# $108/month now or $271/month when I'm 65?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [June 15, 2015, 10:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626 "2015-06-15T22:50:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangosteen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Mangosteen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangosteen)\
**Post date:** [June 17, 2015, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626/21 "2015-06-17T23:39:57Z")

</div>

> [@dracoi](#):
>
> Another key question: Will you be investing the $108 a month, or just spending it?
> 
> I ask because I see this happen a lot with Social Security. People tell themselves that taking the money at 62 makes sense because they can put it in the stock market and get a better return on it. (A questionable proposition itself). But they never quite get around to putting it into the stock market because there are too many shiny things out there.

I’d really like to see the figures on how many 62, 63 and 64 year old individuals die while “waiting” to collect Social Security. All the government brochures tell you that its better to wait until 65 or even 70 to collect your SS. You know why? Because they are hoping you will die before you collect and they will end up not having to pay you a dime.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Feldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lord_feldon/32/341_2.png) [@Lord\_Feldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Feldon)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2015, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626/22 "2015-06-18T00:36:24Z")

</div>

> [@Mangosteen](#):
>
> I’d really like to see the figures on how many 62, 63 and 64 year old individuals die while “waiting” to collect Social Security.

As of 2010, about 4% of men and 2.5% of women alive on their 62nd birthdays will die before age 65 (at least according to the [Social Security Administration](http://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html)’s own numbers).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nearwildheaven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90db22/32.png) [@nearwildheaven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nearwildheaven)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2015, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626/23 "2015-06-18T03:36:28Z")

</div>

> [@Mangosteen](#):
>
> I’d really like to see the figures on how many 62, 63 and 64 year old individuals die while “waiting” to collect Social Security. All the government brochures tell you that its better to wait until 65 or even 70 to collect your SS. You know why? Because they are hoping you will die before you collect and they will end up not having to pay you a dime.

Many of the non-collectors are still working. I do not, however, understand someone who’s struggling to get by, but they won’t sign up “because I get more if I wait.”

uuuurrrgh

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nearwildheaven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90db22/32.png) [@nearwildheaven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nearwildheaven)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2015, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626/24 "2015-09-14T17:28:37Z")

</div>

Update: That money was placed into my account at the end of August.

🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dogzilla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e480ec/32.png) [@Dogzilla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dogzilla)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2015, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626/25 "2015-09-14T20:43:48Z")

</div>

> [@JerrySTL](#):
>
> Read the wording very carefully. Some pensions have a cost of living adjustment in them. If you take the early pension, you might not get the annual cost of living adjustment. I know that this was the case for a job that I had as an employee of the State of Illinois.
> 
> Also you have to wonder why they are offering things like the lump sum to you. It certainly is for their benefit and not yours. I was offered a lump sum and it worked out that if I lived for more than 5 years after I started taking the pension, I’d get more money than the lump sum. I retired at age 60 and reasonably expect to live to at least 70 or longer.

Because retirement payouts sit as accounts payable on the books, which is a liability. Companies like to minimize their financial liabilities and I would take it as a sign that the company is playing around with their books to make the profit margin higher by reducing liabilities. That is, getting former employees to take early pension payouts. The employer doesn’t have to pay taxes on that; the employee does. And the employer doesn’t have to keep a liability running on its books for the next 30 years.

I would also be leaning toward taking the payout, paying the taxes, and invest yourself. The company may not be solvent in 20 years when you’re ready to retire.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nearwildheaven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90db22/32.png) [@nearwildheaven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nearwildheaven)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2015, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626/26 "2015-09-14T21:00:00Z")

</div>

> [@Dogzilla](#):
>
> Because retirement payouts sit as accounts payable on the books, which is a liability. Companies like to minimize their financial liabilities and I would take it as a sign that the company is playing around with their books to make the profit margin higher by reducing liabilities. That is, getting former employees to take early pension payouts. The employer doesn’t have to pay taxes on that; the employee does. And the employer doesn’t have to keep a liability running on its books for the next 30 years.
> 
> I would also be leaning toward taking the payout, paying the taxes, and invest yourself. The company may not be solvent in 20 years when you’re ready to retire.

It’s a hospital, in a state that teeters constantly on the brink of financial insolvency, so Medicaid often runs a year or more behind.

One time when I still worked there, they sent out letters to everyone who owed them money, stating that if the bill was paid in full by a certain date, they would get a 50% discount. It didn’t matter if they owed $100 or $100,000; the balance would be cut in half. IDK how many people took advantage of that, or found a way to do it. I will say that I never went without being paid; some facilities have had to issue IOUs for the above reason to avoid bouncing paychecks. ☹

Because I rolled it over into a 403(b), I will not have to pay taxes on it until I withdraw the money, and no penalty if I wait until I’m 59 1/2. If I simply took the cash option, I would have lost about 30% of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2015, 9:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626/27 "2015-09-14T21:09:16Z")

</div>

> [@dracoi](#):
>
> I ask because I see this happen a lot with Social Security. People tell themselves that taking the money at 62 makes sense because they can put it in the stock market and get a better return on it. (A questionable proposition itself). But they never quite get around to putting it into the stock market because there are too many shiny things out there.

Since the time I responded at the first go around I’ve read a book on how to get the most out of Social Security. Waiting is almost always better, unless you have good reason to think you are going to die soon after 70. From 62 to 70 SS payments go up 8% a year after inflation - you’ll be hard pressed to do better than that risk free in the market. Plus, there are big advantages to waiting until 66 at least for spousal and survivor benefits, which get reduced if you start taking money after 66, but which don’t go up after that.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/108-month-now-or-271-month-when-im-65/722626.md?page=1)
