# 5yo trans girl: "I want the fairy princess to come and make my penis into a vagina"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 11, 2006, 2:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263 "2006-06-11T02:18:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marienee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@Marienee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marienee)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/61 "2006-06-12T21:32:12Z")

</div>

> [@brickbacon](#):
>
> Did you not notice I linked to the respected study my detractors are trumpeting now? Don’t give me some shit about research, I was the first to present that study in this thread. Wiki was a supplementary cite to emphasize that studies involving a handful of people do not rise to the level of conclusive proof, and to state otherwise is dishonest.

Okay, well, let us agree that there is no conclusive answer as to why people might have a persistent belief that they are a different gender than the one their genitalia might indicate. And let us also say that we have before us a five year old who seems to have such a belief, and let us say it seems to be unusually persistent. Though I am troubled by two things – one is, how it can have been persistent for as many years as is suggested and simultaneously be "like, boom, he turned five years old…"as the article says. Still, a shrink was brought in at least two years ago and made a diagnosis which suggests that the parents didn’t just leap at the chance to dress their boy toddler as a girl. The other thing that troubles me is the mother’s use of the word intersex, which suggests to me that the, um, evidence presented by the child’s genitalia is not as conclusive as it might be. Still, again, the evidence suggests that the child went regularly to the pediatrician so i assume it would have come up.

But unless you think the parents are just using their child in some kind of social experiment, the question remains – what response by the parents would have been, in your view, not troubling?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brickbacon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/898d66/32.png) [@brickbacon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brickbacon)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/62 "2006-06-12T21:40:38Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> No, I don’t think it shows any such thing. Wikipedia, like any encyclopedia, is mostly useful as a place to start research from. It’s by no means a definitive source, nor is it meant to be. It is, at best, a general overview of the subject. It should not be used to rebut a primary citation.

It was not used to rebut a primary citation, it was in response to a false claim made by a poster. I provided another cite saying the same thing. Nobody has actually disproven anything said in the wiki article, or the other article I linked to. I think dictionaries and encyclopedias are considered pretty definitive. They are not the end all be all, but what is?

> [@Miller](#):
>
> That goes for encyclopedias as a whole, not just Wiki. In addition, the nature of Wikipedia itself makes it extremely unreliable when it comes to topics that are at all controversial, and transgenderism is one of the more controversial topics out there. The reliability of a wiki entry on that subject is dependent on what particular axe was being ground in the latest edit. On this particular subject, I would not rely on Wikipedia to be accurate, and I would not blame anyone for rejecting such a cite out of hand.

And a study done by scientist is less likely to be influenced by bias? I think you are overestimating the objectivity of studies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 9:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/63 "2006-06-12T21:48:42Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> [Yep.](http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Marley)

Apparently we can’t trust like Wikipedia either, as those guys don’t seem to know the difference between reggae and ska. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matt\_mcl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ab992/32.png) [@matt\_mcl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/matt_mcl)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/64 "2006-06-12T21:51:47Z")

</div>

> [@brickbacon](#):
>
> It was not used to rebut a primary citation, it was in response to a false claim made by a poster. I provided another cite saying the same thing. Nobody has actually disproven anything said in the wiki article, or the other article I linked to. I think dictionaries and encyclopedias are considered pretty definitive. They are not the end all be all, but what is?

Actually, in many cases encyclopedias are actually forbidden as sources; primary sources (journal articles, monographs) are required.

I love and regularly edit Wikipedia, but I find it interesting you’re upselling its accuracy and downplaying that of the peer-reviewed articles that have been put in front of you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/65 "2006-06-12T22:03:52Z")

</div>

> [@brickbacon](#):
>
> I think dictionaries and encyclopedias are considered pretty definitive.

Well, you’re welcome to think that, but there’s a reason why most college professors will mark you down if you cite either as a primary research source in a paper.

> [@](#):
>
> They are not the end all be all, but what is?

Primary research conducted using contemporary data.

> [@](#):
>
> And a study done by scientist is less likely to be influenced by bias?

Yes, vastly, provided its peer reviewed.

> [@](#):
>
> I think you are overestimating the objectivity of studies.

And I think you’re vastly overestimating the reliablity of general reference resources.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/66 "2006-06-12T22:11:37Z")

</div>

Isn’t there a thread on the reliability of Wikipedia you could be having this debate in? Or you could go help me vandalize [Uncyclopedia](http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Marley) s’more.[/wiki debate, please]

Look, I’m sorry. But whenever I see some study to the effect of “Billy has 23 goobleneeder cells, & is male; Jenny has 2200 goobleneeder cells, & is female; therefore goobleneeder cells tell us whether we are male or female,” it sets off my BS meter. It’s a _non sequitur._ What, the kid can’t derive his own sense of what is normal for his anatomy by experience? What’s impossible, exactly, about being a man who cognitively resembles a woman, but is comfortable in his penis? Why can’t a woman have the brain function of a man, while being content with a vagina? What’s the mechanism?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 10:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/67 "2006-06-12T22:24:42Z")

</div>

Crap. Forgot about “unpermissable vanity.” And they were fast, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matt\_mcl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ab992/32.png) [@matt\_mcl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/matt_mcl)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/68 "2006-06-12T22:28:29Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> What’s impossible, exactly, about being a man who cognitively resembles a woman, but is comfortable in his penis? Why can’t a woman have the brain function of a man, while being content with a vagina? What’s the mechanism?

Nothing’s impossible about those things; I know several people that could be described in that way. The contrary is also possible, and happens. This would be because people are different from one another, and accordingly, physical/mental/sexual/psychological states such as transgender and transsexualism have different features from one person to the next.

Why must _all_ gender-variant people to need surgery, for _some_ gender-variant people to need surgery?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matt\_mcl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ab992/32.png) [@matt\_mcl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/matt_mcl)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/69 "2006-06-12T22:35:58Z")

</div>

And on this:

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> What, the kid can’t derive his own sense of what is normal for his anatomy by experience?

Certainly. That’s why SRS is not performed before age 18. By then, she may be certain what she wants with her body. If by then she decides she does not wish to have SRS - or a fortiori if he no longer identifies as female - well then, tant mieux. If she still needs surgery, again, tant mieux. If she hasn’t decided yet, then she can stay on the androgen blockers until she has.

You seem to be under the impression that since Nicole identifies persistently as a girl, she will be railroaded into surgery as soon as her parents can get someone to sign off on it. Not at all. AFAICT, all that her family and associates are doing now is respecting Nicole’s own sense of her identity, ensuring that she is accepted and cared for properly, keeping her options open, and preparing to help her weather the storms of her childhood.

I don’t think anyone is trying to inform her as to who and what she is. Instead, they’re keeping their ears open for _her_ to inform _them._

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DocCathode](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doccathode/32/18773_2.png) [@DocCathode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DocCathode)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/70 "2006-06-12T22:48:58Z")

</div>

> [@Marienee](#):
>
> The other thing that troubles me is the mother’s use of the word intersex, which suggests to me that the, um, evidence presented by the child’s genitalia is not as conclusive as it might be.

It doesn’t necessarilly suggest that. If GID is due to neuroanatomy, then those people are intersexed.

**Foolsguinea** As **Miller** pointed out, I have evidence backing my position. Where’s your evidence of inborn cannibalism?

Re Wikipedia

I never have advanced it as a reliable source in GD. I sometimes cite it in CS threads. I trust it to be correct about comic books and Star Trek. I may also use it as a picture source. I don’t trust it on matters of consequence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 10:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/71 "2006-06-12T22:57:18Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> Reading about the activists, I’m a little worried that this kid will be treated as a poster child instead of an individual human being.

Imagine having to live with that the rest of your life. Especially if (as is entirely possible) the kid is just going through a phase and ultimately decides he’s male. And straight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ensign\_Edison](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7ab992/32.png) [@Ensign\_Edison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ensign_Edison)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 11:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/72 "2006-06-12T23:02:24Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Imagine having to live with that the rest of your life. Especially if (as is entirely possible) the kid is just going through a phase and ultimately decides he’s male. And straight.

When someone is diagnosed with diabetes, do you say ‘Oh, it’s probably just a phase’? Do you question the medical profession about everything, or is this tendency to think your uneducated opinion is probably more correct than theirs limited to issues of sexuality and gender?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/73 "2006-06-12T23:03:41Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> Look, I’m sorry. But whenever I see some study to the effect of “Billy has 23 goobleneeder cells, & is male; Jenny has 2200 goobleneeder cells, & is female; therefore goobleneeder cells tell us whether we are male or female,” it sets off my BS meter. It’s a _non sequitur._

And what was the medical or psychological institute that calibrated your BS meter, pray tell?

It’s pretty much indisputable that men and women have different brain structures. There seems to be some strong evidence that people who are transgendered have the brain structure of the gender with which they identify, as opposed to the one with which they were born. Where’s the non sequitur, here?

> [@](#):
>
> What, the kid can’t derive his own sense of what is normal for his anatomy by experience? What’s impossible, exactly, about being a man who cognitively resembles a woman, but is comfortable in his penis? Why can’t a woman have the brain function of a man, while being content with a vagina? What’s the mechanism?

Well, that’s pretty much the entire point of the research, innit? If we knew the answers to all those questions, we wouldn’t need to debate it, would we?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marienee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@Marienee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marienee)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/74 "2006-06-12T23:04:39Z")

</div>

> [@DocCathode](#):
>
> It doesn’t necessarilly suggest that. If GID is due to neuroanatomy, then those people are intersexed.
> 
> .

Sure. As I say, the rest of the article didn’t bring it up so I just discounted it in thinking about it myself. But it is an interesting word to use. It could be my own experience but that experience is that people use variations of “trans” to talk about transgender and “intersex” usually is used to refer to a person of indeterminate sex or where, as they say, a mistake was made.

But the family circumstances rather discounted that option in my mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/75 "2006-06-12T23:05:32Z")

</div>

The track record of medical experts on understanding & defining sexuality, & on prescribing solutions for sexual deviance, does not in me inspire confidence.

And there are some truly messed up parents in the world, even ones who love their children & are trying to do right by them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/76 "2006-06-12T23:11:47Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> The track record of medical experts on understanding & defining sexuality, & on prescribing solutions for sexual deviance, does not in me inspire confidence.
> 
> And there are some truly messed up parents in the world, even ones who love their children & are trying to do right by them.

Well, that’s conveniently non-responsive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/77 "2006-06-12T23:24:07Z")

</div>

OK, fine, when we get a population of practicing cannibals, I’ll try to get a research grant to compare their brains to lions’ brains, OK? OK!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/78 "2006-06-12T23:25:50Z")

</div>

(Not because lions are cannibalistic, but because they genuinely favor human flesh if they get a taste of it, & are pretty close to us cladistically for something that eats us. Lord, I’m just exploding my post count on this thread.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DocCathode](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doccathode/32/18773_2.png) [@DocCathode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DocCathode)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 11:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/79 "2006-06-12T23:33:27Z")

</div>

So, rather than admit you compared a claim backed by evidence to one without evidence, you now propose to study if cannibalism is inborn by studying the brains of another species which has no inborn drive to eat either human beings or each other.

Your proposed experiment is as flawed as your posts in this thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ensign\_Edison](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7ab992/32.png) [@Ensign\_Edison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ensign_Edison)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2006, 11:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263/80 "2006-06-12T23:33:58Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> OK, fine, when we get a population of practicing cannibals, I’ll try to get a research grant to compare their brains to lions’ brains, OK? OK!

Hey, while you’re waiting for that, maybe you could comment on what Miller pointed out to you:

> [@Miller](#):
>
> It’s pretty much indisputable that men and women have different brain structures. There seems to be some strong evidence that people who are transgendered have the brain structure of the gender with which they identify, as opposed to the one with which they were born. Where’s the non sequitur, here?

Can you answer his question by explaining how, in light of that information, your previous statement:

> [@Dr. foolsguinea](#):
>
> Look, I’m sorry. But whenever I see some study to the effect of “Billy has 23 goobleneeder cells, & is male; Jenny has 2200 goobleneeder cells, & is female; therefore goobleneeder cells tell us whether we are male or female,” it sets off my BS meter. It’s a non sequitur.

is accurate?

All you have to do is back up what you’ve said. Or even just explain it. Elaborate on why your perspective doesn’t need to change based on this new information, perhaps.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/5yo-trans-girl-i-want-the-fairy-princess-to-come-and-make-my-penis-into-a-vagina/360263.md?page=5)
