#1  
Old 08-30-2019, 11:21 PM
bionic_man is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 89

Third party


Could a third party candidate win if trump is too unpopular Democratic candidate too far to the left?

Last edited by bionic_man; 08-30-2019 at 11:24 PM.
  #2  
Old 08-30-2019, 11:26 PM
Czarcasm's Avatar
Czarcasm is online now
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 62,521
Third party candidates don't usually run as "middle-of-the-road" types.
  #3  
Old 08-31-2019, 12:32 AM
eschereal's Avatar
eschereal is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Frogstar World B
Posts: 16,497
No.

The economy – not its contemporaneous performance, per se, but the electorate's depth of optimism about it – will determine the result. There is no gap for a third party to slide into until the Republican Party has finished imploding.
  #4  
Old 08-31-2019, 09:27 AM
Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 31,618
No.

The only issue in the next election will be beating Trump. There will be enormous pressure to unite behind the Democratic candidate. Even the few percent won by third parties in 2016 was sufficient to create screams that they cost Clinton the election. You'd have to convince a full 50% of the voting public (Clinton got 48%) to switch away from the Democrats to a third party that has no organization, no local support, no existing elected officials, and no money. Madness.
  #5  
Old 08-31-2019, 09:48 AM
Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,418
Perot was middle of the road and got 19% first time he ran.
  #6  
Old 08-31-2019, 10:42 AM
BobLibDem is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home 07 NCAA HockeyChamps
Posts: 21,668
No third party will ever win. And if perchance one did win, who is he going to call in Congress to pursue an agenda? Neither party will trust him, neither one will work with him. Like it or not, the US is and always will be a two party state.
  #7  
Old 08-31-2019, 10:49 AM
Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 31,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bijou Drains View Post
Perot was middle of the road and got 19% first time he ran.
Are you still living in 1992? Even if you are, the rest of the country isn't.
  #8  
Old 08-31-2019, 10:57 AM
Riemann's Avatar
Riemann is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Santa Fe, NM, USA
Posts: 7,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
Are you still living in 1992? Even if you are, the rest of the country isn't.
Perot didn't think he had a chance even against Kang and Kodos in '96.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7NeRiNefO0

(Perot shows up at 0:35)

Last edited by Riemann; 08-31-2019 at 10:58 AM.
  #9  
Old 08-31-2019, 10:57 AM
Boycott is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 220
I have never met anyone who admitted voting for John Anderson in 1980. He got 5.7 million votes.
  #10  
Old 08-31-2019, 11:07 AM
OldGuy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Very east of Foggybog, WI
Posts: 5,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boycott View Post
I have never met anyone who admitted voting for John Anderson in 1980. He got 5.7 million votes.
Well we haven't met, but I did as did my wife.
  #11  
Old 08-31-2019, 11:09 AM
E-DUB's Avatar
E-DUB is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,806
I voted for Anderson in 1980. Basically he got votes from people who thought that Carter was demonstrably incompetent and that Reagan was a dangerous loon. A different scenario than today as the dangerous loon is also incompetent and occupies the White House.
  #12  
Old 08-31-2019, 02:20 PM
dalej42 is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 14,538
Third party candidates are only spoilers. I’m still curious how Jill Stein was sitting at a dinner with Vladimir Putin. Most loony city council members don’t get invited to dine with a head of state.
__________________
Twitter:@Stardales IG:@Dalej42
  #13  
Old 08-31-2019, 10:40 PM
Northern Piper is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: The snow is back, dammit!
Posts: 29,715
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobLibDem View Post
No third party will ever win. And if perchance one did win, who is he going to call in Congress to pursue an agenda? Neither party will trust him, neither one will work with him. Like it or not, the US is and always will be a two party state.
That was what happened with Jesse Ventura in Minnesota. He couldn't get anything done, because he had no support in the state legislature.
__________________
"I don't like to make plans for the day. If I do, that's when words like 'premeditated' start getting thrown around in the courtroom."
  #14  
Old 08-31-2019, 10:42 PM
Northern Piper is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: The snow is back, dammit!
Posts: 29,715
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionic_man View Post
Could a third party candidate win if trump is too unpopular Democratic candidate too far to the left?
No, because US ballot access laws are intentionally designed to keep the two parties at all he top of the heap, and make it difficult for third parties to get on the ballot.
__________________
"I don't like to make plans for the day. If I do, that's when words like 'premeditated' start getting thrown around in the courtroom."
  #15  
Old 09-01-2019, 01:32 AM
SlackerInc's Avatar
SlackerInc is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,618
What other people said is true, but maybe even more importantly a third party candidate who got a plurality of the vote (let’s say 35 or 40 percent) would still probably not receive more than 269 electoral votes. Therefore the election would go to the House, and they would not select someone who is from a third party to be president. They would choose a Democrat or a Republican. It would probably be a Democrat at this point, but that’s not certain because they vote by state delegation and not just as the whole body does on other matters.

And I guarantee they would vote for the nominee of their own party even if that nominee came in third in the national popular vote. Of course, that would make the new president controversial and lame duck right off the bat.
  #16  
Old 09-01-2019, 04:39 AM
panache45's Avatar
panache45 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NE Ohio (the 'burbs)
Posts: 47,348
Haven't we already learned our lesson concerning third-party candidates? 2000? 2016?
  #17  
Old 09-01-2019, 05:59 AM
AHunter3's Avatar
AHunter3 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: NY (Manhattan) NY USA
Posts: 20,580
A third party candidate will be viable when we have ranked-choice voting (also called instant-runoff voting). One where people cast their vote indicating who is their first choice and also who is their second choice, etc. Let's say the candidates are Clinton, Stein, Johnson, and Trump. If no one gets a clear majority of votes, the candidate with the least votes (let's say it's Johnson) gets dismissed and those whose first choice was Johnson have their second-choice votes count instead.

In this hypothetical, voters who in real life held their nose and voted for Trump would have felt more comfortable voting 3rd party (such as Johnson), knowing that they weren't "throwing their vote away" or making it easier for Clinton to get elected. Vice versa for people who couldn't bring themselves to line up behind Clinton — they could make Stein their first choice without feeling like they were handing the election to Trump.

(Maine is doing ranked choice voting for statewide races)

At first this would just facilitate 3rd party votes as protest votes. But that would cause 3rd party candidates to pull in far higher numbers than they do as it stands now, and that, in turn, makes them look more viable.
  #18  
Old 09-01-2019, 06:59 AM
Chronos's Avatar
Chronos is online now
Charter Member
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 85,058
Nitpick: Instant-runoff voting is one form of ranked-choice, but it's not the only form. There are other forms that are better than IRV in every way but one: They're harder for the electorate to understand. Which is actually a pretty big deal, because a democracy depends upon the people trusting it, and you can't trust something you can't understand.

But back to the chances of a third-party candidate winning: You don't need to look at the popular vote total, because that's irrelevant. You need to look at what state or states the third-party candidate can win outright. In order to win, three things are necessary for a third-party candidate:
1: They need to win at least one electoral vote (which, aside from Nebraska, Maine, or faithless electors, means winning at least one state).
2: The two main candidates need to be evenly-enough split that the EVs the third party got are enough to deny both main candidates the majority (this becomes easier, the more EVs the third party got).
3: The House-by-state has to prefer the third party over both of the main candidates.

In 2016, Evan McMullin had a chance to pull this off. It was a very, very small chance (538 estimated it at about 1%), but he had a chance, and out of a history of 45 presidents, it wouldn't be too surprising for a 1% chance to come through once.

But McMullin had a couple of key advantages: One, he had very strong local support, in one or two states (Utah and maybe Idaho). And two, one of the major-party candidates was bad on an unprecedented level, leaving the possibility that establishment Republicans (i.e., those in the House) might prefer a more predictable conservative alternative to Trump. Now, though, there doesn't appear to be a local candidate emerging, and the Republican establishment have nearly all firmly embraced Trump. So even that 1% chance won't come up for anyone this cycle.
  #19  
Old 09-01-2019, 09:48 AM
Kimera757 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by bionic_man View Post
Could a third party candidate win if trump is too unpopular Democratic candidate too far to the left?
Go ahead... throw away your vote!

No, I don't see that happening. Furthermore I doubt the Democrats will vote for someone "too left", despite the noise, because most Democrats are mainly interested in defeating Trump! Choosing someone too far left would give people valid reasons not to vote for their candidate, and potential Democratic voters might stay home (which could give Trump victory).

Quote:
Originally Posted by panache45 View Post
Haven't we already learned our lesson concerning third-party candidates? 2000? 2016?
Goldfish genes are spreading... so we've forgotten already.

Last edited by Kimera757; 09-01-2019 at 09:49 AM.
  #20  
Old 09-01-2019, 09:53 AM
Procrustus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pacific NW. •
Posts: 12,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Piper View Post
No, because US ballot access laws are intentionally designed to keep the two parties at all he top of the heap, and make it difficult for third parties to get on the ballot.
Iím not sure thatís part of it. There are always about 12 people Iíve never heard of on the presidential ballot. It canít be that hard to get on.
  #21  
Old 09-01-2019, 10:49 AM
eschereal's Avatar
eschereal is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Frogstar World B
Posts: 16,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Procrustus View Post
Iím not sure thatís part of it. There are always about 12 people Iíve never heard of on the presidential ballot. It canít be that hard to get on.
Different states have different rules. Many of those names appear only on the ballots in some states. A candidate who picks up a handful of EVs but no more because they are only on a few ballots would not be held in much regard by the House.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017