# 9/11

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [July 13, 2012, 12:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099 "2012-07-13T12:46:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/161 "2012-07-19T19:40:50Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There would be no reason for them to care once the planes hit.

You’re saying they put explosives in the towers and then didn’t care if they worked or not?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AndrewL](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3d9bf3/32.png) [@AndrewL](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AndrewL)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/162 "2012-07-19T19:41:46Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There would be no reason for them to care once the planes hit.

Of course there would be. They want the hypothetical demolition charges to go off, don’t they? That means the charges, their detonators, and the wiring connecting to them, has to remain intact. No, they can’t rely on the fire to set the charges off. The plastic explosives used in cutting charges doesn’t explode if you set it on fire - it needs a very specific detonation shock to set it off.

Even worse, our hypothetical demolitionists are risking having the wires cut or detonators disabled, leaving intact unexploded cutting charges in the debris pile to be found by rescue workers or cleanup crew, which would have been a bit of a giveaway. No, you can’t rely on the collapse of the building to set them off either. Plastic explosives are surprisingly insensitive to heat and impact.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/163 "2012-07-19T19:41:49Z")

</div>

> [@Garfield226](#):
>
> the buildings damaged surrounding structures (including one to the point of collapse itself)

Two. WTC 2 fell on and utterly obliterated a church across the street.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/164 "2012-07-19T19:43:26Z")

</div>

> [@AndrewL](#):
>
> Of course there would be. They want the hypothetical demolition charges to go off, don’t they? That means the charges, their detonators, and the wiring connecting to them, has to remain intact. No, they can’t rely on the fire to set the charges off.

And if these explosions were supposed to be triggered remotely, there would have to be transmitters that would also need to remain intact in order to work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/165 "2012-07-19T19:45:03Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> And if these explosions were supposed to be triggered remotely, there would have to be transmitters that would also need to remain intact in order to work.

I always love the idea of remote detonation in the area of the world where radio traffic is probably at its highest level. Nope, no early detonation waiting to happen there, no sir!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt\_Kirk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/779978/32.png) [@Capt\_Kirk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt_Kirk)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/166 "2012-07-19T19:45:38Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There would be no reason for them to care once the planes hit.

How exactly did the planes not set off the pre placed explosives? How were the det cords not damaged? I know that modern explosives are very stable, but there is no way they are that stable. Hole in your logic, such as it is.  
**CAPT**

Edit from upthread, I did not know modern explosives are that stable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![split\_p\_j](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e19b73/32.png) [@split\_p\_j](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/split_p_j)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/167 "2012-07-19T19:53:51Z")

</div>

> [@Garfield226](#):
>
> It looked just like a controlled demolition except for the fact that planes flew into each building and set several floors on fire, the collapse started from the point of impact and fire, rather than the ground, the buildings ejected pieces of debris rather than falling down, the buildings damaged surrounding structures (including one to the point of collapse itself), there were no visible or audio indications of explosions, the collapses didn’t happen simultaneously and, oh yeah, thousands of people died.
> 
> But other than that, they looked exactly like controlled demolitions.

There were reports of expolsions in the sublevels of both buildings, all caught on video by eyewitnesses. There are pictures of “squibs” on the floors preceeding the collaspe, some say they are air pockets, but the kind of look like charges too.

All of you must have seen all this, I’ll link to them if I have to, but come on. You are all telling me you are trying to debate me and have not even looked at other evidence? Really?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Garfield226](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Garfield226](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Garfield226)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/168 "2012-07-19T19:55:24Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There were reports of expolsions in the sublevels of both buildings, all caught on video by eyewitnesses. There are pictures of “squibs” on the floors preceeding the collaspe, some say they are air pockets, but the kind of look like charges too.
> 
> All of you must have seen all this, I’ll link to them if I have to, but come on. You are all telling me you are trying to debate me and have not even looked at other evidence? Really?

They kind of look like charges so they must be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/169 "2012-07-19T19:56:24Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There were reports of expolsions in the sublevels of both buildings, all caught on video by eyewitnesses.

This was dealt with already:

> [@Mr.Miskatonic](#):
>
> A few puffs of smoke and small flashes of light are nowhere near the level CD comes to. If you get reports of ‘half of lower Manhattan deafened’ you might have something, but the videos don’t show anything of the sort.

The fact that none of the rubble looked like it had been cut by an explosive is pretty compelling, too, isn’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/170 "2012-07-19T19:56:49Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There were reports of expolsions in the sublevels of both buildings, all caught on video by eyewitnesses. There are pictures of “squibs” on the floors preceeding the collaspe, some say they are air pockets, but the kind of look like charges too.

> [@Lute Skywatcher](#):
>
> Yet the survivors from Stairwell B said nothing about hearing explosions, just the sounds of the building collapsing above them.

..

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/171 "2012-07-19T19:58:51Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> All of you must have seen all this, I’ll link to them if I have to, but come on. You are all telling me you are trying to debate me and have not even looked at other evidence? Really?

You are not the first to link to videos claiming to see squibs. We have seen them here many times.

There are no puffs suggestive of squibs, and no visible evidence of planned explosives.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/172 "2012-07-19T19:59:55Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There were reports of expolsions in the sublevels of both buildings,

Reports which, BTW, were of the fireball of fuel coming down the shaft after the impact.

Not that these are in any way relevant since the collapse certainly didn’t start in the subbasements.

> [@](#):
>
> all caught on video by eyewitnesses.

Not true.

> [@](#):
>
> There are pictures of “squibs” on the floors preceeding the collaspe, some say they are air pockets, but the kind of look like charges too.

These ‘squibs’ are happening _as the building is already collapsing_. They also have no demolition charge sound. “looks like” isn’t good enough.

> [@](#):
>
> All of you must have seen all this, I’ll link to them if I have to, but come on. You are all telling me you are trying to debate me and have not even looked at other evidence? Really?

Yes. You are completely and utterly wrong. This stuff was debunked over 6 years ago on average.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AndrewL](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3d9bf3/32.png) [@AndrewL](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AndrewL)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/173 "2012-07-19T20:00:42Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> There were reports of expolsions in the sublevels of both buildings, all caught on video by eyewitnesses.

There were not only reports of explosions in the basements, but people injured by those explosions as well. It is instructive to look at the nature of their injuries. Eyewitnesses to the explosions in the basements report people with blackened clothing and skin, and in some cases with skin burned off or hanging off them.

Demolition explosives are very high speed, but don’t actually generate much heat. Injuries from being too close to that type of explosion are typically due to shrapnel or barotrauma due to the shock wave. The injuries seen on the people in the basements of the towers are consistent with being exposed to burning liquid or vapors. There is evidence that following the airplane impacts burning jet fuel poured down the elevator shafts, which would be consistent with the injuries and eyewitness reports.

> [@](#):
>
> There are pictures of “squibs” on the floors preceeding the collaspe, some say they are air pockets, but the kind of look like charges too.

There are, but it is important to note that these happen after the collapse has already begun. Furthermore, the color of the puffs of dust/smoke don’t seem to resemble the explosions from cutting charges, which as already pointed out are very bright, very fast, very loud, and leave a black smoke cloud.

> [@](#):
>
> All of you must have seen all this, I’ll link to them if I have to, but come on. You are all telling me you are trying to debate me and have not even looked at other evidence? Really?

We have. Why do you assume that the people who disagree with you have not seen all the evidence? You are not the first 9/11 conspiracy theorist to come by here by a long shot, and you have yet to bring anything that hasn’t been brought up and debunked many times before.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![split\_p\_j](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e19b73/32.png) [@split\_p\_j](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/split_p_j)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/174 "2012-07-19T20:04:27Z")

</div>

> [@Capt\_Kirk](#):
>
> How exactly did the planes not set off the pre placed explosives? How were the det cords not damaged? I know that modern explosives are very stable, but there is no way they are that stable. Hole in your logic, such as it is.  
> **CAPT**
> 
> Edit from upthread, I did not know modern explosives are that stable.

Easy answer to that. The planes were mis-direction. Anything that happened after the planes hit didn’t really matter.

Even if explosives in the strike area went off too soon or not at all, it didn’t really matter, because the rest of the building was wired anyway.

I think I can say for sure the basements were wired in both buildings, just from eyewitness accounts, including NYFD.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Garfield226](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Garfield226](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Garfield226)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 8:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/175 "2012-07-19T20:05:46Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> I think I can say for sure the basements were wired in both buildings, just from eyewitness accounts, including NYFD.

You’re wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/176 "2012-07-19T20:06:24Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> Even if explosives in the strike area went off too soon or not at all, it didn’t really matter, because the rest of the building was wired anyway.

For I think the third time: how did they know none of the explosive equipment would be damaged by the plane crash and the fires? And since your comment about “large parts of the building being under construction” was wrong, how did all of this stuff get into two of the biggest office towers in the world with nobody noticing?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/177 "2012-07-19T20:07:00Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> Easy answer to that. The planes were mis-direction. Anything that happened after the planes hit didn’t really matter.

Really? Because if you plan to detonate explosives at a set location, having them hit with a hundreds-of-tons molotov cocktail isn’t a way to keep them intact.

> [@](#):
>
> Even if explosives in the strike area went off too soon or not at all, it didn’t really matter, because the rest of the building was wired anyway.

Except that such charges (which are entirely your fantasy) would have stuck out like a sore thumb when detonated.

> [@](#):
>
> I think I can say for sure the basements were wired in both buildings, just from eyewitness accounts, including NYFD.

Once again, you are wrong, and the FDNY does not agree with your assessment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AndrewL](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3d9bf3/32.png) [@AndrewL](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AndrewL)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/178 "2012-07-19T20:07:53Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> I think I can say for sure the basements were wired in both buildings, just from eyewitness accounts, including NYFD.

Please give actual links to these eyewitness accounts.

If the basements were wired with explosives, why didn’t the collapse start at the basement level? Furthermore, what were those explosives even for? Both towers were observed to start collapsing at the impact point, and once the mass above the impact point started moving downwards any explosives in the rest of the building would be irrelevant and unnecessary. It’s not as if once the collapse begins, the buildings are going to stop mid-collapse because the basements weren’t wired with explosives.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/179 "2012-07-19T20:08:30Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> how did all of this stuff get into two of the biggest office towers in the world with nobody noticing?

The bomb-sniffing dogs in particular, one of which was still on duty in the basement when the towers fell.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt\_Kirk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/779978/32.png) [@Capt\_Kirk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt_Kirk)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2012, 8:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099/180 "2012-07-19T20:10:22Z")

</div>

> [@split\_p\_j](#):
>
> \<snip\>
> 
> I think I can say for sure the basements were wired in both buildings, just from eyewitness accounts, including NYFD.

That requires a cite

**CAPT**

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099.md?page=8)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/9-11/628099.md?page=10)
