Is this the proper venue to discuss whether what Mr. Snowden was, in fact, illegal?
If not, then please Moderator, move it with my apologies.
If his actions were illegal was it, in your considered opinions, ethical nonetheless?
Those of us who have a smattering of knowledge of computer systems, networks, databases and such details that make this magical screen carry my words to unknown people all around the planet were all pretty much certain that the NSA was monitoring ALL internet traffic for keywords years before the 9/11 event.
The shear volume of data has always been the chokepoint in effective surveillance. Discrimination of targets is the only way to handle the data, because even with billions of dollars of budget and thousands of sigint personnel, you can only scoop so much gold out of the gravel.
So, until recently, we had a modicum, a figleaf of privacy left, even if it was only statistical in nature.
As our newer generations of users have driven the system to interconnect ‘friends’ using social networking, the task has been made an order of magnitude easier. Now, we have people who indiscriminately broadcast their every action, whim, random notion or object of desire to everyone in their list of hundreds of ‘friends’. And none of it EVER disappears. This is a challenge for the maintenance of the ethical balance between freedom and security.
It is reassuring to see a public debate about these issues. They do affect us all, and if we choose to accept constant surveillance then we should expect a valid and trustworthy overseeing authority that handles disputes between the NSA and the citizenry. Of course, I also want a pony, but I just thought I’d put it out there.