I know we can’t have a real discussion about 9/11 on this board, as this thread shows, but to me there are some problems with fire causing a total collaspe in WTC.
I think that this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Interstate_Tower_fire is pretty daming.
Or this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Meridian_Plaza. This fire lasted 18 hours.
Now, some may say that structural damage helped cause the total collaspe of WTC 7. We all know that it takes explosives to weaken these massive buildings enough to bring about a total collaspe.
Yet now we are supposed to believe that random fires and realtively minor damage can cause a total collaspe. That also just happens to look just like the controlled demolitions we’ve been seeing on TV for years. I mean really, just look at the videos of the collaspe.
WTC 1&2 were built to withstand the impact and resulting fire from a 707, an airplane about the same overall size of the 767’s that actually hit them. Really, the fires don’t look nearly as bad as the fire in the first link, probally because most all the jet fuel burned in those big fireballs outside the building. In fact, pictures show people standing in the holes where the airplanes hit.
Listen to the tapes of ATC on that day. They thought the attack might be part of one of the many “drills” going on that day. Do really believe that the “terrorists” just got lucky on picking 9/11?
I don’t have my own theory of 9/11, but the more questions I ask myself and others, the more I realize that the “offical” story is most likely a huge lie.