# 72 Virgins in Islam Paradise

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856>\
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\
**Created:** [April 21, 2010, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856 "2010-04-21T14:49:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fulene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecae2f/32.png) [@fulene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fulene)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2010, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/1 "2010-04-21T14:49:27Z")

</div>

I have only read about a third of the Qu’ran so far, but paradise sounds like a lovely place and fittingly describes an oasis…a shady garden with flowing streams,raised couches and golden goblets…the only reference I have seen so far to any “virgins” were described as “fitting nubile companions”. Their sex was not stated. I find the Qur’an to be much more coherent than the Bible. I see no reason to think the God of the Quran is not the same God as the Christian God except that the Quran denies the deity of Jesus and denies the trinity, though it talks much about Jesus and Mary too. The word Islam means “belief in one God” and the message is about abolishing polytheism which was rampant among the tribes in the seventh century when the Qu’ran was written. This is why it emphatically states “there shall be no partners with God”. Interestingly it is written in the first person; the “voice” of God. I think Muslim fundamentalists are the equal of Christian fundamentalists, emotionally unbalanced and uninformed More people should read the Qu’ran and see for themselves what is ACTUALLY in it. there is SO MUCH misunderstanding, especially when so many people get all their info from youtube these days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2010, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/2 "2010-04-21T15:45:21Z")

</div>

Did you have a point?

Oh, and the word “Islam” means “submission”. The word for “belief in one God” is “monotheism”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2010, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/3 "2010-04-21T15:54:29Z")

</div>

Do you have a link to the relevant column?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2010, 4:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/4 "2010-04-21T16:34:24Z")

</div>

> [@silenus](#):
>
> Do you have a link to the relevant column?

I do: [Does the Koran really promise Islamic martyrs 72 virgins?](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2329/does-the-koran-really-promise-islamic-martyrs-72-virgins)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatio\_Hellpop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e5b9ba/32.png) [@Horatio\_Hellpop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatio_Hellpop)\
**Post date:** [April 26, 2010, 9:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/5 "2010-04-26T09:09:16Z")

</div>

I don’t have a cite for this, as I heard it on a radio show years ago, but the “fitting nubile companions” translate from a word with the approximate translation of “plumpers.” The linguist being interviewed thought it might refer to grapes. What a burn, for some unemployable and unmarriageable kid-turned-martyr to endure privation and death, show up in the afterlife and be handed a plate of freakin’ grapes!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [April 26, 2010, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/6 "2010-04-26T21:01:09Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Did you have a point?
> 
> Oh, and the word “Islam” means “submission”. The word for “belief in one God” is “monotheism”.

Or, if you want to stay within the religion, [Tawhīd](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawhid).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EvilTOJ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/ee59a6/32.png) [@EvilTOJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EvilTOJ)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2010, 6:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/7 "2010-04-28T06:53:44Z")

</div>

They never said what [type](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_xHKXLX7V0LU/SWcaEPXxkKI/AAAAAAAAAGQ/krMB6cWDisc/s1600-h/superest_super_nerd.jpg) of [virgin](http://www.jimwcoleman.com/photoblog/1986%20Jim%20star%20trek.jpg)would be waiting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grovberg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8baadc/32.png) [@grovberg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/grovberg)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2010, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/8 "2010-04-30T16:57:45Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> I do: [Does the Koran really promise Islamic martyrs 72 virgins?](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2329/does-the-koran-really-promise-islamic-martyrs-72-virgins)

It’s pretty ridiculous that the whole point of this article is to clarify what the Qu’ran says really says about the afterlife, but then refers to Christian heaven as “angels with harps.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eastcheap](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8491ac/32.png) [@eastcheap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eastcheap)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2010, 12:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/9 "2010-05-01T12:40:23Z")

</div>

> [@Krokodil](#):
>
> I don’t have a cite for this, as I heard it on a radio show years ago, but the “fitting nubile companions” translate from a word with the approximate translation of “plumpers.” The linguist being interviewed thought it might refer to grapes.!

Yep, that’s everything you need to know about linguists. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dhkendall](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a9adbd/32.png) [@dhkendall](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dhkendall)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2010, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/10 "2010-05-01T16:11:56Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Did you have a point?
> 
> Oh, and the word “Islam” means “submission”. The word for “belief in one God” is “monotheism”.

I always thought “Islam” meant, or has the root word of “peace”, as “salaam” (peace) seems closely related.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cyningablod](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9fc29f/32.png) [@Cyningablod](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cyningablod)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2010, 5:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/11 "2010-05-01T17:33:16Z")

</div>

> [@fulene](#):
>
> The word Islam means “belief in one God” […].

Umm…no. Not remotely.

I can assure you that the word _islam_ does NOT mean, “belief in one god”. Yes, Islam is a monotheistic religion, but that AIN’T what the word means.

It is a noun form of the Arabic verb root _s-l-m_, which carries the meaning of, “to surrender” or loosely, “to bow before” or perhaps “to worship”.

Interestingly, the same root also carries the idea of “peace”. The Arabic word for peace is _salaam_, a variant of the same lexeme: _s-l-m_.

Even more interestingly, Hebrew, a sister Semitic language of Arabic, has the same lexeme for “peace”, only the initial sibilant is palatized: _sh-l-m_, as in _shalom_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cyningablod](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9fc29f/32.png) [@Cyningablod](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cyningablod)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2010, 5:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/12 "2010-05-01T17:38:25Z")

</div>

> [@eastcheap](#):
>
> Yep, that’s everything you need to know about linguists. 😃

Hey, I’M a linguist! Take that back!

OK, OK, I’m a _trained_ linguist, but I don’t do research or even work in the field. I’m actually a librarian. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cyningablod](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9fc29f/32.png) [@Cyningablod](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cyningablod)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2010, 5:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/13 "2010-05-01T17:56:35Z")

</div>

> [@dhkendall](#):
>
> I always thought “Islam” meant, or has the root word of “peace”, as “salaam” (peace) seems closely related.

Yep. Same verbal root.\* Apparently to the Arab mind, the ideas of “peace” and “surrender” are somewhat related. Explains a lot of their performance in the Six-Day and Yom Kippur Wars, don’t it! 😛

\*In Arabic, the verbal root is called, _maSdar_. It usually consists of three letters, but can sometimes be only two, or as many as four or even five (usually only in loan words. (The _maSdar_ of the verb, “to televise”, an Anglicism, is _t-l-f-z_.)

Some examples:

_k-t-b_ : to read. Related words: _kitaab_ [book], mukaatib [writer], maktaba [library]

_d-r-s_ : to study, to learn. (A cognate is Hebrew _d-r-sh_, whence the term midrash.) Related words: daras [lesson], mudarris [teacher], madrasa [school]

_q-r-a_ : to read, recite. Related words: qur’aan (Qur’aan, Koran) [readings, recitations]

_j-h-d_ : to fight, to struggle, to wage war (esp. in a religious context). Related words: jihaad [struggle], mujaahid [holy fighter, s.], mujaahidiin [holy fighters, pl.]  
Notice the similarities between _mukaatib_, _mudaaris_, and _mujaahid_? They’re all **people** who carry out the action of the verb. So it’s really easy in Arabic to generate nouns associated with the _maSdar_: Just apply a specific set of prefixes, suffixes, and vowel infixes. In this case: mu-_-aa-_-i-\* . Cool, huh? 🙂

I’ve studied Arabic for about 10 years now. It’s complicated, but fun.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cyningablod](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9fc29f/32.png) [@Cyningablod](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cyningablod)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2010, 5:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/14 "2010-05-01T17:58:49Z")

</div>

Oops! The verb _k-t-b_ means “to **write** ”, not “to read”. Sorry!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cyningablod](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/9fc29f/32.png) [@Cyningablod](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cyningablod)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2010, 6:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/15 "2010-05-01T18:08:46Z")

</div>

Can you tell that this stuff fascinates me? It’s why I went into linguistics.

> [@BigT](#):
>
> Or, if you want to stay within the religion, [Tawhīd](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawhid).

I’ve explained about the Arabic _maSdar_, and how pretty much every word contains a lexical skeleton of its conceptual root.

The Arabic word for “one” is _waaHid_. So the noun _tawHiid_ clearly conveys an idea of singularity.

Nifty, huh? Can I get an “Amen!” ?  
Anyone?  
Don’t leave me hangin’…  
Buehler? Buehler? …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2010, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/16 "2010-05-01T22:11:59Z")

</div>

The specific part about the “72 virgins” is taken from a _ḥadīth_, not from the Qur’ān. (Aside: Please, everyone, note the position of the apostrophe in the word Qur’ān, between the r and the ā; it transliterates a specific consonantal sound in Arabic, and is not just sprinkled into text at random like little candies on ice cream.)

A common misconception about the textual sources of Islam, which I see repeated constantly even by those who pretend to knowledge of the subject, is that everything in the religion is spelled out in the Qur’ān. It certainly is not. If everything that people attribute to the Qur’ān were really in there, it would be the size of the friggin _Encyclopædia Britannica_ instead of the modest-sized volume it actually is. The vast bulk of Islamic source material comes from the many _ḥadīth_ collections, which take up several library shelves. The _ḥadīth_s are far more elaborate and detailed.

The distinction is significant, because while no Muslims doubt the authenticity of the Qur’ān in the slightest, the authenticity of the _ḥadīth_s has been challenged again and again. It’s well known that during the first 2 centuries after the Hijrah, phony _ḥadīth_s were fabricated wholesale, to bolster various partisan and sectarian agendas. It is said that al-Bukhārī, the most renowned of all the _ḥadīth_ scholars, evaluated about 100,000 _ḥadīth_s and rejected over 97% of them. While the ones that al-Bukhārī authenticated are widely accepted and have formed the second most important source of Islamic law, lots of critics have found serious problems with even those. To the point that there have been “Qur’ān-only” movements, especially in recent years, that advocate junking all the _ḥadīth_s altogether, because the entire corpus just gets so unreliable and has been so abused by various partisan and sectarian agendas.

So it isn’t a simple issue at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_W.Kennedy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_w.kennedy/32/1031_2.png) [@John\_W.Kennedy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_W.Kennedy)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2010, 2:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/17 "2010-05-02T02:05:31Z")

</div>

> [@Johanna](#):
>
> To the point that there have been “Qur’ān-only” movements, especially in recent years, that advocate junking all the _ḥadīth_s altogether…

Islamic Karaites! Who knew?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marmite\_Lover](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e495f1/32.png) [@Marmite\_Lover](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marmite_Lover)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2010, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/72-virgins-in-islam-paradise/536856/18 "2010-05-03T15:39:54Z")

</div>

Correct Johanna.

Hadith are totally unreliable and actually in places contradict the Quran itself.
