You’re really going to make me type again on this silly phone for such an argument?
Let’s review: you said
So by saying either, you effectively said “there are no moral arguments against the A-bomb” AND
“there are no moral arguments against the firebombing of Tokyo” in the frame of reference during WWII.
I pointed out that moral arguments against area bombing (by definition, both firebombing and atomic bombing are area bombing) were advanced by numerous people during the war itself.
Your comeback, trying to define some difference between atomic and firebombing, is classic moving the goalposts. I specifically refuted what you said.