The sad part is, while he seems to have some knowledge of the subject, he very clearly does not know a whole lot about it. Just enough to make himself look somewhat foolish.
Therefore, Soylent Green is 99.4% Ivory Soap.
*Originally posted by Sublight *
***Originally posted by Qadgop the Mercotan *
**But Soylent Green is people! **
Therefore, Soylent Green is 99.4% Ivory Soap. **
[/QUOTE]
And weighs the same as a duck.
Actually the word is “bloop.”
For those of us who remember the Irwin Allen classic series “Lost in Space,” one of the characters during the first season was “Debbie the Bloop,” a space-chimp who had big ears and went around saying (dubbed, of course), “Bloop! Bloop! Bloop!”
Better check to see if it floats…
*Pure love!
Baby it’s pure love
ninety nine and forty four one hundredth’s
percent pure love!
*
*Originally posted by Homebrew *
**Therefore, Soylent Green is 99.4% Ivory Soap. **
And weighs the same as a duck. **
[/QUOTE]
“BURN IT! BURN IT!!”
Doh!
I think there is a significant point being missed here; the fact that 90-whatever percent of DNA (junk or otherwise) is shared, is not necessarily reason to treat chimps as people, but it is compelling evidence that we share ancestry, particularly the ‘junk’ DNA in this case. This might seem a statement of the obvious, but there are plenty of Biblical Creationists out there who try to ignore things like pseudogenes and the implications of identical pseudogenes in humans and chimps.
Usually, I the creationist rebuttal I hear is that since a watermelon is 97% water, it has 97% similarity to a raincloud. Ergo, evolution is a lie you godless bleeding-heart liberal satanic French scum.
Of course, that ignores the fact that if you’re going to switch to compositional similarity rather than genetic, we’re 100% similar to chimps.
*Originally posted by Sublight *
**compositional similarity… **
“Ugly bags of mostly water”?
You know, you may have hit upon an even deeper level of similarity between man and chimp.
This raises a question like a mustard gas cloud emerging from a sewer grating: do you really need an infinite number of chimpanzees typing, or will some lesser number do?
*Originally posted by JDeMobray *
**Dddrrrrgggh. I’ve clearly been spoiled by the [sarcasm] tag on another board I visit. Mea culpa. :smack: **
No worries.
-j
Somewhere out there is a chimp with J Lo’s butt.
*Originally posted by lieu *
**Somewhere out there is a chimp with J Lo’s butt. **
That can’t be quite right, since her butt makes up far more than a mere 6% of her body.
I bet the J.Lo-butt chimp says more intelligent things than the J.Lo-butt person.
*Originally posted by FranticMad *
**This raises a question like a mustard gas cloud emerging from a sewer grating: do you really need an infinite number of chimpanzees typing, or will some lesser number do? **
Probably more than six, although the experimental evidence is from monkeys, not chimps:
Typing monkeys don’t write Shakespeare
LONDON — Give an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, the theory goes, and they will eventually produce the works of Shakespeare.
Give six monkeys one computer for a month, and they will produce a mess.
Researchers at Plymouth University in England reported this week that primates left alone with a computer attacked the machine and failed to produce a single word.
“They pressed a lot of S’s,” researcher Mike Phillips said Friday. “Obviously, English isn’t their first language.”
. . .
At first, said Mr. Phillips, "the lead male got a stone and started bashing the hell out of it.
“Another thing they were interested in was in defecating and urinating all over the keyboard,” added Mr. Phillips, who runs the university’s Institute of Digital Arts and Technologies.
Eventually, monkeys Elmo, Gum, Heather, Holly, Mistletoe and Rowan produced five pages of text, composed primarily of the letter S. Later, the letters A, J, L and M crept in - not quite literature.
composed primarily of the letter S. Later, the letters A, J, L and M crept in - not quite literature
Hah! Language bigots. That just proves the researchers don’t speak parseltongue.
*Originally posted by Jackmannii *
**Speak for yourself. I am constantly finding new and creative uses for all of my nucleotides. **
It gets my nucleowhites nucleowhiter and my nucleocolors nucleobrighter! Mine diverges from a chimpanzee troop a by .6% of a nucleoside and a phosphate group! A phosphoric ester, there ain’t nothin bester, three cheers for my nucleotiiiiidddees!!!