Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2019, 09:34 PM
Lucas Jackson's Avatar
Lucas Jackson is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,526

Are penguins considered dinosaurs


It’s commonly stated that modern birds are living dinosaurs and penguins are birds. So it would seem so. But based on recent penguin “missing link” find articles, they claim that penguins evolved after the dinosaurs were ‘wiped out’.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/09/world...scn/index.html

I realize that journalist aren’t scientist but still it made me wonder.


.

Last edited by Lucas Jackson; 12-10-2019 at 09:36 PM.
  #2  
Old 12-10-2019, 09:40 PM
Andy L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,293
It's just a journalist speaking imprecisely. By "dinosaurs" he means the popular conception of dinosaur (a big lizardy thing). But any taxonomic grouping that includes what people think of as dinosaurs also includes all birds, including dinosaurs. The fact that modern penguins evolved after the creatures that showed up in Jurassic Park were extinct doesn't matter.
  #3  
Old 12-10-2019, 10:21 PM
whc.03grady is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Montana
Posts: 486
All extant bird species evolved after the (other) dinosaurs were wiped out, nothing special about penguins.
  #4  
Old 12-10-2019, 11:16 PM
Derleth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Missoula, Montana, USA
Posts: 21,519
"Dinosaur" is a huge family of species, grouped into smaller groups of species.

It was a huge living family before one of the Earth's bigger extinction events.

"Birds" is one of the branches of that family. They are a specific group of Theropods, which are a specific group of Dinosaurs. It's a sub-branch of a sub-branch of a bigger tree, which is, itself, a sub-branch of the massive tree of all life on Earth, past and present. You can distinguish birds from non-bird dinosaurs, but there's no way to say birds aren't dinosaurs, any more than you can say housecats aren't mammals.

You can look at this nested list to see how everything's situated. Search for "Aves" to see where all birds, past and present, are attached to the tree. Every group name with a cross in front of it is completely extinct.
__________________
"Ridicule is the only weapon that can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them."
If you don't stop to analyze the snot spray, you are missing that which is best in life. - Miller
I'm not sure why this is, but I actually find this idea grosser than cannibalism. - Excalibre, after reading one of my surefire million-seller business plans.
  #5  
Old 12-10-2019, 11:37 PM
septimus's Avatar
septimus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: the Land of Smiles
Posts: 21,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy L View Post
... But any taxonomic grouping that includes what people think of as dinosaurs also includes all birds, including dinosaurs....
Nitpick: That's true if by "taxonomic grouping" you mean "monophyletic taxonomic grouping," but in fact paraphyletic groupings are in widespread use.

If only monophyletic groupings are allowed, then insects are crustaceans, butterflies are moths, snakes are lizards, ants are wasps, whales are even-toed ungulates, trees are algae, humans are fish, all mammals are sponges, and ... all living creatures are bacteria!
  #6  
Old 12-10-2019, 11:44 PM
Colibri's Avatar
Colibri is offline
SD Curator of Critters
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Panama
Posts: 44,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas Jackson View Post
It’s commonly stated that modern birds are living dinosaurs and penguins are birds. So it would seem so. But based on recent penguin “missing link” find articles, they claim that penguins evolved after the dinosaurs were ‘wiped out’.
All they mean by that is that the birds we recognize as penguins developed after the KT extinction event. It's a pretty stupid headline, since pretty much every kind of bird we recognize today evolved after the non-bird dinosaurs went extinct.

Many kinds of birds existed before the KT event, including both the lineages that led to modern birds as well as others now extinct. Actually, the most common birds before the event were those known as Enantiornithes (or "opposite birds," because their ankle joints were formed in an opposite way from modern birds) but all of these were wiped out.

The KT event appears to have wiped out all tree-living birds, and only four to six lineages of ground dwelling birds survived, including the ratites (ostriches etc), waterfowl, chicken-like birds, and the ancestor of all other birds. These lineages, especially the last, underwent very rapid divergence immediately after the extinction event, and most modern groups originated in the Paleocene/Eocene.

The article actually says that the ancestors of penguins split from their nearest relatives, the albatrosses and petrels, before the KT event, so it's not even accurate to say that penguins originated after non-avian dinosaurs became extinct. It's just that the lineage that led to modern penguins split from older kinds of penguins after the extinction event

Last edited by Colibri; 12-10-2019 at 11:55 PM.
  #7  
Old 12-11-2019, 12:42 AM
Lucas Jackson's Avatar
Lucas Jackson is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,526
Thanks guys. And thanks for the links.

I see what you are saying Colibri. I guess I didnít stop to think that all birds today evolved after dinosaurs went extinct.

Still it seems weird to think of penguins as dinosaurs.
  #8  
Old 12-11-2019, 09:05 AM
markn+ is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: unknown; Speed: exactly 0
Posts: 3,129
I dunno. Penguins seem pretty dinosaurish to me, compared to things like finches and hummingbirds.
  #9  
Old 12-11-2019, 09:21 AM
Machine Elf is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Challenger Deep
Posts: 12,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by markn+ View Post
I dunno. Penguins seem pretty dinosaurish to me, compared to things like finches and hummingbirds.
I think geese might be the winners in the "looks like a dinosaur" contest.
  #10  
Old 12-11-2019, 10:04 AM
naita is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 6,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas Jackson View Post
Thanks guys. And thanks for the links.

I see what you are saying Colibri. I guess I didnít stop to think that all birds today evolved after dinosaurs went extinct.

Still it seems weird to think of penguins as dinosaurs.
I find this illustration very helpful to "unweird" it some.

https://www.xkcd.com/1211/
  #11  
Old 12-11-2019, 10:32 AM
Colibri's Avatar
Colibri is offline
SD Curator of Critters
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Panama
Posts: 44,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas Jackson View Post
Still it seems weird to think of penguins as dinosaurs.
I don't think many people realize how much like birds certain non-avian dinosaurs like Anchiornis looked. And no, that's not a bird, but from a different lineage than that that led to modern birds. Some, like the bizarre four-winged Microraptor, may have been capable of powered flight. Many small feathered theropods looked much more like typical birds than penguins do.
  #12  
Old 12-11-2019, 12:36 PM
GreysonCarlisle's Avatar
GreysonCarlisle is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colibri View Post
Many kinds of birds existed before the KT event, including both the lineages that led to modern birds as well as others now extinct. Actually, the most common birds before the event were those known as Enantiornithes (or "opposite birds," because their ankle joints were formed in an opposite way from modern birds) but all of these were wiped out.
Since the OP has been answered, I hope it's ok to ask a followup.

Why did the Enantiornithes go extinct while the ancestors of modern birds did not? Just reading the Wiki on them, they were highly diverse and widespread, with all sorts of special adaptations, and they too had the power of flight. They seem like the sort of animal that would have had at least some survivors.

Were they just out-competed by what would become modern birds, or was there something about their flight capabilities or growth rate (both mentioned in the Wiki article) that made them inefficient in the post-KT world?
  #13  
Old 12-11-2019, 01:01 PM
Bumbershoot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 3,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colibri View Post
I don't think many people realize how much like birds certain non-avian dinosaurs like Anchiornis looked. And no, that's not a bird, but from a different lineage than that that led to modern birds. Some, like the bizarre four-winged Microraptor, may have been capable of powered flight. Many small feathered theropods looked much more like typical birds than penguins do.
I always enjoy watching the roadrunners around here; it's very easy to think of them as little dinosaurs (especially when they're hunting lizards). This one looks a lot like your Anchiornis. And this one resembles the microraptor.

Last edited by Bumbershoot; 12-11-2019 at 01:02 PM.
  #14  
Old 12-11-2019, 01:09 PM
Colibri's Avatar
Colibri is offline
SD Curator of Critters
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Panama
Posts: 44,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreysonCarlisle View Post
Why did the Enantiornithes go extinct while the ancestors of modern birds did not? Just reading the Wiki on them, they were highly diverse and widespread, with all sorts of special adaptations, and they too had the power of flight. They seem like the sort of animal that would have had at least some survivors.

Were they just out-competed by what would become modern birds, or was there something about their flight capabilities or growth rate (both mentioned in the Wiki article) that made them inefficient in the post-KT world?
I don't think that anything other than the luck of the draw is necessary to explain their extinction. As I mentioned as few as four to six lineages - possibly as few as six species, but probably more - of modern birds survived the KT event. There's no evidence that any Enantiornithes survived the event and were outcompeted subsequently.

As I said, all tree-dwelling birds apparently went extinct. The surviving modern bird lineages were ground birds at the time. It also appears they may have also been seed-eaters. Enantiornithes mostly still had teeth rather than beaks like modern birds, so perhaps lacked specialized seed-eaters.
  #15  
Old 12-11-2019, 01:27 PM
GreysonCarlisle's Avatar
GreysonCarlisle is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colibri View Post
possibly as few as six species...of modern birds survived the KT event.
That really puts things into perspective. It was hell on earth, and we're kind of lucky that any higher animals survived.

Quote:
Enantiornithes mostly still had teeth rather than beaks like modern birds, so perhaps lacked specialized seed-eaters.
Makes sense. Seeds can last for a long time, even surviving fire and floods, so seed-eaters had a path to survival. Thanks!
  #16  
Old 12-11-2019, 01:46 PM
Tamerlane is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 14,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumbershoot View Post
I always enjoy watching the roadrunners around here; it's very easy to think of them as little dinosaurs (especially when they're hunting lizards). This one looks a lot like your Anchiornis. And this one resembles the microraptor.
Behold the terror that is the Common Merganser!

ETA: The first time I saw one walking on land( something they don't do a lot of ), I thought it looked distinctly raptorial, with a triangular crested head, toothy mouth and the way the feet are set father back in the body giving it a kind of lurching, menacing gait.

Last edited by Tamerlane; 12-11-2019 at 01:51 PM.
  #17  
Old 12-11-2019, 03:44 PM
Bumbershoot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 3,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamerlane View Post
Behold the terror that is the Common Merganser!

ETA: The first time I saw one walking on land( something they don't do a lot of ), I thought it looked distinctly raptorial, with a triangular crested head, toothy mouth and the way the feet are set father back in the body giving it a kind of lurching, menacing gait.
Yikes! That and Machine Elf's goose photo are downright scary. I've seen common (and hooded) mergansers here in New Mexico, but not walking on land. We get quite a variety of water birds here, mostly along the Rio Grande. I saw a flock of white pelicans in October, just south of Elephant Butte. Bosque Del Apache Wildlife Refuge (which is north of Elephant Butte) gets a huge variety of birds migrating through.

Last edited by Bumbershoot; 12-11-2019 at 03:48 PM.
  #18  
Old 12-11-2019, 06:19 PM
Andy L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by septimus View Post
Nitpick: That's true if by "taxonomic grouping" you mean "monophyletic taxonomic grouping," but in fact paraphyletic groupings are in widespread use.

True. I was imprecise.


If only monophyletic groupings are allowed, then insects are crustaceans, butterflies are moths, snakes are lizards, ants are wasps, whales are even-toed ungulates, trees are algae, humans are fish, all mammals are sponges, and ... all living creatures are bacteria!
That's not quite true. "Butterflies" are a monophyletic group, so are "humans" - "Whales" are a polyphyletic group, though.
  #19  
Old 12-11-2019, 10:30 PM
Colibri's Avatar
Colibri is offline
SD Curator of Critters
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Panama
Posts: 44,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy L View Post
That's not quite true. "Butterflies" are a monophyletic group, so are "humans" - "Whales" are a polyphyletic group, though.
You misunderstand. All of the first-mentioned groups (except trees, and they are being used as a stand-in for multicellular green plants) are monophyletic. But if they are removed, the second group becomes paraphyletic. For the second groups to be monophyletic, the first groups must be considered to be part of them. (And "whales" is being used in the broad sense, to include dolphins and other toothed whales. In that sense all cetaceans are monophyletic.)

Last edited by Colibri; 12-11-2019 at 10:34 PM.
  #20  
Old 12-12-2019, 07:36 AM
Andy L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colibri View Post
You misunderstand. All of the first-mentioned groups (except trees, and they are being used as a stand-in for multicellular green plants) are monophyletic. But if they are removed, the second group becomes paraphyletic. For the second groups to be monophyletic, the first groups must be considered to be part of them. (And "whales" is being used in the broad sense, to include dolphins and other toothed whales. In that sense all cetaceans are monophyletic.)
Got it. My apologies.
  #21  
Old 12-12-2019, 09:50 AM
DesertDog is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mesa, Ariz.
Posts: 6,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colibri View Post
Many small feathered theropods looked much more like typical birds than penguins do.
The Arizona Museum of Natural History where I volunteer is real proud of its Suskityrannus hazelae specimen. The articulated skeleton is in the Dino Hall on the main level and last May, a life-size model was placed at the base of the Dinosaur Mountain exhibit. Both are of a juvenile and the model is covered with "filimentous feathers" (the model maker confessed he faked them with fur). The current thinking is that a lot of young dinos were feathered for conserving body heat, but lose them as they mature.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreysonCarlisle View Post
That really puts things into perspective. It was hell on earth, and we're kind of lucky that any higher animals survived.
IIRC no land specie over ten kilos survived the K-T event.
  #22  
Old 12-12-2019, 10:53 AM
Really Not All That Bright is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 68,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colibri View Post
Many kinds of birds existed before the KT event...
I did not know this. Thanks!
__________________
This can only end in tears.
  #23  
Old 12-12-2019, 11:31 AM
Colibri's Avatar
Colibri is offline
SD Curator of Critters
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Panama
Posts: 44,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colibri View Post
I don't think many people realize how much like birds certain non-avian dinosaurs like Anchiornis looked. And no, that's not a bird, but from a different lineage than that that led to modern birds. Some, like the bizarre four-winged Microraptor, may have been capable of powered flight. Many small feathered theropods looked much more like typical birds than penguins do.
I should clarify that the base of the split within the maniraptors between the lineage that led to modern birds and that that led to dromeosaurs/troodontids is very fuzzy and rather arbitrary. Every new analysis seems to shift some species from one side of the line to the other. In the link for Anchiornis above, it is shown as being an early split from the combined lineage of birds/dromaeosaurs/troodontids, while in the article on Avialae, basically the bird lineage, it is shown as being a member of that group. Note that Avialae itself is pretty much a group defined for convenience by including Archaeopteryx as the first known "bird." Some studies have concluded that Archaeopteryx is more closely related to dromaeosaurs/troodontids than modern birds.

Regardless, there are still some feathered, apparently flying dinosaurs like Microraptor that were outside the bird clade.

Last edited by Colibri; 12-12-2019 at 11:34 AM.
  #24  
Old 12-12-2019, 11:39 AM
Sailboat's Avatar
Sailboat is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colibri View Post
I don't think that anything other than the luck of the draw is necessary to explain their extinction. As I mentioned as few as four to six lineages - possibly as few as six species, but probably more - of modern birds survived the KT event. There's no evidence that any Enantiornithes survived the event and were outcompeted subsequently.

As I said, all tree-dwelling birds apparently went extinct. The surviving modern bird lineages were ground birds at the time. It also appears they may have also been seed-eaters. Enantiornithes mostly still had teeth rather than beaks like modern birds, so perhaps lacked specialized seed-eaters.
A lot of people underestimate the potential impact of contingency ("the luck of the draw") on evolution. It turns out "shit happens" is a valid evolutionary principle that helped shape biology as we know it.
  #25  
Old 12-12-2019, 03:16 PM
Skywatcher's Avatar
Skywatcher is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Somewhere in the Potomac
Posts: 36,058
Penguins are now Snow Chickens.


Last edited by Skywatcher; 12-12-2019 at 03:17 PM.
  #26  
Old 12-12-2019, 04:27 PM
Chronos's Avatar
Chronos is offline
Charter Member
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 87,418
Quote:
Quoth septimus:

and ... all living creatures are bacteria!
Nitpick: Eukaryotes are not descended from bacteria. Eukaryotes and bacteria are both descended from archae. And in fact, there are some modern archae that are more closely related to us than either are to any bacteria.
  #27  
Old 12-12-2019, 04:57 PM
Colibri's Avatar
Colibri is offline
SD Curator of Critters
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Panama
Posts: 44,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
Nitpick: Eukaryotes are not descended from bacteria. Eukaryotes and bacteria are both descended from archae. And in fact, there are some modern archae that are more closely related to us than either are to any bacteria.
Actually, Eucaryotes and Archaea are both descended from a common ancestor that was descended from Bacteria (or a bacteria-like organism). The fact that they are more closely related to one another than to Bacteria indicates that Bacteria is the basal group.

Now it's arguable whether the common ancestor to Bacteria on one hand, and Archaea/Eucaryota on the other, should be called a Bacterium. But if it is, then all living things would fall within a monophyletic Bacteria.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017