Caitlin and I live off of less than 100k per year, take multiple trips every year, until now paid 2800 a month roughly on housing expenses, raise a child and still go out to eat, have cable, etc... We'll be cutting our expenses by at least 600 a month by moving to Manhattan.
This is at a time when I am about to increase my earnings potential by a significant margin. In 2009 I project that we will break 100k. If someone has trouble with that, either they are dropping 50-100 on food and drinks nearly every night, or have an apartment they can’t afford.
Living in San Francisco is like living in Downtown Manhattan. There have to be cheaper neighborhoods that are a little farther from the main drag. The culture in New York has been to move out into the boroughs. I imagine there are some analogs to this in Oakland or something. I have a hard time believing she can’t cut her rent expenses in San Francisco. If I can find a three bedroom apartment in Manhattan for 2000 a month, there has to be something in San Fran for cheaper than 2300 for a single person.
I understand that standards of living are relative to expected income, but at a certain point you can learn to live cheaply. Living off of 300 a week for general day to day stuff is enough to eat reasonably well, and even go out from time to time. Even in New York or San Fran. I have known people in NYC who make 300 a week as their total take home. It’s not comfortable but it can be done.
BTW, that means that apartment we signed on is in Ft. Tryon in case you hadn’t heard.

