Old 04-28-2012, 01:50 PM
gargunkle gargunkle is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Extra cost of being overweight


It's very interesting reading about the fuel difference. What is the additional effect of greater passenger weight on things like wear and tear on car tires, engines having to work harder, etc?
Old 04-29-2012, 09:09 AM
Gorbag Gorbag is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 10
This gives us the desired conclusion: fat people, by their very existence, are imperiling the planet.
Gee, that's not biased. How about 'people, by their very existence'..... or better: 'progressives, by their very existence'...

Last edited by Gorbag; 04-29-2012 at 09:11 AM.
Old 04-29-2012, 10:08 AM
Wesley Clark Wesley Clark is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,207
I liked this part.

Finally, a recent George Washington University study assessed the annual per-person cost of obesity as $4,879 for women and $2,646 for men, mostly due to higher medical costs and lost job opportunities. So listen to what science is telling you, America: don’t be fat.
He neglects to mention that the reason women lose more money than men is probably because of social prejudice against obese women resulting in more career hurdles.


Telling obese women to lose weight so they won't be discriminated against is like me telling black people that because you earn 10k a year less than white people, go home and bleach your skin. Using the negative effects of discrimination as a justification to enforce discrimination is a pretty crappy argument.

So many things wrong on so many levels with those arguments. I wouldn't know where to start.

I have no idea about wear and tear on cars due to obesity. Wear and tear on shoes would also be an issue too. Americans spend about $51 billion a year on shoes, no idea how much faster obese people go through shoes. But most people who are overweight/obese are in the 25-35BMI range. I think only 8% of people have a BMI of 35 or higher. So I don't know what an extra 40 or so pounds is going to do to your shoes (how much faster they wear out, etc).

Of those $51 billion though, I don't know how much is due to obese people buying three pairs of $50 sneakers a year vs the wealthy and fashion class buying numerous pairs of $300 shoes, and I'm assuming most of them tend not to be obese. So I really would have no idea how to do the calculation.

Last edited by Wesley Clark; 04-29-2012 at 10:12 AM.
Old 05-08-2012, 01:55 AM
Captain Obvious Captain Obvious is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2
I would guess obese people cause less wear and tear on their shoes than fit, active people.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2018 STM Reader, LLC.

Copyright © 2017