n/m
This post has been blabbered by the blabberist.
Any resemblance between controlled building demolitions and the destruction of the WTC is attributable to the fact that the destruction in both cases is primarily carried out by gravity.
Even if they would, it doesn’t mean they did.
Well then that being said l guess l’ll move on. Something is offered yet frowned on if one use’s it. Sounds like bullcrap to me.
So delete my account or not l’ll not post here again.
Oh, you don’t know the half of it. On Tuesdays, you forbidden from using adverbs. And did you notice we don’t have avatars?
Remember blabber? I miss him.
Dude, it isn’t “offered,” it just comes with the software. And we prefer you don’t use it because it might make you look like an immature idiot and we want to think you have something more to say than the twelve year old your font and color choices suggest you are.
Your account does not get deleted just because you stormed out in a huff. The real, grownup world doesn’t work like that. Your words will remain to embarrass you well into your teens and twenties, after you have learned something about engineering and “demotions,” whatever color those words are.
^^^ This.
For all you tinfoil hat merchants: **Voodoo, Quackery, and a bad case of the CT’s **
You’re going to flounce just because someone took your blue crayon away?
Hey, it worked!
There was that one Dutch guy. Danny Jowenko said 1 & 2 could not possibly be controlled demolitions due to all the fire. After looking at video footage of 7’s northern face, and not being told about it having burned uncontrolled for nearly 7 hours, he said that was a controlled demolition. When he was finally informed of 7 also being on fire, he said he had “no explanation”.
Why is this such a common request – and threat – from posters who make no sense to begin with?
I would suggest that we add the bolded section to the forum rules to remind new posters that they’ll have to live with their stupid posts forever, but the people making the stupid posts don’t read the rules so I suppose it wouldn’t make any difference anyway.
nm
Yeah, and no surprise which parts the truthers crowed about and which parts they pretended never happened.
And have no repsonse to, “Why put so much stock in someone you think is wrong two-thrids of the time?”
Ah ha - you’re saying the WTC didn’t collapse, it was just demoted? To the “North American Trade Center”, perhaps, or even the “Manhattan Trade Center”. That’s pretty harsh.
To “Pile of Smoking Rubble”.
You may be on to something…Donald Rumsfeld won’t admit he and Cheney aren’t lizards.