# 2014 MLB Hall of Fame Ballot

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [November 26, 2013, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859 "2013-11-26T21:04:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![markdash](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@markdash](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markdash)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2013, 6:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/181 "2013-12-29T18:21:38Z")

</div>

> [@Yookeroo](#):
>
> Yes. How does Bill James himself not have a vote? Or someone like Vin Scully? Or Voros McCracken? Or some of those SABR historians? You’ll find very few, if any, BBWAA members more qualified to have a Hall of Fame opinion than these people. Why do the writers have a stranglehold on this door to the Hall?

Well, James is an employee of the Boston Red Sox, and I wouldn’t be surprised if team-affiliated people aren’t allowed to have votes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 12:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/182 "2013-12-30T00:25:26Z")

</div>

> [@markdash](#):
>
> Well, James is an employee of the Boston Red Sox, and I wouldn’t be surprised if team-affiliated people aren’t allowed to have votes.

That’s not the case, I don’t believe, but even if it is, the point surely stands?

Giving the vote to the BBWAA just doesn’t seem terribly logical to me; it was kind of a convenient choice at the time, but we’re long past the point where they could strike a balanced committee of experts from many fields and types of involvement with baseball.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Munch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/munch/32/5281_2.png) [@Munch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Munch)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/183 "2013-12-30T14:56:33Z")

</div>

64 ballots currently (Yookeroo’s link is much better than mine, unless you want to see individual votes):

100 - Maddux  
98.4 - Glavine  
87.5 - F. Thomas  
81.3 - Biggio  
———————————  
70.3 - Piazza  
65.6 - Jack (The Jack) Morris  
62.5 - Bagwell  
53.1 - Raines  
43.8 - Schilling  
43.8 - Bonds  
43.8 - Clemens  
31.3 - Mussina  
25.0 - L. Smith  
21.9 - Trammell  
18.8 - McGriff  
15.6 - E. Martinez  
14.0 - Kent  
10.9 - McGwire  
9.4 - R. Palmeiro  
7.8 - L. Walker  
6.3 - S. Sosa  
———————————  
3.1 - Mattingly

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Justin\_Bailey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/justin_bailey/32/8792_2.png) [@Justin\_Bailey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Justin_Bailey)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/184 "2013-12-30T15:38:58Z")

</div>

It is a travesty that Mike Piazza might not make it in AGAIN!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmkeller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmkeller/32/118_2.png) [@cmkeller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmkeller)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 3:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/185 "2013-12-30T15:49:16Z")

</div>

I agree, but if the released ballots are representative, and he’s over 70%, at least he’s likely a lock for next year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Munch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/munch/32/5281_2.png) [@Munch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Munch)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/186 "2013-12-30T16:21:25Z")

</div>

For the sake of discussion, here’s next year’s ballot, along with the number of years they’ll have been on (assuming that everyone this year hits 5%, which is unlikely). Wow - I guess I didn’t realize McGwire’s been on so long!

Don Mattingly 15th  
Alan Trammell 14th  
Lee Smith 13th  
Mark McGwire 9th  
Tim Raines 8th  
Edgar Martinez 6th  
Fred McGriff 6th  
Jeff Bagwell 5th  
Larry Walker 5th  
Rafael Palmeiro 5th  
Craig Biggio 3rd  
Mike Piazza 3rd  
Curt Schilling 3rd  
Roger Clemens 3rd  
Barry Bonds 3rd  
Sammy Sosa 3rd  
Greg Maddux 2nd  
Frank Thomas 2nd  
Mike Mussina 2nd  
Tom Glavine 2nd  
Jeff Kent 2nd  
Kenny Rogers 2nd  
Luis Gonzalez 2nd  
Moises Alou 2nd  
Ray Durham 2nd  
Shannon Stewart 2nd  
Esteban Loaiza 2nd  
Jon Lieber 2nd  
Hideo Nomo 2nd  
Geoff Jenkins 2nd  
Keith Foulke 2nd  
Matt Morris 2nd  
Jose Vidro 2nd  
Richie Sexson 2nd  
Paul Lo Duca 2nd  
Armando Benitez 2nd  
Mike Timlin 2nd  
Sean Casey 2nd  
Dmitri Young 2nd  
Eric Gagne 2nd  
Shawn Estes 2nd  
J.T. Snow 2nd  
Todd Jones 2nd  
Joe Borowski 2nd  
Randy Johnson 1st  
Pedro Martinez 1st  
John Smoltz 1st  
Gary Sheffield 1st  
Brian Giles 1st  
Nomar Garciaparra 1st  
Carlos Delgado 1st  
Darin Erstad 1st  
Tom Gordon 1st  
Jason Schmidt 1st  
Jarrod Washburn 1st  
Cliff Floyd 1st  
Kelvim Escobar 1st  
Jermaine Dye 1st  
Mark Loretta 1st  
Rich Aurilia 1st  
Troy Percival 1st  
Paul Byrd 1st  
Joe Crede 1st  
Tony Clark 1st  
B.J. Ryan 1st  
Eddie Guardado 1st  
David Weathers 1st  
Braden Looper 1st  
Julian Tavarez 1st  
Alan Embree 1st  
Ron Villone 1st

Ton of interesting names on there - Randy, Pedro and Smoltz are shoe-ins, IMO. So’s Sheffield. But what about guys like Nomar, Delgado and Giles?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Justin\_Bailey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/justin_bailey/32/8792_2.png) [@Justin\_Bailey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Justin_Bailey)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/187 "2013-12-30T16:44:37Z")

</div>

> [@Munch](#):
>
> Ton of interesting names on there - Randy, Pedro and Smoltz are shoe-ins, IMO. So’s Sheffield. But what about guys like Nomar, Delgado and Giles?

Sheffield has steroid taint. He’s not getting in on the 1st ballot.

And holy crap, Mike Piazza retired two whole years before Gary Sheffield? I completely forget he played that long.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray\_Ghost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/c0e974/32.png) [@Gray\_Ghost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gray_Ghost)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/188 "2013-12-30T17:01:26Z")

</div>

Piazza is _so_ close in our poll. I wonder if you get rid of some of the head-scratcher votes, whether that bumps him over 75%?

The list of 2015 potential inductees is interesting. Martinez is one of the easiest “He’s in” votes I can think of, and Johnson’s not too far behind. I think Nomahhhhh! Brian Giles, and Carlos Delgado are members of the Hall of the Very Good. But what do we think of [Sheffield](http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/sheffga01.shtml) and [Smoltz](http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/smoltjo01.shtml)? .292/.393/.514, with a 140 OPS+ and 509 HR make me say, HoFer, but I think there are some people on our ballot who should get in ahead of him.

Aren’t Smoltz’s WHIP and ERA+ numbers helped out a bit by his four years closing? He does have 66.5 WAR, ahead of guys like [Bob Feller](http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/f/fellebo01.shtml), but then again, that’s behind [Kevin Brown](http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/brownke01.shtml) (already dropped off the HoF ballot) and [Rick Reuschel](http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/reuscri01.shtml) (ditto). So I’m a bit lost.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/189 "2013-12-30T17:30:48Z")

</div>

I’d have to say that Smoltz’ ability to dominate in either role works \*for \*him, like it did for Eckersley. Smoltz is in even without his closing years, and Eck would be in without his starting years, sure.

[Dan Shaughnessy](http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2013/12/29/time-cast-his-votes-for-baseball-hall-fame/ojPVH3NSylmZg1vJAGW6fJ/story.html), one of the biggest jerks ever to have a long-time reporting gig, shows some of the perversity behind some ballots:

> [@](#):
>
> I consider a vote for Schill a demonstration that BBWAA members do not use the ballot to settle scores. Sometimes I think I vote for him \*because \*I can’t stand him.

> [@](#):
>
> Nobody thinks Glavine or Maddux cheated. That’s probably because of their body types. Glavine looked athletic, but nothing out of the ordinary. Maddux looked like he played slow-pitch softball. He should be unanimous. But, of course, he won’t be unanimous.
> 
> Thomas had a Popeye body, but was never suspected of being a ’roids guy. Lucky him.
> 
> This is where we go off the rails. Like Thomas, guys such as Piazza and Bagwell have Hall of Fame numbers and never tested positive for PEDs. But they look dirty. Something doesn’t make sense. Thomas makes sense.

Thomas had a roid-looking body. So did Piazza. Palmeiro didn’t. So, if you’re going to use that standard, at least pretend to be consistent about it. :rolleyes:

> [@](#):
>
> Not voting for Raines and Martinez also feels totally unfair. I just never thought of them as Hall of Famers. They fail the “I know it when I see it” test.

I suspect he’s more typical than not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f475e1/32.png) [@Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jimmy_Chitwood)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/190 "2013-12-30T18:24:37Z")

</div>

I think as this backlog of Raineses and Bondses and Schillings grows we’re starting to see what the Hall of Fame is going to be going forward. The only guys who will get in without hiccups are the ones who match some magical Venn diagram at the intersection of incredibly great performance and vaguely clean and/or unobjectionable character. Everybody else goes into the queue and just has to hope for some kind of inexplicable winning coalition to form, and success or failure will depend entirely on weird conversational inertia based on something other than how good they did on baseball fields. At some point the taint will be gone - I don’t _think_ people will say “Bryce Harper never tested positive for anything, but…” - and we’ll be left with a donut hole generation of guys who you had to be there to really accurately fail to understand why they aren’t in. So there’s that to look forward to.

Bonds and Clemens, great but permanently dirty: out. Piazza and Bagwell, great but apparently vaguely dirty, probably because they had beards: out, but only for a probationary period, or maybe not? Biggio and Thomas, great and no beards: in. A Rod, permanently dirty; Jeter, no beard: in. Ryan Braun - permanently dirty? Albert Pujols, Miguel Cabrera - under suspicion? Andrew McCutchen: right in?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 10:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/191 "2013-12-30T22:04:10Z")

</div>

> [@Gray\_Ghost](#):
>
> Aren’t Smoltz’s WHIP and ERA+ numbers helped out a bit by his four years closing?

Wait, you’re asking if Smoltz’s numbers are helped by years he had good numbers?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray\_Ghost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/c0e974/32.png) [@Gray\_Ghost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gray_Ghost)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/192 "2013-12-30T23:08:37Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> Wait, you’re asking if Smoltz’s numbers are helped by years he had good numbers?

It’s relevant if we’re treating him as a starting pitcher, yet including a bunch of innings where all he had to do for that game was throw gas at (hopefully) only three guys.

Removing the four years that I can easily see in BBRef that he closed (2001-2004), it changes his career stats to:

IP: 3473 to 3187.2  
H: 3074 to 2839  
BB: 1010 to 955

Which changes his career WHIP from 1.176 to 1.190, and career ERA from 3.33 to 3.39. Greater minds than mine can figure out what that did to his ERA+. The sum of WAR for those year was 7.5, removing them lowers his career WAR to 59.0

After looking at the changes, I don’t think it makes that much of a difference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Southern\_Yankee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/southern_yankee/32/2800_2.png) [@Southern\_Yankee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Southern_Yankee)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2013, 11:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/193 "2013-12-30T23:14:48Z")

</div>

But Smoltz is being evaluated as a _baseball player_, not as a starting pitcher. If he was a crappy closer the numbers would have negatively affected him. But he wasn’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2013, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/194 "2013-12-31T00:44:12Z")

</div>

> [@Gray\_Ghost](#):
>
> After looking at the changes, I don’t think it makes that much of a difference.

I don’t understand why the changes should be considered at all. He actually pitched those four years as a relief pitcher, and pitched well, and helped his team win. Those innings count.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gray\_Ghost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/c0e974/32.png) [@Gray\_Ghost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gray_Ghost)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2013, 1:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/195 "2013-12-31T01:14:07Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> I don’t understand why the changes should be considered at all. He actually pitched those four years as a relief pitcher, and pitched well, and helped his team win. Those innings count.

Because it’s easier to pitch well as a closer than it is as a starting pitcher. If we evaluate pitchers by stats such as ERA, WHIP, H/9, K/9, etc… a closer is going to have much better numbers than a starting pitcher would. Go compare the above stats for a list of closers vs. starters. The closers are going be heads and tails better than the starters.

Much fewer innings pitched, of course, and that shows up in their respective WARs. Which is why the thought of Gagne going to the Hall is such a howler. Despite Gagne being essentially unhittable by anybody for about a year and a half.

This would matter if Smoltz had more than the ~6.5% of his career innings pitching relief that he has. Since he doesn’t, I think I’ve shown that the stat inflation he had from pitching relief is essentially negligible. Really, the problem is that guys like Kevin Brown and Rick Reuschel aren’t in the Hall, not that Smoltz is going to get in. But that’s what we have a Veterans’ Committee for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2013, 4:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/196 "2013-12-31T04:41:33Z")

</div>

> [@Gray\_Ghost](#):
>
> Because it’s easier to pitch well as a closer than it is as a starting pitcher.

I agree that that may be true, but it is also true that in those four years Smoltz legitimately helped his team win ballgames and so he must be given due credit for that.

> [@](#):
>
> If we evaluate pitchers by stats such as ERA, WHIP, H/9, K/9, etc… a closer is going to have much better numbers than a starting pitcher would. Go compare the above stats for a list of closers vs. starters. The closers are going be heads and tails better than the starters.
> 
> Much fewer innings pitched, of course, and that shows up in their respective WARs. Which is why the thought of Gagne going to the Hall is such a howler. Despite Gagne being essentially unhittable by anybody for about a year and a half.

But in your last sentence you explain why Gagne REALLY isn’t going to the Hall of Fame. It has nothing at all to do with it being “easier” to be a relief pitcher. He’s not going to the Hall of Fame because he was only a great pitcher for two years. Eric Gagne isn’t going to the Hall of Fame for exactly the same reason Lefty O’Doul isn’t in the Hall of Fame.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2013, 1:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/197 "2013-12-31T13:53:22Z")

</div>

Isn’t it just as hard to be _one of the best_ relievers in the game as it is to be one of the best starters?

Another reason Gagne isn’t going in is that he was simply horrible after his surgery, and his post-Dodgers teams gave him too much opportunity for a comeback. A player’s last few years do tend to affect memories of him disproportionately, so guys who hung on too long seem to get penalized for it come voting time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawkeyeop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/958977/32.png) [@Hawkeyeop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hawkeyeop)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2013, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/198 "2013-12-31T14:16:07Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> Isn’t it just as hard to be _one of the best_ relievers in the game as it is to be one of the best starters?

No. Just like it isn’t as easy to be the best defensive shortstop than it is to be the best defensive first baseman. Cause if you are good at both, you are going to play short. It is easier to throw one inning at a time than it is to throw seven. And since 7 innings is so much more valuable than one, the people who can do both are almost always going to be a starter. A dominant closer is maybe equivilant to a midrotation starter. Move a guy to the bullpen and his era will instantly improve. I forget the numbers, but I think it about half a run on average. Of course there is a large degree of variance in this.

Overall, I find the early ballot returns promising. Maddux should approach record vote totals. Glavine should sail in with ease as well, which is a little surprising given the strength of the ballot. If Thomas and Biggio get in too, we might be able to start dealing with this lockjam. I’m also happy to see that Kent and Mussina are at least getting enough support to stay comfortably on the ballot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bellhorn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/898d66/32.png) [@Bellhorn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bellhorn)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2013, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/199 "2013-12-31T17:01:26Z")

</div>

Willhelm, Gossage, Sutter, Fingers and, in part, Eckersly are the only relievers in the Hall of Fame, and they’re lucky they preceded the era of Mariano Rivera. Five years from now, Rivera has a good chance to beat Tom Seaver’s record of highest percentage of the BBWA voters.

Rivera’s career numbers (205 ERA+, 56.6 WAR) exceed any other closer by such a huge margin, that it will set the bar so high, I doubt if any closer will make the HOF for another 50 years. (Trevor Hoffman is up in a couple of years, and I’ll doubt he’ll ever get about 30% of the vote, but pre Mariano, his career saves would have made him a viable candidate.)

I do believe, however, that a great closer gets undervalued by WAR. Even Rivera’s career WAR puts him just ahead of Johnny Damon and just behind of Dave Stieb. I understand the sabermetric argument that the ninth inning is just 3 outs of _slightly_ higher leverage, but almost every manager seems to disagree. 15 years ago, I thought we’d see the concept of bullpen-by-committee by now, but it seems like we’re further away from that then ever. I’m assuming that there is something to the fact that a dominant closer helps stabilize the rest of the roles in a bullpen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f475e1/32.png) [@Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jimmy_Chitwood)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2013, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859/200 "2013-12-31T17:11:18Z")

</div>

Really, 30%? I think Hoffman walks in. I think even Billy Wagner might approach that number.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859.md?page=9)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/2014-mlb-hall-of-fame-ballot/674859.md?page=11)
