# 53 bicycles:  A lateral thinking puzzle

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868>\
**Category:** Thread Games\
**Created:** [July 9, 2017, 7:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868 "2017-07-09T19:51:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 29

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/561 "2017-07-18T15:51:14Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> LHOD:  
> Did anyone else on the train die?  
> Was the train itself damaged in any way?  
> Are the windows on the train relevant?

1. No.

2. No.

3. No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 3:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/562 "2017-07-18T15:53:18Z")

</div>

> [@Mahaloth](#):
>
> That was good, Left Hand. I like these kinds of lateral puzzles.
> 
> Now, mine again, which I so rudely interrupted before.
> 
> \*\*A man was traveling from Switzerland to his home in France by train. If he had been in a non-smoking car he would have died. Why? \*\*

Thanks for the pause!

1. Is Switzerland important to the answer?
2. Is France important to the answer?
3. Would he have died on the train?
4. Did anyone die on this train trip?
5. Were the windows open on the smoking car?
6. Is the open windows the reason for his survival?

(I’m realizing, after running one of these, how important it is to make questions simple instead of compound.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RivkahChaya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rivkahchaya/32/8919_2.png) [@RivkahChaya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RivkahChaya)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/563 "2017-07-18T16:21:29Z")

</div>

1. Were people actually smoking in the smoking car?

2. If yes to 1, is this the relevant factor?

3. Did he at any time borrow a lighter or matches from someone?

4. Is the fact that this takes place in Europe significant? (other than, they still allow smoking on trains. I think.)

5. Do his economic circumstances play a role in his choosing a train over a plane?

6. If no to 5, in there a medical reason?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/564 "2017-07-18T16:44:42Z")

</div>

**LHOD** , I wouldn’t sweat the details: Carbon monoxide has in fact historically been used for such purposes. In other words, chemistry knowledge might be a hindrance, but only if one doesn’t have the history knowledge to make up for it.

I’ll wait on further questions for **Mahaloth** ’s until I see the answers to **Rivkah** ’s. I suspect that her #3 is key.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 4:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/565 "2017-07-18T16:47:28Z")

</div>

Actually, two questions, just to rule out the obvious:

Did he die anyway?  
Was he suffering from extreme nicotine withdrawal?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knowed\_Out](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/knowed_out/32/7380_2.png) [@Knowed\_Out](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knowed_Out)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 5:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/566 "2017-07-18T17:37:49Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> If anything, as Chronos’s note demonstrates, knowledge of chemistry is an impediment.

Carbon monoxide poisoning isn’t applying chemistry? Not that I would have got it anyway…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 5:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/567 "2017-07-18T17:45:39Z")

</div>

> [@Knowed\_Out](#):
>
> Carbon monoxide poisoning isn’t applying chemistry? Not that I would have got it anyway…

I don’t want to distract from the current puzzle, but in looking into matters, here’s what I found:  
-Natural gas only seems to kill (other than explosions) by displacing oxygen in the air; it’s far less dangerous than coal gas.  
-Coal gas (what was used prior to liquid natural gas) contains carbon monoxide as a component, and this is the deadliest part of the mix.  
-Everyone knows that having the gas on if it’s not being burned kills you; knowing the exact method of death means you start asking questions like, “but why wasn’t the fireplace vented?” or “if the room has enough ventilation to supply the fireplace with oxygen, there’s enough ventilation that the natural gas won’t kill you,” that sort of thing. And that’s not even getting into the question of what the odor of coal gas is (the best reference I can find is a 1951 letter to a medical journal, and at that point I realize I’m getting way too deep in the weeds).

So I figured that a little knowledge was, in this case, a salubrious thing :).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/568 "2017-07-18T19:00:26Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Thanks for the pause!
> 
> 1. Is Switzerland important to the answer?
> 2. Is France important to the answer?
> 3. Would he have died on the train?
> 4. Did anyone die on this train trip?
> 5. Were the windows open on the smoking car?
> 6. Is the open windows the reason for his survival?
> 
> (I’m realizing, after running one of these, how important it is to make questions simple instead of compound.)

1. No.
2. No.
3. Yes.
4. No.
5. No.
6. No.

> [@RivkahChaya](#):
>
> 1. Were people actually smoking in the smoking car?
> 
> 2. If yes to 1, is this the relevant factor?
> 
> 3. Did he at any time borrow a lighter or matches from someone?
> 
> 4. Is the fact that this takes place in Europe significant? (other than, they still allow smoking on trains. I think.)
> 
> 5. Do his economic circumstances play a role in his choosing a train over a plane?
> 
> 6. If no to 5, in there a medical reason?

1. Yes.
2. Yes, it’s relevant.
3. No.
4. No.
5. No.
6. No.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Actually, two questions, just to rule out the obvious:
> 
> Did he die anyway?  
> Was he suffering from extreme nicotine withdrawal?

1. No.
2. No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Some_Call_Me.Tim)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/569 "2017-07-18T19:11:31Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> I don’t want to distract from the current puzzle, but in looking into matters, here’s what I found:  
> -Natural gas only seems to kill (other than explosions) by displacing oxygen in the air; it’s far less dangerous than coal gas.  
> -Coal gas (what was used prior to liquid natural gas) contains carbon monoxide as a component, and this is the deadliest part of the mix.  
> -Everyone knows that having the gas on if it’s not being burned kills you; knowing the exact method of death means you start asking questions like, “but why wasn’t the fireplace vented?” or “if the room has enough ventilation to supply the fireplace with oxygen, there’s enough ventilation that the natural gas won’t kill you,” that sort of thing. And that’s not even getting into the question of what the odor of coal gas is (the best reference I can find is a 1951 letter to a medical journal, and at that point I realize I’m getting way too deep in the weeds).
> 
> So I figured that a little knowledge was, in this case, a salubrious thing :).

… This makes absolutely no sense. A natural gas fire does this:

CH[sub]4[/sub] + 2O[sub]2[/sub] –\> CO[sub]2[/sub] + 2 H[sub]2[/sub]O

Let’s imagine two otherwise identical rooms, with equal amounts of CH[sub]4[/sub] being pumped in, with the only difference being that in one room the CH[sub]4[/sub] is burning and the other it isn’t. The room where it’s burning will have LESS oxygen and MORE CO[sub]2[/sub].

_Even ignoring the removal of O[sub]2[/sub]_, as to displacement of air with CH[sub]4[/sub]: if it’s on fire the displacement is at least as bad, with as much CO[sub]2[/sub] being produced as there was CH[sub]4[/sub] in the no-fire room, and CO[sub]2[/sub] is always going to be worse than an equal amount of any inert-to-breathing gas.

Extinguishing the fire makes the room _far safer_ with respect to asphyxiation. The room was a deathtrap from the start, and his lover lessened the danger by stopping the combustion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/570 "2017-07-18T19:12:50Z")

</div>

> [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](#):
>
> … This makes absolutely no sense.

SEE! THIS is why I say a knowledge of chemistry is an impediment!

With that I think I’d better be done with this discussion. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/571 "2017-07-18T19:17:12Z")

</div>

Okay, to recap:  
-A dude on a train, doesn’t matter the origin or destination, would have died during his train trip had he not been on the smoking car. The fact that people were smoking is relevant to his survival. The windows were closed, and he didn’t borrow a lighter or matches.

1. Is that an accurate summary?
2. Would he have died due to a pre-existing medical condition (e.g., heart disease)?
3. Would he have died due to homicide?
4. Did he survive due to deliberate intervention by another person in the smoking car?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/572 "2017-07-18T19:19:26Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Okay, to recap:  
> -A dude on a train, doesn’t matter the origin or destination, would have died during his train trip had he not been on the smoking car. The fact that people were smoking is relevant to his survival. The windows were closed, and he didn’t borrow a lighter or matches.
> 
> 1. Is that an accurate summary?
> 2. Would he have died due to a pre-existing medical condition (e.g., heart disease)?
> 3. Would he have died due to homicide?
> 4. Did he survive due to deliberate intervention by another person in the smoking car?

1. Yes.
2. No.
3. No.
4. No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/573 "2017-07-18T19:25:01Z")

</div>

So, not a pre-existing condition, not homicide.

1. Would he have died due to an accidental injury?
2. Would he have died due to a sudden medical emergency such as a stroke?
3. Would he have committed suicide?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knowed\_Out](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/knowed_out/32/7380_2.png) [@Knowed\_Out](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knowed_Out)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/574 "2017-07-18T19:25:56Z")

</div>

Did the non-smoking car break off from the rest of the train and fall off?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Some_Call_Me.Tim)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/575 "2017-07-18T19:36:49Z")

</div>

1. Would he have lived in the non-smoking car if there had been a lit candle sitting next to him?
2. Did he have an unusual medical condition? (I’ll uncompound the previous question to not require that this was the proximate cause of death for a yes response.)
3. Were there any unusual contaminants in the air in either or both cars, other than cigarette/cigar smoke?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Some_Call_Me.Tim)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/576 "2017-07-18T19:39:55Z")

</div>

> [@Knowed\_Out](#):
>
> Did the non-smoking car break off from the rest of the train and fall off?

Well, we know no one died, but this could be true if it had been vacant…  
4. Were all the non-smoking cars unoccupied?  
5. Was he in the smoking car?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/577 "2017-07-18T19:46:34Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> So, not a pre-existing condition, not homicide.
> 
> 1. Would he have died due to an accidental injury?
> 2. Would he have died due to a sudden medical emergency such as a stroke?
> 3. Would he have committed suicide?

1. No.
2. No.
3. Yes.

> [@Knowed\_Out](#):
>
> Did the non-smoking car break off from the rest of the train and fall off?

No.

> [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](#):
>
> 1. Would he have lived in the non-smoking car if there had been a lit candle sitting next to him?
> 2. Did he have an unusual medical condition? (I’ll uncompound the previous question to not require that this was the proximate cause of death for a yes response.)
> 3. Were there any unusual contaminants in the air in either or both cars, other than cigarette/cigar smoke?

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. No.

> [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](#):
>
> Well, we know no one died, but this could be true if it had been vacant…  
> 4. Were all the non-smoking cars unoccupied?  
> 5. Was he in the smoking car?

1. No.
2. No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Some_Call_Me.Tim)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/578 "2017-07-18T19:51:11Z")

</div>

1. Was he the conductor?
2. Did the smoke keep him awake, preventing him from falling asleep at the controls?
3. Was he some other employee of the train?
4. Was he a stowaway?
5. Was he a refugee/fugitive/etc who would have been caught and executed if he’d been in the non-smoking car?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Some_Call_Me.Tim)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/579 "2017-07-18T19:56:29Z")

</div>

1. Did he have a severe allergy?
2. Did an open flame purify the air in some way?
3. Was the light given off by a candle or a lit cigarette relevant?
4. Was he in a sleeper car?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2017, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868/580 "2017-07-18T20:08:42Z")

</div>

> [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](#):
>
> 1. Was he the conductor?
> 2. Did the smoke keep him awake, preventing him from falling asleep at the controls?
> 3. Was he some other employee of the train?
> 4. Was he a stowaway?
> 5. Was he a refugee/fugitive/etc who would have been caught and executed if he’d been in the non-smoking car?

1. No.
2. No.
3. No.
4. No.
5. No.

> [@Some\_Call\_Me.Tim](#):
>
> 1. Did he have a severe allergy?
> 2. Did an open flame purify the air in some way?
> 3. Was the light given off by a candle or a lit cigarette relevant?
> 4. Was he in a sleeper car?

1. No.
2. No.
3. Yes.
4. Irrelevant or “no”.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868.md?page=28)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/53-bicycles-a-lateral-thinking-puzzle/790868.md?page=30)
