# 2012 POTUS: Speculate on the Outcome

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [September 1, 2012, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376 "2012-09-01T16:11:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HeyHomie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/heyhomie/32/207_2.png) [@HeyHomie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HeyHomie)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376/1 "2012-09-01T16:11:31Z")

</div>

This is just a gauge of who you _think_ is going to win; not who you _hope_ will win.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terraplane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/74df32/32.png) [@Terraplane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terraplane)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376/2 "2012-09-01T17:13:54Z")

</div>

Obama, not a landslide but not a squeaker either, a little worse than his 2008 win.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376/3 "2012-09-01T17:28:27Z")

</div>

I wish there was an option for “a moderate win.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DigitalC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ebca7d/32.png) [@DigitalC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DigitalC)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376/4 "2012-09-01T19:17:25Z")

</div>

> [@John\_DiFool](#):
>
> I wish there was an option for “a moderate win.”

This. Obama will win comfortably in the electoral college and by 1 or 2 points in the popular vote. That’s neither a landslide nor a squeaker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 9:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376/5 "2012-09-01T21:06:16Z")

</div>

Agreed. I selected “landslide”, as the closest approximation, but what I mean is that there’s a nice, high probability of him winning by a moderate amount.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zoog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/7ea924/32.png) [@zoog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoog)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2012, 9:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376/6 "2012-09-01T21:15:54Z")

</div>

I’m going with “Too Early To Tell”. Right now, it looks like Romney has an uphill battle - he has to win almost all of the swing states, and he’s trailing in a lot of them. But Romney has a pretty big cash advantage, and the real ad blitz hasn’t really kicked in yet. And voter suppression efforts in PA and FL might very well move those states into the Red column. There’s a lot of game left here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2012, 1:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376/7 "2012-09-02T01:11:54Z")

</div>

IMO it’s very winnable by Romney but Obama has the (vulnerable) advantage for now. As to how we call a landslide or not, even well-fought competed elections tend to end up with a decent EV margin due to the WTA allocation of Electoral Votes; the only elections in the last 100 years (531 to 538 total EVs in play) that the winner had under 300EVs were 1916, 1976 and 2000.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Lendervedder](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/happy_lendervedder/32/8488_2.png) [@Happy\_Lendervedder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Lendervedder)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2012, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376/8 "2012-09-02T01:17:06Z")

</div>

Another vote for an Obama win that’s neither a squeaker nor a landslide.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siam\_Sam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@Siam\_Sam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siam_Sam)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2012, 3:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2012-potus-speculate-on-the-outcome/633376/9 "2012-09-02T03:05:42Z")

</div>

I voted “Obama in a landslide,” but really I think it will be somewhere between a landslide and a squeaker.
