When I was young, I was taught about the basic forms of for-profit companies that exist in the US, namely sole proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. A major difference was that the corporation had what was called limited liability - if the company did badly, the owners stood to lose only their investment. On the other hand, if you invested in a partnership and the company hit rough times due to another partner’s mismanagement, the partnership’s creditors could come to your house and tow away your car and garnish your bank account to pay the company’s debt. A big idea was that having limited liability corporations made it easier to raise a little bit of capital from a lot of people. Perhaps many people would be interested in investing $5000 toward owning a thousandth of your company knowing that they might lose it all if the company did really badly, but few, if any, would be willing to do it knowing that not only could they lose their $5000, but they could lose their home and end up on the streets. There was also this newfangled thing called the LLC that was sort of like a partnership but provided limited liability like a corporation.
Are there any advantages to owning an unlimited liability company nowadays over a limited liability one? For example, if Joe the Entrepreneur wants to start a company, he can choose to make it a limited liability company and protect a big chunk of his assets. If there were no downsides to this, it would seem like a no-brainer - why risk your home when you don’t have to? Do unlimited liability companies have an easier time getting credit because banks know that when times get rough, the bank can start towing BMW’s?