# $15B to fight AIDS in Africa--  why is this good?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 2, 2003, 8:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210 "2003-06-02T20:27:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2003, 5:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210/21 "2003-06-03T05:54:59Z")

</div>

Well, sure. I’m all ears. What did you have in mind?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leaper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/4bbf92/32.png) [@Leaper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaper)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2003, 5:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210/22 "2003-06-03T05:58:51Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by John Mace \*  
> \*\*Bush could use the famous bully pulpit to convince corporate sponsors and private individuals to accomplish this. \*\*

Heh.

Ha!

Hahahahahahaha!!

Whew, I needed the laugh.

No offense to you, **John** , really. I find your boundless faith rather touching, actually…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2003, 6:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210/23 "2003-06-03T06:38:03Z")

</div>

**State interest** pure and simple. State interest Mace. It’s not uninterested charity any more than my former Swiss Masters charity was. It’s public relations, it’s buying market access and influence. Pure and simple, cost of doing business. Sam rather accurately captures the rational for this. Think Bismark.

One can complain as if this is a matter of personal charity, but the analytical framework is entirely wrong. The US already is the stingiest donar by % of GDP, I fail to see what there is to complain about. USAID slaps its little brand sticker on anything it touches (as well it should), so you’re getting bang for the buck at some level.

As to bullypulpit – I personally don’t see any rational reason nor can I recall anything in economic or political literature that supports the idea that foreign aid monies necessary to achieve major policy aims could be raised by cajoling. The idea really is risable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2003, 12:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210/24 "2003-06-03T12:39:22Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> And, BTW, AIDS is rampant in India, China and Southeast Asia. Are we giving them money next?

Frankly, the US does not have the money, power, nor inclination to exert itself to save everyone everywhere. AIDS is worst in Africa right now, although it does come close in some Asian nations.

Geez, some of you surprise me. The President could announce tommorow he wqas releasing his just-discovered True Meaning of Life and you’d be PO’d at him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2003, 2:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210/25 "2003-06-03T14:29:50Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Qwertyasdfg \*  
> **John Mace**
> 
> 1. if you ruled the US, would you abolish public education and health care? I don’t mean to put words in your mouth but that’s the impression I get.
> 
> 2. To further respond to the OP, consider this: We took over Afghanistan on the basis that it was harboring terrorists, thus threatening American lives. This I think falls under your idea of what a government should do.
> 
> 3. If a government is threatening American lives through being unable to effectively fight AIDS, why isn’t our government just as justified in helping that government fight AIDS as we are in fighting terrorism or any other danger found abroad? In other words, why is the US allowed to spend money on bombs but not hospitals?

1. Probably. But that’s another thread.

2. Yes

3. As some have posted, AIDS is one disease that is fairly easy to avoid in an educated, industrialized society such as the US. And if you truely believed that foreigners with AIDS are a big threat to the US, a better place to battle it would be Asia, not Africa.

Anyway, Thanks to the various posters to this thread. I had hoped to stir up some libertarian thought by tossing out a controversial subject. Somewhat sad to see that that viewpoint is starkly absent from this board these days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FranticMad](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c68b51/32.png) [@FranticMad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FranticMad)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2003, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210/26 "2003-06-03T16:44:35Z")

</div>

Consider the orphan problem – “More than 5.5 million children in eastern and southern Africa, at the epicenter of the epidemic, have lost their mothers or both parents to AIDS” ([cnn](http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2000/aids/stories/women.children/)). Depopulation and political chaos are inevitable, and the results already dwarf any military conflict in the region.

Libertarian philosophy is impotent at dealing with situations like this – all you have proposed is that the President cajole people. How? By making speeches perhaps? Ridiculous.

Somewhat glad to see that that viewpoint is starkly absent from this board these days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2003, 5:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210/27 "2003-06-03T17:03:00Z")

</div>

The American Association of Fundraising Counsel (AAFRC) Trust for Philanthropy, publishers of “Giving USA,” released their estimations of total charitable contributions in the U.S. for the year 2001. Total giving is estimated at **$212 billion for the year 2001**"

from [this site](http://64.58.76.136/search/cache?p=how+much+charity+by+Americans&url=8BZricuvy7QJ:fdncenter.org/learn/faqs/givingstats.html).

I guess by many standards on this board, that is a laughably small amount.

That’s real money voluntarily given to solve real problems.

Again, I had hoped for a debate about the rightness or wrongness of the gov’t forcing people to do good things, with the African money as an example.

What is, then, the limmit of how much good a government can force it’s citizens to do?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/15b-to-fight-aids-in-africa-why-is-this-good/179210.md?page=1)
