
Posts: 41,265
He was for Medicare for All on January 23, 2019. He was in favor of adding more Justices to the Supreme Court on January 23, 2019.

Any other big positions he plans to abandon, and then attack or ridicule those who still hold them, between now and January 23, 2021?

Guy's so wet behind the ears, he can't even decide who he wants to pretend to be for more than a few months at a time.
  #18  
Old 02-08-2020, 06:04 PM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTFirefly View Post
He was for Medicare for All on January 23, 2019. He was in favor of adding more Justices to the Supreme Court on January 23, 2019.

Any other big positions he plans to abandon, and then attack or ridicule those who still hold them, between now and January 23, 2021?

Guy's so wet behind the ears, he can't even decide who he wants to pretend to be for more than a few months at a time.
I'm guessing he figured the progressive vote was locked up for Bernie & Warren, so he tried to become the alternative to Biden.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion
  #19  
Old 02-08-2020, 09:02 PM
RioRico is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: beyond cell service
Posts: 3,193
I'm less than excited about Mayor Pete because McKinsey.

Mayors aren't elected U.S. President without a few other political posts on top. Andrew Johnson. Grover Cleveland. Calvin Coolidge. Those are the lot. Pete's best shot at the hotseat is to make Veep first.
  #20  
Old 02-08-2020, 09:28 PM
Lamoral's Avatar
Lamoral is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Fenario
Posts: 3,415
People with no government experience at all don't usually become President. Secular loudmouth womanizers from New York City don't usually carry the Bible Belt. Things are possible now that weren't possible before, for better or worse.
  #21  
Old 02-08-2020, 09:47 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamoral View Post
People with no government experience at all don't usually become President. Secular loudmouth womanizers from New York City don't usually carry the Bible Belt. Things are possible now that weren't possible before, for better or worse.
Bill Clinton admitted smoking marijuana but didn’t inhale. Obama admitted he did inhale. Bush/Cheney were the first all DUI team running for the party of law and order.

The sample size is just amazingly small. I’m sure there would have been threads about Carter being too inexperienced had the SDMB been around back then. And, they may have had a point. While Carter did serve a single term as governor of Georgia, southern governors are notoriously weak. Most of their time is spent with ribbon cutting and take a picture (not a selfie in 1976) with the high school football champs.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His

Last edited by dalej42; 02-08-2020 at 09:48 PM.
  #22  
Old 02-08-2020, 11:15 PM
RioRico is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: beyond cell service
Posts: 3,193
Of the three who had been mayors, A.Johnson and C.Coolidge had run small cities - and succeeded to the White House after assassinations. Only G.Cleveland (of Buffalo NY, a major city then) was elected into the presidency.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamoral View Post
People with no government experience at all don't usually become President. Secular loudmouth womanizers from New York City don't usually carry the Bible Belt. Things are possible now that weren't possible before, for better or worse.
The electoral system wasn't so broken and rigged before. Russian campaign tampering wasn't so intensive before. Fewer legislators were foreign assets before. Yes, much has changed.
  #23  
Old 02-08-2020, 11:27 PM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamoral View Post
People with no government experience at all don't usually become President. Secular loudmouth womanizers from New York City don't usually carry the Bible Belt. Things are possible now that weren't possible before, for better or worse.
The voters of the republican party and the voters of the democratic party are not the same people though. We aren't comfortable with the same things they are comfortable with (rape*, treason, pedophilia, incompetence, dementia, etc).

*we did somewhat overlook this issue with the clintons though.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion

Last edited by Wesley Clark; 02-08-2020 at 11:27 PM.
  #24  
Old 02-08-2020, 11:34 PM
Lamoral's Avatar
Lamoral is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Fenario
Posts: 3,415
Ah yes, rape, treason, pedophilia, dementia, only being a mayor and not a Senator or Vice President - all definitely comparable attributes of a presidential candidate.
  #25  
Old 02-08-2020, 11:52 PM
Velocity is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 17,465
Buttigieg and Bernie supporters shouting each other verbally in New Hampshire: "Buttigieg won" vs "Bernie won" (about Iowa)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/sanders-b...040944763.html
  #26  
Old 02-09-2020, 05:39 AM
The Other Waldo Pepper is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 17,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by RioRico View Post
Of the three who had been mayors, A.Johnson and C.Coolidge had run small cities - and succeeded to the White House after assassinations. Only G.Cleveland (of Buffalo NY, a major city then) was elected into the presidency.
Werenít they, respectively, Governor of Tennessee, and Governor of Massachusetts, and Governor of New York?
  #27  
Old 02-09-2020, 05:52 AM
Bijou Drains is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,024
I think he does like H. Clinton and moves to a place he has a better shot at winning for the house or senate. He could win a safe Dem seat in Indiana but probably not Gov. or Senate.
  #28  
Old 02-09-2020, 09:33 AM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bijou Drains View Post
I think he does like H. Clinton and moves to a place he has a better shot at winning for the house or senate. He could win a safe Dem seat in Indiana but probably not Gov. or Senate.
If he doesnít win the nomination and the Dems donít win the presidency, I predict that Chasten takes a teaching job in a blue state and they move. Heís already finished his two terms and theyíre so young it wouldnít be blatant carpetbagging.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #29  
Old 02-09-2020, 11:41 AM
nightshadea is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: a condo in hell 10th lvl
Posts: 6,444
this is a rather interesting story about what he did before politics .....
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/comp...N&ocid=SK2DDHP

If he uses the connections that the story makes it sound like he has even if he doesn't win anything now he will lin the future
  #30  
Old 02-09-2020, 05:06 PM
Thing Fish is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago (NL)
Posts: 3,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalej42 View Post
If he doesnít win the nomination and the Dems donít win the presidency, I predict that Chasten takes a teaching job in a blue state and they move. Heís already finished his two terms and theyíre so young it wouldnít be blatant carpetbagging.
Oh, it would totally be blatant carpetbagging, but hey, it worked for Hillary. I think if he finds a landing spot with lots of white moderates and no Dem incumbent he could pull it off.
  #31  
Old 02-10-2020, 08:09 AM
RTFirefly is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Maryland
Posts: 41,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Buttigieg
“The time has come for my party to get a lot more comfortable owning this issue [deficit/debt]... It’s not fashionable in progressive circles to talk too much about the debt.”
Source.

Dear Mayor Pete:

Jimmy Carter shrunk the deficit. (Before Buttigieg was born.)
Reagan blew up the deficit to pass tax cuts. (Ditto.)
Bush the Elder raised taxes, and all but got drummed out of the party because of it. (When Buttigieg was in elementary school.)
Clinton not only shrunk the deficit, he balanced the freakin' budget for four years straight. (This happened when Buttigieg was in high school. He should at least have some dim memory of this.)
Dubya cut taxes on the rich and blew up the deficit again. (While Buttigieg was at Harvard.)
Obama, despite having to deal with the worst recession since the Great Depression, reduced the deficit on his watch. (While Buttigieg was mayor.)
Trump cut taxes almost entirely on rich people, and blew up the deficit again. (Ditto.)

Over and over and over again, Dems don't spend money on stuff that would actually make people's lives better, because they're cleaning up after the elephants.

There's a motherfucking reason why it's not 'fashionable' for progressives to talk about deficits. It's because the Dems have been the more fiscally responsible party for forty freakin' years, and all it gets us is handcuffing ourselves from doing other things that might actually benefit people, and losing elections.

If Mayor Pete wants to take us through yet one more cycle of this absurdity, he can go fuck himself. With good old Midwestern heartland farm implements.
  #32  
Old 02-10-2020, 08:14 AM
RTFirefly is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Maryland
Posts: 41,265
And (same link, scroll down):
Quote:
Pete Buttigieg gets a question about how he’d deal with Mitch McConnell and a Republican Senate.

His Plan A: Flip the Senate

His Plan B: Work w/ GOP in good faith and if that fails use Air Force One to travel the country and call them out
Re Plan A: remember everything Obama was able to get through the Senate with a 59-41 majority? Flipping the Senate is a necessary condition, but it's far from sufficient. I give this plan an Incomplete.

Re Plan B: LOLOLOL. Man, I'd like to be in the alternate universe where this had a snowball's chance of working.
  #33  
Old 02-10-2020, 08:39 AM
CarnalK's Avatar
CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 20,094
Well, I know it's missing "ask the senate to please change their rules and kill the filibuster" but there really isn't a great answer to that question.
  #34  
Old 02-10-2020, 08:51 AM
E-DUB's Avatar
E-DUB is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarnalK View Post
Well, I know it's missing "ask the senate to please change their rules and kill the filibuster" but there really isn't a great answer to that question.
Might as well say you'll send the flying monkeys after them.
  #35  
Old 02-10-2020, 09:24 AM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTFirefly View Post
Source.

Dear Mayor Pete:

Jimmy Carter shrunk the deficit. (Before Buttigieg was born.)
Reagan blew up the deficit to pass tax cuts. (Ditto.)
Bush the Elder raised taxes, and all but got drummed out of the party because of it. (When Buttigieg was in elementary school.)
Clinton not only shrunk the deficit, he balanced the freakin' budget for four years straight. (This happened when Buttigieg was in high school. He should at least have some dim memory of this.)
Dubya cut taxes on the rich and blew up the deficit again. (While Buttigieg was at Harvard.)
Obama, despite having to deal with the worst recession since the Great Depression, reduced the deficit on his watch. (While Buttigieg was mayor.)
Trump cut taxes almost entirely on rich people, and blew up the deficit again. (Ditto.)

Over and over and over again, Dems don't spend money on stuff that would actually make people's lives better, because they're cleaning up after the elephants.

There's a motherfucking reason why it's not 'fashionable' for progressives to talk about deficits. It's because the Dems have been the more fiscally responsible party for forty freakin' years, and all it gets us is handcuffing ourselves from doing other things that might actually benefit people, and losing elections.

If Mayor Pete wants to take us through yet one more cycle of this absurdity, he can go fuck himself. With good old Midwestern heartland farm implements.
Yup, exactly. Sounds like he was playing into the right wing narrative that the GOP cuts the deficit and democrats increase it, which is the opposite of reality.

Democrats are willing to raise taxes, which is necessary to cutting the deficit. The deficit was down to 2% of GDP near the end of Obama's second term. Now with Trump's tax cuts and spending programs on the military its up to 5%.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion

Last edited by Wesley Clark; 02-10-2020 at 09:26 AM.
  #36  
Old 02-10-2020, 09:47 AM
CarnalK's Avatar
CarnalK is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 20,094
Talking after that rally, he specifically says that the Dems have shrunk the deficit and Repubs have grown it. I think a more charitable interpretation is that he is talking optics.
O'Donnell response with a little more than a one line tweet quote:
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/lawrence...mpression=true
  #37  
Old 02-10-2020, 10:56 AM
ISiddiqui is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Decatur, Georgia, USA
Posts: 7,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thing Fish View Post
Oh, it would totally be blatant carpetbagging, but hey, it worked for Hillary. I think if he finds a landing spot with lots of white moderates and no Dem incumbent he could pull it off.
He may be successful in a purple state against a beleaguered GOP Senator. Something like how Colorado is this year. Or Pennsylvania in 2022 against Pat Toomey?
  #38  
Old 02-10-2020, 11:12 AM
Thing Fish is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago (NL)
Posts: 3,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by ISiddiqui View Post
He may be successful in a purple state against a beleaguered GOP Senator. Something like how Colorado is this year. Or Pennsylvania in 2022 against Pat Toomey?
I'd want to see him show some more appeal to minority voters before I'd be comfortable with him running in those States. Maybe Iowa, it's only a couple States over and they seem to like him there. I don't think he'd have a great chance of winning a Statewide race in Illinois, but there are certainly a bunch of Congressional districts Downstate he'd be a good fit for.
  #39  
Old 02-10-2020, 11:14 AM
ISiddiqui is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Decatur, Georgia, USA
Posts: 7,105
I don't think he beats Joni Ernst though.
  #40  
Old 02-17-2020, 03:40 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
A very long, but excellent, article on Buttigieg written by one of his college professors.
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/reading-buttigieg
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #41  
Old 02-17-2020, 05:22 PM
Wesley Clark's Avatar
Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 23,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalej42 View Post
A very long, but excellent, article on Buttigieg written by one of his college professors.
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/reading-buttigieg
That was an extremely good article. I had to use a speed reading app to get through it all since it was 8000+ words but it was a very good picture of what Buttigieg actually stands for.

I'll vote for whomever the democrats nominate, but if Buttigieg actually gets the nomination I'd say I'm more excited to vote for him than I was before reading that.

But, I must say, that Buttigieg is right that we've basically been put into a bind where the democrats are basically just neo-liberal republican lite and lots of democrats do not like that choice, and they don't like the lack of a positive national vision from democrats. But that is why Sanders is so popular. Sanders is presenting this narrative as an alternative to the neoliberal republican-lite politics most of us have come to expect from the democratic party. I can understand why Pete did a major paper on Sanders because of this, but with Sanders already as the transformative candidate rejecting neoliberalism I guess Buttigieg had to present himself as the voice of a new generation instead as that lane was taken by Sanders and Warren.

I voted in the 2010 Indiana elections. I don't remember voting for treasurer, but I tend to vote pretty much straight democratic so I'm sure I voted for Pete in 2010, despite not remembering him from that election. I hope he has a meaningful role in the future of the democratic party. However there is no future for him in Indiana, which is basically a southern state in the north (senators, governors and other statewide office all tend to go republican here). He may want to focus on behind the scenes work with narratives and how to portray the party on a national level, being involved in executive level cabinet positions, etc. if his plan to run for president doesn't pan out.
__________________
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to sparkle motion

Last edited by Wesley Clark; 02-17-2020 at 05:23 PM.
  #42  
Old 02-17-2020, 05:56 PM
Socsback is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTFirefly View Post
Source.

Dear Mayor Pete:

Jimmy Carter shrunk the deficit. (Before Buttigieg was born.)
Reagan blew up the deficit to pass tax cuts. (Ditto.)
Bush the Elder raised taxes, and all but got drummed out of the party because of it. (When Buttigieg was in elementary school.)
Clinton not only shrunk the deficit, he balanced the freakin' budget for four years straight. (This happened when Buttigieg was in high school. He should at least have some dim memory of this.)
Dubya cut taxes on the rich and blew up the deficit again. (While Buttigieg was at Harvard.)
Obama, despite having to deal with the worst recession since the Great Depression, reduced the deficit on his watch. (While Buttigieg was mayor.)
Trump cut taxes almost entirely on rich people, and blew up the deficit again. (Ditto.)

Over and over and over again, Dems don't spend money on stuff that would actually make people's lives better, because they're cleaning up after the elephants.

There's a motherfucking reason why it's not 'fashionable' for progressives to talk about deficits. It's because the Dems have been the more fiscally responsible party for forty freakin' years, and all it gets us is handcuffing ourselves from doing other things that might actually benefit people, and losing elections.

If Mayor Pete wants to take us through yet one more cycle of this absurdity, he can go fuck himself. With good old Midwestern heartland farm implements.
It might be helpful to consider the entire context of this statement, rather than just spewing rage all over the internet.

His point is that we need to find money to provide social services, which will be more manageable if we control the debt. He also points out that Democrats have historically done a better job of controlling the debt than Republicans have, and blames the current debt entirely on Trump.

He's right. We SHOULD be discussing this, and if a Democrat is going to be in the White House, they will have to address it.
  #43  
Old 02-18-2020, 09:16 PM
QuickSilver's Avatar
QuickSilver is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,245
Buttigieg is head and shoulders above Sanders and Klobuchar in the townhall. Always smart. Always consistent.
__________________
St. QuickSilver: Patron Saint of Thermometers.
  #44  
Old 02-19-2020, 01:18 PM
SuntanLotion is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: mentor ohio
Posts: 505
I saw a clip of him being asked what if the president brings up "family values"? he said hes never cheated on his husband or paid someone to keep quiet about an affair. Good for him!
https://www.businessinsider.com/butt...rn-star-2020-2
__________________
Divide and conquer. Power to the people

Last edited by SuntanLotion; 02-19-2020 at 01:22 PM. Reason: pasted link
  #45  
Old 02-24-2020, 08:58 AM
Elendil's Heir is offline
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: 221B Baker St.
Posts: 90,068
I saw Mayor Pete speak at a suburban Cleveland library about a year ago and liked what I saw - smart, funny, low-key, quick on his feet. His best line: asked about his electability, he said, "I think I have the ex-Navy small-town-mayor gay Episcopalian Maltese-American lane pretty much locked up."

That said, moving from South Bend city hall to the White House is quite a leap, he has serious problems with black Democrats, and I think most Americans in the secrecy of the voting booth aren't going to go for a gay President. I think he might be best as HUD Secretary in the next Democratic Cabinet.
  #46  
Old 02-24-2020, 08:59 AM
Elendil's Heir is offline
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: 221B Baker St.
Posts: 90,068
This was a good moment for him out on the campaign trail recently, BTW: https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/23/polit...ent/index.html
  #47  
Old 02-24-2020, 09:24 AM
QuickSilver's Avatar
QuickSilver is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,245
Head and shoulders above the rest of the field.

If this is not his time to be POTUS, I hope to see him back in the ring.
__________________
St. QuickSilver: Patron Saint of Thermometers.
  #48  
Old 02-24-2020, 10:33 AM
RTFirefly is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Maryland
Posts: 41,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socsback View Post
It might be helpful to consider the entire context of this statement, rather than just spewing rage all over the internet.

His point is that we need to find money to provide social services, which will be more manageable if we control the debt. He also points out that Democrats have historically done a better job of controlling the debt than Republicans have, and blames the current debt entirely on Trump.

He's right. We SHOULD be discussing this, and if a Democrat is going to be in the White House, they will have to address it.
Some of the candidates are discussing it. Warren's got a wealth tax proposal which pays for an astounding amount of stuff, and IIRC Sanders has a similar proposal.

Maybe Buttigieg should discuss it, rather than just going around saying we ought to.
  #49  
Old 03-01-2020, 06:27 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16,460
And not really a fall as Pete drops out. He beat Biden in IA and NH as well as beating Amy and Warren in every single race.

It was a remarkable rise and Iím so proud to have be associated with this campaign. Iíve met some truly amazing people over the last year or so.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42 He/Him/His
  #50  
Old 03-01-2020, 10:57 PM
Elendil's Heir is offline
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: 221B Baker St.
Posts: 90,068
Here's more: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...al-race-118489

Too bad.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017