Good grief! I spend my working life caring for sick, injured and orphaned wild animals, so I hope that my ‘caring credentials’ are beyond question. But I am also a biologist, and I recognize that my work must remain within biological realities. I certainly do not hate raccoons. They are bright, adaptable, fascinating critters. The memory of my first orphaned litter still warms the cockles of my flinty old heart. And over the years I’ve been able to put quite a few of them back into appropriate native habitats. But…
Raccoons are one of the few species whose populations actually rise (rather than decline) in close contact with humans. Even accidental feeding (garbage and road kill) causes their populations to grow beyond the levels of a normal, balanced ecosystem. Deliberate feeding drives this population increase even further.
Note that raccoons are not simply scavengers, but are opportunistic predators. When their population is artificially expanded, populations of prey species (meaning almost anything smaller than a raccoon) are diminished. This has a significant negative impact, not just on those prey species, but on competing predators as well. So there will be fewer mice, rats, voles, nesting birds, snakes, frogs, etc. as well as fewer hawks, owls, skunks, foxes, etc. This is certainly not a service to the ecosystem as a whole.
Neither is it a service to the raccoons. In these artificially maintained populations, diseases and parasites are rampant, tansmitted from one raccoon to another far more frequently than at normal population densities. (Think: one flu carrier on a crowded airplane.) The animals are continually physically stressed, and their stress grows as the population increases.
Physical stress also occurs from ingestion of contaminated foodstuffs. I don’t know about other people’s garbage, but mine contains food scraps along with lots of things that are hardly food. Think discarded medicines, household cleansers (or the rags and sponges used with them), household pesticides, and lots more that I would never deliberately feed to an animal but that a garbage-foraging coon will find along with my apple cores.
They are also psychologically stressed by over-crowding. Their intra- and inter-specific behaviors are warped, and become even more abberant as the population grows, becomes more and more dense, wild resources diminish, and the coons become ever more dependant upon human food sources. These animals have almost zero ability to ‘revert’ or to survive in the absence of human supplementation. Their whole behavioral system, a lifetime of habits, mitigates against it.
Musicat, your attitude toward this amazes me. “What happens if I move or die? Either someone else will take over, or the population of some animals will adjust.” So after you admittedly create a problem, in your absence they can just go to hell? Well most of them *won’t * go to hell. They *will * go to your neighbors. At least short term. They will perforce continue the behaviors you have so well taught them. While your neighbors may tolerate a few raccoons straying from your feeding stations, I doubt they will remain as sanguine when the entire gang descends on their yards. Somebody (more likely several some-bodys), in the name of human safety or the safety of their domestic animals, is gonna get out their guns, their traps, or their bowls of antifreeze.
None of this is a service to the people involved, their pets and livestock, the native ecosystem, or the raccoons themselves.
One way or the other though, the balance will eventually be restored. Raccoons will once again be relatively rare high order predators in a balanced ecosystem. Too bad all the ones you so loved won’t be among them.