# 2010: "The Pacific." Spielberg and Hanks' New Project's Trailer is Out.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [October 5, 2009, 1:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618 "2009-10-05T01:29:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RandMcnally](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/b782af/32.png) [@RandMcnally](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RandMcnally)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 1:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/1 "2009-10-05T01:29:52Z")

</div>

Seen as the spritual successor to “Band of Brothers,” Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg’s new “The Pacific” looks as good as I could imagine. I cannot wait until it comes out.

Here is the new trailer: [Awesome!](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e99B80crU3E)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shamozzle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shamozzle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shamozzle)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 6:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/2 "2009-10-05T06:16:37Z")

</div>

I liked it the first time I saw it when it was called “The Thin Red Line”.

Just kidding. I look forward to it, it looks great.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 6:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/3 "2009-10-05T06:31:05Z")

</div>

\*Band of Brothers \*was the greatest war movie ever made. If this is only half as good, it’ll be astounding.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cckerberos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f0a364/32.png) [@cckerberos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cckerberos)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 9:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/4 "2009-10-05T09:42:07Z")

</div>

I’m looking forward to it. I’ve never been really interested in the Pacific ground battles (I’ve just never found the IJA to be as compelling/formidable a foe as the Wehrmacht) so it’ll be interesting to see if this changes that. I’m also interested in seeing how they address some of the uglier aspects of the theater.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wargamer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/df705f/32.png) [@Wargamer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wargamer)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 1:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/5 "2009-10-05T13:43:42Z")

</div>

> [@cckerberos](#):
>
> I’m looking forward to it. I’ve never been really interested in the Pacific ground battles (I’ve just never found the IJA to be as compelling/formidable a foe as the Wehrmacht) so it’ll be interesting to see if this changes that. I’m also interested in seeing how they address some of the uglier aspects of the theater.

The inability of either side (in the Pacific) to even comprehend that there was a vast gulf of misunderstanding between them makes the Pacific Theater a much more fertile ground for story-telling in my opinion. At least the Germans behaved in a way that was somewhat comprehensible to the GIs (leaving out the occasional fanatical SS unit), but there was an almost genetic inability to relate to the Japanese (and vice-versa). This of course, led both sides to demonize the other through-out the war, as the sense of alienness was intense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Isamu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/7c8e57/32.png) [@Isamu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Isamu)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 2:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/6 "2009-10-05T14:37:21Z")

</div>

I’m looking forward to it. I still pop in the old B of B DVD every now and then. Great viewing. The WW2 pacific theater is closer to my realm of experience and understanding than the European theater, so I’m looking forward to it a lot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 3:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/7 "2009-10-05T15:25:31Z")

</div>

> [@cckerberos](#):
>
> I’m looking forward to it. I’ve never been really interested in the Pacific ground battles (I’ve just never found the IJA to be as compelling/formidable a foe as the Wehrmacht) so it’ll be interesting to see if this changes that. I’m also interested in seeing how they address some of the uglier aspects of the theater.

I’ll be all over it, but just once I’d like to see a miniseries give the Navy its due.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hypno-Toad](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b2d939/32.png) [@Hypno-Toad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hypno-Toad)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/8 "2009-10-05T16:14:08Z")

</div>

> [@John\_DiFool](#):
>
> I’ll be all over it, but just once I’d like to see a miniseries give the Navy its due.

It’s hard to give the navy its due because naval warfare is harder to protray dramatically than infantry firefights.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![interface2x](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/c0e974/32.png) [@interface2x](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/interface2x)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 5:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/9 "2009-10-05T17:36:11Z")

</div>

I’ve been looking forward to this for a long time, it looks great.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knorf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/58956e/32.png) [@Knorf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knorf)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/10 "2009-10-05T17:46:08Z")

</div>

> [@Hypno-Toad](#):
>
> It’s hard to give the navy its due because naval warfare is harder to protray dramatically than infantry firefights.

The Battle of Midway is pretty easy to portray dramatically, in my opinion, and of course has been …

Of course most of the battles in the Pacific involving the Navy were either carrier combat with airplanes, the Navy bombing the crap out of some island the Marines were about to land on, or sneaky submarine battles–all of which having been successfully depicted in films.

In recent years, we’ve had three terrific movies about Pacific combat: _The Thin Red Line_, _Flags of our Fathers_, and _Letters from Iwo Jima_ and one crappy one, _Pearl Harbor_.

Why should I get all excited about Spielberg’s new flick, which seems to offer nothing new?

Movie…Depicts Bonding…Depicts Realistic Mayhem…Lush, Tropical setting.

It’s been done quite a bit recently.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RikWriter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/49beb7/32.png) [@RikWriter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RikWriter)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 5:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/11 "2009-10-05T17:57:26Z")

</div>

> [@Knorf](#):
>
> In recent years, we’ve had three terrific movies about Pacific combat: _The Thin Red Line_, _Flags of our Fathers_, and _Letters from Iwo Jima_ and one crappy one, _Pearl Harbor_.

I would say we’ve had one good movie about Pacific combat, Letters from Iwo Jima, one mediocre movie about men coming home from Pacific combat, Flags of Our Fathers, and two crappy movies, one (TTRL) much more disappointing than the other, of which little was expected.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Simplicio](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c37758/32.png) [@Simplicio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Simplicio)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 5:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/12 "2009-10-05T17:58:52Z")

</div>

Yea, I kinda wish they’d find a new war to make movies about, or, barring that, at least a new part of the Second World War. The only movies I’ve seen about Korea are MASH and the Manchurian Candidate (yea, I’m sure there are others, but none that have caught my notice).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Count\_Blucher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c5a1d2/32.png) [@Count\_Blucher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Count_Blucher)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 7:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/13 "2009-10-05T19:20:17Z")

</div>

> [@Simplicio](#):
>
> …or, barring that, at least a new part of the Second World War.

How about a movie based on the facts & the hardships of the Burma campaign in WW2? Yes there was ‘Bridge over the River Kwai’, but there was so much more that happened over there. I never see that story getting told.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hypno-Toad](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b2d939/32.png) [@Hypno-Toad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hypno-Toad)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 7:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/14 "2009-10-05T19:35:38Z")

</div>

> [@Count\_Blucher](#):
>
> How about a movie based on the facts & the hardships of the Burma campaign in WW2? Yes there was ‘Bridge over the River Kwai’, but there was so much more that happened over there. I never see that story getting told.

I used to enjoy _Bridge on the River Kwai._ But now that I know what I know about the Japanese treatment of POWs, I just can’t suspend my disbelief enough to enjoy it.

As for _Pacific,_ I noticed that Chesty Puller is listed but no one else that I know. Are the characters fictional or based on real people? Also, William Sadler and John Seda are the only two actors I recognized. I like it when a movie is full of new faces. Let’s me think of the characters instead of the actors.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knorf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/58956e/32.png) [@Knorf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knorf)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 7:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/15 "2009-10-05T19:38:47Z")

</div>

> [@RikWriter](#):
>
> I would say we’ve had one good movie about Pacific combat, Letters from Iwo Jima, one mediocre movie about men coming home from Pacific combat, Flags of Our Fathers, and two crappy movies, one (TTRL) much more disappointing than the other, of which little was expected.

A significant portion of _Flags of Our Fathers_ did, in fact, depict realistic combat.

Also, I found _The Thin Red Line_ to be an exceptionally interesting war movie; it was also nominated for an Academy Award (but lost to _Saving Private Ryan_), so certainly I’m hardly alone in this. In any case, TTRL depicted realistic combat in a lush tropical setting.

_The Thin Red Line_ is 78% fresh at Rotten Tomatoes (95% from top critics), 81% from the RT community.

_Pearl Harbor_ has 25% (23%) and 40%, respectively.

So mine is a more mainstream opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 7:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/16 "2009-10-05T19:46:30Z")

</div>

> [@Count\_Blucher](#):
>
> How about a movie based on the facts & the hardships of the Burma campaign in WW2? Yes there was ‘Bridge over the River Kwai’, but there was so much more that happened over there. I never see that story getting told.

Just another reason to get my proposed Orde Wingate biopic off the ground.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fiddlesticks](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fiddlesticks/32/18129_2.png) [@fiddlesticks](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fiddlesticks)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/17 "2009-10-05T19:58:34Z")

</div>

> [@Knorf](#):
>
> Why should I get all excited about Spielberg’s new flick, which seems to offer nothing new?
> 
> Movie…Depicts Bonding…Depicts Realistic Mayhem…Lush, Tropical setting.
> 
> It’s been done quite a bit recently.

It’s a mini-series, not a movie, so like Band of Brothers I’m presuming we’re going to be following a group of Marines as they train up and then island-hop across the Pacific over the course of 10 or 12 hours of television. I think what’s new is the opportunity for breadth of coverage more so than a 2.5 hour long movie can provide.

Band of Brothers set a pretty high bar for Pacific to follow, and I presume since the same group of people are in charge, they’ll manage to do it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/18 "2009-10-05T20:02:12Z")

</div>

…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knorf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/58956e/32.png) [@Knorf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knorf)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/19 "2009-10-05T20:04:38Z")

</div>

> [@fiddlesticks](#):
>
> It’s a mini-series, not a movie, so like Band of Brothers I’m presuming we’re going to be following a group of Marines as they train up and then island-hop across the Pacific over the course of 10 or 12 hours of television. I think what’s new is the opportunity for breadth of coverage more so than a 2.5 hour long movie can provide.
> 
> Band of Brothers set a pretty high bar for Pacific to follow, and I presume since the same group of people are in charge, they’ll manage to do it.

Well, that is an excellent point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618/20 "2009-10-05T20:08:07Z")

</div>

> [@Knorf](#):
>
> Also, I found _The Thin Red Line_ to be an exceptionally interesting war movie; it was also nominated for an Academy Award (but lost to _Saving Private Ryan_), so certainly I’m hardly alone in this.

Actually, they both lost Best Picture to _Shakespeare in Love_, though 4 of the other Oscars it was nominated for (Director, Cinematography, Editing, Sound) did go to _SPR_.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2010-the-pacific-spielberg-and-hanks-new-projects-trailer-is-out/512618.md?page=2)
