# $400 million bribe if the GOP repeals the Affordable Care Act?  It can't be true, right...

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [September 22, 2017, 3:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934 "2017-09-22T03:14:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/161 "2017-09-27T20:59:24Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> Of course it is.
> 
> The answer to your question is: yes.
> 
> However, I am still in favor of some of those things.
> 
> Why? Because I contend that in any question that involves restricting freedom, there’s a balancing analysis. The analysis begins with the default proposition that everyone should bear his own costs, and then assesses whether the specific program overcomes that default and should be publicly funded. In the case of roads and bridges, I agree it does.

So if I’m hearing you right, you think that the state has an interest in people to having roads to drive on, but it has no interest in them being alive enough to do so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/162 "2017-09-27T21:08:17Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> So if I’m hearing you right, you think that the state has an interest in people to having roads to drive on, but it has no interest in them being alive enough to do so.

Shockingly, you’re not hearing me right.

I know you were totally confident that you were, so this news must come as a shock to you. Do you need to lie down?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/163 "2017-09-27T21:12:42Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> No one claimed that GIGO made that assertion so it’s not surprising that you missed something non-existent. He did however seem indignant that his personal anecdotal experience could be so easily dismissed:  
> (my bold in each of the above)
> 
> No one is denying GIGO’s personal experience. It’s simply not controlling when discussing public policy.

You need to notice though that \*\*Bricker \*\*decided to make that the issue instead of dealing with the cites that should be the ones used for the policy.

It is easy to see why he did choose that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/164 "2017-09-27T21:18:28Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> You need to notice though that \*\*Bricker \*\*decided to make that the issue instead of dealing with the cites that should be the ones used for the policy.
> 
> It is easy to see why he did choose that.

It’s somewhat of a threshold item. The basics need to be addressed before more complex matters so there can be an understood frame of reference. You seemed to think that the anecdotes had some argumentative value so as a threshold matter we’d first need to agree that the anecdotes while on topic, aren’t dispositive when talking about public policy. Because if you think that they are, then that’s an early hurdle to overcome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/165 "2017-09-27T21:22:12Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> It’s somewhat of a threshold item. The basics need to be addressed before more complex matters so there can be an understood frame of reference. You seemed to think that the anecdotes had some argumentative value so as a threshold matter we’d first need to agree that the anecdotes while on topic, aren’t dispositive when talking about public policy. Because if you think that they are, then that’s an early hurdle to overcome.

I think you are also missing that I already did say that regarding my experience: “But that was not the point anyhow (my experience), the reality is that you [Bricker] can not deal with the cites I made.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/166 "2017-09-27T21:23:10Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I note that you support dragging unborn children from their mother’s womb and killing them, do you not? I bet you even want me to pay for that, don’t you?

Strawman much? :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/167 "2017-09-27T21:23:55Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> Shockingly, you’re not hearing me right.
> 
> I know you were totally confident that you were, so this news must come as a shock to you. Do you need to lie down?

The only way your position makes sense is if health care has no impact on human health. (Or, I suppose, if human health has no impact on how they use the roads.)

Look, I get it. You get some benefit from the roads, so you’re willing to chip in a bit to pay for them. You benefit not at all from other people not suffering and dying, so you don’t want to pay to keep them alive and healthy. This is pretty simple to understand.

However, we’re not talking about your interests, not really. We’re talking about the government’s interests. Whether it’s in the government’s interests for there to be roads, and NASA, and a military, and support for the poor, and support for the unhealthy. So the real question here is, how good is it for the country if we don’t go around shooting people whose legs break like we do horses? How much is it worth it to us, both to avoid tripping on corpses everywhere, and to avoid lost income/GDP, and to avoid seeming less civilized than the average third-world country?

The country’s interests may differ from your personal interests.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/168 "2017-09-27T21:24:48Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> Strawman much? :rolleyes:

Never.

My comment was intended to illustrate the fact that neither you nor I get to unilaterally impose definitions or values on the discussion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/169 "2017-09-27T21:42:34Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> I think you are also missing that I already did say that regarding my experience: “But that was not the point anyhow (my experience), the reality is that you [Bricker] can not deal with the cites I made.”

That’s what a threshold item is. It must be dealt with first, before anything else.

But regarding the cites, I addressed those first:

> [@Bone](#):
>
> The cites you offered proffer a particular way to evaluate freedom. It’s only necessary to address them if one shares in that rubric. The things you value and the criteria you establish as the metrics for success are not necessarily shared. They may be interesting, but they are not controlling.

The way you choose to evaluate the benefit of a particular program is up to you. Not everyone shares the same methodology. You describe freedom from fear of bankruptcy for health reasons - but I don’t think that’s within the proper scope of government. You describe freedom to seek a different job wrt job lock - but I don’t care about job lock. You talk about freedom to start a business, yet businesses started plenty before the ACA. These things you hold out as freedoms I don’t agree these are freedoms are within the proper role of government to secure.

It’s not a matter of dealing with your cites or not. There’s nothing to deal with because they are not germane to the objections being raised. The main point I’ve been trying to make in this thread is that a given position is not such a slam dunk, not a virtual mathematical proof because we don’t agree on the relative value of the elements of the equation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/170 "2017-09-27T21:46:42Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> That’s what a threshold item is. It must be dealt with first, before anything else.
> 
> But regarding the cites, I addressed those first:
> 
> The way you choose to evaluate the benefit of a particular program is up to you. Not everyone shares the same methodology. You describe freedom from fear of bankruptcy for health reasons - but I don’t think that’s within the proper scope of government. You describe freedom to seek a different job wrt job lock - but I don’t care about job lock. You talk about freedom to start a business, yet businesses started plenty before the ACA. These things you hold out as freedoms I don’t agree these are freedoms are within the proper role of government to secure.
> 
> It’s not a matter of dealing with your cites or not. There’s nothing to deal with because they are not germane to the objections being raised. The main point I’ve been trying to make in this thread is that a given position is not such a slam dunk, not a virtual mathematical proof because we don’t agree on the relative value of the elements of the equation.

Actually yours are an opinion, and one that does not deal with the points or the cites made.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/171 "2017-09-27T21:53:10Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> Actually yours are an opinion, and one that does not deal with the points or the cites made.

Of course. That’s the point. The cites you offer are not compelling because they frame the question in a way that we don’t agree upon. It would be like me bringing up the Gouda vs. mozzarella cheese, exalting the superiority of Gouda as it relates to the downsides of the ACA. You may say that cheese has nothing to do with the ACA, and I would say job lock has nothing to do with opposition to the ACA either. Should I complain that you didn’t address my cheese argument?

The point is that you don’t get to unilaterally impose definitions or values on the discussion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/172 "2017-09-27T21:57:44Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> Of course. That’s the point. The cites you offer are not compelling because they frame the question in a way that we don’t agree upon.

Who is we, kemosabe?

In reality what you are doing here is to complain that someone has found a different way to approach this issue and I can say that just because it is making some conservatives queasy is not a good reason to kill the messenger.

I can see why that is better than dealing with the cites.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/173 "2017-09-27T22:05:51Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> The point is that you don’t get to unilaterally impose definitions or values on the discussion.

This should be engraved in granite at the entrance to the SDMB. It is such an alien concept to many of the posters here that it may as well have been uttered in Proto-Indo-European.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 10:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/174 "2017-09-27T22:07:09Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> … someone has found a different way to approach this issue and I can say that just because it is making some conservatives queasy is not a good reason to kill the messenger.

Why must I accept the assumptions inherent in your “different way?” When does it become my turn to define assumptions that you must accept?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/175 "2017-09-27T22:08:28Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> Who is we, kemosabe?

You and me? Unless of course you agree with me. I take it that you think job lock is important. I don’t. See, we disagree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2017, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/176 "2017-09-27T23:13:25Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> Why must I accept the assumptions inherent in your “different way?” When does it become my turn to define assumptions that you must accept?

Dude, you’re the one in favor of dumping poor people in the gutter to bleed to death.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2017, 12:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/177 "2017-09-28T00:05:32Z")

</div>

Good Heavens, man, can’t you see? He is being denied power over his personal property! Perhaps you have some delusion that property rights are but one of many, but be advised: private property rights are the very core, the axle upon which civilization turns! Its it the crown jewel of Rights, the glittering gem surrounded by other semi-precious stones that serve as grace notes to emphasize the primacy of property. I own, therefore, I am. You don’t, therefore, you aren’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Tooth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c67d28/32.png) [@The\_Tooth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Tooth)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2017, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/178 "2017-09-28T00:07:55Z")

</div>

> [@Lemur866](#):
>
> Dude, you’re the one in favor of dumping poor people in the gutter to bleed to death.

_Wisely_ dumping poor people in the gutter to bleed to death, don’t forget.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2017, 12:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/179 "2017-09-28T00:45:51Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> You and me? Unless of course you agree with me. I take it that you think job lock is important. I don’t. See, we disagree.

Based on the last 3 posts and several others before, it is clear that it is not just you and me, and there is more disagreement with the sorry opinion of the ones trying to make the republicans in congress sound reasonable.

It is a really silly reason to dismiss evidence just because you disagree, particularly when others (and even experts in the cites) clearly do not agree with your dismissal. As usual, I only have to notice that your tactic does avoid dealing with the cites I made.

Anyhow, sorry if I had to go all medieval 🙂 on the arguments of another poster and yours, but as others noted: the Republican plan was not what was promised and the failure of turning back the clock is IMHO still something that reasonable and even a good chuck of the Republicans voting for the latest miscarriage of legislation know that the current system is unsustainable, less free and wasteful; but they have to mega pander to the ones demanding the blood of poor people. Ignoring that sending them and also many other Americans into bankruptcy is very likely to lead us into another economic meltdown.

Maybe after another disaster we will have to depend on real fiefdoms.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2017, 12:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934/180 "2017-09-28T00:49:54Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> Why must I accept the assumptions inherent in your “different way?” When does it become my turn to define assumptions that you must accept?

When a Republican health plan give all Americans less death, more liberty and more happiness.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934.md?page=8)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/400-million-bribe-if-the-gop-repeals-the-affordable-care-act-it-cant-be-true-right/796934.md?page=10)
