Deconstructing Dr. Seuss

Hop on Pop

It starts off innocently enough, claiming to teach vocabularly. “Pup on Cup. Mouse on house. Etc.” But, as we shall soon see, this book is a veritable viper’s nest of vicious and vituperative vitriol.

Later it tells us that “We all play ball on the wall,” luring us to beleive in a utopian society of cooperation. The wall symbolizes between people of all types. Unfortunately, this utopia is not to last as we “All fall off the wall.” It’s a clear reference to the ongoing economic and cultural segregation in the U.S. today, and how out of touch with the people our leaders are. In truth, we have all fallen off the wall of harmony.

The reference is repeated. “We play all day. We fight all night.”

Later we meet Red. “Red. Red. They call me Red.” Red has flaming red hair, and a knowing smirk.

We find that “Red is in Bed.” Not only is Red in Bed. He is in bed with Ted Ned and Ed! They all have guilty smiles on their faces. What are they doing beneath those covers. Clearly this is reinforcing the stereotype of the guilty and promiscuous homosexual. Let’s get them started on their hate and guilt early, Ok?

But it doesn’t stop there. Next we meet Pat. Pat is your basic white guy. He’s a little fat and stupid looking. You know he watches ball, and drinks a few beers before beating his wife. Pat does stupid things like sit on cats, bats, and cactuses. It’s right out of the Jeffersons.

The next guy (also a white male,) is called Dad. We learn that “Dad is sad. Very very sad. He had a bad day.” Dad is sitting in his chair with a sour look on his face. He has been out oppressing the proletariat (like Pat) and is tired, and ill-humored. Early on we are reinforcing the stereotypical malignant and apathetic curmudgeonliness of the power structure of society. Has this book no shame?

If there is any doubt, this message is later clarified. Kids like to “Hop on Pop.” But Pop shouts angrily “Stop! You must not hop on pop.” Hopping on Pop is a clear metaphor for overturning the antiegalitarian power structure, and achieving a true beneficial society. Children have a natural tendency to seek out peaceful solutions to societal problems. By reading them this book, you are teaching them that the power structure will deny and thwart these tendencies. They must be suppressed and sublimated, so that the artificial power structure of hate can survive.

Still later we are told that Mr. Brown is out of town, but comes back with Mr. Black. This is a clear reference to imperialist slave traders who recruited members of minorities to do their bidding and enslave their own people. If this book is to be believed, then this is the natural order of things.

If you doubt this, consider that we are invited to “Eat a snack with Brown and Black.” Once again it is demonstrated and reinforced how the power structure feeds off of and subjugates minorities.

Still not convinced?

Then, why is father, a white male in a business suit and a clear member of the power structure, the only who is capable of reading “big words too, like Constantinople and Timbuktu?” Clearly a good education has been denied the folks of lower orders and minorities, like Mr. Brown, and Mr. Black, and Pat. Red is clearly too busy being promiscuous to take an interest.

It’s all about preserving the power structure, and indroctinating our children at an early age in order to maintain the status quo.

Oh, God, Scylla, I laughed so hard at that I coughed up a lung. Now I’ve got lung all over my monitor. (And you thought cleaning Coke out of your keyboard was a pain.)

Nimmune:

I see nothing funny about the systematic moral corruption of generation after generation of American youth.

Fox on Socks is a primer on sytematic categorization, instilling prejudicial stereotypes within our youth, reducing racial conflict to a “piddle paddle muddle battle.”

I can Read with My Eyes Shut is a shamefacedly obvious attempt to prevent our children from opening their eyes to social injustice.

Signals Scylla via Semaphore

Scylla said:
“I see nothing funny about the systematic moral corruption of generation after generation of American youth.”

I think this is one of those subjects where we’ll have to agree to disagree.

Since you are in GD and not MPSIMS, than I’m assuming you are as serious as a heart attack. But I don’t think you have offered enough evidence to support your claims. Right now I feel like shrugging and saying “And sometimes a cigar is just a cigar”.
What can you tell me about Dr. Suess to make me believe he was that kind of bigot?
Furthermore, how do you reconcile your dissection of Hop on Pop with other classics like The Sneetches, which, if your interpertation is correct, is the exact opposite of Hop on Pop and Fox on Socks? Or Yurtle the Turtle, which also appears to be the opposite of the stories you cited? What about his other stories, such as The Lorax that teach a positive lesson?
Which is the real Dr. Suess?

Sneetches on Beaches and The Lorax were never meant to be disseminated to the general public, but were mistakenly published.

Later it was decided, that these positive messages would be good camoflage for the true Seussian/Power structure coalition.

The truth was that both of these books were intended to be read to the children of the ruling party. Snecches on Beaches teaches the children of the ruling class how to exploit the proletariat masses and capitalize on racial dissension and economic envy. The Lorax teaches these children how to exploit the environment for capitalistic good. Do not forget the moral of The Lorax “Business is business, and business must grow. In spite of crummies in tummies, you know.”

“Yurtle” in Yurtle the Turtle is a boneheadedly obvious anagram that spells “YT Rule.” or “Whitey Rules.” Duh!

Get with the program Pepper. I don’t have the time to point out the obvious to you. You should know this.

I have it on good authority that Green Eggs and Ham was written to incite Vegetarian depravity. The Popeye references (“Sam I Am”) serve only to cement anti-RedMeat profligacy:

Green Eggs & Ham = Spinach
More “Green” leads to Increased Vegetable Consumption
leading to Decreased RedMeat Consumption
leading to Reduced American Dietary Protein
leading to Weaker American Muscles
leading to Easier Takeover by Godless Communist Homosexual Perverts

Resist Dr. Suess! He’s biass!

On the Other Hand, in Horton Hears a Who things take a decidedly socialist bent, with the protagonist, Horton, not only saving the downtrodden Whos, but having to convince the others they even exist. What more proof is necessary?

Since the title is actually “Yertle the Turtle,” your anagram proof is going to need some work.

Wring:

I’m surprised that you could be so naive. Horton is Seussian construct used to instill a false sense of worth in the masses while misdirecting their attention from the valid social issues and injustices of the day.

There’s nothing more that the power structure would like than for you to keep your attention focused on dust specks, in the vain beleif that you’ll be saving an alternate tiny universe.

This keeps you happy and occupied while they pursue there agenda. Remember that Horton’s virtue was that his attention and devotion never swayed from the dust speck no matter what happened around him.

Once you’ve been indoctrinated in such a fashion the power structure is free to pursue their own ends without fear of retribution of even notice from the distracted masses of Hortons that make society, grasping at straws.

Unless of course you think there really are little people living on dust specks. ::Snicker snicker::

When will you wake up?

should have known you’d disagree w/me, in GD, if nothing else on principal Scylla :wink:

They didn’t want it to be too obvious, or you might figure it out. Thus, the transposition of vowels.

It’s quite clever actually. You see “Yertle,” but the rhyme scheme makes you think “Yurtle.” Then of course, the anagram is picked up by your unconscious and the message driven home. Because they actually spell it “Yertle,” it is the perfect psychological weapon, as no blame can possibly be assigned. After all, they spelled it “Yertle.” The mistake is in your head. Clearly it’s not their fault, right.

You think I didn’t know that?

The prood that I’m right is easy to see. “Yertle” is an anagram for “leter Y,” or “letter y.” Y of course is sometimes a vowel. This is a clear signal to your subconscious that leads you to the involuntary transcription of the vowel from “turtle.” Insidious, isn’t it?

Scylla,

As you may know, Dr. Seuss is an alumn of Dartmouth college.

Expect a visit from the trustees soon.

Why are you giving out all of this information? You invite the wrath of the Seuss Police, a horrific squad of imaginary animals who wear tall, striped hats, eat green eggs and ham in a house as well as with a mouse, and carry automatic machine guns. They kill without mercy, and usually rhyme while they do it.

In all honesty, I’m a great and lifelong admirer of the Doctor and his work. I relish the moments I spend reading my child his books, and her obvious delight.

The point for debate is that if you can deconstruct Dr. Seuss, you can deconstruct anything. Therefore, deconstructionism, the primary mover of much of the PC movement is an inherently fallacious if not wholly disingenuous device.

I remember reading somewhere that Seuss’s Marvin K. Mooney, Will You Please Go Now? was written about Nixon during the Watergate mess. I have no idea if it is true, but the timing is right and the syllables match as well.

I actually terrified to ask this, but I must. What is your take on ** The Butter Battle Book** ???

I always thought Yurtle the Turtle was really about the child’s game “King of the Hill”, where being ruler of all you see is frequently a temporary and delicate position to be in.

But what do I know. I had a highly dysfunctional childhood.

Cartooniverse

Excellent hypothesis, Scylla. It correlates very well with my work on the antisemitic subtext of Green Eggs and Ham as well as the neocolonialist implications of Scrambled Eggs Super.

Tell me, do you have access to the suppressed second half of Happy Birthday to You?