Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2006, 09:37 PM
Mr. Excellent is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,989

Which organs could I sell?


Let's imagine that, hypothetically, I lived in a jurisdiction where selling one's organs was perfectly legal. Which ones could I sell?

The organ, or portion thereof, has to meet two criteria:

1.) I need to be able to live a normal life without it. It's okay if losing the organ would make me fall ill, but needing constant dialysis is out.

2.) There needs to be, at least conceivably, a market for the organ. Yah, I could live without my spleen - but who'd want to buy it?

3.) Profit!
  #2  
Old 12-05-2006, 09:57 PM
Queen Bruin is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: High Desert, California
Posts: 4,454
You could sell sections of your liver.
  #3  
Old 12-05-2006, 10:05 PM
InternetLegend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 3,584
You could sell one kidney. In fact, if you were charitably inclined, you could probably donate one kidney right now.
  #4  
Old 12-05-2006, 10:13 PM
bouv is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: VT
Posts: 12,872
You could sell one kidney, one lung, part of your liver, blood vessels, bone marrow, pieces of ligament, cartligage, and tendon, an eye, part of your intestines (I think), and probably other stuff.
  #5  
Old 12-05-2006, 11:26 PM
DrCube is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Caseyville, IL
Posts: 7,211
Don't forget to get money in advance for all those organs you won't be needing after you die. I mean, you are a walking credit card, why not use it?
  #6  
Old 12-06-2006, 01:07 AM
outlierrn is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: republic of california
Posts: 5,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by bouv
blood vessels, pieces of ligament, cartligage, and tendon,

I wonder if there's enough demand for these to make it profitable, considering how much greater the expense of harvesting from a living donor without compromising their quality of life; I wouldn't be willing to give very large pieces of any of them from the same place, YMMV
__________________
Just another outlying data point on the bell curve of life
  #7  
Old 12-06-2006, 08:38 AM
Mangetout's Avatar
Mangetout is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 57,842
Don't forget both arms and legs - I'm sure these can be broken down for useful parts such as bones, skin, ligaments etc- you didn't specify that mobility and independence were essential.
  #8  
Old 12-06-2006, 08:42 AM
One And Only Wanderers is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bolton, UK
Posts: 4,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mangetout
Don't forget both arms and legs - I'm sure these can be broken down for useful parts such as bones, skin, ligaments etc- you didn't specify that mobility and independence were essential.
would this not come under the normal life caveat? Don't think I could live MY normal life without limbs.
  #9  
Old 12-06-2006, 08:43 AM
Nanoda is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,848
If you count skin as an organ, I imagine you could donate some (though it would be uncomfortable I'm sure). I imagine cadavers are a sufficient source, but IANAD, so perhaps it happens.

A kidney is standard, though I'm uncertain of the long-term consequences (it's my understanding that you'd have to be careful to avoid sports where blunt trauma may damage the remaining kidney, but that may be decades old data)

Is bone marrow an organ? I understand it's fairly painful, but a chart here says it's mostly ok after a month, so if I really like you I'll pony up.

According to this interview, (involving someone who IAD), the remaining half of a donated liver will re-grow within two weeks, so right now that's leading my list of available organs.
(Though certainly not to someone called The Sausage Creature. )
  #10  
Old 12-06-2006, 08:43 AM
chowder is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 7,592
Testicles.....well one of them anyway
  #11  
Old 12-06-2006, 09:30 AM
Ike Witt's Avatar
Ike Witt is offline
Friend of Cecil
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lost in the mists of time
Posts: 14,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowder
Testicles.....well one of them anyway
Probably not. I mean just because you have two of something doesn't mean you can automatically donate one of them. I mean, is a testicle transplant even feasible and would it eventually start producing your own sperm?
  #12  
Old 12-06-2006, 10:05 AM
bouv is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: VT
Posts: 12,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by outlierrn
I wonder if there's enough demand for these to make it profitable, considering how much greater the expense of harvesting from a living donor without compromising their quality of life; I wouldn't be willing to give very large pieces of any of them from the same place, YMMV
Talk to someone who has osteoarthritis, or has torn all the ligaments in their knee and ask them if they want some nice, healty, cartilage or a ligament. These types of tissues are notable for having disatrous results in the artificial department, and even ones harvested from cadavers don't do so hot. And losing one of your knew ligaments wouldn't be that bad, as long as you weren't a very active person.

And someone who has suffered multiple bypasses would love to get their hands on some more big, fat, juicy, leg veins.

I'm not saying there would be a huge demand, certainly not akin to that of a kidney or part of your liver, but it would be there.
  #13  
Old 12-06-2006, 10:08 AM
Pushkin is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Belfast Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,619
A recent copy of The Economist touted a legal trade in kidney donations as a good thing.
  #14  
Old 12-06-2006, 12:26 PM
mrklutz is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pushkin
A recent copy of The Economist touted a legal trade in kidney donations as a good thing.
There are certainly some good arguments in favor of it. The law allows people to take much higher risk of loss of life in a single year of commercial fishing than is incurred in a kidney donation (0.03% chance of death from donation, if I recall correctly; fishing is something like an order of magnitude higher). If we allow that fishing is an acceptable risk for profit, why not organ donation?

Secondly, it would increase the supply of living-donor kidneys available for transplant. Living-donor kidneys fare better than cadaver kidneys after transplant, and there is a shortage even of cadaver kidneys today.

The only downside I see is that it has the potential to make the transplant process more expensive, thus driving overall health care costs up a bit in the grand scheme of things. That's not a negligible downside, but it seems to me that the benefits outweigh the costs.

The transplant center at Fairview University here in town does a lot of kidney and liver transplants (to the tune of tens of thousands since they were established), many of them with live donors. I'm told the liver donation is far more painful than kidney donation, though.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright 2018 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017