(This requires a lot of exposition, but trust me, there is a question at the end!)
I’m currently working at a Blockbuster store that’s in its seventh week of a going-out-of-business sale. Shortly before the sale started, we were given a Protected List of movies and games that we were required to immediately pull off the shelves and ship back to the distribution center or to other stores, because the studios don’t want us selling them at such a greatly-reduced rate.
The list contained practically every big-budget film that had been released on home video since November of '12, and practically every rental video game we had on the shelves at that time. With the exception of perhaps one or two video games that I may be unaware of, we shipped back our rental video games, and every video game sold in the store since the sale, was one that was already a previously-viewed product (PRP) before the sale began.
We’ve still been processing customer rental returns, however, though obviously the number of check-ins we’ve had has decreased dramatically over time. (If I had to guess, by now we’re averaging maybe one return per week.) By now any successful return is almost certainly a Combo Pass rental, because Blockbuster only allows 30 days to return an overdue movie before it becomes unreturnable.
So:
A couple days ago, a customer returned an XBox 360 copy of Assassin’s Creed III while I wasn’t there. Someone placed it on top of the video game cabinet, which is in easy sight of customers as they exit the store.
We’re frequently asked by customers if we have any video games left. This being Week 7, we only have one video game left: The Shoot for PlayStation Move, which no doubt will still be there when we close in a month.
After I told this to a customer, he turned to leave the store, and lo and behold his eyes locked onto that copy of Assassin’s Creed III. "Can you sell me that?" he asked.
Very professionally, I apologetically replied in the negative, saying that the game had just been returned, and because it was on a Protected List, we had to send it back to the distribution center. He nodded understandingly and left. And I put the game elsewhere, behind the opposite-side counter, a little harder for customers to see.
Problem solved, right? Well, no. This afternoon before I came in, a customer saw that game standing behind the counter (in an employees-only area of the store), grabbed it, and demanded that my boss TJ sell it to him.
TJ had to spend a good five minutes telling him why he couldn’t sell it to him. Angrily, the customer stormed out, leaving the game behind, thank goodness. (No word on whether the customer wanted it for the $2.99 [rental] price on the sticker).
Customer comes back in (or calls?) 10 minutes later, and says that common-law of the United States says that because the item was in the store, in view of a customer and not explicitly exempt from sale, Blockbuster had to sell him the game. "You’ve got no choice." Another long argument ensued, ending when TJ basically said, “Fine, go ahead and sue us.”
If I’d been there I like to think I’d have come up with a snappy remark about the customer committing criminal trespassing by going behind the counter in the first place. But anyway:
-
Was the customer correct in saying that Blockbuster could not deny him the right to purchase the game, even though it wasn’t on the sales floor, because it was in view of a customer?
-
Was the customer committing criminal trespassing by going behind the counter in the first place?
-
If both answers are “yes”, wouldn’t the customer’s initial crime in #2 have nullified #1?