You didn’t want to hear about Star Trek, but I would like to point out that Star Trek II had some of the more graphic violence of the Star Trek movies, and all of it had to be done with old school special effects, including a crewman on the Enterprise screaming because he’s on fire.
[QUOTE=CalMeacham]
Well, no, that’s not the reason. The book I took this list from included both of those. But if you read Lord of the Flies, the setting is a future war in which the boys have to be evacuated and the implications are that it’s a pretty big and possibly nuclear war. It’s as much a candidate as Fail-Safe.
[/quote]
I’ve read Lord of the Flies, thank you, and I think it’s a tremendous stretch to include it as science fiction. I haven’t read Fail Safe, but if it’s no more science fiction than Lord of the Flies, I’d say it’s a stretch too.
Fantasy is not the same as science fiction. There’s a lot of overlap, but The Birds is about as much science fiction as is Jaws.
[QUOTE=Johnny L.A.]
But I do have Star Crash on a VHS tape. I remember not liking it when it came out. Total dreck. I thought it would be fun in its badness. I… think I need to be in the right mood.
[/QUOTE]
It’s more bad than fun, as I remember it, although I still enjoyed it more than Battle Beyond the Stars.
[QUOTE=The Them]
Hard to characterize, though it’s often listed with horror flicks:* Lair of the White Worm.* A VERY different viewing experience.
[/QUOTE]
I saw a little bit of it, I reminded myself of what it was like on Youtube and my goodness. Can Amanda Donohue look any more like the cat that got the very last drop of cream on the planet?
[QUOTE=Love Rhombus]
On a slight hijack, was the TV miniseries of Day of The Triffids any good? Or should I stick with the movie?
[/QUOTE]
Completely different beasts really, I like them both for different reasons.
The miniseries would probably compare favourably with something like Jericho today.